Building a complex discourse is not an easy task for second language learners. This study investigates how learners that have French as their first language (L1) and Chinese as a second language (L2) convey the function of referent introduction in narratives. It aims to identify which syntactic constructions are used to highlight new information and relate it to given information at the utterance level, and how learners organize information between utterances to ensure discourse cohesion. The procedure used consists of the analysis of an oral corpus collected from five groups of participants (N = 110): French and Chinese native speakers, and three groups of learners (low, intermediate and advanced levels). The stimulus of the elicited task is a comic strip. The results show that low learners mostly follow the canonical word order, while intermediate learners demonstrate more syntactic diversity but still differ from native speakers at the discourse level. Advanced learners almost achieved native-like proficiency and demonstrated only one difference when compared with the target pattern that lies in the lexical-semantic characteristics of the predicate used.
AleksandrovaT. (2012). Reference to entities in fictional narratives of Russian/French quasi-bilinguals. In WatorekM.BenazzoS.HickmannM. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp. 520–534). Multilingual Matters.
2.
AndornoC. (2012). The cohesive function of word order in L1 and L2 Italian: How VS structures mark local and global coherence in the discourse of native speakers and of learners. In WatorekM.BenazzoS.HickmannM. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp. 535–558). Multilingual Matters.
3.
ArslangulA. (2015). How French learners of Chinese L2 express motion events in narratives. In XuD.FuJ. (Eds.), Space and quantification in languages of China (pp. 165–187). Springer.
4.
ArslangulA.HendriksH.HickmannM.DemagnyA.-C. (2018). L’expression des procès spatiaux causatifs chez les apprenants francophones du chinois: Pousser ou entrer? [The expression of caused motion event in French-speaking learners of Chinese: Pushing or entering?]. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 9, 256–293.
5.
ArslangulA.WatorekM. (2021). Locative phrase and descriptive discourse in L2 Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 10, 155–182.
6.
BirnerB.J. (1996). The discourse function of inversion in English. Routledge.
7.
BirnerB.J.WardG. (2009). Information structure and syntactic structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1167–1187.
8.
BraniganH.P.PickeringM.J.TanakaM. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, 172–189.
9.
BresnanJ. (1994). Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language, 70, 72–131.
10.
CadiernoT. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In RobinsonP.EllisN.C. (Eds.), Handbook in cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239–275). Routledge.
11.
CalliesM. (2009). Information highlighting in advanced learner English. John Benjamins.
12.
CalliesM.KellerW.R. (2008). The teaching and acquisition of focus constructions: An integrated approach to language awareness across the curriculum. Language Awareness, 17, 249–266.
13.
CappeauP.LahousseK. (2015). Le sujet postposé [The postposed subject]. In Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. Available at: http://encyclogram.fr/notx/005/005_Notice.php (accessed August 2023).
14.
CarrollM.LambertM. (2003). Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In DimrothC.StarrenM. (Eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 267–287). John Benjamins.
15.
CarrollM.LambertM. (2006). Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s: French and German learners of English. In ByrnesH.Weger-GuntharpH.SprangK.A. (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (pp. 54–73). Georgetown University Press.
16.
CarrollM.von StutterheimC. (2002). Typology and information organization: Perspective-taking and language-specific effects in the construal of events. In Giacalone-RamatA. (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 365–402). Mouton de Gruyter.
17.
ChiniM. (2002). Ordres marqués et perspective du locuteur en italien L2 [Marked orders and speaker’s perspective in L2 Italian]. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 7, 117–137.
18.
ChiniM. (2005). Reference to person in learner discourse. In HendriksH. (Ed.), The structure of learner varieties (pp. 65–110). De Gruyter Mouton.
19.
ComrieB. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. University of Chicago Press.
20.
ContiV. (2010). La construction en avoir SN qui SV (« J’ai ma copine qui habite à Paris »): Une forme de dispositif clivé ? [The en avoir SN qui SV construction (‘J’ai ma copine qui habite à Paris’)]. Linx, 62–63, 63–87.
21.
CrosthwaiteP.R. (2014). Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: A study of bridging in Mandarin, Korean, and English. Language Learning, 64, 456–492.
22.
CrosthwaiteP.YeungY.BaiX.LuL.BaeY. (2018). Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 625–649.
23.
DanešF. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In DanešF. (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Academia, Mouton.
24.
DonaldsonB. (2012). Syntax and discourse in near-native French: Clefts and focus. Language Learning, 62, 902–930.
25.
EllisN.C.Larsen-FreemanD. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, 90–125.
26.
FangM. (2019). Cóng huàyǔ gōngnéng kàn suǒwèi ‘wúdìng NP zhǔyǔjù’ [On the discourse function of the co-called ‘indefinite-subject sentence’]. Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiàoxué, 33, 189–200.
27.
FleckenM.CarrollM.WeimarK.von StutterheimC. (2015). Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 Users. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 100–122.
28.
FuchsC. (2009). La postposition du sujet nominal: Paramètres linguistiques et effets stylistiques [The postposition of the nominal subject: Linguistic parameters and stylistic effects]. In Fontvieille-CordaniA.ThonnerieuxS. (Eds.), L’ordre des mots à la lecture des textes (pp. 27–44). Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
29.
FuchsC. (2014). Les éléments initiaux dans les énoncés à sujet inversé: Une étude sur corpus [The initial elements in inverted subject utterances: A corpus study]. Corpus, 13, 61–78.
30.
GerwienJ.von StutterheimC. (2022). Conceptual blending across ontological domains: References to time and space in motion events by Tunisian Arabic speakers of L2 German. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 856805.
31.
GivónT. (2001). Syntax: An introduction, Volume II. John Benjamins.
32.
HåkanssonG.PienemannM.SayehliS. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18, 250–273.
33.
HendriksH. (1998). Reference to person and space in narrative discourse: A comparison of adult second language and child first language acquisition. Studi Italiani Di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 1, 67–87.
34.
HendriksH.HickmannM. (2015). Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary crossing by English learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 14–31.
35.
HertelT.J. (2003). Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research, 19, 273–304.
36.
HuangC.R.ShiD.X. (2016). A reference grammar of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
37.
HuoM.J. (2021). Xiàndài Hànyǔ yǐnxiàn gòushì de rènzhī yǔfǎ yánjiū [The fugitive construction in modern Chinese: A cognitive grammar approach]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Xīnán Dàxué, Chongqing, China.
38.
HuumoT. (2003). Incremental existence: The world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics, 41, 461–493.
39.
KleinW.PerdueC. (1993). Utterance structure. In PerdueC. (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives, Volume II: The results (pp. 3–40). Cambridge University Press.
40.
KurodaS.Y. (1973). Le jugement catégorique et le jugement thétique: Exemples tirés de la syntaxe japonaise [Categorical judgment and thetic judgment: Examples from Japanese syntax]. Langages, 30, 81–110.
41.
LahousseK. (2006). NP subject inversion in French: Two types, two configurations. Lingua, 116, 424–461.
42.
LambertM.LenartE. (2004). Incidence des langues sur le développement de la cohésion en L1 et en L2: Gestion du statut des entités dans une tâche de récit [Impact of languages on the development of cohesion in L1 and L2: Management of the entities’ status in a narrative task]. Langages, 155, 14–32.
43.
LambertM.von StutterheimC.CarrollM.GerwienJ. (2022). Under the surface. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 13, 1–28.
44.
LambrechtK. (1988). Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In HaimanJ.ThompsonS.A. (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 135–179). John Benjamins.
45.
LambrechtK. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.
46.
LambrechtK. (2000). Prédicative seconde et structure informationnelle: La relative de perception comme construction présentative [Second predicative and informational structure: The relative of perception as a presentative construction]. Langue Française, 127, 49–66.
47.
LenaL. (2020). Referent introducing strategies in advanced L2 usage: A bi-directional study on French learners of Chinese and Chinese learners of French. In RyanJ.CrosthwaiteP. (Eds.), Referring in a second language: Studies on reference to person in a multilingual world (pp. 164–183). Routledge.
48.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
49.
LevinB.Rappaport-HovavM. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. MIT Press.
50.
LiC.N.ThompsonS.A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
51.
LiP.BatesE.MacWhinneyB. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169–192.
52.
LiT. (2010). Yǔpiān shìjiǎo xià de Hànyǔ cúnxiànjù yánjiū [Study on existential sentences in Chinese from a discourse perspective]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Huádōng Shīfàn Dàxué, Shanghai, China.
53.
LiuA.C. (2003). ‘Yī gè’ de yòngfǎ yánjiū [A study on the usage of ‘a’]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Zhōngguó Shèhuì Kēxué Yuàn, Beijing, China.
54.
LiuQ. (2014). Jùfǎ yǔ yǔpiān: Hànyǔ xùshì zhōng shítǐ shǒuxiàn de guīlǜ yǔ wúdìng gòushì de chéngyīn fēnxī [Syntactic and discourse: Rules of entity first-mention and cause analysis on indefinite construction in Chinese FIS discourse]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Huázhōng Shīfàn Dàxué, Wuhan, China.
LozanoC.CalliesM. (2018). Word order and information structure in advanced SLA. In MalovrhP.A.BenatiA.G. (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 419–441). Wiley Blackwell.
57.
LuY.Q.LeeT.H. (2020). Hànyǔ fēibīngé yǔ fēizuògé dòngcí de jùfǎ jí yǔyì jièdìng biāozhǔn [Syntactic and semantic criteria for unaccusative and unergative verbs in Mandarin Chinese]. Dāngdài Yǔyánxué, 22, 475–502.
58.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
NakahamaY. (2009). Cross-linguistic influence on referent introduction and tracking in Japanese as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 93, 241–260.
60.
OshitaH. (2001). The unaccusative trap in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 279–304.
61.
PanW. (2003). Xiàndài Hànyǔ cúnxiànjù yánjiū [On existence constructions in Chinese]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fùdàn Dàxué, Shanghai, China.
62.
PanW.YanJ.R. (2007). Lùn xiàndài Hànyǔ cúnxiànjù de yǔyòng fēnlèi [On pragmatic classification of existential sentences in modern Chinese]. Wénxué Yǔyánxué Yánjiū, 1, 209–213.
63.
ParteeB.H.BorschevV. (2007). Existential sentences, BE, and the genitive of negation in Russian. In ComorovskiI.von HeusingerK. (Eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (pp. 147–190). Springer.
64.
PaulW.LuY.LeeT.H.T. (2020). Existential and locative constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Review, 37, 231–267.
65.
PienemannM. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
66.
PienemannM. (Ed.). (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
67.
RyanJ. (2016). Introducing referents for recognition: L2 pragmatic competence and miscommunication. Journal of Pragmatics, 97, 55–73.
68.
RyanJ.CrosthwaiteP. (2020). Referring in a second language: Studies on reference to person in a multilingual world. Routledge.
69.
SasseH. (1987). The thetic/categorial distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511–580.
70.
SharpenR. (2016). L1 conceptual transfer in the acquisition of L2 motion events in Spanish and English: The thinking-for-speaking hypothesis. Open Linguistics, 2, 235–252.
71.
ShuaiZ.S. (2017). Cóng cíhuì-gòushì fànshì kàn Hànyǔ cúnxiànjù de fēnlèi hé fànwéi [The classification and category of Chinese existential sentences: A lexical-construction account]. Yǔyán Jiàoxué Yǔ Yánjiū, 3, 81–91.
72.
SlobinD. (2012). Child language study and adult language acquisition: Twenty years later. In WatorekM.BenazzoS.HickmannM. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition: A tribute to Clive Perdue (pp. 245–262). Multilingual Matters.
73.
SoraceA. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Acquisition, 9, 22–47.
74.
SoraceA. (1995). Contraintes sémantiques sur la syntaxe: L’acquisition de l’inaccusativité en italien L2 [Semantic constraints on syntax: Accusativity acquisition in L2 Italian]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 5, 79–113.
75.
StefanowitschA.GriesS.Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209–243.
76.
TalmyL. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume II: Typology and process in concept structuring. MIT Press.
77.
TeixeiraJ. (2016). Locative inversion and stage topics: A cross-linguistic study. Discours, 19, 9229.
78.
TomitaN. (2013). Strategies for linking information by German and Japanese native speakers and by German learners of Japanese. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51, 117–149.
79.
TurcoG. (2008). Introduction et identification d’un référent chez les apprenants francophones de l’italien L2 [Introduction and identification of a referent among French-speaking learners of Italian L2]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 26, 211–237.
80.
von StutterheimC.CarrollM. (2018). Texts as answers to questions: Information structure and its grammatical underpinnings in narratives and descriptions in German and English (topic and anaphoric linkage). In HüblA.SteinbachM. (Eds.), Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages (pp. 67–92). John Benjamins.
81.
von StutterheimC.KleinW. (1989). Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In DietrichR.GraumannC.F. (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 39–76). Elsevier.
82.
von StutterheimC.KleinW. (2002). Quaestio and L-perspectivation. In GraumannC.F.KallmeyerW. (Eds.), Perspective and perspectivation in discourse (pp. 59–88). John Benjamins.
83.
WangG.C. (2013). Hànyǔ wúdìng míngcí duǎnyǔ de yǔyì hé jùfǎ [The semantic and syntax of Chinese indefinite NPs]. Běijīng Dàxué Chūbǎnshè.
84.
WardG.BirnerB. (2004). Information structure and non-canonical syntax. In HornL.R.WardG. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 153–174). Blackwell.
85.
WuS.-L. (2014). Influence of L1 thinking for speaking on use of an L2: The case of path expressions by English-speaking learners of Chinese. In HanZ.H. (Ed.), Studies in second language acquisition of Chinese (pp. 1–29). Multilingual Matters.
86.
WuS.-L.NunomeT.WangJ. (2022). Crosslinguistic influence in the conceptualization of motion events: A synthesis study on L2 acquisition of Chinese motion expressions. Second Language Research. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221132205
87.
WuX.Y. (2006). Xiàndài Hànyǔ cúnxiànjù [Existential sentences in modern Chinese]. Xuélín Chūbǎnshè.
88.
XuL.J. (1995). Definiteness effects on Chinese word order. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 24, 29–48.
89.
XuY.C. (2015). ‘Yǒu + NP + VP’ jiégòu kǎochá [On the construction of ‘You + NP + VP’]. Yǔyán Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū, 2, 45–53.
90.
XuanH.D. (2011). Xiàndài Hànyǔ yǐnxiànjù yánjiū [A study on fugitive sentence in modern Chinese]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ānhuī Dàxué, Hefei, China.
91.
XuanH.D. (2016). Yǐnxiànjù de yǔtǐ chàyì kǎochá [An investigation on stylistic differences of fugitive sentence]. Héféi Shīfàn Xuéyuàn Xuébào, 34, 77–82.
92.
XueC.M. (2005). Yīngyǔ mǔyǔzhě duì Hànyǔ fēibīngé dòngcí de dì’èr yǔyán xídé yánjiū: Jiǎnyàn ‘fēibīngé xiànjǐng jiǎshè’ [L2 acquisition of Chinese unaccusative verbs by English-speaking learners: Testing on unaccusative trap hypothesis]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Guǎngdōng Wàiyǔ Wàimào Dàxué, Guangzhou, China.
93.
YangA.Q.ChenA.J. (2014). Prosodic focus marking in child and adult Mandarin Chinese. In The 4th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (pp. 54–58).
94.
YangS.Y.HuangY.Y.GaoL.Q.CuiX.L. (2007). Hànyǔ zuòwéi dì’èr yǔyán cúnxiànjù xídé yánjiū [The L2 acquisition of the Chinese existential constructions]. Hànyǔ Xuéxí, 1, 59–70.
95.
YuanB.P. (1999). Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction in a second language: Evidence from English-speaking learners of L2 Chinese. Linguistics, 37, 275–296.
96.
ZhangB.J. (2009). Cóng shī shòu guānxì dào jùshì yǔyì [From the relationship between agent and patient to sentence semantics]. Shāngwù Yìnshūguǎn.
97.
ZhangH.L.PanH.H. (2019). Hànyǔ jùwěi xìnxī jiāodiǎn yǔ zhòngyīn shíxiàn [Sentence-final information focus in Chinese and nuclear stress]. Dāngdài Yǔyánxué, 21, 23–42.
98.
ZhangJ. (2011). L2 acquisition of Chinese locative inversion. In Jing-SchmidtZ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-23), 1, University of Oregon, Eugene (pp. 250–261). NACCL Proceedings Online.
99.
ZhangX.L.FanX. (2010). Xiàndài Hànyǔ cúnzàijù yánjiū [Existential sentences in modern Chinese]. Zhōngguó Shèhuì Kēxué Chūbǎnshè.
100.
ZhouS.H.ShenL. (2016). Hànyǔ zhōng de ‘wúdìng NP zhǔyǔjù’ jí xiāngguān de ‘yǒu’ zì chéngxiànjù [The sentence with an unidentifiable NP subject and its relevant ‘you’ complex presentative relative construction]. Lìyún Yǔyán Xuékān, 3, 105–120.
101.
ZhuY.S. (1995). Zhǔwèi tuījìn móshì yǔ yǔpiān fēnxī [Patterns of thematic progression and text analysis]. Wàiyǔ Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū, 3, 6–12.
