Course materials play a vital role in the foreign language classroom. Relatively little attention has been paid, however, to analyzing the activities that foster oral interactional ability in course materials for English as a foreign language (EFL). For the purpose of this study, a coding scheme was designed that focuses specifically on the development of interactional ability. This was used to analyse the three most commonly used EFL course books for pre-vocational learners in the Netherlands. The analysis revealed that course books focus more on developing language knowledge than on developing the ability to use this knowledge in interaction, that interactional strategies practice is missing, and that interactional practice is limited to the personal and public context. We conclude that EFL course books lag behind current theories of second language acquisition (SLA) in the practical application of activities focused on developing interactional ability. Recommendations to strengthen the link between theory and practice are made.
AhmadS.RaoC. (2012). Does it work? Implementing communicative language teaching approach in EFL context. Journal of Education and Practice, 3, 28–35.
2.
AhmadianM.J.TavakoliM. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.
BejaranoY.LevineT.OlshtainE.SteinerJ. (1997). The skilled use of interaction strategies: Creating a framework for improved small-group communicative interaction in the language classroom. System, 25, 203–214.
6.
BonnetG. (2002). The assessment of pupils’ skills in English in eight European countries: A European project. European Network of Policy Makers for the Evaluation of Education Systems.
7.
BoxerD.PickeringL. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49, 44–58.
8.
Bueno-AlastueyM.C.Luque AgullóG.L. (2015a). A tool to analyze oral competence development in EFL textbooks. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada / Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 73–96.
9.
Bueno-AlastueyM.C.Luque AgullóG.L. (2015b). Explicit instruction and implicit use of L2 learning strategies in higher secondary EFL coursebooks. International Journal of English Studies, 15, 17–39.
10.
BurnsA.HillD. (2013). Teaching speaking in a second language. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and materials development (pp. 231–248). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
11.
BygateM. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BygateM. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In WillisJ.WillisD. (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Australia: MacMillan Education.
13.
BygateM. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Pearson Education.
14.
ByramM.HolmesP.SavvidesN. (2013). Intercultural communicative competence in foreign language education: Questions of theory, practice and research. The Language Learning Journal, 41, 251–253.
15.
CanaleM. (1983). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In OllerJ.W. (Ed.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 333–342). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
16.
Celce-MurciaM. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In SolerE.A.JordaP.S. (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht: Springer.
17.
ChenZ.GohC. (2011). Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 333–345.
CornfoldA.Van der KooiH.OosterleeA., et al. (2010). New Interface yellow label, 3 vmbo (k)gt. 2nd edition.Utrecht: ThiemeMeulenhoff.
20.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
CriadoR.SánchezA. (2009). English language teaching in Spain: Do textbooks comply with the official methodological regulations? A sample analysis. International Journal of English Studies, 9, 1–28.
22.
CunningsworthA. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: MacMillan Heinemann.
23.
De BotK. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–25.
24.
De JongN.PerfettiC.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.
25.
DerwingT.M.DiepenbroekL.G.FooteJ.A. (2013). How well do general-skills ESL textbooks address pronunciation?TESL Canada Journal, 30, 22–44.
26.
DiepenbroekL.G.DerwingT.M. (2014). To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development?TESL Canada Journal, 30, 1–20.
27.
DörnyeiZ. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 55–85.
28.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 349–385.
29.
DörnyeiZ.ScottM. (1995). Communication strategies: An empirical analysis with retrospection. In TurleyJ.S.LusbyK. (Eds.), Selected papers from the proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistics Society (pp. 155–168). Provo: Brighham Young University.
Educational Inspectorate. (2004). Werk aan de basis: Evaluatie van de basisvorming na vijf jaar [Building the foundation: Evaluation of the foundation curriculum after five years]. De Meern: Inspectie van het onderwijs.
32.
EllisG. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach?ELT Journal, 50, 213–218.
33.
EllisR. (2009). Task-based research and language pedagogy. In: Van de BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 109–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
FasoglioD. (2015). Doelstellingen en toetsing gespreksvaardigheid Engels, Duits en Frans [Attainment targets and assessment oral interaction English, German and French]. Enschede: Stichting Leerplanontwikkeling.
35.
FaucetteP. (2001). A pedagogical perspective on communication strategies: Benefits of training and an analysis of English language teaching materials. Second Language Studies, 19, 1–40.
36.
ForbesK.FisherL. (2018). The impact of expanding advanced level secondary school students’ awareness and use of metacognitive learning strategies on confidence and proficiency in foreign language speaking skills. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 173–185.
37.
FosterP.HunterA. (2017). When it’s not what you do, but the way that you do it: How research into second language acquisition can help teachers to make the most of their classroom materials. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), SLA research and materials development for language learning (pp. 280–293). New York: Routledge.
38.
FosterP.SkehanP. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324.
39.
FosterP.SkehanP. (2013). The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 249–273.
40.
GatbontonE.SegalowitzN. (2005) Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325–353.
41.
GilmoreA. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal, 58, 363–374.
42.
Gómez-RodríguezL.F. (2010). English textbooks for teaching and learning English as a foreign language: Do they really help to develop communicative competence?Educación y Educadores, 13, 327–346.
43.
HarmerJ. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
44.
HayesA.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.
45.
HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA: Volume 32. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
46.
Houtenbos-StupeneaV.HemstraL.VosB. (2014). All Right! Engels voor de bovenbouw 3 vmbo-k [All right! English for year 3 of the advanced vocational track]. 2nd edition.’s-Hertogenbosch: Malmberg.
47.
JansmaN.PennewaardL. (2014). Aansluiting Engels tussen vmbo-tl en mbo: Ervaringen vanuit de onderwijspraktijk [Aligning English in pre-vocational and vocational education: Experiences from the field]. Enschede: Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling.
48.
KormosJ. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
49.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
KurtzJ. (2011). Breaking through the communicative cocoon: Improvisation in secondary school foreign language classrooms. In SawyerR.K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 133–161). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
51.
KurtzJ. (2015). Fostering and building upon oral creativity in the EFL classroom. In MaleyA.PeachyN. (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 73–83). London: British Council.
52.
KwakernaakE. (2008). Een goede mix [A good mix]. Levende Talen Magazine, 95, 9–12.
53.
KwakernaakE. (2016). Tussen blokkendoos en taalbad: Waarheen met ons vreemdetalenonderwijs? [Between building bricks and language bath: Where to with our modern foreign language education?] Part I. Levende Talen Magazine, 103, 10–14.
54.
LamW.Y.K. (2004). Teaching strategy use for oral communication tasks to ESL learners. Leeds: University of Leeds.
55.
LamW.Y.K. (2006). Gauging the effects of ESL oral communication strategy teaching: A multi-method approach. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3, 142–157.
56.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57.
LiembergE.Van KleunenE. (1998). Talen in actie: Eindrapport van een onderzoek naar de rol van de moderne vreemde talen in de BVE-sector [Languages in action: Final report on research into the role of modern foreign languages in vocational and adult education]. Den Bosch: CINOP/SLO.
58.
LightbownP.M. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In HanZ. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
59.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448.
60.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN. (2013) How languages are learned. 4th edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
LittlejohnA. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 179–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
LongM. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: RitchieW.BhatiaT. (Eds.) Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
63.
LongM. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
64.
LongM.CrookesG. (2009). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. In Van de BrandenK.BygateM.NorrisJ. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 57–81). Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65.
Luque AgullóG.L.Bueno-AlastueyM.C. (2017). Analysis of oral skills development in the most used English language textbooks in the second year of Baccalaureate in Spain. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 27, 107–121.
66.
LynchT.MacleanJ. (2001). A case of exercising: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow: Pearson Education.
67.
LysterR.SaitoK. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
MatthewsA. (1985). Choosing the best available textbook. In MatthewsA.SprattM.DangerfieldL. (Eds.), At the chalkface (pp. 202–206). London: Edward Arnold.
70.
MukundanJ.AhourT. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). In TomlinsonB.MasuharaH. (Eds.), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 336–352). London: Bloomsbury.
71.
MukundanJ.NimehchisalemV.HajimohammadiR. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist: A focus group study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1, 100–106.
72.
NakataniY. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 76–91.
73.
NeuendorfK.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
OrtegaL. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In DeKeyserR.M. (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.180–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
PeroneA. (2011). Improvising with adult English language learners. In SawyerR.K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
RichardsJ.C.RodgersT.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
RossiterM.J. (2003). ‘It’s like chicken but bigger’: Effects of communication strategy in the ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 105–121.
78.
RossiterM.J.DerwingT.M.ManimtimL.G.ThomsonR.I. (2010). Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 583–606.
79.
SampleE.MichelM. (2015). An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 31, 23–46.
SawyerR.K. (2011). What makes good teachers great? The artful balance of structure and improvisation. In SawyerR.K. (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
SayerP. (2005). An intensive approach to building conversational skills. ELT Journal, 59, 14–22.
83.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 127–158.
84.
SegalowitzN.LightbownP.M. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43–63.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.M.MaddenC.G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
88.
TavakoliP.HunterA.M. (2017). Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22, 330–349.
89.
ThaiC.BoersF. (2016). Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 369–393.
90.
ThornburyS. (2005). How to teach speaking. Harlow: Pearson Education / Longman.
91.
TomlinsonB. (2003). Materials evaluation. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 15–36). London: Continuum.
92.
TomlinsonB. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45, 143–179.
93.
TomlinsonB. (2013). Second language acquisition and materials development. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and materials development (pp. 11–29). London: Bloomsbury.
94.
TomlinsonB. (2015). Challenging teachers to use their coursebook creatively. In MaleyA.PeachyN. (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 24–28). London: British Council.
95.
UrP. (2012). A course in language teaching (pp. 200–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96.
VellengaH. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL and EFL textbooks: How likely?The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 8.
97.
WangZ. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In SkehanP. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–61). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
98.
WillisJ. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
99.
WongJ. (2002). ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL, 40, 37–60.
100.
YoungR.F. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume 2 (pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.
101.
YuleG.PowersM. (1994). Investigating the communicative outcomes of task-based interaction. System, 22, 81–91.
