Affective factors,intercultural sensitivity,and willingness to communicate orally outside class: A study with EFL secondary school learners in Poland and Spain
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
Affective factors,intercultural sensitivity,and willingness to communicate orally outside class: A study with EFL secondary school learners in Poland and Spain
This study examined out-of-school oral willingness to communicate (WTC) in two modes of communication – face-to-face (FtF) and digital – among secondary school students of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Poland and Spain. It also examined the associations between affective factors and intercultural sensitivity with WTC in both settings. A total of 1,480 students from 17 schools in Poland and 1,128 students from 11 schools in Spain participated in this study. The study found that learners from both national contexts shared extremely similar levels of out-of-class oral WTC in the two settings. After controlling for sociodemographic factors (age, gender, socioeconomic status, and relative self-assessed spoken competence), hierarchical regression analyses revealed that Foreign Classroom Language Anxiety (FLCA), Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE), and intercultural sensitivity were predictors of the two communicative settings in both contexts, although the relative importance of predictors differed in each case, as determined by the dominance analyses. Intercultural sensitivity, a factor that has seldom been investigated in relation to WTC, emerged as the most influential predictor for oral WTC in both communication environments within the two study samples. The study also discusses the implications for both research and foreign language pedagogy.
BennettM. J. (1993). Towards a developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In PaigeR. M. (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Intercultural Press.
2.
BotesE.DewaeleJ.M.GreiffS. (2021). The development and validation of the short form of the foreign language enjoyment scale. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 858–876.
3.
BotesE.DewaeleJ.-M.GreiffS. (2022). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of the effects of foreign language enjoyment. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 205–232.
4.
ButlerY.G. (2014). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research Papers in Education, 29, 410–437.
5.
ButlerY.G. (2015). Parental factors in children’s motivation for learning English: A case in China. Research Papers in Education, 30, 164–191.
6.
ButlerY.G. (2017). The dynamics of motivation development among young learners of English in China. In EneverJ.LindgrenE. (Eds.), Early language learning: Complexity and mixed methods (pp. 167–185). Multilingual Matters.
7.
ButlerY.G.LeV.N. (2018). A longitudinal investigation of parental social-economic status (SES) and young students’ learning of English as a foreign language. System, 73, 4–15.
8.
ByramM. (1989). Cultural studies in foreign language education. Multilingual Matters.
9.
ChenG.M.StarostaW.J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.
10.
ChenX.VallerandR.J.PadillaA.M. (2021). On the role of passion in second language learning and flourishing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 2761–2779.
DeardorffD.K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241–266.
13.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.
14.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 237–274.
Dziecioł-PedichA. (2015). Limited effectiveness of the communicative approach in Poland. In J.KamionowskiMalenkoN. (Eds.), Towards better language teaching: Methodological concerns/Using cultural and literary studies (pp. 43–54). Panstwowa Wyzsza Szkola Informatyki i Przedsiebierczosci w Lomzy.
17.
Elahi ShirvanM.KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.TaherianT. (2019). A meta-analysis of L2 willingness to communicate and its three high-evidence correlates. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 1241–1267.
18.
FanF.RuntingC.TariqE. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between global perspective and willingness to communicate in English in a Chinese university context. Journal of Language and Education, 6, 39–54.
19.
FantiniA.E. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence: Issues and tools. In D.K.Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456–476). Sage.
20.
García-SampedroM. (2021). Teaching spoken English in Spain: Classroom practices and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 583–596.
21.
GudykunstW.B.NishidaT. (1994). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 20, 562–598.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
24.
HuangB.ChangY.H.S.NiuL.ZhiM. (2018). Examining the effects of socio-economic status and language input on adolescent English learners’ speech production outcomes. System, 73, 27–36.
25.
International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). International Test Commission.
26.
JinS.LeeH. (2022). Willingness to communicate and its high-evidence factors: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41, 716–745.
27.
LeeJ.S.DrajatiN.A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 168–182.
28.
LeeJ.S.HsiehJ.C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73.
29.
LeeJ.S.LeeK. (2020). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24, 813–833.
30.
LeeJ.S.LeeK.Chen HsiehJ. (2022). Understanding willingness to communicate in L2 between Korean and Taiwanese students. Language Teaching Research, 26, 455–476.
31.
LeeJ.S.LuY. (2023). L2 motivational self system and willingness to communicate in the classroom and extramural digital contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36, 126–148.
32.
LeeJ.S.SylvénL.K. (2021). The role of informal digital learning of English in Korean and Swedish EFL learners’ communication behaviour. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1279–1296.
33.
LeeJ.S.TaylorT. (2022). Positive psychology constructs and Extramural English as predictors of primary school students’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2079650
34.
LeeJ.S.YeungN.M.OsburnM.B. (2022). Foreign language enjoyment as a mediator between informal digital learning of English and willingness to communicate: A sample of Hong Kong EFL secondary students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2112587
35.
LiuM. (2017). Adult Chinese as a second language learners’ willingness to communicate in Chinese: Effects of cultural, affective, and linguistic variables. Psychological Reports, 120, 423–442.
36.
MacIntyreP.D. (1992). Anxiety and language learning from a stages of processing perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, Canada. Available at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/2155 (accessed February 2024).
37.
MacIntyreP.D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 564–576.
38.
MacIntyreP.D. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 111–131.
39.
MacIntyreP.D.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589–608.
40.
MacIntyreP.D.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
41.
MahmoodiN.GhafooriN.AminiD. (2013). Exploring the relationship between international posture and willingness to communicate in Iranian EFL context. Life Science Journal, 10, 466–471.
42.
McCroskeyJ.C.RichmondV.P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In McCroskeyJ.C.DalyJ.A. (Eds.), Personal and interpersonal communication (pp. 129–156). Sage.
43.
MizumotoA. (2023). Calculating the relative importance of multiple regression predictor variables using dominance analysis and random forests. Language Learning, 73, 161–196.
44.
Morales GálvezC. (2009). La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en la Unión Europea [Teaching foreign languages in the European Union]. Educación y Futuro: Revista de investigación aplicada y experiencias educativas, 20, 17–30.
45.
MulyonoH.SaskiaR. (2020). Dataset on the effects of self-confidence, motivation and anxiety on Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate in face-to-face and digital settings. Data in Brief, 31, 105774.
46.
MulyonoH.SaskiaR. (2021). Affective variables contributing to Indonesian EFL students’ willingness to communicate within face-to-face and digital environments. Cogent Education, 8, 1911282.
47.
OlsonC.L.KroegerK.R. (2001). Global competency and intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5, 116–137.
48.
OnoH.ZavodnyM. (2007). Digital inequality: Five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36, 1135–1155.
49.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2022). Education at a glance 2022. OECD.
50.
PavelescuL.M. (2023). Emotion, motivation and willingness to communicate in the language learning experience: A comparative case study of two adult ESOL learners. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221146884
51.
SoyoofA. (2022). Iranian EFL students’ perception of willingness to communicate in an extramural digital context. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 5922–5939.
52.
SuY.C. (2018). Assessing Taiwanese college students’ intercultural sensitivity, EFL interests, attitudes toward native English speakers, ethnocentrism, and their interrelation. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27, 217–226.
53.
SundqvistP. (2009). Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. Doctoral dissertation, Karlstad University, Sweden. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:275141/FULLTEXT03.pdf (accessed February 2024).
54.
TabachnickB.G.FidellL.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row.
55.
UuskoskiO. (2011). Playing video games: A waste of time . . . or not?: Exploring the connection between playing video games and English grades. Master’s thesis, Helsingfors Universitet, Finland. Available at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/35037?show=full (accessed February 2024).
56.
WangH.PengA.PattersonM.M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529.
57.
WuJ.F. (2015). Examining Chen and Starosta’s model of intercultural sensitivity in the Taiwanese cultural context. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 7, 1–8.
58.
XiaoY.QiuX. (2022). A study of the relationship between students’ global perspective and willingness to communicate in English at an English medium instruction university in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873766.
59.
YashimaT. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
60.
YashimaT.Zenuk-NishideL.ShimizuK. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54, 119–152.
61.
ZhouL.XiY.LochtmanK. (2023). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: The moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44, 129–143.
62.
ZouW.C.ZhangS.L. (2011). Family background and English learning at compulsory stage in Shanghai. In FengA. (Ed.), English language education across greater China (pp. 189–211). Multilingual Matters.
