Use of partial information to learn to read Chinese characters in non-native Chinese learners

Abstract

The ability to decode new words of varying degrees of orthographic-phonological mapping is an important word recognition skill across languages. Chinese characters represent three types of phonetic regularity: regular, semi-regular, and irregular depending on the degree of reliability of the pronunciation information provided by the phonetic component. This study investigated whether adult non-native Chinese learners can use partial phonological information encoded in semi-regular characters to learn the pronunciations of new characters. A total of 55 college students, enrolled in an intensive Chinese program with varying proficiency levels, were taught the pronunciations of 18 novel compound characters of three phonetic regularity types over three trials. Non-native Chinese learners of advanced and intermediate levels learned the pronunciations of regular characters (initial-same and final-same), which contain full information about pronunciation, and semi-regular characters (initial-different, final-same), which contain partial information about pronunciation, significantly better than irregular characters (initial-different and final-different), which contain misleading pronunciation information. The performance difference between semi-regular and irregular characters decreased over trials. Novice students demonstrated limited ability in using partial information to learn to pronounce characters compared to intermediate and advanced students. These results provide implications for effective character instruction for adult learners of Chinese with varying Chinese proficiency levels.

Keywords

Chinese character learning Chinese as foreign language learners Chinese proficiency level orthographic regularity partial information

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. (2012). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. Available at: https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012 (accessed June 2020).

Anderson

R.C.

W.L.

Y.-M.

Shu

N.N.

(2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 52–57.

Fang

S.-P.

Horng

R.-Y.

Tzeng

O.J.-L.

(1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In Kao

H.S.R.

Hoosain

(Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11–22). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

Goswami

Bryant

(1992). Rhyme, analogy, and children’s reading. In Gough

Ehri

Treiman

(Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 49–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gough

P.B.

Juel

Griffith

P.L.

(1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In Gough

Ehri

Treiman

(Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wang

Anderson

R.C.

(2005). Chinese children’s use of sub-character information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 572–579.

C.S.H.

Bryant

(1997). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 276–289.

C.S.H.

Wong

W.L.

Chan

W.S.

(1999). The use of orthographic analogies in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 393–403.

Jiang

(2001). An experimental study of foreign learners’ awareness of phonetic cues in pictophonetic characters. Chinese Teaching in the World, 56, 68–74.

10.

(1998). Effects of language background on the learning of Chinese characters among foreign language students. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 91–102.

11.

Kim

S.A.

Packard

Christianson

Anderson

R.C.

Shin

J.A.

(2016). Orthographic consistency and individual learner differences in second language literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing, 29, 1409–1434.

12.

Lee

C.-Y.

Tsai

J.-L.

E.C.-I.

Tzeng

O.J.-L.

Hung

D.L.

(2005). Consistency, regularity, and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 75–107.

13.

Lin

C.H.

Collins

(2012). The effects of L1 and orthographic regularity and consistency in naming Chinese characters. Reading and Writing, 25, 1747–1767.

14.

Liu

Y.H.

Yao

T.-C.

N.-P.

L.Y.

Shi

Y.H.

(2009). Integrated Chinese Level 1 Part 1. 3rd edition. Boston, MA: Cheng & Tsui Company.

15.

Perfetti

C.A.

Zhang

(1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24–33.

16.

Shu

Anderson

R.C.

(2000). Phonetic awareness: Knowledge of orthography-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 56–62.

17.

Shu

Chen

Anderson

R.C.

Xuan

(2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.

18.

(2010). Radical awareness among Chinese-as-a-foreign-language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

19.

Thompson

G.B.

Cottrell

D.S.

Fletcher-Flinn

C.M.

(1996). Sublexical orthographical relations early in the acquisition of reading: The knowledge sources account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 190–222.

20.

Wang

Perfetti

C.A.

Liu

(2003). Alphabetic readers quickly acquire orthographic structure in learning to read Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 183–208.

21.

Yang

McCandlisss

B.D.

Shu

Zevin

(2009). Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 238–257.

22.

Yum

Y.N.

Law

S.P.

I.F.

Lau

K.Y.

K.N.

(2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 315.

23.

Zhang

Dong

Sholar

(2016). Implicit use of radicals in learning characters for nonnative learners of Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 507–527.

24.

Zhang

Perfetti

C.A.

Yang

(1999). Whole word, frequency-general phonology in semantic processing of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 858–875.