Many explanations have been offered for the widely attested problems second language (L2) learners experience with the English article system. One influential proposal from formal linguistics is the Article Choice Parameter and associated Fluctuation Hypothesis, which states that learners of English fluctuate between correct and incorrect usage by sometimes selecting articles on the basis of definiteness (correct for English) and sometimes on the basis of specificity (correct for Samoan). The current study trialled new instruction materials which taught specificity then measured the outcome with low-intermediate first language Chinese learners of English (n = 50). Results show that learners who were taught about specificity did not perform significantly better than learners who were taught about definiteness (using standard teaching materials) or learners who received no instruction on the English article system. The low proficiency of the learners and short intervention period likely contributed to their difficulty understanding the complexities of article meaning. Issues also arose when developing instructional materials which were both linguistically-accurate and sufficiently simple for learners of this level.
DeanM. (1993). English grammar lessons: An interactive classroom grammar: Upper-intermediate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
DeKeyserR.M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25.
6.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
7.
EllisR. (2006). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.
8.
FodorJ.D.SagI.A. (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–398.
9.
García MayoM. (2009). Article choice in L2 English by Spanish speakers: Evidence for full transfer. In García MayoM.HawkinsR. (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles (pp. 13–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.
HawkinsR.Al-EidS.AlmahboobI.et al. (2006). Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers. EUROSLA yearbook, 6, 7–25.
11.
HeimI. (1991). Artikel and Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In StechowA.V.WunderlichD. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 487–535). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
12.
HewingsM. (2005). Advanced grammar in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HirakawaM. (2013). Alternations and argument structure in second language English: Knowledge of two types of intransitive verbs. In WhongM.GilK.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom, (pp. 117–137). Dordrecht: Springer.
14.
IoninT. (2003). Article semantics in second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
15.
IoninT.KoH.WexlerK. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.
16.
IoninT.ZubizarretaM.L.Bautista MaldonadoS. (2008). Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554–576.
17.
IoninT.ZubizarretaM.L.PhilippovV. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 337–361.
18.
LardiereD. (2004). Knowledge of definiteness despite variable article omission in second language acquisition. In BrugosA.MicciullaL.SmithC.E. (Eds.), BUCLD 28 Proceedings (pp. 328–339). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
19.
LardiereD. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In LicerasJ.ZoblH.GoodluckH. (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
LiC.ThompsonS. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
LyonsC. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MasterP. (1990). Teaching the English article system as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461–478.
23.
MasterP. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In OdlinT. (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MasterP. (2002). Information structure and English article pedagogy. System, 30, 331–348.
25.
NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
26.
ParrishB. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361–383.
27.
SchwartzB. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behaviour. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.
28.
SnapeN. (2009). Exploring Mandarin Chinese speakers’ L2 article use. In SnapeN.LeungYKI.Sharwood-SmithM. (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 27–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29.
SnapeN.LeungYKI.TingH.C. (2006). Comparing Chinese, Japanese, and Spanish speakers in L2 English article acquisition: Evidence against the Fluctuation Hypothesis? In Grantham O’BirenM.SheaC.ArchibaldJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 132–139). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
30.
SnapeN.YusaN. (2013). Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. In WhongM.GilK.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 161–183). Dordrecht: Springer.
31.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
32.
TothP.D.Guijarro-FuentesP. (2013). The impact of instruction on second-language implicit knowledge: Evidence against encapsulation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1163–1193.
33.
TrenkicD. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 1–18.
34.
TryznaM. (2009). Questioning the validity of the Article Choice Parameter and Fluctuation Hypothesis: Evidence from L2 English article use by L1 Polish and L1 Mandarin Chinese Speakers. In García MayoM.HawkinsR. (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles (pp. 67–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35.
UCLES. (2001). Oxford quick placement test: Paper and pen pack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Van PattenB. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
37.
WhiteL. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129–141.
38.
WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (2013). Introduction: Generative second language acquisition and language pedagogy. In WhongM.GilK.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Springer.
39.
WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (2014). Beyond paradigm: The ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of classroom research. Second Language Research, 30, 551–568.
40.
YoungR. (1996). Form–function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In BayleyR.PrestonD. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 135–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
