Ellis (2003) identifies four key criteria that distinguish a ‘task’ from the types of situational grammar exercises that are typically found in the more traditional language classroom. This study investigates how well teachers were able to design tasks that fulfilled these four criteria (Ellis, 2003) at the end of a year-long professional development programme in which TBLT figured prominently. Forty-three tasks designed by the teachers for use in their own foreign language classrooms are analysed against Ellis’s four criteria in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the professional development programme, on the premise that adequate understanding of the construct of task underpins successful implementation of TBLT. The findings show that some aspects of task-design were difficult for teachers. Implications for professional development programmes that focus on TBLT, such as the one whose effectiveness is evaluated here, are discussed.
AndonN.EckerthJ. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 286–310.
2.
BreenM. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In: CandlinC.MurphyD. (Eds.) Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). London: Prentice Hall.
3.
BreenM. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In: JohnsonR. (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (2001). (Eds.) Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and assessment. London: Pearson.
5.
CarlessD. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662.
6.
CarlessD. (2012). TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forward. In: ShehadehA.CoombeC (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 345–358). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7.
ChanS. (2012). Qualitative differences in novice teachers’ enactment of task-based language teaching in Hong Kong primary classrooms. In: ShehadehA.CoombeC. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 187–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
ClarkJ.LoY.C.HuiM.F.KamM.CarlessD.WongP.M. (1999). An investigation into the development and implementation of the TOC initiative with special reference to professional competencies, professional development, and resources: Final report. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
9.
DörnyeiZ. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In: RobinsonP. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed learning (pp. 137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.
EastM. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11.
EllisR. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
EllisR. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209–224.
14.
EllisR. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
15.
EllisR. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
16.
EllisR.ShintaniN. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Oxon: Routledge.
17.
ErlamR. (2008). What do you researchers know about language teaching? Bridging the gap between SLA research and language pedagogy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 253–67.
18.
HuR. (2013). Task-based language teaching: Responses from Chinese teachers of English. TESL-EJ, 16, 1–21.
19.
InsleyS.ThomsonW. (2008). Supporting teachers to increase the quality and quantity of student target language use: Description and analysis of the ‘Teacher Professional Development in Languages’ (TPDL) programme. The New Zealand Language Teacher, 34, 21–30.
20.
KaganD. (1992). Professional growth among pre-service and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.
21.
KlapperJ. (2003). Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. The Language Learning Journal, 27, 33–42.
22.
Larsen-FreemanD.AndersonM. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LittlewoodW. (2004). The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58, 319–326.
24.
LittlewoodW. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?Language Teaching, 47, 349–362.
25.
McDonoughK.ChaikitmongkolW. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 1071–1132.
26.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
27.
NunanD. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
NunanD. (2004). A Framework for task-based language teaching. In: NunanD., Task based language teaching (pp. 19–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PrabhuN.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
RichardsJ.C.RodgersT. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. 3rd edition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
SamudaV. (2007) Tasks, design and the architecture of pedagogic spaces. Unpublished plenary presented at the Second International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT 2007), University of Hawai’i. Available at: http://www.hawaii.edu/tblt2007/PP/presentations.htm (December2014).
32.
SamudaV.BygateM. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
SeedhouseP. (2005). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55, 533–570.
34.
SheenR. (1994). A critical analysis of the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 1, 127–151.
35.
SkehanP. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.
36.
SwanM. (2005). Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401.
37.
Van den BrandenK. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Van den BrandenK. (2009). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In: Van den BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 401–430). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39.
Velez-RendonG. (2006). From student to teacher: A successful transition. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 320–335.
40.
WiddowsonH.G. (1993). Innovation in teacher development. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 260–275.
41.
WiddowsonH.G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
WillisJ. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Essex: Pearson.
43.
WillisD.WillisJ. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
ZhengX.BorgS. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–221.
