Much has been written about what constitutes effective literacy teaching and learning, the power of effective ‘teacher talk’ and the impact on student learning outcomes. There is a growing body of research into pedagogical change to improve literacy outcomes and the implementation of schoolwide approaches to teaching and learning, particularly within the context of school improvement. This article ties together these two threads through the powerful stories of two primary schools that had undertaken a long-term school improvement project. The evidence of their explicit teaching of literacy is examined through investigation of the ‘teacher talk’ that occurs in classroom interactions and professional conversations. The way this talk reflects teachers’ shared pedagogical practices, their use of metalanguage for learning and students’ engagement is exemplified. It shows how, in each case, the pedagogical dialogue and literacy learning is mutually used by teachers and students in their literacy practices.
AnsteyM.BullG. (1996). Re-examining pedagogical knowledge and classroom practice. In BullG.AnsteyM. (Eds.), The literacy labyrinth (pp. 89–106). Sydney: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BlaiseM.NuttallJ. (2010). Learning to teach in the early years classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BlankM. (2002). Classroom discourse: A key to literacy. In ButlerK. G.SillimanE. R. (Eds.), Speaking, reading and writing in children with learning disabilities: New paradigms in research and practice (pp. 151–173). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
ClayM. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
6.
CostaA. L.KallickB. (Eds.) (2000). Discovering and exploring habits of mind (Habits of mind: A developmental series). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7.
CowenJ. E. (2003). A balanced approach to beginning reading instruction: A synthesis of six major U.S. research studies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
8.
CrowtherF.AndrewsD.MorganA.O’NeillS. (2012). Hitting the bullseye of school improvement: The IDEAS Project at work in a successful school system. Leading and Managing, 18(2), 1–33.
9.
CulicanS. J. (2005). Troubling teacher talk: The challenge of changing classroom discourse patterns. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, University of Western Sydney, NSW. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/cul05592.pdf.
10.
de BonoE. (1990). Six thinking hats. London: Penguin.
11.
DET. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide. State of NSW, Department of Education and Training, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate, Ryde, NSW.
12.
Edwards-GrovesC. J. (1999). Explicit teaching: Focusing teacher talk on literacy. In PEN118. NSW: PETA.
FleschR. F. (1955). Why Johnny can’t read: And what you can do about it. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
HealyA. (2008). Expanding student capacities. In HealyA. (Ed.), Multiliteracies: Pedagogies for diverse learners (pp. 2–29). Sydney: Oxford University Press.
16.
HendersonR.PetersenS. (2008, 6–9July). Professional conversations: Teacher educators making sense of literacy pedagogies. Paper presented at the National Conference for Teachers of English and Literacy, Adelaide.
17.
IsaacsW.SmithB. (1994). Designing a dialogue session. In SengeP.KleinerA.RobertsC.RossR. B.SmithB. (Eds.), The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization (pp. 374–381). London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
18.
LodgeC. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 125–146.
19.
LodgeC. (2008). Engaging student voice to improve pedagogy and learning: An exploration of examples of innovative pedagogical approaches for school improvement. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(5), 4–19.
MayerR. E.SimsK. V. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401.
23.
NAPLAN. (2011). The national language conventions and numeracy report. Canberra: MCEETYA.
24.
O’NeillS.GeogheganD. (2011). First year pre-service teachers’ views about literacy: Exploring the breadth and depth of their pedagogical needs. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(3), 187–205.
25.
Robinson-PantA. (2010). ‘Why literacy matters’: Exploring a policy perspective on literacies, identities and social change. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(6), 779–796. DOI:10.1080/00220380802057711.
26.
RoseD. (2003). Preparing for reading: Teacher resource book 1. Faculty of Education, University of Sydney (Learning to Read: Reading to Learn).
27.
RoseD. (2005). Democratising the classroom: A literacy pedagogy for the new generation. Journal of Education, 37, 131–167.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. F.CarlsonC. D.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
30.
SengeP.KleinerA.RobertsC.RossR. B.RothG.SmithB. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
31.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, XXI(4), 360–407.
32.
TarasatH. S.O’NeillS. (2012). Changing traditional reading pedagogy: The importance of classroom interactive talk for Year One Malay readers. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(3), 239–261.
33.
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
van EsE. A.SherinM. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
36.
WalshS. (2006). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 60(2), 133–141. doi:10.1093/elt/cci100.
