Countries around the world have increased their focus on high quality early childhood programing. Recognizing the importance of parental and community engagement as a lever for improving child development and learning outcomes, and as a means of addressing social justice challenges, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2018) has emphasized the need for more research on the complex dynamics between structure, process, learning, and development. Such research should consider the impacts of the dominant neo-managerial paradigm and its overemphasis on clearly defined linear cause and effect pathways between structure and student learning, which underrepresents the reciprocal role that parents, the community and the students themselves play in shaping the learning setting (Myran & Sutherland, 2019a). Students’ and families’ senses of belonging to the community of knowers have major implications for their motivation, sense of ownership and buy-in (Davis, 2006; Goodenow & Grady, 1993). This study explored the lived experiences of parents/guardians of young children with the leadership of their children’s early childhood education program and how these individual and social interactions shaped parents’ epistemic agency, and their access to rhetorical spaces that recognized them as credible knowers. Utilizing a phenomenological approach, we conducted in-depth interviews with 20 parents whose children attended publicly funded pre-school programs. Findings revealed limited communication with leadership and difficulty developing positive relationships. Moreover, these challenges limited their access to rhetorical spaces to be heard and recognized as credible knowers. This study offers one small window into the OECD’s (2018) call for more research on the dynamics between structure, process, learning and development, and the importance of the quality of parental and community engagement as a lever for enhancing healthy child development and learning, and as a means of more effectively addressing ongoing social justice challenges.
AlexanderP. A.SchallertD. L.ReynoldsR. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192.
2.
AndersonE. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–173.
3.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.FurlongM. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
AuW. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
6.
BaileyC. A. (1996). A guide to field research. Pine Forge.
7.
BanduraA. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344.
8.
BartonA. C.DrakeC.PerezJ. G.St. LouisK.GeorgeM. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33(4): 3–12.
9.
BirtL.ScottS.CaversD.CampbellC.WalterF. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
10.
BitzerL. F. (1992). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1–14.
11.
BoydC. O. (2001). Phenomenology the method. In MunhallP. L. (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (3rd ed., pp. 93–122). Jones and Bartlett.
12.
CallahanR. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. University of Chicago Press.
13.
CamilliG.VargasS.RyanS.BarnettW. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(112), 579–620.
14.
CareyJ. W.MorganM.OxtobyM. J. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. CAM Journal, 8(3), 1–5.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Sage.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. Digital Commons@University of Nebraska. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
17.
CubanL. (2001). Leadership for student learning: Urban school leadership–different in kind and degree. Institute for Educational Leadership.
18.
CubanL. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice?Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109–125.
19.
DamşaC. I.KirschnerP. A.AndriessenJ. E.ErkensG.SinsP. H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143–186.
20.
DavisH. A. (2006). Exploring the contexts of relationship quality between middle school students and teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 193–223.
21.
DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.) (2015). Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (Vol. 10). Left Coast Press.
22.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publishing.
23.
DiasM. (2005). Market trends and the dilemmas of parental participation in schools. Aula Abierta, 85, 185–204.
24.
DouglassB. G.MoustakasC. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 39–55.
25.
Eddles-HirschK. (2013). Girly girls, tomboys, athletes and nerds: A phenomenological study of social context in the specialized school environment. Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies, 17(1): 88–101.
26.
Eddles-HirschK. (2015). Phenomenology and educational research. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8): 251–260.
27.
EnglanderM. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 13–35.
28.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G.SheldonS. B.SimonB. S.SalinasK. C.JansornN. R.Van VoorhisF. L.MartinC. S.ThomasB. G.GreenfeldM. D.HutchinsD. J.WilliamsK. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Corwin Press.
29.
FineM.WeisL.WessenS.WongL. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–131). Sage.
30.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
31.
FrickerM. (1998). Rational authority and social power: Towards a truly social epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 98(2), 159–177.
32.
FrickerM. (2003). Epistemic justice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy, 34(1/2), 154–173.
33.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
FryB.O’NeillK.BottomsG. (2006). Schools can’t wait: Accelerating the redesign of university principal preparation programs. Southern Regional Education Board.
36.
FullerB.CollC. G. (2010). Learning from Latinos: Contexts, families and child development in motion. Developmental Psychology, 46(3), 559–565.
37.
Garcia-ReidP. (2007). Examining social capital as a mechanism for improving school engagement among low income Hispanic girls. Youth & Society, 39(2), 164–181.
38.
GauntR. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1340–1355.
39.
GioiaD. A.PitreE. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.
40.
GoodenowC.GradyK. E. (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 60–71.
41.
GreenR. L. (2017). A problem-based approach to implementing the professional standards for educational leaders (5th ed.). Pearson.
42.
GreenfieldT. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17(2), 57–80.
43.
GroenewaldT. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55.
44.
GrolnickW. S.SlowiaczekM. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237–252.
45.
GutmanL. M.SameroffA. J. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: Effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 777–790.
46.
HalgunsethL. C. (2009). Family engagement, diverse families, and early childhood programs: An integrated review of the literature. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
47.
HayesD. G.SinghA. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. Guilford Press.
48.
HollowayI. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Blackwell Science.
49.
HoyW. K.Tschannen-MoranM. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 184–208.
50.
HulmeC.GoetzK.GoochD.AdamsJ. W.SnowlingM. J. (2007). Paired-associate learning, phoneme awareness and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(2), 150–166.
51.
HycnerR. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279–303.
52.
HycnerR. H. (1999). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 143–164). Sage.
53.
International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry. (2011). Seventh international congress of qualitative inquiry. Retrieved March 25, 2020, from https://icqi.org/previous-congresses/
54.
IsraelG. D.BeaulieuL. J.HartlessG. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 63–68.
55.
KeenE. (1975). A primer in phenomenological psychology. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
56.
KiddI. J.MedinaJ.PohlhausG. (Eds.) (2017). The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. Taylor & Francis.
57.
KleinH. K.MyersM. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23, 67–93.
58.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528.
59.
LeithwoodK.PattenS.JantziD. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706.
60.
LeithwoodK.SeashoreK.LouisS.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). Executive summary: Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
61.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289(331), 289–327.
62.
LutharS. S.CrossmanE. J.SmallP. J. (2015). Resilience and adversity. In LambM. E.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–40). John Wiley & Sons.
63.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
64.
MashburnA. J. (2008). Quality of social and physical environments in preschools and children’s development of academic, language, and literacy skills. Applied Development Science, 12(3), 113–127.
65.
MayanM.DaumC. (2014). Politics and public policy, social justice, and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry Outside the Academy, 9, 73.
66.
McConkeyJ. (2004). Knowledge and acknowledgement: ‘Epistemic injustice’ as a problem of recognition. Politics, 24(3), 198–205.
67.
MountfordR. (2001). On gender and rhetorical space. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(1), 41–71.
68.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
69.
MyranS.MastersonM. (2020). Training early childhood leaders: Developing a new paradigm for professional development using a practice to theory approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1803924
70.
MyranS.SutherlandI. (2019a). Defining learning in educational leadership: Reframing the narrative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 657–696.
71.
MyranS.SutherlandI. (2019b). Academic and epistemic drift and the re-production of leadership preparation norms. In DanzigA. B.BlackW. R.AravamudhanR. (Eds.), Who controls the preparation of education administrators?Information Age Publishing.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Starting strong: Engaging young children: Lessons from research about quality in early childhood education and care. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085145-en
74.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
RavitchD. (2016). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.
77.
RoysterJ. J. (1996). When the first voice you hear is not your own. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 29–40.
78.
SawyerR. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
79.
SpowartL.NairnK. (2013). (Re)performing emotions in diary-interviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 327–340.
80.
StroupeD. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516.
81.
SwickK. J.WilliamsR. D. (2006). An analysis of Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological perspective for early childhood educators: Implications for working with families experiencing stress. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 371–378.
82.
SwickK. J.WilliamsR. (2010). The voices of single parent mothers who are homeless: Implications for early childhood professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(1), 49–55.
83.
The Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. The Wallace Foundation.
84.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. Jossey-Bass.
85.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). UNESCO roadmap for implementing the global action programme on education for sustainable development. UNESCO.
86.
WelmanJ. C.KrugerS. J. (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. International Thompson.
87.
WillowerD. J. (1973). Schools, values and educational inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 9(2), 1–18.
