Research on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has contributed to the identification of factors that may influence languages’ bias formation. Accents, language varieties, and language lexical-semantic properties affect the relationship between cognitive and emotional processes. Our study aims to examine the influence of the language used during the administration of the IAT on bilingual participants’ performance—specifically, on the detected biases toward Traditional Galician (TG) and Galician Spanish (GS).
Design/methodology/approach:
A quantitative, experimental design was created to explore the BIAS and the IAT language effect on participants’ IAT scores. A total of 168 bilingual students in Galicia, an autonomous community in Spain with two official languages (Spanish and Galician), took part in our study.
Data and analysis:
An ANOVA was performed to explore the interaction and main effect of IAT’s language and BIAS on IAT scores. Results showed a statistically significant interaction effect, reflecting that the IAT scores were different both in terms of BIAS and IAT’s language.
Findings/conclusions:
Our findings suggest that both bias and the IAT language had an impact on bilingual participants’ IAT scores.
Originality:
This study is one of the first studies to confirm the influence of the IAT language over the IAT results in bilingual populations.
Significance/implications:
The language of IAT appears to be important when investigating bilingual populations by means of this tool. The discussion emphasizes the need for controlling the linguistic setup in the IAT.
AdelmanJ. S.BrownG. D. A.QuesadaJ. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
2.
AgueteA. (2020). Contacto de linguas e variedades na emerxencia de novos modelos de vocalismo galego [Language Contact and Varieties in the Emergence of New Models of Galician Vowelism]. In Dubert-GarcíaF.MíguezV.SousaX. (Eds.), Variedades lingüísticas en contacto na Península Ibérica (pp. 155–193). Consello da Cultura Galega.
3.
AltarribaJ.Basnight-BrownD. M. (2007). Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192839
4.
ÁlvarezC. M.TaylorK. A.GomezC. (2017). The effects of Hispanic bilinguals’ language use and stereotype activation on negotiations outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 72, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.009
5.
Álvarez-MosqueraP. (2019). Young Coloureds’ implicit attitudes towards two historically White English accents in the South African context. English World-Wide, 40(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00034.alv
6.
Álvarez-MosqueraP.Marín-GutiérrezA. (2018). Implicit language attitudes toward historically White accents in the South African context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17718349
7.
Álvarez-MosqueraP.Marín-GutiérrezA. (2021). Language, race or place? Influential factors in determining young “coloured” individuals’ attitudes towards Afrikaans accents in English. Lingua, 251, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINGUA.2020.103027
8.
Álvarez-MosqueraP.Marín-GutiérrezA.Iglesias ÁlvarezA. (2023). Language biases and implicit attitudes among university students in Galicia (Spain). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2226647
AnooshianL. J.HertelP. T. (1994). Emotionality in free recall: Language specificity in bilingual memory. Cognition and Emotion, 8(6), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408956
11.
ArkesH. R.TetlockP. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?” Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01
12.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press.
13.
BrysbaertM.ManderaP.KeuleersE. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727521
14.
Caldwell-HarrisC. L.TongJ.LungW.PooS. (2011). Physiological reactivity to emotional phrases in Mandarin–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910379262
15.
CaliskanA.BrysonJ. J.NarayananA. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4230
16.
CallesanoS.CarterP. M. (2023). Unidirectional language bias: The Implicit Association Test with Spanish and English in Miami. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(6), 960–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221121159
ČavarF.TytusA. E. (2018). Moral judgement and foreign language effect: When the foreign language becomes the second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1304397
19.
CirciR.GattiD.RussoV.VecchiT. (2021). The foreign language effect on decision-making: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01871-z
20.
ComstockL.IacoboniM. (2020). Sociolinguistic context, not test language, predicts implicit bias scores between ethnicities. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jaf96
21.
CostasX. H. (Coord.). (2009). 55 mentiras sobre a lingua galega [55 Lies About the Galician Language]. Edicións Laiovento.
22.
DaiW.AlbarracínD. (2022). It’s time to do more research on the attitude–behavior relation: A commentary on implicit attitude measures. WIREs Cognitive Science, 13(4), Article e1602. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1602
23.
DanzigerS.WardR. (2010). Language changes implicit associations between ethnic groups and evaluation in bilinguals. Psychological Science, 21(6), 799–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610371344
24.
DasguptaN.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2003). The first ontological challenge to the IAT: Attitude or mere familiarity?Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_06
25.
DavisC. J.PereaM. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 665–671.
26.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
27.
DubertF. (2002). Os sociolectos galegos [The Galician Sociolects]. Cadernos de lingua, 24, 5–27.
28.
EisenchlasS.SchalleyA. (2020). Making sense of “home language” and related concepts. In SchalleyA.EisenchlasS. (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development: Social and affective factors (pp. 17–37). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510175-002
29.
EllisC.HaddenL.JonesM. W. (2019). Language and transient emotional states affect implicit cultural bias. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818792412
30.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
31.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
GalloD. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203782934
34.
GarridoM.PradaM. (2018). Comparing the valence, emotionality and subjective familiarity of words in a first and a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24, 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1456514
35.
GawronskiB. (2019). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 574–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619826015
36.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
37.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
38.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575
39.
GrosjeanF. (2013). Bilingualism: A short introduction. Oxford University Press.
HutchisonK. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196544
42.
IanosM. A.Hinostroza-CastilloU.SenarF.PetreñasC. (2023). Predicting language use in Catalonia (Spain): The role of implicit and explicit language attitudes. International Journal of Multilingualism, 21(3), 1419–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2170382
43.
IanosM. A.RusuA.HuguetÀ.Lapresta-reyC.AdelinaM.RusuA.HuguetÀ.Lapresta-reyC.IanosM. A.RusuA. (2020). Implicit language attitudes in Catalonia (Spain): Investigating preferences for Catalan or Spanish using the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(3), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1806857
44.
Iglesias ÁlvarezA. M.Álvarez MosqueraP.Marín GutiérrezA. (2024). Explorando actitudes lingüísticas implícitas e explícitas: O caso galego [Exploring Implicit and Explicit Linguistic Attitudes: The Galician Case]. Estudos de Lingüística Galega, 16. https://doi.org/10.15304/elg.16.9723
45.
IleanaM. (2021). The influence of test language on bilinguals’ intergroup attitudes: The moderating effect of group and perceived language status [Master’s thesis, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa]. https://t.ly/PWb4m
JASP Team. (2024). JASP (Version 0.19.0) [Windows 11].
48.
KarpinskiA.SteinmanR. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16
49.
KoustaS.-T.VinsonD. P.ViglioccoG. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
50.
KrollJ. F.BialystokE. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.799170
51.
KsiazkiewiczA.HedrickJ. (2013). An introduction to implicit attitudes in political science research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(3), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513000632
52.
KumarV.DixitA.JavalgiR. G.DassM. (2016). Research framework, strategies, and applications of intelligent agent technologies (IATs) in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0426-9
53.
KupermanV.EstesZ.BrysbaertM.WarrinerA. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669
54.
KurdiB.MannT. C.CharlesworthT. E. S.BanajiM. R. (2019). The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(13), 5862–5871. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1820240116
55.
LaneK. A.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G. (2007). Procedures and their implementation understanding and using the IAT 3 understanding and using the implicit association test: IV what we know (so far) about the method. In WittenbrinkB.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59–102). The Guilford Press. www.implicit.harvard.edu
56.
LynottD.KansalH.ConnellL.O’BrienK. S. (2012). Modelling the IAT: Implicit Association Test reflects shallow linguistic environment and not deep personal attitudes. In MiyakeN.PeeblesD.CooperR. P. (Eds.), Building bridges across cognitive sciences around the world: Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1948–1953). Cognitive Science Society. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/modelling-the-iat-implicit-association-test-reflects-shallow-ling
57.
MonteagudoH. (2021). O idioma galego baixo o franquismo [The Galician Language under Francoism]. Galaxia.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101
60.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418
61.
OgunnaikeO.DunhamY.BanajiM. R. (2010). The language of implicit preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 999–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.006
OswaldF. L.MitchellG.BlantonH.JaccardJ.TetlockP. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734
64.
PantosA. J.PerkinsA. W. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12463005
65.
PavlenkoA. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition?International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.743665
66.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
67.
Real Academia Galega. (1996). Actitudes lingüísticas en Galicia [Linguistic Attitudes in Galicia.].
68.
Real Academia Galega. (2011). Mapa sociolingüístico de Galicia 2004. Actitudes lingüísticas en Galicia [Sociolinguistic Map of Galicia 2004. Linguistic Attitudes in Galicia.].
69.
RegueiraX. L. (2019). Variación fonética, a lingua da esfera pública e estándar oral: entre a lingüística e a política [Phonetic Variation, the Language of the Public Sphere, and Oral Standard: Between Linguistics and Politics]. Revista Galega de Filoloxía, 20, 119–147.
70.
RegueiraX. L.Fernández ReiE. (2020). The Spanish sound system and intonation in contact with Galician. In RajivR. (Ed.), Spanish phonetics and phonology in contact: Studies from Africa, the Americas, and Spain (pp. 325–362). John Benjamins.
71.
RoesselJ.SchoelC.StahlbergD. (2018). What’s in an accent? General spontaneous biases against nonnative accents: An investigation with conceptual and auditory IATs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2339
72.
SaraivaM.GarridoM. V.PandeiradaJ. N. (2021). Surviving in a second language: Survival processing effect in memory of bilinguals. Cognition and Emotion, 35(2), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1840336
73.
SchnabelK.AsendorpfJ. B.GreenwaldA. G. (2008). Assessment of individual differences in implicit cognition a review of IAT measures. IAT measures European. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.210
74.
Siguán SolerM. (1994). Conocimiento y uso de las lenguas en España [Knowledge and Use of Languages in Spain]. Centro de investigaciones sociológicas.
75.
Suárez QuintasS. (2017). O galego non é o ghallegho que falamos nós’: a percepción e as actitudes como condicionantes do cambio lingüístico [Galician is not the Ghallegho we speak: Perception and Attitudes as Determinants of Linguistic Change]. In Fernández ReiE.RegueiraX. L. (Eds.), Estudos sobre o cambio lingüístico no galego actual (pp. 187–213). Consello da Cultura Galega.
76.
TrofimovichP.TuruševaL. (2020). Language attitudes and ethnic identity: Examining listener perceptions of Latvian-Russian bilingual speakers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2019.1696682
77.
ZentellaA. C. (1998). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Blackwell.
