Community policing promises to foster collaboration between police and citizens, strengthen social cohesion, and address the root causes of crime and disorder. In order to understand why it often fails to achieve this, we argue that scholars should recognize community–police meetings as sites of dynamic, multi-scalar political contestation and pay closer attention to the not-so-hidden partisan struggles that shape them. Our empirical analysis focuses on Buenos Aires, Argentina. Based on ethnographic observation of 30 community–police meetings and interviews with 50 politicians, police officers, activists, and everyday citizens, we explain how higher-order partisan contests influenced the dynamics and outcomes of local meetings. We show how these meetings exacerbated social schisms, reified ideological differences between competing parties, and galvanized support for the City Government’s “law and order” policies. Our results suggest that local participation sometimes reinforces the punitive approaches to urban problems that community policing originally aimed to transcend.
BlairGWeinsteinJMChristiaF, et al. (2021) Community policing does not build citizen trust in police or reduce crime in the Global South. Science (New York)374(6571): eabd3446.
4.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (Thompson JB, ed. and introduction; Raymond G and Adamson M, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BourdieuP (2014) On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989–1992 (Champagne P, Lenoir R, Poupeau F, eds; Fernbach D, trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
6.
BrennerN (2019) New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BrogdenM (2005) “Horses for courses” and “thin blue lines”: Community policing in transitional society. Police Quarterly8(1): 64–98.
8.
BrogdenMNijharP (2005) Community Policing: National and International Models and Approaches. Portland, OR: Willan.
9.
ClemensES (2016) What Is Political Sociology? Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
CrowlJN (2017) The effect of community policing on fear and crime reduction, police legitimacy and job satisfaction: An empirical review of the evidence. Police Practice and Research18(5): 449–462.
11.
WellsW, Department of Justice and Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (2009) Community partnerships. In: Maguire E and Wells W (eds) Implementing Community Policing: Lessons from 12 Agencies. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 3–12.
12.
DoeringJ (2020) Us versus Them: Race, Crime, and Gentrification in Chicago Neighborhoods. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
DuneierM (2001) Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
14.
EilbaumL (2004) La policía “al servicio de la comunidad”: Tradición policial y vientos de cambio. In: TiscorniaSMartínezMJ (eds) Burocracias y violencia: Estudios de antropología jurídica. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA, 159–201.
15.
EliasophN (1997) “Close to home”: The work of avoiding politics. Theory and Society26(5): 605–647.
16.
FriedmannRR (1992) Community Policing: Comparative Perspectives and Prospects. New York: St Martin’s Press.
17.
FrühlingH (2007) The impact of international models of policing in Latin America: The case of community policing. Police Practice and Research8(2): 125–144.
18.
FrühlingH (2012) A realistic look at Latin American community policing programmes. Policing and Society22(1): 76–88.
19.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GascónLDRoussellA (2019) The Limits of Community Policing: Civilian Power and Police Accountability in Black and Brown Los Angeles. New York: New York University Press.
21.
GillC (2016) Community interventions. In: WeisburdDFarringtonDPGillC (eds) What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation. New York: Springer, 77–109.
22.
GillCWeisburdDTelepCW, et al. (2014) Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology10(4): 399–428.
23.
GlancL (2014) Caught between soldiers and police officers: Police violence in contemporary Argentina. Policing and Society24(4): 479–496.
24.
GonzálezYM (2019) Participation as a safety valve: Police reform through participatory security in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society61(2): 68–92.
25.
GuerreroA (2013) La Federal: La Trama Policial detras del Delito, la Inseguridad y el Miedo. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
26.
HenerA (2008) Comunidades de víctimas—comunidades de victimarios: Clases medias y sentidos de lo comunitario en el discurso de la prevención del delito. Papeles Del CEIC, 2008/1(#34). Available at: http://www.identidadcolectiva.es/pdf/34.pdf (accessed 1 August 2021).
27.
HerbertS (2006) Citizens, Cops, and Power: Recognizing the Limits of Community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HintonMS (2006) The State on the Streets: Police and Politics in Argentina and Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
29.
JohnsonCCRothJA (2003) COPS program and the spread of community policing practices, 1995–2000 (No. 200517). Urban Institute Justice Policy Center. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/200517.pdf (accessed 15 January 2021).
30.
KangJH (2015) Participation in the community social control, the neighborhood watch groups: Individual- and neighborhood-related factors. Crime & Delinquency61(2): 188–212.
31.
KesslerG (2009) El sentimiento de inseguridad: Sociología del temor al delito. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
32.
LamontMSwidlerA (2014) Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology37: 153–171.
33.
LevineJR (2017) The paradox of community power: Cultural processes and elite authority in participatory governance. Social Forces 95(3): 1155–1179.
34.
LombardoRMDonnerCM (2018) Can community policing increase residents’ informal social control? Testing the impact of the Chicago alternative policing strategy. Police Practice and Research19(5): 427–442.
35.
LyonsW (1999) The Politics of Community Policing: Rearranging the Power to Punish. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36.
MayrlDQuinnS (2016) Defining the state from within: Boundaries, schemas, and associational policymaking. Sociological Theory34(1): 1–26.
37.
MillerJDavisRHendersonN, et al. (2003) Public opinions of the police: The influence of friends, family, and news media. Summary Research Report to the National Institute of Justice No. 205619. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
38.
PegoraroJ (2002) Las políticas de seguridad y la participación comunitaria en el marco de la violencia social. In: Violencia, sociedad y justicia en América Latina. Buenos, Aires: CLACSO—Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, 29–55.
39.
PitaMV (2019) Hostigamiento policial o de las formas de la violencia en barrios populares de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires: Relato de una investigación. Desacatos: Revista De Ciencias Sociales60: 78–93.
40.
ReinerR (2010) The Politics of the Police. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
RenauerBCDuffeeDEScottJD (2003) Measuring police–community co-production: Trade-offs in two observational approaches. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management26(1): 9–28.
42.
RiosAL (2017) “Policía propia” y autonomía en los discursos constituyentes de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Sociohistórica40: 034.
43.
RukusJWarnerMEZhangX (2018) Community policing: Least effective where need is greatest. Crime & Delinquency64(14): 1858–1881.
44.
ShilstonT (2015) Democratic policing, community policing and the fallacy of conflation in international police development missions. International Journal of Police Science & Management17(4): 207–215.
45.
SklanskyD (2005) Police and democracy. Michigan Law Review103(7): 1699–1830.
46.
SkoganW (1994) The impact of community policing on neighborhood residents: A cross-site analysis. In: RosenbaumD (ed.) The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Hypotheses. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 167–181.
47.
SmallML (2004) Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
48.
SmallML (2009) How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
49.
SozzoM (2000) Seguridad urbana y tácticas de prevención del delito. Cuadernos de Jurisprudencia y Doctrina Penal—Ad-Hoc 10: 103–136.
50.
SozzoM (2009) Gobierno local y prevención del delito en la Argentina. Urvio: Revista Latinoamericana de Seguridad Ciudadana6: 58–73.
51.
SozzoM (2016) ¿Legados dictatoriales? Instituciones y prácticas policiales entre pasado y presente en América del Sur. Civitas—Revista de Ciências Sociais16(4): 552–574.
52.
ThacherD (2001) Conflicting values in community policing. Law & Society Review35(4): 765–798.
53.
TillyC (2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
TiscorniaS (2008) Activismo de los derechos humanos y burocracias estatales: El caso Walter Bulacio. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto.
55.
Van DethJW (2014) A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica49(3): 349–367.
56.
VargasR (2016) Wounded City: Violent Turf Wars in a Chicago Barrio. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
VommaroG (2019) De la construcción partidaria al gobierno: PRO-Cambiemos y los límites del “giro a la derecha” en Argentina. Colombia Internacional99: 91–120.
58.
WeisburdDEckJE (2004) What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593(1): 42–65.
