Naturalization language testing and its basis in ideologies of national identity and citizenship

Abstract

National belonging is a central facet of modern social identities. In Europe, nation-building often went hand in hand with linguistic nationalism. While the monarchial empires that preceded the modern nation had been multilingual polities (e.g., the Habsburg Empire), nations were founded on the ideology of “One Language, One Nation.” Nations are not only “Imagined Communities,” that is, systems of cultural representation whereby people come to imagine a shared experience of identification with an extended community, but also exclusionary historical and institutional practices to which access is restricted via citizenship. Linguistic restrictions to such access can be found in naturalization language testing, which usually takes place during the naturalization interview and tests the applicant's proficiency in a country's official and/or majority language. In this paper I examine the interrelationship of ideologies of national and linguistic identity and the ways in which they impact upon ideologies of citizenship. I describe current naturalization legislationina number of countries and the ways in which it is based on these ideologies. The paper has a special focus on Germany where naturalization legislation changed on January 1st, 2000. I describe the linguistic tests as they are stipulated by law and as they are conducted in actual practice. Finally, I turn away from the national ideologies behind these language tests to the linguistic ideologies that (mis)inform them. The data for this analysis come mainly from legal texts pertaining to naturalization, but also from newspaper accounts and interviews with naturalization candidates. I will show that the relationship between naturalization and language requirements depends on the different national ideologies that the various countries hold. The paper ends with the conclusion that most of the practices I report on are compatible neither with a contemporary understanding of citizenship nor with recent advances in linguistic research and the study of multilingualism.

Keywords

language legislation language testing nation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ålund, A. (1999). Feminism, multiculturalism, essentialism. In N. Yuval-Davis & P. Werbner (Eds.), Women, citizenship and difference (pp. 147 - 161). London, New York: Zed Books .

Andersen, A-M. (1997). Interkulturelle Wirtschafts kommunikation in Europa: Deutschland- Daenemark. Tostedt: Attikon.

Anderson, B. (1991).Imagined communities. London : Verso.

Bachman, L.F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17, 1-42.

Balibar, E. (1991). The nation form : History and ideology. In I. Wallerstein & E. Balibar (Eds.), Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities (pp. 86 - 106). New York: Routledge .

Benson, P., Grundy, P., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (Eds.). ( 1998). Language rights. Language Sciences, 20.

Bourdieu,P. ( 1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6),645-668.

Chapelle, C. , & Douglas, D. (1993). Foundations and directions for a new decade of language testing. In D. Douglas & C. Chapelle (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research: Selected papers from the 1990 Language Testing Research Colloquium (pp. 1 - 22). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Cohen, A. (1993). Culture as identity: An anthropologist's view . New Literary History, 24, 195-209.

10.

Coulmas, F. (1995). Germanness : Language and nation. In P. Stevenson (Ed.), The German language and the real world. Sociolinguistic, cultural, and pragmatic perspectives on contemporary German (pp. 55-68). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

11.

Crawford, J. (1998). Anatomy of the English-only movement: Social and ideological sources of language restrictionism in the United States. In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp.98-122). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

12.

Faist, T. (1997).Immigration, citizenship and nationalism: Internal internationalisation in Germany and Europe. In M. Roche & R. van Berkel (Eds.), European citizenship and social exclusion (pp.213- 226). Aldershot , Brookfield, Singapore , Sydney: Ashgate.

13.

Faulks, K. ( 1998). Citizenship in modern Britain. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.

14.

Flynn, P. (1993). European social policy: Options for the Union. Green Paper. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, DG-V

15.

García, S. (1997). European Union identity and citizenship: Some challenges. In M. Roche & R. van Berkel (Eds.), European citizenship and social exclusion (pp.201-212). Aldershot, Brookfield, Singapore, Sydney : Ashgate.

16.

Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

17.

Gumperz, J.J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Cambridge: Newbury House .

19.

Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London, New York: Routledge.

20.

Kibbee, D. A. (Ed.) (1998). Language legislation and linguistic rights: Selected Proceedings of the Language Legislation and Linguistics Rights Conference, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, March,1996. Amsterdam , Philadelphia: John Benjamins .

21.

Kibbee, D.A. ( 1998a). Legal and linguistic perspectives on language legislation . In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 1-23). Amsterdam , Philadelphia: John Benjamins .

22.

Kisch, E.E. (1993). Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 5, Paradies Amerika, Landungin Australien. 11937. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag .

23.

Kontra, M. , Phillipson, R. , Skutnabb-Kangas, T. , & Várady, T. (Eds.). (1999). Language: A right and a resource: Approaching linguistic human rights. Budapest: Central European University Press .

24.

Kuhn, M.H. , & McPartland, T.S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.

25.

Kymlicka, W. (1995).Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

26.

Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.

27.

MacGregor-Mendoza, P. (1998). The criminalization of Spanish in the United States . In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp.55-67). Amsterdam , Philadelphia: John Benjamins .

28.

Mann, K. (1994). Zweimal Deutschland. Aufsaetze, Reden. Kritiken, 1938-1942. Reinbek: Rororo.

29.

Marek, Y. (1998). The philosophy of the French language legislation: Internal and international aspects. In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 341 - 350). Amsterdam, Philadelphia : John Benjamins.

30.

McClintock, A. (1993). Family feuds: Gender, nationalism and the family . Feminist Review, 44, 61-80.

31.

Nelles, G. (Ed.). (1999). Australien . München: Nelles.

32.

Pavlenko, A. , & Piller, I. (2001). New directions in the study of multilingualism, second language learning and gender. In A. Pavlenko , A. Blackledge , I. Piller , & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning and gender (pp. 17-52). Berlin, New York : Mouton de Gruyter.

33.

Peled, Y. (1992). Ethnic democracy and the legal construction of citizenship: Arab citizens of the Jewish State. American Political Science Review, 86, 432-443.

34.

Peirce, B.N. (1995). Social identity investment, and language learning . TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9-31.

35.

Piller, I. (1999). "Something tattooed on my forehead": Gendered performances and perceptions of linguistic and national identity. In U. Pasero & F. Braun (Eds.), Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht-Perceiving and Performing Gender (pp. 117-126). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

36.

Piller, I. (2001).Identity constructions in multilingual advertising . Language in Society, 30, 153-186.

37.

Piller, I. (In press). Who, if anyone, is a native speaker? Anglistik. Mitteilungen des Verbandes Deutscher Anglisten, 12.

38.

Quell, C. (1998). Requirements, dynamics and realities of language use in the EU: A case study of the European Commission. In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 288- 309). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

39.

Scott, P. , & Spencer, C. (1998). Psychology: A contemporary introduction. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

40.

Seidel, E. (1999). Buergerwird, wer das lesen kann. taz, 6007 (03. 12. 1999), 5.

41.

Smith, D.M. , & Wistrich, E. (1997). Citizenship and social exclusion in the European Union. In M. Roche & R. van Berkel (Eds.), European citizenship and social exclusion(pp.227-246). Aldershot, Brookfield, Singapore, Sydney : Ashgate.

42.

Spolsky, B. (1990). Social aspects of individual assessment. In J. de Jong & D. K. Stevenson (Eds.), Individualizing the assessment of language abilities (pp. 3 - 15). Clevedon: MultilingualMatters.

43.

Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words: The development of objective language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

44.

Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.). (1997). Strukturdaten ueber die auslaendische Bevoelkerung. Stuttgart : Metzler-Poeschel.

45.

Tilly, C. (1995). Citizenship, identity and social history. In C. Tilly (Ed.), Citizenship, identity and social history. International Review of Social History, 40, Supplement 3,1-17.

46.

Vahedi, N. (1996). Diskriminierung, Gesundheitliche Beschwerden und Arbeitszufriedenheit. Ulm: Universitaets verlag Ulm.

47.

Watson, C.W. ( 2000).Multiculturalism. Buckingham, Philadelphia : Open University Press.

48.

Werbner, P. , & Yuval-Davis, N. (1999). Women and the new discourse of citizenship. In N. YuvalDavis & P. Werbner (Eds.), Women, citizenship and difference (pp. 1-38). London, New York: Zed Books.

49.

Wiley, T.G. (1998). What happens after English is declared the official language of the United States? In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), Language legislation and linguistic rights (pp. 179-195). Amsterdam, Philadelphia : John Benjamins.

50.

Wodak, R. Cillia, R. de, Reisigl, M. , & Liebhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national Identity . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

51.

Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. London , Thousand Oaks, New Delhi : Sage.