Through a conceptual framework focused on student engagement, this article explores students’ perceptions about the impact the design of learning environments has on student engagement. The current mixed-methods study was conducted at two Texas replacement elementary schools where the entire learning community, all teachers, administrators, staff, and students, moved from an old building to a new building. Through the qualitative component of the study, student focus groups, the study explores the attributes of design and spaces that students value and perceive as having an impact on their learning and engagement. Students’ perceptions demonstrate that learning environments impact student engagement.
BouslamaF.KalotaF. (2013, December). Creating smart classrooms to benefit from innovative technologies and learning space design [Paper presentation]. The 2013 International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology, Dubai. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2013.6749486.
2.
BrooksD. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.
3.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
4.
DittoeW. (2002). Innovative models of learning environments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(92), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.82
5.
EarthmanG. I.LemastersL. K. (2009). Teacher attitudes about classroom conditions. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910955764
6.
GallagherA.ThordarsonK. (2018). Design thinking for school leaders: Five roles and mindsets that ignite positive change. ASCD.
7.
GassM. (1997). Facilitating experiential learning: Co-creating stories with better endings for clients. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(2), 66–67.
Gurzynski-WeissL.LongA. Y.SolonM. (2015). Comparing interaction and use of space in traditional and innovative classrooms. Hispania, 98(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2015.0028
10.
HerzogS. (2007). The ecology of learning: The impact of classroom features and utilization on student academic success. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(135), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.224
11.
LewisL.SnowK.FarrisE.SmerdonB.CronenS.KaplanJ. (2000). Conditions of America’s public school facilities: 1999. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(3), 42–46. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001602.pdf#page=41
12.
MillerN. G.EricksonA.YustB. L. (2001). Sense of place in the workplace: The relationship between personal objects and job satisfaction and motivation. Journal of Interior Design, 27(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2001.tb00364.x
13.
MorroneA.OuimetJ.SieringG.ArthurI. (2014). Coffeehouse as classroom: Examination of a new style of active learning environment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 137, 41–51.
