BaeJ.LeeL. (2012). Evaluating the development of children’s writing ability in an EFL context, Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(4), 348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.721424
2.
BaronP. A.PapageorgiouS. (2014). Mapping the TOEFL® Primary™ Test onto the Common European Framework of Reference (TOEFL Research Memorandum ETS RM 14-05). Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-14-05.pdf
3.
BenignoV.de JongJ. (2016). The “Global Scale of English Learning Objectives for Young Learners”: A CEFR-Based Inventory of Descriptors. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. Educational Linguistics, Vol. 25. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_3
4.
BenignoV.de JongJ. (2017). Developing the Global Scale of English Vocabulary for Young Learners (6 to 11). Pearson.
5.
ButlerY. G.LeeJ. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370
ChoY.SoY. (2014). Construct-irrelevant factors influencing young English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ perceptions of test task difficulty. ETS Research Memorandum (RM-14-04). Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/s/research/pdf/RM-14-04.pdf
9.
CrusanD.PlakansL.GebrilA. (2016). Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Assessing Writing, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.03.001
10.
CurtainH. (2009). Assessment of early learning of foreign languages in the USA. In NikolovM. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 60–82). Mouton de Gruyter.
EdelenbosP.VinjéM. P. (2000). The assessment of a foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education. Language Testing, 17(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700203
GalikyanI.MadyarovI.GasparyanR. (2019). Student Test Takers’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the TOEFL Junior® Standard Test. (Research Report No. RR-19-29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12264
15.
GattulloF. (2000). Formative assessment in primary (elementary) ELT classes: An Italian case study. Language Testing, 17(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700210
16.
HabókA.MagyarA. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
17.
HasselgrenA. (2000). The assessment of the English ability of young learners in Norwegian schools: An innovative approach. Language Testing, 17(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700209
HasselgreenA.CaudwellG. (2016). Assessing the language of young learners. Equinox.
21.
HasselgreenA.SundetK.T. (2017). Introducing the CORYL Corpus: What it is and how we can use it to shed light on learner language. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies,7, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v7i0.1107
22.
HuangB. H.ButlerY. G. (Eds.). (2020). Validity considerations for assessing language proficiency in young language minority students [Special Issue]. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(5).
23.
HsiehC.IonescuM.HoT. (2017). Out of many, one: Challenges in teaching multilingual Kenyan primary students in English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1378670
24.
JiangJ.BiP.LiuH. (2019). Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
25.
JohnstoneR. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700202
26.
JohnstoneR. (2009). An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? In EneverJ.MoonJ.RamanU. (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: international perspectives (pp. 31–42). Garnet Education Publishing.
27.
Kondo-BrownK. (2004). Investigating interviewer-candidate interactions during oral interviews for child L2 learners. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02426.x
28.
KormosJ.BrunfautT.MichelM. (2020). Motivational factors in computer-administered integrated skills tasks: A Study of young learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1664551
29.
LanC.FanS. (2019). Developing classroom-based language assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.003
30.
McKayP. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.
31.
NikolovM. (2016). A framework for young EFL learners’ diagnostic assessment: ‘Can do’ statements and task types. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 65–92). Springer.
32.
NikolovM.DjigunovićJ. M. (2011). All shades of every color: An over-view of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000183
PappS.SalamouraA. (2009). An exploratory study into linking young learners’ examinations to the CEFR. (Research Notes 37, pp. 15–22). Cambridge ESOL.
35.
PappS.WalczakA. (2016). The development and validation of a computer-based test of English for young learners: Cambridge English young learners. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 139–190). Springer.
36.
PižornK. (2009). Designing proficiency levels for English for primary and secondary school students and the impact of the CEFR. In FiguerasN.NoijonsJ. (Eds.), Linking to the CEFR levels: Research perspectives. (pp. 87–102). Cito.
37.
PillJ.HardingL. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337
38.
PinterA. (2017). Teaching young language learners. Oxford University Press.
39.
Rea-DickinsP. (Ed.). (2000a). Assessment in early years language learning contexts [Special Issue]. Language Testing, 17(2).
Rea-DickinsP.GardnerS. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700206
42.
Rea-DickinsP.RixonS. (1997). The assessment of young learners of English as a foreign language. In ClaphamC.CorsonD. (Eds.), The Encyclopaedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language Testing (pp. 151–161). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
SundhS. (2016). A corpus of young learners’ English in the Baltic region – texts for studies on sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0018
TaylorL. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice, and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
48.
VogtK.TsagariD. (2014) Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
49.
WinkeP.LeeS.AhnJ. I.ChoiI.CuiY.YoonH.-J. (2018). The cognitive validity of child English language tests: What young language learners and their native speaking peers can reveal. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.396
50.
ZanglR. (2000). Monitoring language skills in Austrian primary (elementary) schools: A case study. Language Testing, 17(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700208
