The present study presents an instructional procedure developed in an attempt to enhance incidental learning through graded readers in class, the Multiple Incidental Exposures (MIE) procedure, and compares it to a more common procedure involving reading and doing the exercises, which is referred to as Traditional Explicit Practice (TEP). Participants were 44 Catalan/Spanish students (aged 10–11 years) taking the fifth course of primary education in a school in Catalonia. Participants belonged to two intact classes that were randomly assigned a condition: MIE group (n = 23, n = 15 males, n = 8 females) and the TEP group (n = 21, n = 12 males, n = 9 females). The MIE group was first told the story by their teacher, then read and listened to the graded readers twice (first collectively and later on individually), to be followed by a True/False activity and a jigsaw reading task. The TEP group read and listened to the story collectively once and then performed a series of traditional explicit exercises very similar in format to those included at the end of the graded reader. Participants were administered a vocabulary test, a grammar test and a perception of pronunciation test following a pre- post-test design. A questionnaire on the participants’ attitudes was also administered on the post-test. The results show that while the TEP procedure is more effective for grammar learning, the MIE and TEP procedures are equally effective in terms of vocabulary and pronunciation. In terms of enjoyment and perception of learning, both groups showed comparable results.
BarcroftJ. (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 79–103.
2.
CadwalladerJ. (2009). Uncle Jack and the Emperor Penguins. Young ELI Readers.
3.
CadwalladerJ. (2011). Uncle Jack and the Meerkats. Young ELI Readers.
4.
CEFR (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf (accessed July 2021).
5.
ChangA.C.-S.MillettS. (2013). Improving reading rates and comprehension through timed repeated reading. Reading in a Foreign Language Journal, 25, 126–148.
6.
ChangA.C.-S.MillettS. (2015). Improving reading rates and comprehension through audio-assisted extensive reading for beginner learners. System, 52, 9–102.
7.
CollinsL.WhiteJ. (2019). Observing language-related episodes in intact classrooms: Context Matters! In DekeyserR.M.Prieto BotanaG. (Eds.), Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom (pp. 9–30). John Benjamins.
8.
De WildeV.EyckmansJ. (2017). Game on! Young learners’ incidental language learning of English prior to instruction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 673–694.
9.
de VosJ.F.SchriefersH.NivardM.G.LemhöferK. (2018). A meta-analysis and meta-regression of incidental second language word learning from spoken input. Language Learning, 68, 906–941.
10.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379–97.
11.
EllisR. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge, and instruction. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC.PhilpR.ReindersH. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.
12.
EllisR.ShintaniN. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
13.
FlegeJ.E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). York Press.
14.
GorsuchG.TaguchiE. (2008). Repeated reading for developing reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of EFL learners in Vietnam. System, 36, 253–278.
15.
HanZ.ChenC. (2010). Repeated-reading-based instructional strategy and vocabulary acquisition: A case study of a heritage speaker of Chinese. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 242–262.
16.
HestetræetT.I. (2019). Vocabulary teaching for young learners. In GartonS.CoplandF. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 220–233). Routledge.
17.
HulstijnJ.H. (2013). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In ChapelleC.A. (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 2632–2640). Wiley
18.
KartalG.SimsekH. (2017). The effects of audiobooks on EFL students’ listening comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 17, 112–123.
19.
KasprowiczR.MarsdenE. (2018). Towards ecological validity in research into input-based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form-meaning practice. Applied Linguistics, 39, 886–911.
20.
KasprowiczR.E.MarsdenE.SephtonN. (2019). Investigating distribution of practice effects for the learning of foreign language verb morphology in the young learner classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 580–606.
21.
KimT.J.KuoL.-J.RamírezG., et al. (2015). The relationship between bilingual experience and the development of morphological and morphosyntactic awareness. Language Awareness, 24, 332–54.
22.
KuppensA.H. (2010). Incidental language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, media and technology, 35, 65–85.
23.
LauferB. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587.
24.
LefeverS. (2010). English skills of young learners in Iceland: ‘I started talking English when I was 4 years old. It just bang . . . just fall into me.’Paper presented at the Menntakvika Conference, Reijkjavik, Iceland.
25.
LichtmanK. (2016). Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners?Journal Child Language, 43, 707–730.
26.
LightbownP. (1992). Can they do it themselves? A comprehension-based ESL course for young children. In CourchêneR.St JohnJ.ThérienC.GliddenJ.I. (Eds.), Comprehension-based second language teaching (pp. 353–370). University of Ottawa Press
27.
LiuY-T.ToddA.G. (2016). Implementation of assisted repeated reading techniques for the incidental acquisition of novel foreign vocabulary. Language Teaching Research, 20, 53–74.
28.
LoewenS. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.
29.
LoganJ.S.LivelyS.E.PisoniD.B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /1/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886.
30.
LongM. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated?Language Teaching, 53, 169–182.
31.
MarsdenE.ChenX. (2011). The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote. Language Learning, 61, 1058–1098.
32.
MinH. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58, 73–115.
33.
MuñozC. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In MuñozC. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 1–40). Multilingual Matters.
34.
MuñozC.CadiernoT.CasasI. (2018). Different starting points for English language learning: a comparative study of Danish and Spanish young learners. Language Learning, 68, 1076–1109.
35.
NagyW.E.AndersonR.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
36.
NassajiH. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. Modern Language Journal, 101, 353–368.
37.
NationI.S.P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
38.
NicholsW.D.RupleyW.H.RasinskiT. (2008). Fluency in learning to read for meaning: Going beyond repeated readings. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 1–13.
39.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
40.
ParibakhtT.S.WescheM. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In CoadyJ.HuckinT. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). Cambridge University Press.
41.
Pellicer-SánchezA.ConklinK.VilkaiteL. (2020). The effect of pre-reading instruction on vocabulary learning: An investigation of L1and L2 readers’ eye movements. Language Learning, 7, 162–203.
42.
PierrehumbertJ.B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In BodR.HayJ.JannedyS. (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 177–228). MIT Press.
43.
PinterA. (2011). Children learning second languages. Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
ReynoldsB.L. (2014). A mixed-methods approach to investigating first- and second-language incidental vocabulary acquisition through the reading of fiction. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 111–127.
45.
SchmittN. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
46.
SchmittR. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
SerranoR.Pellicer-SánchezA. (2016). Science vocabulary learning through reading-only vs. reading-while-listening in primary school. BAAL Vocab SIG. University of Nottingham.
48.
ShintaniN. (2012). Repeating Input-based Tasks with Young Beginner Learners. RELC Journal, 43, 39–51.
49.
ShintaniN.EllisR. (2014). Tracking ‘learning behaviours’ in the incidental acquisition of two dimensional adjectives by Japanese beginner learners of L2 English. Language Teaching Research, 18, 521–542.
50.
SokS.HanZ. (2020). A study of L2 vocabulary acquisition under incidental and intentional conditions. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 113–140.
51.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
52.
ThomsonR.I. (2018). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT). Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 42, 208–231.
53.
TragantE.VallbonaA. (2018). Reading while listening to learn: Young EFL learners’ perceptions. ELT Journal, 72, 395–404.
54.
TragantE.LlanesÀ.PinyanaÀ. (2019). Linguistic and non-linguistics outcomes of a reading-while-listening program for young learners of English. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 819–838.
55.
TragantE.MuñozC.SpadaN. (2016). Maximizing young learners’ input: An intervention program. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 72, 234–257.
56.
TrofimovichP.LightbownP.HalterR.SongH. (2009). Comprehension-based practice: The development of L2 pronunciation in a listening and reading program. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 609–639.
57.
UchiharaT.WebbS.YanagisawaA. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69, 559–599.
58.
UggenM.S. (2012). Reinvestigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62, 506–540.
59.
WebbS.ChangA. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Journal / La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 68, 267–290.
60.
WebbS.ChangA. (2015). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 651–675.
61.
WebbS.NationP. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
62.
WodeH. (1996). Speech perception and L2 phonological acquisition. In JordensP.LallemanJ. (Eds.), Investigating second language acquisition (pp. 321–353). Mouton de Gruyter.
