Imitation has a fundamental role in learning and development within Vygotskyan sociocultural theory. In this study, we adopt a sociocultural theory view of imitation as an intentional, meaningful, and transformative process leading learners to higher developmental levels. The study centers on instances of imitation that occurred as adult learners of English as a second language (ESL) were engaged in a classroom shadow-reading task. The task consisted of an interactional phase where two learners, working collaboratively, read aloud, shadowed, and orally summarized a story, and a non-interactional phase where students produced written retellings of the story. The qualitative analysis of the data involved identifying possible instances of imitation and tracking relevant story segments throughout the different phases of the activity. Various types of imitative behaviors were found, ranging from close copies to major transformations of models, as well as immediate to deferred reproductions. From an instructional point of view, the built-in, recursive structure of the shadow-reading task seemed effective in providing affordances for persistent, meaningful imitation and internalization of second language (L2) exemplars as well as story comprehension and retention.
ArbibM.A. (2002). The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In DautenhahnK.NehanivC.L. (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 229–280). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
BialystokE.HakutaK. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Bley-VromanR.ChaudronC. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language competence. In TaroneE.E.GassS.M.CohenA.D. (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BrownH.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.
8.
Centeno-CortésB. (2003). Private speech in the second language classroom: Its role in internalization and its link to social production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, PA.
9.
DuffP.A. (2000). Repetition in foreign language classroom interaction. In HallJ.K.VerplaetseL.S. (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 109–138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gal’perinP.Y. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In ColeM.MaltzmanI. (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 249–273). New York: Basic Books.
12.
GrayM.J. (1975). Effects of shadowing on reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 423–428.
13.
HatchE.M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
14.
HaughtJ.R.McCaffertyS.G. (2008). Embodied language performance: Drama and the ZPD in the second language classroom. In LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E. (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 139–162). London: Equinox.
15.
HeyerS. (1987). True stories in the news. White Plains, NY: Longman.
16.
HurleyS.ChaterN. (2005). Introduction. In HurleyS.ChaterN. (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: Volume 2: From neuroscience to social science: Imitation, human development, and culture (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
JordanN.C. (1988). Language processing and reading ability in children: A study based on speech-shadowing techniques. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 357–377.
18.
KurzI. (1992). ‘Shadowing’ exercises in interpreter training. In DollerupC.LoddegaardA. (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting: Training, talent and experience (pp. 245–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19.
LantolfJ.P. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In KozulinA.AgeyevV.S.MillerS.GindisB. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s theory of education in cultural context (pp. 349–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LantolfJ.P.Centeno-CortésB. (2007). Internalization and language acquisition. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Language acquisition and development: Studies of learners of first and other languages (pp. 90–106). London: Continuum.
21.
LantolfJ.P.ThorneS.L. (2006). The sociogenesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
LantolfJ.P.YáñezM.C. (2003). Talking yourself into Spanish: Private speech and second language learning. Hispania, 86, 97–109.
23.
MacqueenS. (2009). The emergence of patterns in second language writing: A sociocognitive exploration of lexical trails. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
24.
Marslen-WilsonW.D. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226–228.
25.
McCaffertyS.G. (2008). Mimesis and second language acquisition: A sociocultural perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 147–167.
26.
MeltzoffA.N.PrinzW. (Eds.). (2002). The imitative mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MoerkE.L. (1989). The fuzzy set called ‘imitations’. In SpeidelG.E.NelsonK.E. (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 277–304). New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
MuchiskyD.M. (1983). Relationships between speech and reading among second language learners. Language Learning, 33, 77–102.
29.
MurpheyT. (1996, September). Proactive adjusting to the zone of proximal development: Learner and teacher strategies. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference for Socio-cultural Research Vygotsky–Piaget, Geneva, 1–4.
30.
MurpheyT. (2001a). Exploring conversational shadowing. Language Teaching Research, 5, 128–155.
31.
MurpheyT. (2001b). Tools of recursion, intermental zones of proximal development, and critical collaborative autonomy. JALT Journal, 23, 130–150.
32.
NewmanF.HolzmanL. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. New York: Routledge.
33.
SabatiniE. (2000). Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two ‘non-standard’ English speeches. Interpreting, 5, 25–48.
34.
SasakiA.TakeuchiO. (2010). EFL students’ vocabulary learning in NS-NNS e-mail interactions: Do they learn new words by imitation?ReCALL, 22, 70–82.
35.
Saville-TroikeM. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Journal of Child Language, 15, 567–590.
SpeidelG.E.HerreshoffM.J. (1989). Imitation and the construction of long utterances. In SpeidelG.E.NelsonK.E. (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 181–197). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38.
SpeidelG.E.NelsonK.E. (1989). A fresh look at imitation in language learning. In SpeidelG.E.NelsonK.E. (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 1–21). New York: Springer-Verlag.
39.
TabataM. (2002). Shadowing and summarizing as effective output SLA activities. Nanzan Studies in English Language Education, 9, 115–170.
40.
TamaiK. (2001). Strategic effect of shadowing on listening ability. In WhiteJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on foreign language education and technology (FLEAT IV) (pp. 620–625). Kobe: Japan Association for Language Education and Technology.
41.
TannenD. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TomaselloM. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
TomaselloM. (2002). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. In TomaselloM.BatesE. (Eds.), Language development: The essential readings (pp. 169–186). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
VygotskyL.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47.
VygotskyL.S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 5: Child psychology. RieberR.W. (Ed.). New York: Plenum.
