This study examines how language teacher identity shapes technology integration through the lens of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-language teacher identity framework. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving survey data from 320 university foreign-language teachers and qualitative data from interviews, observations, and journals with 30 participants. Quantitative results showed that pedagogical beliefs and self-efficacy significantly predicted Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge levels. Qualitative findings revealed that identity conflicts, especially tensions between traditional roles and innovation demands, often constrained technology use, despite high confidence or competence. By foregrounding identity as a mediating mechanism, the study positions the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-language teacher identity framework as an extension of existing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge theory. Findings highlight the need for professional development that explicitly integrates identity work with technical training and is supported by enabling institutional conditions. Supporting teachers in reconciling who they are with how they teach emerges as central to achieving sustainable technology integration in language education.
AdmiraalW.SchenkeW.De JongL.EmmelotY.SligteH. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?. Professional development in education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
2.
AloizouV.LinardatouS.BoloudakisM.RetalisS. (2024). Integrating a movement-based learning platform as core curriculum tool in kindergarten classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13511
3.
BackfischI.LachnerA.StürmerK.ScheiterK. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!Computers & Education, 166, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159
4.
BarkhuizenG. (2016). Narrative approaches to exploring language, identity and power in language teacher education. RELC Journal, 47(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631222
BaşerD.KopchaT.J.ÖzdenM.Y. (2015). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456
8.
Blum-SmithS.YurkofskyM.M.BrennanK. (2021). Stepping back and stepping in: Facilitating learner-centered experiences in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 160, 104042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104042
ChaiC. S.KohJ. H. L.TsaiC. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
11.
ChenC.-H.JongM. S.-Y.TsaiC.-C. (2022). A comparison of in-service teachers’ conceptions of barriers to mobile technology-integrated instruction and technology-integrated instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7299
12.
ChengS.-L.ChenS.ChangJ.-C. (2020). Examining the multiplicative relationships between teachers’ competence, value and pedagogical beliefs about technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13052
FairleyM.J. (2020). Conceptualizing language teacher education centered on language teacher identity development: A competencies-based approach and practical applications. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 1037–1064.
18.
FengL. (2024). Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted language learning strategies on cognitive load and learning outcomes: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1741–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241268349
19.
FilhoW.L.TrevisanL.V.DinisM.A.P.SivapalanS.WahajZ.LiakhO. (2023). Ensuring sustainability in internationalisation efforts at higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(7), 1416–1429. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-10-2022-0333
20.
GagnierK.M.HolochwostS.J.FisherK. (2021). Spatial thinking in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Elementary teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21722
21.
HannaF.OostdamR.SeveriensS.E.ZijlstraB.J. (2019). Domains of teacher identity: A review of quantitative measurement instruments. Educational Research Review, 27, 15–27.
22.
HoiV.N.MuG.M. (2020). Perceived teacher support and students’ acceptance of mobile-assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13044
23.
HsuC.-Y.TsaiM.-J. (2024). Predicting robotics pedagogical content knowledge: The role of computational and design thinking dispositions via teaching beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(5), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241236882
Immordino-YangM.H.NasirN.S.CantorP.YoshikawaH. (2023). Weaving a colorful cloth: Centering education on humans’ emergent developmental potentials. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x231223516
26.
KarimpourS.NamaziandostE.BehbahaniH.K. (2024). Contributions of computerized dynamic assessment and digitalized feedback to L2 learners’ grammar acquisition: Technology-enhanced learning facilitation theory. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241296889
27.
KeL.SchwarzC.V. (2020). Supporting students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
28.
KennedyM. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?. Review of educational research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
29.
KimmonsR.GrahamC.R.WestR.E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176–198.
30.
KlassenR.M.ChiuM.M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of educational Psychology, 102(3), 741.
31.
LiB. (2021). Ready for online? Exploring EFL teachers’ ICT acceptance and ICT literacy during COVID-19 in Mainland China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211028934
32.
López-BelmonteJ.GuerreroA.J.M.Pozo-SánchezS.MarínJ.A.M. (2021). Co-word analysis and academic performance from the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology in Web of Science. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6940
33.
MaQ.LeeH.T.H.GaoX.ChaiC.S. (2024). Learning by design: Enhancing online collaboration in developing pre-service TESOL teachers’ TPACK for teaching with corpus technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2639–2667. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13458
34.
MichosK.Hernández-LeoD. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679
35.
MishraP.KoehlerM.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
36.
NaJ.PereraC.J.ZainuddinZ. (2023). Home-campus nexus: The shift to homebased smart e-learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6709
37.
OlivosF.YuanX. (2023). Teachers’ beliefs about educational quality: Examining the power of school settings through survey experiments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 129, 104140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104140
38.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
39.
PenningtonM. C.RichardsJ. C. (2016). Teacher identity in language teaching: Integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors. RELC journal, 47(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219
40.
PishghadamR.GolzarJ.MiriM.A. (2022). A new conceptual framework for teacher identity development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 876395.
41.
RoseH.McKinleyJ.GallowayN. (2020). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444820000518
42.
RuttA.MumbaF.KiblerA.K. (2020). Preparing preservice teachers to teach science to english learners: A review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 625–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21673
43.
SchererR.TondeurJ.SiddiqF. (2017). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, 112, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012
44.
SchmidtD.A.BaranE.ThompsonA.D.MishraP.KoehlerM.J.ShinT.S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
45.
SuárezE.OteroV.K. (2023). Ting, tang, tong: Emergent bilingual students investigating and constructing evidence-based explanations about sound production. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(1), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21868
46.
SutherlandK.E.BrockG.de Villiers ScheepersM.J.MillearP.NormanS.StrohfeldtT.DownerT.MastersN.BlackA.L. (2023). Non-traditional students’ preferences for learning technologies and impacts on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09354-5
VargheseM.MorganB.JohnstonB.JohnsonK.A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2
49.
Wade-JaimesK.AyersK.A.PennellaR.A. (2022). Identity across the STEM ecosystem: Perspectives of youth, informal educators, and classroom teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 885–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21820
50.
WrightD.S.WeinbergA.E.McMeekingL.B.S.HunterD.E.L.BalgopalM.M. (2022). I will survive: Teachers reflect on motivations to remain in education amidst a global pandemic. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(6), 1266–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21831
51.
YouH.S.ParkS.HongM.WarrenA. (2024). Unveiling effectiveness: A meta-analysis of professional development programs in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(4), 971–1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21985
52.
YueM.JongM.S.-Y.NgD.T.K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19505–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
