A survey was conducted with nine Brazilian cisgender, non-heterosexual women who are mothers, with the aim of understanding the challenges faced by double-motherhood in Brazil. Nine interviews and one focus group were conducted online and asynchronously through WhatsApp. The data was transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. The findings revealed four categories: IC as a form of resistance; violence and LGBTphobia against queer motherhood; the invisibility of queer motherhood in relation to the state; and queer subjectivity. This research concludes that double-motherhood can be seen as a form of resistance, as the mothers use technologies, such as home insemination.
AmorimACHOliveiraMB (2012) Dupla Maternidade: conexões entre antropologia e direito. In: Seminário Internacional Fazendo Gênero 10, Florianópolis, Brazil, 16–20 September 2013. Avaiable at: http://www.mprj.mp.br/documents/20184/151138/amorim.pdf (accessed 26 May 2022).
2.
BarbadilloGRiosMF (2019) ‘Es una maternidad que hay que inventar’: madres lesbianas, técnicas de reproducción asistida y retos a los que se enfrentan. Politica y Sociedad56(2): 361–380. DOI: 10.5209/poso.60557.
CharltonK (2022) Who is the mum? Who is the dad?”: same-sex couples’ motivations for and experiences of parenthood. Sexualities0(0): 1–23. DOI: 10.1177/13634607221091485.
CôtéILavoieK (2019) A child wanted by two, conceived by several: lesbian-parent families negotiating procreation with a known donor. Journal of GLBT Family Studies15(2): 165–185. DOI: 10.1080/1550428X.2018.1459216.
11.
CuetoMLopesG (2021) Backlash in global health and the end of AIDS’ exceptionalism in Brazil, 2007–2019. Global Public Health17(6): 815–826. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1896764. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17441692.2021.1896764 (accessed 19 March 2023).
FranklinS (2013) From blood to genes? Rethinking cosanguinity in the context of geneticization. In: JohnsonCH (ed) Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York and Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 285–320.
14.
GabbJ (2018) Unsettling lesbian motherhood: critical reflections over a generation (1990–2015). Sexualities21(7): 1002–1020. DOI: 10.1177/1363460717718510. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1363460717718510 (accessed 19 March 2023).
15.
HanssenJD (2015) The donor figuration: a progenitor, father or friend? How young people in planned lesbian families negotiate with their donor. Sexualities18(3): 276–296. DOI: 10.1177/1363460714532936.
16.
HarawayDJ (1985) A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review15(2): 65–108.
17.
HintonLDumelowCRoweR, et al. (2018) Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth18(1): 12. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1601-4.
18.
ImazE (2018) ‘Quem nuptiae demonstrant…’ some thoughts on filiation and lesbian motherhoods from an anthropological perspective. Athenea Digital: Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social18 (1):113–128. DOI: 10.5565/rev/athenea.2306.
19.
MacêdoS (2020) Ser mulher trabalhadora e mãe no contexto da pandemia COVID-19: tecendo sentidos. Revista do NUFEN12(2): 187–204. DOI: 10.26823/RevistadoNUFEN.vol12.nº02rex.33.
20.
MachinRCoutoMT (2014) Fazendo a escolha certa: tecnologias reprodutivas, práticas lésbicas e uso de bancos de sêmen. Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva24(4): 1255–1274. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-73312014000400012.
21.
PerdokHJansSVerhoevenC, et al. (2016) Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth16(1): 188. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0975-z.
22.
PrabhakarASReyesLGKleinschmidtVM, et al. (2017) Investigating the suitability of the asynchronous, remote, community-based method for pregnant and new mothers. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Mendoza, 6–11 May 2017, pp. 4924–4934. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025546.
23.
PreciadoBP (2014) Manifesto Contrassexual: Práticas Subversivas de Identidade Sexual.Translated by Maria Paula Gurgel Ribeiro. São Paulo: N-1 Edições.
24.
RaesIParysHVProvoostV, et al. (2014) Parental (in)equality and the genetic link in lesbian families. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology32(5): 457–468. DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2014.947473. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02646838.2014.947473 (accessed 19 March 2023).
25.
SierraJC (2017) Que quer o queer? Sobre o contexto de emergência e suas contribuições aos deslocamentos pós-identitários. In: FonsecaACMGalantinDVRibasTF (eds) Políticas Não Identitárias. São Paulo: Intermeios, pp.137–160.
26.
SkeltonKEvansRLaChenayeJ, et al. (2018) Utilization of online focus groups to include mothers: a use-case design, reflection, and recommendations. Digital Health4. DOI: 10.1177/2055207618777675.
27.
TamanzaGFacchinFFranciniF, et al. (2019) ‘Doubly mother’: heterologous artificial insemination between biological and social parenthood: a single case study. World Future: The Journal of New Paradigm Research75(7): 480–501. DOI: 10.1080/02604027.2019.1654769.
28.
TrevisanJS (2018) Devassos no Paraíso: A Homossexualidade no Brasil, da Colônia à Atualidade. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.
