Set against the backcloth of increasing recognition and attention to literature in foreign language education (FLE) globally, this article reports part of a large-scale study of 1,190 secondary-level learners’ views of the benefits of literature, as instantiated by short stories (ShS) and poems and songs (PS) in their English-as-a-foreign-language learning. An inventory of 27 items (13 language-related and 14 non-language-related) was compiled with reference to previous studies and curricular documents. The analyses compared the two modules through independent t-tests, as well as including an exploratory factor analysis to examine latent factors. Findings reveal a three factor structure and a slightly positive view of the benefits of literature. ShS were perceived to be generally more beneficial than PS, especially in the domains of generic skills and work/studies. There were benefits common to ShS and PS, which by extension, may be universal to literary texts at large. This study makes a theoretical contribution by unveiling the potential value of literature in FLE and the three underlying factors of its perceived benefits. Practically, the inventory can be used by foreign language (FL) teachers to measure students’ perceptions to inform their use of literature in FLE.
AkyelA.YalçinE. (1990), Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement incongruence. ELT Journal, 44, 174–180.
2.
BlandJ. (Ed.). (2018) Using literature in English language education: Challenging reading for 8-18 year olds. London: Bloomsbury.
3.
BloemertJ.JansenE.van de GriftW. (2016). Exploring EFL literature approaches in the Dutch secondary education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29, 169–188.
4.
BloemertJ.JansenE.ParanA. (2019a). Student motivation in Dutch secondary school EFL literature lessons. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 12October2019. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2019-0041.
5.
BloemertJ.ParanA.JansenE.van de GriftW. (2019b). Students’ perspective on the benefits of EFL literature education. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 371–384.
6.
BobkinaJ.DominguezE. (2014). The use of literature and literary texts in the EFL classroom: Between consensus and controversy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3, 248–260.
7.
BrownA.V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60.
8.
CarlessD.HarfittG. (2013). Innovation in secondary education: A case of curriculum reform in Hong Kong. In HylandK.WongL.C. (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education (pp. 172–185). Milton: Routledge.
9.
CarterR. (2007). Literature and language teaching 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 3–13.
CheungA.Hennebry-LeungM. (2020). Exploring an ESL teacher’s beliefs and practices of teaching literary texts: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 24June2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820933447.
12.
ChooS.S. (2011). On literature’s use(ful/less)ness: Reconceptualizing the literature curriculum in the age of globalization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 47–67.
13.
ChuS.K.W.ReynoldsR.B.TavaresN.J.NotariM.LeeC.W.Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. Singapore: Springer.
14.
CollinsD. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229–238.
Curriculum Development Council & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (CDC & HKEAA). (2014). English language curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
17.
DavisJ.N.KlineR.R.GorellL.C.HsiehG. (1992). Readers and foreign languages: A survey of undergraduate attitudes toward the study of literature. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 320–332.
18.
Diaz-SantosG. (2000). Technothrillers and English for science and technology. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 221–236.
19.
DörnyeiZ. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. 2nd edition.London: Routledge.
DuncanS.ParanA. (2018). Negotiating the challenges of reading literature: Teachers reporting on their practice. In BlandJ. (Ed.), Using literature in English language education: Challenging reading for 8–18 year olds (pp. 243–269). London: Bloomsbury.
22.
GhiabiS. (2014). Investigation of the effect of using a novel as an extensive reading on students’ attitudes and reading ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3, 55–64.
23.
GilroyM.ParkinsonB. (1996). Teaching literature in a foreign language. Language Teaching, 29, 213–225.
24.
HallG. (2015). Literature in language education. 2nd edition.Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HallG. (2016). Using literature in ELT. In HallG. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 456–469). London / New York: Routledge.
26.
HanauerD.I. (2001). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22, 295–323.
27.
HarlowL.L.MuyskensJ.M. (1994). Priorities for intermediate-level language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 141–154.
28.
HeilbronnR. (2019) Literature, culture and democratic citizenship. In DiamantidakiF. (Ed.), Teaching literature in modern foreign languages. (pp. 9–23). London: Bloomsbury.
29.
HirvelaA. (2005). ESL students and the use of literature in composition courses. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 33, 70–77.
30.
HornJ.L. (1965). A rationale and a test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
31.
JonesC. (Ed.). (2019). Literature, spoken language and speaking skills in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KimM. (2004). Literature discussions in adult L2 learning. Language and Education, 18, 145–166.
33.
KirchhoffP. (2016). Is there a hidden canon of English literature in German secondary schools. In KlippelF. (Ed.), Teaching languages: Sprachen Lehren (pp. 229–248). Münster: Waxmann.
34.
KuzeK. (2015). Using short stories in university composition classrooms. In TeranishiM.SaitoY.WalesK. (Eds.), Literature and language learning in the EFL Classroom (pp. 182–196). Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
LiawM.L. (2001). Exploring literary responses in an EFL classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 35–45.
36.
LuukkaE. (2019). Selection, frequency, and functions of literary texts in Finnish general upper-secondary EFL education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 198–213.
37.
MartinA.L.LaurieI. (1993). Student views about the contribution of literary and cultural content to language learning at intermediate level.Foreign Language Annals, 26, 188–207.
NgP.T. (2004). Students’ perception of change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3, 77–92.
40.
NguyenH.T.T. (2016). How does an interactive approach to literary texts work in an English as a foreign language context? Learners’ perspectives in close-up. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 171–189.
41.
NguyenP.N.T.JanssenT.RijlaarsdamG.AdmiraalW. (2016). Effects of self-questioning on EFL students’ engagement in literary reading. Cultura y Educación, 28, 702–737.
42.
ParanA. (2006). The stories of literature and language teaching. In ParanA. (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning: Case studies in TESOL (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: TESOL.
43.
ParanA. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41, 465–496.
44.
ParanA. (2012). Language skills: Questions for teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 67, 450–458.
45.
ParanA.SpöttlC.RatheiserU.EberharterK. (2021). Measuring literary competences in SLA. In WinkeP.BrunfautT. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 326–337). New York: Routledge.
46.
SchmidtI. (in preparation) Shakespeare in the foreign language classroom: Results of an empirical study. In ParanA. (Ed.), Shakespeare and the second language learner.
47.
SchmittT.A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 304–321.
48.
Shelton-StrongS.J. (2012). Literature circles in ELT. ELT Journal, 66, 214–223.
49.
SivasubramaniamS. (2006). Promoting the prevalence of literature in the practice of foreign and second language education: Issues and insights. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 254–273.
50.
StruyvenK.DochyF.JanssensS. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325–341.
51.
TeranishiM.SaitoY.WalesK. (2015). Literature and language learning in the EFL classroom. Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
UrP. (2020). Review of S. Walsh and MannS. (Eds.) ‘The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education’. ELT Journal. Epub ahead of print 7September2020. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccaa041.
53.
UrlaubP. (2012). Reading strategies and literature instruction: Teaching learners to generate questions to foster literary reading in the second language. System, 40, 296–304.
54.
VanT.T.M. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 47, 2–9.
55.
VianaV.ZyngierS. (2019). Creative writing and iconicity in English as a foreign language. New Writing, 16, 38–49.
56.
WheelerJ.M. (1997). Poems in the language classroom. In MokA. (Ed.), English language enrichment programme resource book (pp. 30–40). Hong Kong: INSTEP.
57.
WilliamsM.BurdenR. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
WolthuisF.BloemertJ.Tammenga-HelmantelM.ParanA. (2019). A curriculum in transition: TL/L1 use in Dutch EFL literature lessons. Language, Culture and Curriculum. Epub 4December2019. DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1697279.
59.
XerriD. (2016). ‘Living in a house without mirrors’: Poetry’s cachet and student Engagement. Anglica: An International Journal of English Studies, 25, 271–286.
60.
YangA. (2001). Reading and the non-academic learner: A mystery solved. System, 29, 450–460.
61.
YangA. (2002). Science fiction in the EFL class. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 5, 50–60.
