Children make use of various information in linguistic input to learn verbs, including syntactic distribution and semantic features. Within the intransitive verb class, unaccusative and unergative verbs differ in distribution with respect to word order as well as in semantic features such as telicity. Both the distributional and semantic information might act as cues for learning the two types of verbs. In this study, we investigate how Mandarin-speaking toddlers make use of these input cues to learn the unaccusative-unergative distinction. In verb learning experiments using the visual fixation procedure, 31-month-old toddlers were taught two novel verb items (VUA and VUE) and then tested on whether they were able to distinguish them. Results show that participants learned the difference between the two novel verbs based on the word-order cue and the telicity cue separately, but not simultaneously. Our findings provide evidence for toddlers’ ability to employ distributional and semantic information in the input during verb learning, shedding light on the learning mechanisms of verb argument structure.
AkhtarN.TomaselloM. (1997). Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 952–965.
2.
AmbridgeB.BarakL.WonnacottE.BannardC.SalaG. (2018). Effects of both preemption and entrenchment in the retreat from verb overgeneralization errors: Four reanalyses, an extended replication, and a meta-analytic synthesis. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.133
3.
AmbridgeB.PineJ. M.RowlandC. F.YoungC. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1), 87–129.
4.
BabyonyshevM.GangerJ.PesetskyD.WexlerK. (2001). The maturation of grammatical principles: evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), 1–44.
5.
BakerC. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(4), 533–581.
6.
BeckerM.SchaefferJ. (2013). Animacy, argument structure and unaccusatives in child English. In BeckerM.GrinsteadJ.RothmanJ. (Eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams (pp. 13–54). John Benjamins Publishing.
7.
BehrendD. A.HarrisL. L.CartwrightK. B. (1995). Morphological cues to verb meaning: Verb inflections and the initial mapping of verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 22, 89–106.
8.
BowermanM.CroftW. (2008). The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In BowermanM.BrownP. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 279–308). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
BraineM. (1971). On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In SlobinD. (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar: A theoretical symposium (pp. 153–186). Academic Press.
10.
BraineM.BrodyR. E.FischS. M.WeisbergerM. J.BlumM. (1990). Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure?Journal of Child Language, 17(02), 313–342.
11.
BrooksP. J.TomaselloM. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75(4), 720–738.
12.
BurzioL. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
13.
CandanA.KüntayA. C.YehY.CheungH.WagnerL.NaiglesL. R. (2012). Language and age effects in children’s processing of word order. Cognitive Development, 27(3), 205–221.
14.
ChildersJ. B.TomaselloM. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 739.
15.
ChomskyN. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.
16.
FriedmannN.CostaJ. (2011). Acquisition of SV and VS order in Hebrew, European Portuguese, Palestinian Arabic, and Spanish. Language Acquisition, 18(1), 1–38.
17.
GervainJ.NesporM.MazukaR.HorieR.MehlerJ. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57(1), 56–74.
18.
GómezR. L.LakustaL. (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7(5), 567–580.
19.
GonzalesK.GerkenL.GómezR. L. (2018). How who is talking matters as much as what they say to infant language learners. Cognitive Psychology, 106, 1–20.
20.
GropenJ.PinkerS.HollanderM.GoldbergR. (1991). Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41(1–3), 153–195.
21.
HeA. X. (2015). Verb learning under guidance [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland].
22.
HsuD. B. (2018). Children’s syntactic representation of the transitive constructions in Mandarin Chinese. PLoS One, 13(11), e0206788.
23.
HuangC.-T. J. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in) definiteness. In ReulandE.terMeulenA. (Eds.), The representation of (in) definiteness (pp. 226–253). The MIT Press.
24.
KoulaguinaE.ShiR. (2019). Rule generalization from inconsistent input in early infancy. Language Acquisition, 26(4), 416–435.
25.
LevinB.Rappaport HovavM. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Vol. 26). The MIT Press.
26.
Lew-WilliamsC.PelucchiB.SaffranJ. R. (2011). Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1323–1329.
27.
LidzJ.GagliardiA. (2015). How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 333–353.
28.
LidzJ.GleitmanH.GleitmanL. (2003). Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition, 87(3), 151–178.
29.
LuY. (2019). The acquisition of unaccusativity in Mandarin Chinese [Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong].
30.
LuY.LeeT. H. (2020). Hanyu feibinge yu feizuoge dongci de jufa ji yuyi jieding biaozhun [Syntactic and semantic criteria for unaccusative and unergative verbs in Mandarin Chinese]. Dangdai Yuyanxue[Contemporary Linguistics], 22(4), 475–502.
31.
MacWhinneyB. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883–914.
PanH.HanJ. (2008). Hanyu baoliu binyu jiegou de jufa shengcheng jizhi [The syntactic generative mechanism of the retained object construction in Mandarin]. Zhongguo Yuwen[Studies of the Chinese Language], 6, 511–522.
34.
PennerZ.SchulzP.WymannK. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language-impaired from normally developing children?Linguistics, 41(2), 289–319.
35.
PerlmutterD. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In JaegerJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics (pp. 157–189). University of California Press.
36.
PinkerS. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.
37.
PinkerS. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. The MIT Press.
38.
RandallJ.van HoutA.WeissenbornJ.BaayenH. (2004). Acquiring unaccusativitity: A cross-linguistic look. In AlexiadouA.AnagnostopoulouE.EveraertM. (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 332–370). Oxford University Press.
39.
SanoT.EndoM.YamakoshiK. (2001). Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In DoA. H.-J.DomínguezL.JohansenA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on language sevelopment (pp. 668–683). Cascadilla Press.
40.
SaffranJ. R.AslinR. N.NewportE. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.
41.
SaxtonM. (2010). Child language: Acquistion and development. Sage Publications.
42.
ShiR.EmondE. (2023). The threshold of rule productivity in infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1251124.
SnyderW.HyamsN.CrismaP. (1995). Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: Evidence for early knowledge of unaccusativity. In ClarkE. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th annual child language research forum (pp. 127–136). CSLI, Stanford University.
45.
Van ValinR.Jr. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, 66(2), 221–260.
46.
VerniceM.GuastiM. T. (2015). The acquisition of SV order in unaccusatives: manipulating the definiteness of the NP argument. Journal of Child Language, 42(1), 210–237.
47.
WagnerL. (2010). Inferring meaning from syntactic structures in acquisition: The case of transitivity and telicity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(10), 1354–1379.
48.
WangZ.YangX.ShiR. (2024). Mandarin-learning 19-month-old toddlers’ sensitivity to word order cues that differentiate unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 51(2), 249–270.
49.
YangC. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. The MIT Press.
50.
YangS. (1999). Cong feibinge dongci xianxiang kan yuyi yu jufa jiegou zhijian de guanxi [The unaccusative phenomenon – A study on the relationship between syntax and semantics]. Dangdai Yuyanxue[Contemporary Linguistics], 1, 30–43.
51.
ZaenenA. (1988). Unaccusative verbs in Dutch and the syntax-semantics interface. In CSLI reports (pp. 88–123). CSLI, Stanford University.
52.
ZhuJ.FranckJ.RizziL.GavarróA. (2021). Do infants have abstract grammatical knowledge of word order at 17 months? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 49(1), 60–79.
