This qualitative case study explored how a novice language teacher negotiated her pedagogical beliefs and practices during her socialization into a foreign cultural and educational context. The focal participant was an Uzbek language teacher at a university in the USA. Using a language socialization theoretical framework, data were drawn from multiple sources such as interviews, video-recorded classroom observations, and classroom materials. The findings indicate that biographical factors (e.g. the teacher’s personal history, experience as a learner), contextual factors (e.g. interactions with students and institutional resources), and dialogic factors (e.g. the teacher’s knowledge of theories of teaching and learning) guided the process of socialization. The teacher was able to transform her beliefs and practices by negotiating the tensions, dilemmas, concerns, and questions across her biography, current teaching context, and theoretical knowledge of teaching and learning.
BambergM. (2006). Stories: Big or small: Why do we care?Narrative Inquiry, 16, 139–147.
2.
BurkeB. (2006). Theory meets practice: A case study of pre-service world language teachers in U.S. secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 148–166.
3.
CreswellJ.W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage.
5.
DuffP. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Taylor & Francis.
6.
FarrellT. (1999). The reflective assignment: Unlocking pre-service English teachers’ beliefs on grammar teaching. RELC Journal, 30, 1–17.
7.
FarrellT. (2001). English language teacher socialization during the practicum. Prospect, 16, 49–62.
8.
FreemanD. (1993). Renaming experience/reconstructing practice: Developing new understandings of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 485–497.
9.
GoldY.RothR. (2005). Teachers managing stress and preventing burnout. London: The Falmer Press.
10.
GollnickD.M.ChinnP.C. (2013). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
11.
GrantC.A.ZeichnerK. (1981). In-service support for first year teachers: The state of the scene. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 14, 99–111.
12.
HanksR. (1999). World bibliographical series: Uzbekistan. Santa Barbara, CA: Clio Press.
13.
HasanovaD. (2007). Functional allocations of English in post-Soviet Uzbekistan: Pedagogical implications for English language teachers. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
14.
HiverP.DörnyeiZ. (2015). Language teacher immunity: A double-edged sword. Applied Linguistics. E-publication.
15.
HorwitzE. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333–340.
16.
HorwitzE. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557–576.
17.
HoutenV.BottJ. (2009). The state perspective on teacher shortage, certification, and recruitment. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 274–277.
18.
JohnsonK. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
19.
KubanyiovaM. (2012). Teacher development in action: Understanding language teachers’ conceptual change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
LantolfJ.P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
MelvinN. (2005). Uzbekistan: Transition to authoritarianism on the Silk Road. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
24.
MerriamS.B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
OchsE.SchieffelinB. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In: ShwederR.A.LeVineR.A. (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 276–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PeacockM. (2001). Pre-service ESL teacher beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177–195.
27.
PollardA. (1982). A model of classroom coping strategies. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3, 19–37.
28.
SjobergA. (1963). Uzbek structural grammar. Bloomington, MN: Indiana University Press.
29.
UzumB. (2013a). A language socialization approach to Uzbek language learning. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 14, 87–104.
30.
UzumB. (2013b). Foreign language teacher socialization: A multiple case study of foreign language teachers in an American higher education institution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
31.
WatzkeJ. (2007). Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a developmental theory of beginning teacher practices. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 63–82.
32.
WedellM. (2009). Planning for educational change: Putting people and their contexts first. London: Continuum.
33.
ZeichnerK.GoreJ. (1990). Teacher socialization. In: HoustonW.R.HowsamR.SikulaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (pp. 329–348). New York: Macmillan.
