This study examines the ways in which Saudi teachers have responded or are responding to the challenges posed by a new curriculum. It also deals with issues relating to workload demands which affect teachers’ performance when they apply a new curriculum in a Saudi Arabian secondary school. In addition, problems such as scheduling and sharing space require committee negotiations between head teachers, teachers, and higher level management in the project. The results show the importance of open communication, and a bottom-up as well as a top-down flow of decision-making. Communication and decisions flow down to the middle managers, and the reactions and opinions of those at the bottom may or may not flow back up to the decision-makers at the top.
AbatainS. (2001). Computer education in Saudi Arabian secondary schools (Doctoral thesis). University of Manchester, UK.
2.
AboulfarajA. (2004). Teachers’ performance in secondary schools for girls in Jeddah, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Education [Theses, Th24048].
3.
AddisonR.BrundrettM. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of teachers in primary schools: The challenge of change. Education 3-13, 36, 79–94.
4.
AlAlwaniA. E. S. (2005). Barriers to integrating information technology in Saudi Arabia science education. Ph.D., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
5.
AlBuraidiJ. A. (2006). An empirical study of the perceptions of male teachers and students of the Islamic Education Curriculum in secondary schools in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Hull, UK.
6.
AlhawitiM. (2011). Faculty perceptions about attributes and barriers impacting the diffusion of online education in two Saudi Universities (Dissertation). Indiana State University.
7.
AlkahtaniA. (2009). Supporting and encouraging teachers: A survey of the views of teachers to improve their classroom performance in Saudi Arabian secondary schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
8.
AlMainiY. H. (2011). Using technology in EFL in Saudi Arabia. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 2(3).
9.
AlmuliseM. (2008). The project of King Abdullah to develop education. Alsharg alawaset, 2July2008 (press report in Saudi newspaper, in Arabic).
10.
AlsharidahM. (2012). The use of information and communications technology by male Islamic studies teachers in Saudi Arabia. Ph.D., La Trobe University.
11.
AlshowayeM. (2002). Use of computer-based information technology and the Internet in Saudi Arabian intermediate and secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Manchester, UK.
12.
AlsolamiG. T. (2013). Barriers to the integration of technology into an EFL program in Saudi Arabia. D.Ed., Flinders University.
13.
BarbourS. R.SchostakJ. (2005). Interviewing and focus groups. In SomekhB.LewinC. (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 95–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
BarmbyP. (2006). Improving teacher recruitment and retention: The importance of workloadand pupil behaviour. Educational Research, 48(3), 247–265.
15.
Brisson-BanksC. V. (2010). Managing change and transitions: A comparison of different models and their commonalities. Library Management, 31, 241–252.
ByrneB. M. (1991). Burnout: Investigating the impact of background variables for elementary, intermediate, secondary and university educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 197–209.
18.
CameronM.BergerJ. M.LovettS.BakerR. (2007, September7). Early career teachers’ opportunities for professional learning: Impacts on teaching practice, job satisfaction, motivation, and career decisions. Paper presented at the BERA Annual Conference, Institute of Education, University of London, England.
DenscombeM. (2007). The good research guide: For small scale social research projects (22nd ed.). London, England: Open University Press.
21.
FullanM. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of education reform. London, England: Falmer Press.
22.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative. New York, NY: Research Aldine.
23.
GreckhamerT.LjungbergM. K. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 229–250.
24.
HarrisA. (2010). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility?School Leadership and Management, 23, 313–324.
25.
HarrisJ.ZhaoY.CaldwellB. J. (2009). Global characteristics of school transformation in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 413–426.
26.
HattieJ. (2005). The paradox of reducing class size and improving learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 387–425.
27.
JonesM.AlonyI. (2011). The use of grounded theory in research: Knowledge sharing in the Australian Film Industry. In HasanH. (Ed.), Being practical with theory: A window into business research (pp. 113–122). Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia: THEORI.
28.
KanterR. (1985). The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work. London, England: Paperbacks.
29.
KotterJ. J. (1995). A 20% solution: Using rapid re-design to build tomorrow’s organization today. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
Le FeverD. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64.
MohantyR. P.YadavO. P. (1996). Understanding the fundamentals for managing change. Management Science and Operations, 45(7), 5–8.
34.
OyaidA. A. (2009). Education policy in Saudi Arabia and its relation to secondary school teachers’ ICT use, perceptions, and views of the future of ICT in education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
35.
PowneyJ.WattsM. (1984, September). Reporting interviews: A code of good practice [BERA Newsletter]. Research Intelligence, 17, 164–168.
RobsonC. (2002). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
38.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SmithM. K. (2001). Peter Senge and the learning organization. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/senge.htm
TromanG. (2007, September5–8). The highs and lows of teaching in performative and creative primary school cultures: Implications for teacher identity, commitment and career. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Institute of Education, University of London, England.
WengrowiczN. (2014). Teachers pedagogical change mechanism-Pattern of structural relations between teachers’ pedagogical characteristics and teachers’ perceptions of transactional distance (TTD) in different teaching environments. Computers & Education, 76, 190–198.
44.
WilkinsonD. (2000). The researcher’s toolkit: The complete guide to practitioner research (Routledge Study Guides). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
45.
WilsonT. D. (2002, September11–13). Alfred Schutz, phenomenology and research methodology for information behaviour research. A paper delivered at ISIC4 - Fourth International Conference on Information Seeking in Context, Universidade Lusiada, Lisbon, Portugal. Online. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/schutz02.html (accessed 7 October 2014).
46.
ZembylasM.PapanastiouE. (2004). Teacher job satisfaction in Cyprus: The results of a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 357–374.
