This study examines the effects of the continuation task and the model-as-feedback writing task (MAFW) on English as a foreign language (EFL) vocabulary learning. Three classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to a continuation group, a MAFW group, and a control group. Three aspects of vocabulary knowledge – written form, meaning and form, and grammatical functions – were each assessed by receptive and productive tests. It was found that (1) both tasks led to significant immediate and long-term development of word knowledge of written form, form and meaning, and grammatical functions; and (2) the continuation task showed superiority over the MAFW task in enhancing productive knowledge of written form, and receptive and productive knowledge of form and meaning as well as grammatical functions. Implications of these results for EFL vocabulary teaching are discussed.
ArroyoD.C.YilmazY. (2018). An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning, 68, 942–972.
2.
AtkinsonD.NishinoT.ChurchillE.OkadaH. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 169–188.
3.
CostaA.PickeringM.J.SoraceA. (2008). Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 528–556.
4.
CoyleY.de LariosJ.R. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 451–485.
5.
CoyleY.GuiraoJ.C.de LariosJ.R. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43.
6.
EllisN. (2009). The psycholinguistics of the interaction approach. In MackeyA.PolioC. (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 11–40). Routledge.
7.
EllisN. (2012). Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition. In GassS.MackeyA. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 193–210). Routledge.
8.
EschholzP.A. (1980). The prose models approach: Using products in the process. In DonovanT.R.McClellandB.W. (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 21–36). National Council of Teachers of English.
9.
FolseK. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 273–293.
10.
Garcia MayoM.P.Loidi LabandibarU. (2017). The use of models as written corrective feedback in EFL writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 110–127.
11.
GarrodS.AndersonA. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.
12.
GuiraoJ.C.de LariosJ.R.CoyleY. (2015). The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52, 63–77.
13.
HanaokaO. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 459–479.
14.
HanaokaO.IzumiS. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 332–347.
15.
HendersonC. (2021). The effect of feedback timing on L2 Spanish vocabulary acquisition in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research, 25, 185–208.
16.
HulstijnJ.LauferB. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.
17.
JiangL.ChenJ. (2015). The continuation task: Effects on written accuracy, complexity and fluency. Modern Foreign Languages, 38, 366–375.
18.
JiangL.TuM. (2016). Effects of the continuation task on L2 vocabulary learning. Modern Foreign Languages, 39, 819–829.
19.
KangE. (2020). Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89, 102196.
20.
KasaharaK. (2011). The effect of known-and-unknown word combinations on intentional vocabulary learning. System, 39, 491–499.
21.
KeatingG. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365–386.
22.
LauferB. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.
23.
LauferB. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587.
24.
LauferB.HulstijnH. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.
25.
LavoletteE.PolioC.KahngJ. (2015). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students’ responses to it. Language Learning and Technology, 19, 50–68.
26.
LiS. (2020). What is the ideal time to provide corrective feedback? Replication of Li, Zhu & Ellis (2016) and Arroyo & Yilmaz (2018). Language Teaching, 53, 96–108.
27.
LiS.ZhuY.EllisR. (2016). The effect of timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100, 276–295.
28.
LongM. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
29.
LuM. (2013). Effects of four vocabulary exercises on facilitating learning vocabulary meaning, form, and use. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 167–176.
30.
NationP. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
PengJ.WangC.LuX. (2020). Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Language Teaching Research, 24, 364–381.
33.
PickeringM.J.GarrodS. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226.
34.
PolioC. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389.
35.
QinJ.KarabacakE. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 41, 217–230.
36.
QuinnP.G.NakataT. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In NassajiH.KartchavaE. (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 35–47). Routledge.
37.
RassaeiE. (2017). Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 76–95.
38.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
39.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
SchmittN. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 52, 261–274.
42.
SchoberM. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47, 1–24.
43.
SheenY.WrightD.MoldawaA. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused writing correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556–569.
44.
ShiB.HuangL.LuX. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37, 361–388.
45.
ShintaniN.AubreyS. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. Modern Language Journal, 100, 296–319.
46.
SwainM. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In CookG.SeidhoferB. (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
47.
TengF. (2020). Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 24, 785–812.
48.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
49.
Van BeuningenC.G.De JongN.H.KuikenF. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62, 1–41.
50.
WangC. (2012). The continuation task: An effective method in enhancing foreign language acquisition. Foreign Language World, 5, 2–7.
51.
WangC. (2014). Content creation and language imitation: Fundamental to effective foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Languages World, 2, 42–48.
52.
WangC. (2015). Why does the continuation task facilitate L2 learning?Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 47, 753–762.
53.
WangC. (2016). Learning by extension. Modern Foreign Languages, 6, 784–793.
54.
WangC.WangM. (2015). Effect of alignment on L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 36, 503–526.
55.
WangQ. (2019). Effect of the continuation task on learning Chinese as a second language. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 3, 38–46.
56.
WangQ.WangF. (2016). Effects of alignment in the continuation task on L2-Chinese writing. Modern Foreign Languages, 39, 794–805.
57.
WangQ.WangC. (2019). Learning English relative clauses by extension. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 3, 1–5.
58.
WatsonC. (1982). The use and abuse of models in the ESL writing class. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 5–14.
59.
WebbS. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33–52.
60.
WebbS. (2007). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single word context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 11, 63–81.
61.
WilkinsD.A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold.
62.
XinS. (2017). Effects of continuation task condition on L2 grammatical structure acquisition. Modern Foreign Languages, 40, 507–517.
63.
ZhangX. (2017a). Reading-writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development. Language Teaching Research, 21, 217–240.
64.
ZhangX. (2017b). Effects of receptive-productive integration tasks and prior knowledge of component words on L2 collocation development. System, 66, 156–167.
65.
ZhouX.WangC. (2021). Effects of interactive alignment on L2 vocabulary learning by Chinese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 15April2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211004629.
66.
ZouD. (2017). Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and composition-writing: Extending the evaluation component of the involvement load hypothesis. Language Teaching Research, 21, 54–75.
67.
ZwaanR. A.RadvanskyG. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
