This study introduces ‘seamless Chinese vocabulary learning’ (SCVL), a mobile-assisted initiative designed to bridge learners’ everyday experiences with formal language instruction. The SCVL framework integrates mobile technologies to foster vocabulary acquisition through artefact creation in a seamless learning environment. Employing a design-based research (DBR) methodology with mixed-methods design, 32 participants of varying proficiency levels took part in a 16-week intervention facilitated via the DingTalk platform. Quantitative analysis of 2,397 artefacts using the type–token ratio (TTR) indicated significant improvements in lexical variety across sentences, paragraphs, and essays across performance groups. Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests revealed significant main effects of time and group. A notable Group × Time interaction was observed for TTR Sentence and TTR Paragraph, but not for TTR Essay. These findings suggest that vocabulary development under SCVL is non-linear and shaped by learners’ proficiency levels. Qualitative data from interviews and learner feedback highlighted two major themes: (1) affective engagement, reflecting heightened motivation and emotional involvement, and (2) challenges, including technological barriers and frustration with peer review processes. Despite these difficulties, students reported that SCVL was both engaging and effective in enhancing their vocabulary learning. This study contributes to seamless learning research by addressing limitations in earlier work that often overlooked learners’ perspectives and the obstacles they encounter. Pedagogically, the findings highlight the potential of the ‘sentence–paragraph–essay’ artefact creation process to guide language instructors in developing more effective, sustainable strategies for vocabulary instruction.
AbdullahS.N.A.HashimH. (2021). Seamless language learning in an ESL context. Creative Education, 12, 1349–1363.
2.
AiniN.A.MufidM.K.SariE.M.P. (2020). An analysis on IL fossilization phenomenon in students writing performance. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 3, 114–130.
3.
AnH.LiS. (2024). Task-specific writing anxiety and self-efficacy are separate from general L2 writing anxiety and self-efficacy and they have differential associations with the effects of written corrective feedback in pre-task and within-task planning. System, 126, Article 103480.
4.
ArmelliniA.Teixeira AntunesV.HoweR. (2021). Student perspectives on learning experiences in a higher education active blended learning context. TechTrends, 65, 433–443.
5.
AwG.P.WongL.H.ZhangX.J.LiY.Q.QuekG.H. (2016). MyCLOUD: A seamless Chinese vocabulary learning experience mediated by loud and mobile technologies. In ChaiC.LimC.TanC. (Eds.), Future learning in primary schools (pp. 65–78). Springer.
6.
BaeJ.BentlerP.M.LeeY.S. (2016). On the role of content in writing assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13, 302–328.
7.
BarabS.SquireK. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.
8.
BarhamK.A.ClarkeR. (2022). ‘When we see strange words’: Student-centered experiences using dictionary apps within and beyond the English language classroom in Palestine. Sage Open, 12(4).
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV.HayfieldN.TerryG. (2019). Thematic analysis. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–60). Springer.
10.
CaoX.W.TianX. (2020). The effect of task conception conditions on lexical richness in Chinese second language spoken output. Learning Chinese, 10, 82–91.
11.
ChaiC.S.WongL.H.KingR.B. (2016). Surveying and modeling students’ motivation and learning strategies for mobile-assisted seamless Chinese language learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19, 170–180.
12.
ChenC.M.LiM.C.ChenY.T. (2022). The effects of web-based inquiry learning mode with the support of collaborative digital reading annotation system on information literacy instruction. Computers and Education, 179, Article 104428.
13.
DurakG.ÇankayaS. (2018). Seamless learning: A scoping systematic review study. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 5(4), 225–234.
14.
FoomaniM.E.HedayatiM. (2016). A seamless learning design for mobile assisted language learning: An Iranian context. Canadian Center of Science and Education: English Language Teaching, 9, 206–213.
15.
GhimireA. (2025). Utilizing ChatGPT to integrate world English and diverse knowledge: A transnational perspective in critical artificial intelligence (AI) literacy. Computers and Composition, 75, Article 102913.
16.
HambrockH.De VilliersF. (2023). Proposing a seamless learning experience design (SLED) framework based on international perspectives of educators from five higher education institutions. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21, 52–68.
17.
HaoP.LiF. (2024). Exploring the challenges of learning and teaching Chinese/Mandarin language at higher education institutes: Voices from non-Chinese speaker teachers and learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 53, Article 75.
18.
HeK. (2022). Supportive integration of information technology and subject teaching: Neo-constructivism. In Innovative education informatization with Chinese characteristics: Theory and practice (pp. 67–104). Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0622-0.
19.
HsiehY. (2016). An exploratory study on Singaporean primary school students’ development in Chinese writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 541–548.
20.
JiangJ.Y.BiP.LiuH.T. (2019). Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 3–18.
21.
KawauchiC. (2008). Proficiency differences in CALL based vocabulary learning: The effectiveness of using “Power Words.”Fleat, 5, 55–65.
22.
KayalarF. (2022). Seamless learning in language education: Work of recent pandemic. In Proceedings of IAC 2022 in Prague (pp. 73–76). International Academic Conferences (IAC).
23.
KoE.G.LimK.Y. (2021). Promoting English learning in secondary schools: Design-based research to develop a mobile application for collaborative learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 7, 1–13.
24.
LanY.J.LinY.T. (2016). Mobile seamless technology enhanced CSL oral communication. Educational Technology and Society, 19, 335–350.
25.
LantolfJ.P.XiJ. (2023). Digital language learning: A sociocultural theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 57, 702–715.
26.
LauferB.NationP. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307–322.
27.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LegaultJ.ZhaoJ.ChiY.A., et al (2019). Immersive virtual reality as an effective tool for second language vocabulary learning. Languages, 4, 1–13.
29.
LuoY.WattsM. (2022). Exploration of university students’ lived experiences of using smartphones for English language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37, 608–633.
30.
MercerN.HoweC. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 12–21.
31.
MilesM.B.HubermanA.M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
32.
MohammedS.H.KinyoL. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7, 249–256.
33.
MoonJ.LeeD.ChoiG.W., et al (2024). Learning analytics in seamless learning environments: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 3208–3225.
34.
NationP. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
35.
NibradG.M. (2019). Methodology and application of two-way ANOVA. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 9, 1–8.
36.
RamalingamS.YunusM.M.HashimH. (2021). Exploring ESL learners’ blended learning experiences and its effectiveness through web-based technologies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1436–1445.
37.
ReillyC.ReevesT.C. (2024). Refining active learning design principles through design-based research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25, 81–100.
38.
RiniatiW.O. (2024). The role and benefits of seamless learning in improving primary school children’s learning achievement. Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology, 2, 375–387.
39.
SchoonenboomJ.JohnsonR.B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS – Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69, 107–131.
40.
ShadievR.HwangW.Y.HuangY.M.LiuT.Y. (2018). Facilitating application of language skills in authentic environments with a mobile learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 42–52.
41.
SiemensG. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In HugT. (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning: Concepts, discourses and examples (pp. 53–68). Waxmann.
42.
SinghG.RichardsJ.C. (2006). Teaching and learning in the language teacher education course room: A critical sociocultural perspective. RELC Journal, 37, 149–175.
43.
SongY.HwangG.J. (2020). What ‘seams’ have been bridged in seamless vocabulary learning? A review of the literature. Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 1–17.
44.
TsaiS.C. (2023). Learning with mobile augmented reality- and automatic speech recognition-based materials for English listening and speaking skills: Effectiveness and perceptions of non-English major English as a foreign language students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61, 444–465.
45.
UnderwoodJ.LuckinR.WintersN. (2014). MALL in the wild: Learners’ designs for scaffolding vocabulary learning trajectories. In JagerS.BradleyL.MeimaE.J.ThouësnyS. (Eds.), CALL design: Principles and practice; Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 1–7). Research-Publishing.Net.
46.
UosakiN.MouriK.KiyotaM.OgataH. (2019). Supporting seamless learning with a learning analytics approach. In LooiC.K.WongL.-H.GlahnC.CaiS. (Eds.), Seamless learning: Perspectives, challenges and opportunities (pp. 171–190). Springer.
47.
WatzingerT.J.RubioF.TharpD.S. (2018). Linguistic performance of dual language immersion students. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 575–595.
48.
WeiX.P. (2008). Implication of IL fossilization in second language acquisition. English Language Teaching, 1, 127–131.
49.
WenY.ChiuM.GuoX.WangZ. (2025). AI-powered vocabulary learning for lower primary school students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13537
50.
WenY.SongY.AwG.P.GohH.H.ZhengY.WangY. (2024). Investigating seamless vocabulary learning for young learners: ARCH for bridging home-based learning and classroom-based learning. Educational Technology and Society, 27, 102–113.
51.
WilkinsD.A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. MFT Press.
52.
WongL.H.KingR.B.ChaiC.S.LiuM. (2016). Seamlessly learning Chinese: Contextual meaning making and lexical variety in a seamless Chinese as a second language learning environment. Instructional Science, 44, 399–422.
53.
WongL.H.LooiC.K. (2010). Vocabulary learning by mobile-assisted authentic content creation and social meaning-making: Two case studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 421–433.
54.
WongL.H.LooiC.K.AwG.P. (2021). Does seamless learning translate seamlessly?: A decade of experiences in adapting seamless learning designs for various subjects, levels and technological settings. In KohE.R.HungD.W.L. (Eds.), Scaling up ICT-based innovations in schools: The Singapore experience (pp. 269–289). Springer.
55.
WuH.PanZ. (2025). What deserve studying the most? A Q-methodology approach to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on research priorities in GenAI-supported second language education. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e12898.
56.
WuH.WangY.WangY. (2024). ‘To use or not to use?’: A mixed-methods study on the determinants of EFL college learners’ behavioral intention to use AI in the distributed learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25, 158–178.
57.
YanS. (2021). Exploration of English group learning approach on DingTalk broadcast. Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 33, 169–173.
58.
YehH.C. (2024). The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning: Transforming the landscape of English teaching and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 33, 88–102.
59.
ZhouQ. (2023). Translating willingness to communicate into learner talk in a Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) classroom. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231176035
60.
ZhouX.GohY.S. (2025). What shapes tertiary learners’ experiences and challenges in mobile-assisted seamless vocabulary learning? A case of Chinese as a foreign language. Acta Psychologica, 257, Article 105123.
