The present study investigated whether a distinct link exists between attention-shift, foreign language anxiety (FLA) and both a subjective and an objective measure of oral fluency. Participants were 34 French first language (L1) English second language (L2) speakers. Oral production data were collected through a picture-cued narration task and analysed using both oral fluency measures. We used a measure of attention-shift capacity and a measure of FLA. Results first show strong correlations between both fluency measures. Additionally, both measures of fluency were negatively correlated with FLA and attention-shift. However, multiple regression analyses indicated that only the subjective measure was explained by both attention-shift capacity and FLA, the objective one only being explained by FLA. The results suggest that subjective measures, while highly correlated with objective ones, may detect qualities of oral fluency not detected by objective measures.
ArbuthnottK.FrankJ. (2000). Trail Making Test, part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 518–528.
2.
AtkinsonT.M.RyanJ.P. (2008). The use of variants of the Trail Making Test in serial assessment: A construct validity study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 42–53.
3.
Baker–SmemoeW.DeweyD. P.BownJ.MartinsenR. A. (2014). Does measuring L2 utterance fluency equal measuring overall L2 proficiency? Evidence from five languages. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 707–728.
4.
BarrettL.F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1833.
5.
BaumannN.KuhlJ. (2005). Positive affect and flexibility: Overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 123–134.
6.
BiberD.ConradS.ReppenR. (2006). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. 5th edition.Cambridge University Press.
7.
BielakJ. (2022). To what extent are foreign language anxiety and foreign language enjoyment related to L2 fluency? An investigation of task-specific emotions and breakdown and speed fluency in an oral task. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2022. DOI: 10.1177/13621688221079319
8.
BrindleyG. (1998). Describing language development? Rating scales and second language acquisition. In BachmanL.F.CohenA.D. (Eds.), Interfaces between SLA and language testing research (pp. 112–114). Cambridge University Press.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. 2nd edition.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CorriganJ.HinkeldeyN. (1987). Relationships between part A and part B of the Trail Making Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 402–409.
11.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
12.
CrookesG. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. BasicBooks.
14.
DamasioA.R. (2012). L’autre moi-même [The other me]. Odile Jacob.
15.
de BotK. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
16.
de BotK.BátyiS. (2022). Bilingual models of speaking. In DerwingT.MunroM.ThompsonD. (Eds.), Routledge handbook on second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 9–23). Routledge.
17.
de JongN.H. (2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15, 237–254.
18.
de JongN.H.BoskerH.R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In
EklundR. (Ed.), Proceedings of disfluency in spontaneous speech, DiSS 2013 (pp. 17–20). Royal Institute of Technology.
19.
de JongN.PerfettiC.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.
20.
de JongN. H.SteinelM. P.FlorijnA.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 893–916.
21.
DeKeyserP.Larson-HallJ. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In KrollJ.F.de GrootA.M.B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford University Press.
22.
DerwingT.M. (2017). L2 fluency development. In LoewenS.SatoM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 246–259). Routledge.
23.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2002). Individual differences in L2 fluency: The effect of neurobiological correlates. In CookV. (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 221–249). Multilingual Matters.
24.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274.
25.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 349–385.
26.
DuijmK.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ. H. (2018). Professional and non-professional raters’ responsiveness to fluency and accuracy in L2 speech: An experimental approach. Language Testing, 35, 501–527.
27.
EllisR. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20.
28.
EysenckM.W. (1979). Anxiety, learning and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 363–385.
29.
FosterP. (2013). Fluency. In ChapelleC. (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
30.
FosterP. (2020). Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, 53, 446–461.
31.
FosterP.SkehanP. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323.
32.
FredricksonB.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
33.
FredricksonB.L. (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91, 330–335.
34.
FredricksonB.L. (2006). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In CsikszentmihalyiM.SelegaI. (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 85–103). Oxford University Press.
35.
FredricksonB. L. (2013). Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist, 68(9), 814–822.
36.
FredricksonB.L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332.
37.
FreedB. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes and ears of the beholder? In RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243–265). University of Michigan Press.
38.
FreedB.SegalowitzN.DeweyD. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301.
39.
FulcherG. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13, 208–238.
40.
FulcherG. (1997). The testing of speaking in a second language. In ClaphamC.CorsonD. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language education: Volume 7: Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 75–85). Kluwer Academic.
41.
GardnerR.C.MacIntyreP.D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43, 157–194.
42.
GigerenzerG. (2007). Gut feelings. Penguin.
43.
GintherA.DimovaS.YangR. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27, 379–399.
44.
GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ.M. (2017). New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications. Multilingual Matters.
45.
HatchE.LazaratonA. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Heinle & Heinle.
46.
HiltonH. (2008). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning, 36, 153–166.
47.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
48.
HuhtaA.KallioH.OhranenS.UllakonojaR. (2019). Fluency in language assessment. In LintunenP.MuttaM.PeltonenP. (Eds.), Fluency in L2 learning and use (pp. 129–145). Multilingual Matters.
49.
IzumiS. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale for the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 2, 168–196.
50.
KaponenM.RiggenbachH. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5–24). University of Michigan Press.
51.
KleinmannH.H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 93–107.
52.
KormosJ. (1999). The effect of speaker variables on the self-correction behaviour of L2 learners. System, 27, 207–221.
53.
KormosJ. (2000a). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 343–384.
54.
KormosJ. (2000b). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 145–167.
55.
KormosJ. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
KormosJ.DénesM. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.
57.
KormosJ.PréfontaineY. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching, 21, 699–716.
58.
Larson-HallJ. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge.
59.
LennonP. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.
60.
LennonP. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In
RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 25–42). University of Michigan Press.
61.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
62.
LeveltW.J.M. (1999). Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In BrownC.HagoortP. (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford University Press.
63.
MacIntyreP.D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In YoungD.J. (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language teaching: A practical guide to creating a low anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 24–45). McGraw-Hill.
64.
MacIntyreP.D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ.-M. (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research, and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Multilingual Matters.
65.
MacIntyreP.D.DörnyeiZ.ClementR.NoelsA. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
66.
MacIntyreP.D.GardnerR.C. (1991a). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513–534.
67.
MacIntyreP.D.GardnerR.C. (1991b). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41, 85–117.
68.
MacIntyreP.D.GregersenT.MercerS. (2016). Positive psychology in SLA. Multilingual Matters.
69.
MeinhardtJ.PekrunR. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 477–500.
70.
NorthB. (1997). The development of a common framework scale or descriptors of language proficiency based on a theory of measurement. In HuhtaA.KohonenV.Kurki-SuonioL.LuomaS. (Eds.), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment (pp. 423–447). University of Jyväskylä.
71.
NorthB. (2003). Scales for rating language performance: Descriptive models, formulation styles, and presentation formats. TOEFL Monograph 24. Educational Testing Services.
72.
NorthB. (2014). The CEFR in practice. Cambridge University Press.
73.
O’ConnorB.P. (1998). SIMPLE: All-in-one programs for exploring interactions in moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 836–840.
74.
OppenheimerD.M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241.
75.
OrtegaL. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
76.
PawleyA.SyderF. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In RichardsJ.SchmidtR. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). Longman.
77.
PawleyA.SyderF. (2000). The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 163–199). University of Michigan Press.
78.
PoulisseN. (1997). Language production in bilinguals. In de GrotA.KrollJ. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 201–224). Lawrence Erlbaum.
79.
PréfontaineY. (2010). Differences in perceived fluency and utterance fluency across speech elicitation tasks: A pilot study. In KaufholdK.McCullochS.TomincA. (Eds.), Papers from the Lancaster Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching (LAEL PG), Lancaster University, Lancaster: Volume 5 (pp. 134–154). Lancaster University.
80.
PréfontaineY. (2013). Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 324–348.
81.
PréfontaineY.KormosJ. (2015). The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. Modern Language Journal, 99, 96–112.
82.
PréfontaineY.KormosJ. (2016). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, 151–169.
83.
PréfontaineY.KormosJ.JohnsonD.E. (2016). How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language?Language Testing, 33, 53–73.
84.
RabinL.A.BarrW.B.BurtonL.A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33–65.
85.
ReitanR. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indication of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.
86.
RossiterM.J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 395–412.
87.
RossiterM.J.DerwingT.M.JonesV.L.M.O. (2008). Is a picture worth a thousand words?TESOL Quarterly, 42, 325–329.
88.
RossiterM.J.DerwingT.M.ManimtimL.G.ThomsonR.I. (2010). Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 583–606.
89.
SegalowitzN. (2007). Access fluidity, attention control, and the acquisition of fluency in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 181–186.
90.
SegalowitzN. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.
91.
SegalowitzN. (2013). Fluency. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 240–244). Routledge.
92.
SegalowitzN. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, 79–95.
93.
SegalowitzN.Frenkiel-FishmanS. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory and Cognition, 33, 644–653.
94.
SimardD. (2022). Psycholinguistic processes in L2 oral production. In DerwingT.MunroM.ThompsonD. (Eds.), Routledge handbook on second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 24–38). Routledge.
95.
SimardD.BergeronA.LiuY.-G.NaderM.RedmondL. (2016). Production d’autoreformulations autoamorcées en langue seconde: Rôle de l’attention et de la mémoire phonologique [Production of self-primed self-reformulations in the second language: The role of attention and phonological memory]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72, 183–210.
96.
SimardD.FortierV.ZunigaM. (2011). Attention et production d’autoreformulations autoamorcées en français langue seconde: Quelle relation? [Attention and production of self-initiated self-reformulations in French as a second language: What relationship?]Journal of French Language Studies, 21, 417–436.
97.
SkehanP. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14.
98.
SkehanP. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins.
99.
SteinbergF.S.HorwitzE.K. (1986). The effect of induced anxiety on the denotative and interpretive content of second language speech. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 131–136.
100.
SuzukiS.KormosJ. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 143–167.
101.
SuzukiS.KormosJ.UchiharaT. (2021). The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Modern Language Journal, 105, 435–463.
102.
TavakoliP.CampbellC.McCormackJ. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 447–471.
103.
TavakoliP.HunterA.-M. (2018). Is fluency being “neglected” in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22, 330–349.
104.
TavakoliP.NakatsuharaF.HunterA.-M. (2020). Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 104, 169–191.
105.
TavakoliP.SkehanP. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In EllisR. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–277). John Benjamins.
106.
TombaughT. (2004). Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 203–214.
107.
TremblayA.DerwingB.LibbenG.WestburyC. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613.
108.
TurnerC.E. (2001). Developing an empirically based rating scale for evaluating speaking ability at the secondary 4 and 5 levels. MEQ Project Research Report: English as a Second Language. Ministère de l’éducation.
109.
TurnerC.E.UpshurJ.A. (1995). Some effects of task type on the relation between communicative effectiveness and grammatical accuracy in intensive ESL classes. TESL Canada Journal, 12, 18–31.
110.
TurnerC.E.UpshurJ.A. (1996). Developing rating scales for the assessment of second language performance. In WigglesworthG.ElderC. (Eds.), The language testing cycle: From inception to washback. The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S, No. 13 (pp. 55–79). Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.
111.
TurnerC.E.UpshurJ.A. (2002). Rating scales derived from student samples: Effects of the scale maker and the student sample on scale content and student scores. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 49–49.
112.
UpshurJ.A.TurnerC.E. (1995). Constructing rating scales for second language tests. English Language Teaching Journal, 49, 3–12.
113.
UpshurJ.A.TurnerC.E. (1999). Systematic effects in the rating of second language speaking ability: Test method and learner discourse. Language Testing, 16, 82–111.
114.
van GelderenA. (1994). Prediction of global ratings of fluency and delivery in narrative discourse by linguistic and phonetic measures- oral performances of students aged 11–12 years. Language Testing, 11, 291–319.
115.
VerhoevenL.T. (1989). Monitoring in children’s second language speech. Second Language Research, 5, 141–155.
116.
WennerstromA. (2000). The role of intonation in second language fluency. In RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 102–127). The University of Michigan Press.
117.
WhiteJ.L.TurnerC.E. (2005). Comparing children’s oral ability in two ESL programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 491–517.
118.
WisniewskiK. (2017). Empirical learner language and the levels of the Common European Framework of Reference. Language Learning, 67, 232–253.
119.
YuanF.EllisR. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.
120.
ZunigaM. (2015). Le rôle de l’attention dans la production orale en L2 [The role of attention in oral production in L2]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
121.
ZunigaM.SimardD. (2019). Factors influencing L2 self-repair behavior: The role of L2 proficiency, attentional control and L1 self-repair behavior. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 43–59.
122.
ZunigaM.SimardD. (2022). Exploring the intricate relationship between foreign language anxiety, attention and self-repairs during L2 speech production. System, 105, 102732.
