The role of grammar teaching in foreign language education is a controversial one both in second language acquisition (SLA) research and language pedagogy and, as a result, a potential source of confusion to student teachers. The objective of this study was to gain insight into the beliefs on grammar teaching of student teachers of English as a foreign language enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate teacher education programmes at Dutch universities of applied sciences. To this end a questionnaire was developed and validated based on four construct pairs from SLA literature: meaning- versus form-focused instruction, focus on form (FonF) versus focus on forms (FonFs), implicit versus explicit instruction, and inductive versus deductive instruction. Overall, respondents (n = 832) were found to prefer form-focused, explicit, inductive instruction, and FonFs. However, higher-year undergraduates’ and postgraduates’ results showed a trend towards a preference for more meaning-focused and implicit instruction, and FonF. When learner level was factored in, however, these forms of language instruction were considered subordinate to more traditional form-focused approaches for teaching higher-level language learners.
AllenL. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 518–529.
2.
AndersonJ. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.
3.
AndrewsS. (2003). ‘Just like instant noodles’: L2 teachers and their beliefs about grammar pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching, 9, 351–376.
4.
ArnettK.TurnbullM. (2008). Teacher beliefs in second and foreign language teaching: A state of the art review. In: SiskenH. (Ed.), From thought to action: Exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language program (pp. 9–29). Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.
5.
BartelsN. (2005). Applied linguistics and language teacher education. New York: Springer.
6.
BasturkmenH. (2012). A review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40, 282–295.
7.
BigelowM.RanneyM. (2005). Pre-service ESL teachers’ knowledge about language and its transfer to lesson planning. In: BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher training (pp. 179–200). New York: Springer.
BreenM.HirdB.MiltonM.OliverR.ThwaiteA. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22, 470–501.
17.
BrownH. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. 3rd edition.White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
18.
BrownT. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd edition.New York: The Guilford Press.
19.
BurnsA.KnoxJ. (2005). Realisation(s): Systemic-functional linguistics and the language classroom. In: BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 235–259). New York: Springer.
20.
BuschD. (2010). Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14, 318–337.
21.
ByrdP. (2005). Instructed grammar. In: HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 545–561). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
CabarogluN.RobertsJ. (2000). Development in student teachers’ pre-existing beliefs during a 1-year PGCE programme. System, 28, 387–402.
23.
CreswellJ. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Da SilvaM. (2005). Constructing the teaching process from inside out: How pre-service teachers make sense of their perceptions of the teaching of the four skills. TESL-EJ, 9, 1–19.
25.
DeKeyserR. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410.
26.
DeKeyserR. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In: VanPattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
DörnyeiZ. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Eisenstein-EbsworthM.SchweersC. (1997). What researchers say and practitioners do: Perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. Applied Language Learning, 8, 237–260.
29.
EllisN. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297–339.
30.
EllisR. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.
31.
EllisR. (2006a). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
32.
EllisR. (2006b). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml022
33.
EllisR. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
FivesH.GillM. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. New York: Routledge.
36.
GrausJ.CoppenP.-A. (2015). Grammatical difficulty: A student teacher perspective. Language Awareness, 24, 101–122.
37.
Gutierrez AlmarzaG. (1996). Student foreign language teachers’ growth. In: ReynoldsM. (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). Oxford: Pergamon.
38.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
HanZ.FinneranR. (2014). Re-engaging the interface debate: Strong, weak, none, or all?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, 370–389.
40.
HinkelE. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II. New York: Routledge.
41.
HousenA.PierrardM. (2005). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In: HousenA.PierrardM. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
42.
IsikogluN.BasturkR.KaracaF. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centred education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 350–356.
43.
JohnsonK. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 439–452.
44.
JohnstonB.GoettschK. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 437–468.
45.
KaganD. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.
46.
KaganD. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.
47.
KrashenS. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
48.
KwakernaakE. (2009). Didactiek van het vreemdetalenonderwijs [Foreign language teaching pedagogy]. Bussum: Coutinho.
49.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48, 263–280.
50.
LoewenS. (2011). Focus on form. In: HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II (pp. 576–592). New York: Routledge.
51.
LongM. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: De BotK.GinsbergR.KramschC. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
LongM.RobinsonP. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In: DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MacDonaldM.BadgerR.WhiteG. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning and teaching?Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 949–963.
54.
NumrichC. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 131–153.
55.
OppenheimA.N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.
56.
PajaresM. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
57.
ParadisM. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58.
PeacockM. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177–195.
59.
PenningtonM.C.UrmstonA. (1998). The teaching orientation of graduating students on a BA TESL course in Hong Kong: A comparison with first-year students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 17–46.
60.
PhippsS. (2007). What difference does DELTA make?Research Notes, 29, 12–16.
61.
PickeringA. (2005). Harnessing influences for change: Some implications from research for teacher educators. In: ClanfieldL. (Ed.), Affect and self-esteem in teacher education (pp. 17–26). Whitstable: IATEFL.
62.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In SikulaJ.ButteryT.GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). 2nd edition.New York: Macmillan.
63.
RobinsonP. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.
64.
RobinsonP. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65.
SatoK.KleinsasserR. (2004). Beliefs, practices and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 797–816.
66.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
67.
StaatsenF. (2009). Moderne vreemde talen in de onderbouw [Modern foreign languages in lower secondary school]. Bussum: Coutinho.
68.
Tammenga-HelmantelM.ArendsE.CanrinusE. (2014). The effectiveness of deductive, inductive, implicit and incidental grammatical instruction in second language classrooms. System, 45, 198–210.
69.
UrP. (2011). Grammar teaching: Research, theory, and practice. In: HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II (pp. 507–522). New York: Routledge.
70.
UrmstonA. (2003). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong: The opinions of teachers in training. Language and Education, 17, 112–137.
71.
ValeoA.SpadaN. (2015). Is there a better time to focus on form? Teacher and learner views. TESOL Quarterly.
72.
WilliamsJ. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In: HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 671–691). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
Woolfolk HoyA.DavisA.PapeS. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In: AlexanderP.WinneP. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 715–737). 2nd edition.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
