Abstract
Written information exchange is widely used to share information and coordinate care across services. Yet, its coordinating effects remain unclear. The aim of the study was to explore the textually mediated practices through which institutional work was coordinated between social care and healthcare professionals in Danish intersectoral care pathways. We analysed seven Health Statuses, each consisting of a request (LÆ 121) from social care and a reply (LÆ 125) from a general practitioner. These were collected from seven textually mediated pathways of people with disadvantage and examined through an institutional ethnographic text analysis of their textual characteristics and discursive practices. We found that the practices were directly influenced by detailed policy texts. The textually mediated accounts of the client/patients’ situation were brief, highly structured by macro policy documents, and drew on two distinctly different discourses, health and social care respectively. These practices did not support intersectoral coordination and warrant scrutiny of intended and unintended consequences.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
