Although the learning benefits of peer feedback in English-as-a-foreign-language writing instruction have been well recognized, the process and effects of peer feedback are largely reliant on teacher agency in conducting such activities. However, inadequate research has been conducted on this issue, leaving the dynamic features and causes of teacher agency in peer feedback largely unknown. Drawing on an ecological perspective, this comparative case study examined how two English-as-a-foreign-language teachers from two universities enacted agency in organizing peer feedback activities in their writing instructions. Multiple data including classroom observation, interviews and relevant teaching documents were collected and coded for themes. The study revealed that both teachers exerted dynamic agency in creating peer feedback experiences for students, but showed considerable differences before, during and after peer feedback. Overall, the novice teacher shifted from showing proactive agency to constrained agency, whereas the experienced teacher moved from demonstrating automatic agency to autonomous agency. This stark contrast was shaped by the synergism of different temporal affordances and constraints in relation to individual and contextual factors. The study highlights the need to provide tailored support to enhance teacher agency in dealing with possible challenges in facilitating students’ experiences with peer feedback.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
5.
BiestaG.TedderM. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Learning Lives: Learning, Identity, and Agency in the Life Course, 132–149.
6.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
8.
CarlessD.WinstoneN. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163.
9.
ChenX. (Winnie)LeeI. (2022). Conflicts in peer interaction of collaborative writing – a case study in an EFL context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100910
10.
Cong-LemN. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718–738.
11.
Cong-LemN. (2025). Teaching with heart and mind: How social-emotional skills mediate observation, perezhivanie, and pedagogical agency in Vietnamese EFL classrooms. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251367848
12.
DongZ.GaoY.SchunnC. D. (2023). Assessing students’ peer feedback literacy in writing: Scale development and validation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1103–1118.
13.
DuffP. (2018). Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge.
14.
HanY.XuY. (2019). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696.
15.
HeJ.WangH.XiaJ.HeX. (2024). An ecological perspective on learner agency: The case of Chinese tertiary-level EFL students in peer reviews. System, 121, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103222
16.
JenkinsG. (2020). Teacher agency: The effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181.
17.
JiangY.LiJ.WangQ. (2022). An ecological approach to understanding university English teachers’ professional agency in implementing formative assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 916980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916980
18.
Kayi-AydarH. (2019). Language teacher agency: Major theoretical considerations, conceptualizations and methodological choices. In Kayi-AydarH.GaoX.MillerE. R.VargheseM.VitanovaG. (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing language teacher agency (pp. 10–21). Multilingual Matters.
19.
LeeI. (2021). The development of feedback literacy for writing teachers. Tesol Quarterly, 55(3), 1048–1059.
20.
LeeI.MaoZ. (2024). Writing teacher feedback literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, values, and abilities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 63, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101094
LiuK. (2025). How language proficiency and peer familiarity shape engagement with feedback in English as a Foreign Language writing. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251369331
23.
NazariM.HuG. (2024). Novice language teachers steer their emotional vulnerabilities toward exercising agency: A dialogical-community of practice study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, 104759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104759
24.
NazariM.VaeziM.OghyanousP. A.HuG. (2025). Writing teachers’ emotion(s) and agency in a professional development course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 2113–2124.
25.
PriestleyM. R.BiestaG.RobinsonS. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
26.
RollinsonP. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
27.
RuanX.YuN.ZhuY. (2025). Honing innovative language teaching through teaching competitions: The role of teacher agency. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251383764
28.
RuanX.ZhengX.ToomA. (2020). From perceived discrepancies to intentional efforts: Understanding English department teachers’ agency in classroom instruction in a changing curricular landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103074
29.
SunH.WangM. (2025). Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1094–1113.
30.
TaoJ.GaoX. A. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346–355.
31.
TaoJ.GaoX. A. (2021). Language teacher agency. Cambridge University Press.
32.
TaşdemirH.GümüşokF. (2025). An ecological perspective into the interplay of teacher agency and identity for Novice English teachers. In M.Nazari (Ed.), Novice non-native English language teachers navigating agency: International perspectives (pp. 54–72). Routledge.
33.
ToomA.PyhältöK.RustF. O. C. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615–623.
34.
TsuiA. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
35.
VuoganA.LiS. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of peer feedback in second language writing: A meta-analysis. Tesol Quarterly, 57(4), 1115–1138.
36.
WangL.LeeI. (2021). L2 learners’ agentic engagement in an assessment as learning-focused writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 50, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100571
37.
WangL.LeeI.ParkM. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890
38.
WillisJ.KlenowskiV. (2018). Classroom assessment practices and teacher learning: An Australian perspective. In H.JiangM. F.Hill (Eds), Teacher learning with classroom assessment: Perspectives from Asia pacific (pp. 19–37). Springer Singapore.
39.
XuJ.FanY. (2022). Finding success with the implementation of task-based language teaching: The role of teacher agency. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 18–35.
40.
XuY.HarfittG. (2019). Is assessment for learning feasible in large classes? Challenges and coping strategies from three case studies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(5), 472–486.
41.
XuY.TaoJ. (2025). The pedagogical and socio-affective dimensions of identity tensions and teacher agency: Case studies of university English teachers teaching online. Language Teaching Research, 29(8), 3592–3613.
42.
YuS.LeeI. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493.
43.
ZhangY.GaoY. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842
ZongZ.SchunnC.ZhengM.GaoY. (2025). Feedback familiarity explains why some students don’t like peer review: Understanding why using a stressor-strain-outcome framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(4), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10414
