The issue of assessment in Malaysian international schools has rarely been explored. This qualitative study focuses on the views of three groups of stakeholders regarding the English language assessment of young learners in one such school. Primary-age children, their parents, and their teachers were interviewed online in iterative sessions for their experiences and views on language assessment as it was practised in the school. Thematic analysis of the data revealed how the children suffered from test anxiety; they believed the exams were difficult; and the teachers were seen as strict examiners. The parents agreed that the exams were unfairly difficult; they complained about a lack of transparency and feedback, besides excessive test frequency. The teachers believed they assessed both formatively and summatively; however, administratively their formative assessment results formed no part in students’ final assessment reports. The assessment practices in this case, and likely more widely in Malaysia, need reconsideration and point to a broad paradox.
Al-QahtaniZ.ZumorA.W. (2016). Saudi parents’ attitudes towards using English as a medium of instruction in private primary schools. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5, 18–32.
2.
AnJ.MurphyV. (2018). English as a medium of instruction in primary schools in South America: A review of the evidence. Report. Oxford University Press.
3.
ArkseyH.KnightP. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. Sage.
4.
ArslanR.S.Üçok-AtasoyM. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment of young learners of English: Does practice match the policy?International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7, 468–484. Available at: https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/818 (accessed January 2023).
5.
AsiriR.H.A. (2019). Effect of using English as medium of instruction in primary international school on the children’s first language and cultural identity. Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 15–25.
6.
AzizM.N.A.YusoffN.M. (2018). Experiences of using authentic assessment with English language young learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8, 375–384.
7.
BerryR. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong University Press.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
9.
BunnellT. (2014). The changing landscape of international schooling: Implications for theory and practice. Routledge.
10.
BunnellT.FertigM.JamesC. (2016). What is international about international schools? An institutional legitimacy perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 42, 408–423.
11.
ButlerY.G.ZengW. (2014). Young foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11, 45–75.
12.
CarterM.MertinP.PorterS. (2018). Second language learners in international schools. Trentham Books.
13.
CameronL. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.
14.
ChappuisS.CommodoreC.StigginsR. (2016). Balanced assessment systems: Leadership, quality, and the role of classroom assessment. Corwin.
15.
Ch’ngL.C. (2013). English language assessment in Malaysia: Teachers’ practices in test preparation. Issues in Language Studies, 2, 24–39.
16.
CortazziM.JinL. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In ColemanH. (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–208). Cambridge University Press.
17.
CortazziM.JinL. (2007) Narrative learning, EAL and metacognitive development. Early Child Development and Care, 177, 645–660.
18.
CortazziM.JinL. (2020). Quality questions: Researching through interviewing. Journal of Language and Communication, 7, 1–27.
19.
CortazziM.PilcherN.JinL. (2011). Language choices and ‘blind shadows’: Investigating interviews with Chinese participants. Qualitative Research, 11, 505–535.
20.
Cox-PetersenA.OlsonJ.K. (2007). Alternate assessments for English-language learners. Science and Children, 44, 46–48.
21.
CreswellJ.W.PothC.N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
22.
DeardenJ. (2018). The Changing Roles of EMI Academics and English Language Specialists. In KırkgözY.DikilitaşK. (Eds.), Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes in Higher Education. English Language Education: Volume 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_18
EllenS. (2012). Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and children’s voices. Childhood, 20, 66–81.
27.
ErnawatiE.SofendiS.SilvhianyS. (2021). English as a medium of instruction (EMI): A primary school teachers’ and students’ perceptions. International Journal of Research in Counselling, 5, 24–32.
28.
FaulknerS.L.TrotterS.P. (2017). Data saturation. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley.
29.
FulmerG.W.LeeI.C.H.TanK.H.K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: An integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 475–494.
30.
GartonS.CoplandF., (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. Routledge.
31.
GartonS.CoplandBurnsA. (2013). A global study of primary English teachers’ qualifications, training and career development. In Ed SheehanS. (Ed.), British Council ELT research papers: Volume 1 (pp. 35–67). British Council.
32.
GiannikasC.N. (2022). Squaring the circle of alternative assessment in distance language education: A focus on the young learner. Languages, 7, 121.
GubaE.G.LincolnY.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). 3rd edition.Sage.
35.
HaidarS. (2017). Access to English in Pakistan: Inculcating prestige and leadership through instruction in elite schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 833–848.
36.
HasselgreenA. (2005). Assessing the language of young learners. Language Testing, 22, 337–354.
37.
HsiehC.N. (2016). Examining content representativeness of a young learner language assessment: EFL teachers’ perspectives. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 93–107). Springer.
38.
HughesA. (2003). Testing for language teachers. 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
39.
Ioannou-GeorgiouS.PavlouP. (2003). Assessing young learners. Oxford University Press.
40.
JinL.SmithK.Yahya, et al. (2013). Perceptions and strategies of learning in English by Singapore primary school children with dyslexia: A metaphor analysis. In SheehanS. (Ed.), British Council ELT research papers: Volume 1 (pp. 13–34). British Council.
41.
JinL.ZhouJ.HuX.Y., et al. (2016). Researching attitudes and perceived experiences of English learning by kindergarten children and their parents in China. The British Council Research Papers. British Council.
42.
KirkpatrickA.WangL. (2021). Is English an Asian language?Cambridge University Press.
43.
LiuJ.LiX. (2020). Assessing young English learners: Language assessment literacy of Chinese primary school English teachers. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2, 36–50.
44.
MacaroE. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.
45.
MajidF.A. (2011). School-based assessment in Malaysian schools: The concerns of the English teachers. US-China Education Review B, 3, 393–402. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED524802 (accessed January 2023).
46.
MalakolunthuS.HoonS.K. (2010). Teacher perspectives of school-based assessment in a secondary school in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1170–1176.
McIntoshS.HaydenM. (2022). Disrupting conventional concepts of parental engagement: Insights from international schools. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17, 51–70.
49.
McKayP. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.
50.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013–2015 (pre-school to post-secondary). Ministry of Education, Malaysia.
51.
NikolovM. (2016a). Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. Springer.
52.
NikolovM. (2016b). Trends, issues, and challenges in assessing young language learners. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1–17). Springer.
53.
NikolovM.Timpe-LaughlinV. (2021). Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. Language Teaching, 54, 1–37.
54.
NimehchisalemV.FooE.S.K.NowrouziS. (2019). English as a second language learners and teachers’ conceptions of language assessment. Asia TEFL Journal, 16, 1348–1359.
55.
NimehchisalemV.Mat HussinN.I.S. (2018). Postgraduate students’ conception of language assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 8, 1–14.
56.
NjieB.AsimiranS. (2018). A review of the philosophy of international education in an international school setting. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 8, 25–32.
57.
NowellL.S.NorrisJ.M.WhiteD.E.MoulesN.J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1).
58.
PanaderoE.BrownG.T.StrijbosJ.W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 803–830.
59.
PappS. (2019). Assessment of young English language learners. In GartonS.CoplandF. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 389–407). Routledge.
60.
PappS.WalczakA. (2016). The development and validation of a computer-based test of English for young learners: Cambridge English young learners. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 139–190). Springer.
61.
PattonM.Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2nd edition.Sage.
62.
PolkinghorneD.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137–145.
63.
PooleA. (2019). International education teachers’ experience as an educational precariat in China. Journal of Research in International Education, 18, 60–76.
64.
Proši-SantovicD.NavratilA. (2019). Assessment of very young learners of English and the joy of puppetry: A multiple case study. In Proši-SantovicD.RixonS. (Eds.), Integrating assessment into early language learning and teaching (pp. 170–187). Multilingual Matters.
65.
PunJ.K.H.ThomasN. (2020). English medium instruction: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. ELT Journal, 74, 247–257.
66.
Rea-DickinsP.RixonS. (1999). Assessment of young learners: Reasons and means. In RixonS. (Ed.), Young learners of English: Some research perspectives (pp. 89–101). Pearson Education.
67.
RegierN. (2012). Book three: Summative assessment: 50 ways to gather evidence of student learning. Regier Educational Resources.
68.
ResnikJ. (2012). International education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22, 285–289.
69.
RoseG. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
70.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th edition.Sage.
71.
SchneiderE.W. (2020). English around the World: An introduction. 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
StigginsR.J.ArterJ.A.ChappuisJ.ChappuisS. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well. Assessment Training Institute.
74.
SuL.I.W.WeirC.WuJ.R.W. (Eds.). (2020). English language proficiency testing in Asia: New paradigms bridging global and local contexts. Routledge.
75.
TrillingB.FadelC. (2012). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley.
