‘This is something beyond their capacity’: Teacher educators’ cognition of L2 pragmatics and challenges of its integration into EFL teacher education: An exploratory study in Vietnam
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
‘This is something beyond their capacity’: Teacher educators’ cognition of L2 pragmatics and challenges of its integration into EFL teacher education: An exploratory study in Vietnam
Language teacher cognition concerning second language (L2) pragmatics is an under-researched sub-field in language teacher cognition research. L2 pragmatics is also overlooked in many L2 teacher education programs. To address these gaps, this study adopted a within-site case study design to investigate the knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices of 14 Vietnamese teacher educators of English about how to teach L2 pragmatics and their actual teacher education practices. Data was collected through a questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations. Thematic analysis of the data revealed that the teacher educators fell into two broad and equally sized groups differentiated by the extent to which they were able to articulate what L2 pragmatics is, why it is of value, and how they addressed it in their teacher education. The findings offer insight into how to improve the quality of English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher education in Vietnam and similar contexts regarding L2 pragmatics and teacher training.
BachmanL.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
2.
BakerW. (2011). From cultural awareness to intercultural awareness: Culture in ELT. ELT Journal, 66, 62–70.
3.
Bardovi-HarligK. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86.
4.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
5.
BorgS.SanchezH.S. (2020). Cognition and good language teachers. In GriffithsC.TajeddinZ. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 16–27). Cambridge University Press.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide [eBook version]. Sage.
7.
CohenA.D. (2016). The teaching of pragmatics by native and nonnative language teachers: What they know and what they report doing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 561–585.
8.
CohenA.D. (2018). Learning pragmatics from native and nonnative language teachers. Multilingual Matters.
9.
CohenA.D.KnightS.W.P.SykesJ.M. (2023). Teacher gaining awareness of L2 pragmatics by means of an asynchronous professional development module. In Martínez-FlorA.Sánchez-HernándezA.BarónJ. (Eds.), L2 pragmatics in action: Teachers, learners and the teaching–learning interaction process (pp. 31–61). John Benjamins.
10.
CreswellJ.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
11.
CulpeperJ.MackeyA.TaguchiN. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. Routledge.
12.
EllisR.RoeverC.ShintaniN.ZhuY. (2024). Measuring second language pragmatic competence: A psycholinguistic perspective. Multilingual Matters.
13.
Eslami-RasekhZ. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59, 199–208.
14.
FreemanD. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford University Press.
15.
GilakjaniA.P.SabouriN.B. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs in English language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. English Language Teaching, 10, 78–86.
16.
GlaserK. (2023). Teachers’ awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards instruction in L2 pragmatics. In Martínez-FlorA.Sánchez-HernándezA.BarónJ. (Eds.), L2 pragmatics in action: Teachers, learners and the teaching–learning interaction process (pp. 63–85). John Benjamins.
17.
HsiehM.H.ChuangH.H. (2021). Investigating pre-service English teachers’ beliefs of sociolinguistic instruction in EFL classes in Taiwan. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2, 16–28.
18.
IshiharaN. (2011). Co-constructing pragmatic awareness: Instructional pragmatics in EFL teacher development in Japan. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 15, 1–14.
19.
IshiharaN. (2022). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.
20.
JoH.M. (2016). Middle school English teachers’ knowledge and practice on pragmatics in South Korea: An exploratory sequential mixed methods study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
21.
KecskesI. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
22.
McConachyT.HataK. (2013). Addressing textbook representations of pragmatics and culture. ELT Journal, 67, 294–301.
23.
NgaiP.JanuschS. (2018). Professional development for TESL teachers: A course in transcultural pragmatics. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 22, 1–26.
24.
NguyenC.D.Ton-NuA.T. (2024). Teacher’s awareness of intercultural pragmatics in adult EALD classrooms: An exploratory study in the multicultural context of Australia. Language Awareness, 33, 163–181.
25.
PaltridgeB. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 393–406.
26.
RenW.HanZ. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70, 424–434.
27.
SavvidouC.Economidou-KogetsidisM. (2019). Teaching pragmatics: Nonnative-speaker teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and reported practices. Intercultural Communication Education Journal, 2(1), 39–58.
28.
SchauerG. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56, 269–318.
29.
TaguchiN. (2008). The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: A comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 423–452.
30.
TaguchiN. (Ed.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. Routledge.
31.
TaguchiN.RoeverC. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
32.
TaguchiN.YamaguchiS. (2021). Intercultural pragmatics in English as a lingua franca. In TajeddinZ.AlemiM. (Eds.), Pragmatics pedagogy in English as an International Language (pp. 76–94). Routledge.
33.
TajeddinZ.AlemiM. (2020). Pragmatics and good language teachers. In GriffithsC.TajeddinZ. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 189–202). Cambridge University Press.
34.
TateyamaY. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimase. In RoseK.R.KasperG. (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 200–222). Cambridge University Press.
35.
Ton NuA.T.MurrayJ. (2020). Pragmatic content in EFL textbooks: An investigation into Vietnamese national teaching materials. TESL-EJ, 24, 1–28.
36.
Ton-NuA.T.NguyenL.T. (2023). Pragmatics and instructional pragmatics in second/foreign language preservice teacher education: A case study in Australia and Vietnam. RELC Journal, 55, 748–763.
37.
TruongT.M. (2018). Considering teacher cognition and motivation in teacher research engagement: A mixed-methods study involving English language teachers at Vietnamese public universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
38.
VásquezC.SharplessD. (2009). The role of pragmatics in the master’s TESOL curriculum: Findings from a nationwide survey. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 5–28.
39.
VellengaH. (2011). Teaching L2 pragmatics: Opportunities for continuing professional development. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 15(2), 1–14.
40.
VuN.M. (2017). Teaching pragmatics in English as a foreign language at a Vietnamese university: Teachers’ perceptions, curricular content, and classroom practices. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
41.
YatesL. (2004). The secret rules of language. Prospect, 19, 3–21.
42.
YatesL.WigglesworthG. (2005). Researching the effectiveness of professional development in pragmatics. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 261–280). Springer.
43.
Yildiz EkinM.T.DamarA.E. (2013). Pragmatic awareness of teacher trainees and their reflections on pragmatic practices. ELT Research Journal, 2, 176–190.
