This study examines the role of explicit instruction in article semantics to L2 learners of English. Two types of generic sentences, expressed by different articles, were tested over time. An instruction group (n = 21), a control group (n = 16) and a native English speaker control group (n = 9) participated in the study. The instruction group received nine 60-minute lessons across 9 weeks. A pre-test was administered to both groups before instruction began and four post-tests were given to both groups. The results from delayed post-tests show that the instruction group improved, but after one year little knowledge was retained. The findings suggest that explicit knowledge of articles is unlikely to be retained unless ongoing instruction is achieved.
BitchenerJ.KnochU. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409–431.
2.
BoersF. (2015). Weighing the merits of form-focused intervention. Language Teaching Research, 19, 251–253.
3.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
4.
IoninT.KoH.WexlerK. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.
5.
IoninT.MontrulS.KimJ.H.PhilippovV. (2011). Genericity distinctions and the interpretation of determiners in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 18, 242–280.
6.
KrashenS. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
7.
KrifkaM.PelletierF.J.CarlsonG.N.ter MeulenA.LinkG.ChierchiaG. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In CarlsonG.PelletierF. (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp. 1–125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
KurodaS.-Y. (1992). Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9.
LardiereD. (2005). On Morphological Competence. In: DekydtspotterL.SprouseR.A.LiljestrandA. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference GASLA 2004 (pp. 178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
10.
LindstrombergS. (2016). Inferential statistics in Language Teaching Research: A review and ways forward. Language Teaching Research, 20, 741–768.
11.
MasterP. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In: OdlinT., (Ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
RothmanJ. (2008). Aspect selection in adult L2 Spanish and the Competing Systems Hypothesis: When pedagogical and linguistic rules conflict. Languages in Contrast, 8, 74–106.
13.
SchwartzB. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.
14.
SchwartzB.Gubula-RyzakM. (1992). Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research, 8, 1–38.
15.
SnapeN. (2013). Japanese and Spanish adult learners of English: L2 acquisition of generic reference. Studies in Language Sciences: Journal of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences, 12, 70–94.
16.
SnapeN.KupischT. (2016). Second Language Acquisition: Second Language Systems. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
SnapeN.YusaN. (2013). Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. In: WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom (pp. 161–183). Netherlands: Springer.
18.
SnapeN.UmedaM.WiltshierJ.YusaN. (2016). Teaching the complexities of English article use and choice for generics to L2 learners. In: StringerD.GarrettJ.HalloranB.MossmanS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference GASLA 2015 (pp. 208–222). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
19.
VanPattenB. (2016). Why explicit knowledge cannot become implicit knowledge. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 650–657.
20.
VanPattenB.RothmanJ. (2014). Against rules. In: BenatiA.LavalC.ArcheM. J. (Eds.), The Grammar Dimension in Instructed Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 15–35). London: Bloomsbury.
21.
VanPattenB.RothmanJ. (2015). What does current generative theory suggest about the explicit–implicit debate? In RebuschatP. (Ed.), Explicit and Implicit Learning of Languages (pp. 91–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22.
WhiteL. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 70, 133–161.
23.
WhongM. (2011). Language Teaching: Linguistic Theory in Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
24.
WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (2013). Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
25.
WhongM.MarsdenH.GilK.H. (2013). How we can learn from acquisition: The acquisition-learning debate revisited. In: Cabrelli AmaroJ.JudyT.Pascual y CaboD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference GASLA (pp. 203–210). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
