The study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the ARMS in patients with arterial hypertension from health centers in East Lima. This instrumental research included 367 participants (48.77% men and 51.23% women) aged 35–80 years (M = 64.11; SD = 9.49). This study evaluated content validity, internal structure validity using confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance by sex, and reliability. The results demonstrated adequate content validity and a unidimensional structure with good model fit (CFI = 0.979; TLI = 0.973; SRMR = 0.064; RMSEA = 0.105). Additionally, measurement invariance by sex and age was established, and the instrument demonstrated satisfactory reliability (ω = 0.92). In conclusion, the ARMS showed robust psychometric properties in patients with arterial hypertension from health centers in East Lima.
Acuña MoraMRaymaekersK (2024) Measuring up: The significance of measurement invariance in cardiovascular research. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing23: 950–954.
2.
AlammariGAlhazzaniHAlRajhiN, et al. (2021) Validation of an Arabic version of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS). Healthcare9(11): 1430.
3.
Al-AlailiMKAbdiAMBasgutB (2022) Test performance of self-report adherence tools in patients with hypertension: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics47(12): 1932–1944.
4.
Association American Educational Research (AEA), Association American Psychological (APA), and Education National Council on Measurement in education (NCME) (2014) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
5.
BaratiMTaheri-KharamehZBandehelahiK, et al. (2018) Validation of the short form of the adherence to refills and medications scale in Iranian elders with chronic disease. JBR Journal of Clinical Diagnosis and Research12(11): 5–8.
6.
BrownTA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press.
7.
BurnierMPolychronopoulouEWuerznerG (2020) Hypertension and drug adherence in the elderly. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine7: 49.
8.
CampbellNRCPaccot BurnensMWheltonPK, et al. (2022) 2021 World Health Organization guideline on pharmacological treatment of hypertension: Policy implications for the region of the Americas. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas9: 100219.
9.
Campos-NonatoIHernández-BarreraLOviedo-SolísC, et al. (2021) Epidemiología de la hipertensión arterial en adultos mexicanos: Diagnóstico, control y tendencias. ensanut 2020. Salud Pública de México63(6): 692–704.
10.
ChenFF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal14(3): 464–504.
11.
ChenYJChangJYangSY (2020) Psychometric evaluation of chinese version of adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) and blood-pressure control among elderly with hypertension. Patient Preference and Adherence14: 213.
12.
DeJeanDGiacominiMVanstoneM, et al. (2013) Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series13(16): 1.
13.
DovalEViladrichCAngulo-BrunetA (2023) Coefficient alpha: The resistance of a Classic. Psicothema1(35): 5–20.
14.
DunnTJBaguleyTBrunsdenV (2014) From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology105(3): 399–412.
15.
FeiginVLRothGANaghaviM, et al. (2016) Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurology15(9): 913–924.
16.
FinneySJDiStefanoC (2013) Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: HancockGRMuellerRO (eds) Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course. IAP Information Age Publishing, pp.439–492.
17.
GökdoğanFKesD (2017) Validity and reliability of the Turkish adherence to refills and medications scale. International Journal of Nursing Practice23(5): e12566.
18.
González-BuenoJCalvo-CidonchaESevilla-SánchezD, et al. (2017) Traducción y adaptación transcultural al español del cuestionario ARMS para la medida de la adherencia en pacientes pluripatológicos. Atencion Primaria/Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Familia Y Comunitaria49(8): 459–464.
19.
HajriTCaceresLAngamarca-ArmijosV (2021) The burden of hypertension in Ecuador: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Human Hypertension35(5): 389–397.
20.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
21.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (2021) Perú: Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar ENDES 2021. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.
22.
KimCJParkESchlenkEA, et al. (2016) Psychometric evaluation of a Korean version of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educator42(2): 188–198.
23.
KimMTHillMNBoneLR, et al. (2000) Development and testing of the hill-bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing15(3): 90–96.
24.
KripalaniSGogginsKNwosuS, et al. (2015) Medication nonadherence before hospitalization for acute cardiac events. Journal of Health Communication20: 34–42.
25.
KripalaniSRisserJGattiME, et al. (2009) Development and evaluation of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) among low-literacy patients with chronic disease. Value in Health12(1): 118–123.
26.
LeeEKPPoonPYipBHK, et al. (2022) Global burden, regional differences, trends, and health consequences of medication nonadherence for hypertension during 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis involving 27 million patients. Journal of the American Heart Association11(17): 26582.
27.
LeeJChoiJYumY, et al. (2021) Clinical effectiveness and safety of amlodipine/losartan-based single-pill combination therapy in patients with hypertension: Findings from real-world, multicenter observational databases. Journal of Clinical Hypertension23(11): 1975–1983.
28.
LomperKChabowskiMChudiakA, et al. (2018) Psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of the adherence to refills and medications scale (ARMS) in adults with hypertension. Patient Preference and Adherence12: 2661–2670.
29.
MaCChenSYouL, et al. (2012) Development and psychometric evaluation of the treatment adherence questionnaire for patients with hypertension. Journal of Advanced Nursing68(6): 1402–1413.
30.
McDonaldRP (1999) Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Taylor & Francis.
31.
MoriskyDEAngAKrousel-WoodM, et al. (2008) Retracted: Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Hypertension10(5): 348–354.
32.
MoshagenMErdfelderE (2016) A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal23(1): 54–60.
33.
OvergaauwNAlsmaJBrinkA, et al. (2019) Drug nonadherence is a common but often overlooked cause of hypertensive urgency and emergency at the emergency department. Journal of Hypertension37(5): 1048–1057.
34.
PutnickDLBornsteinMH (2016) Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review41: 71–90.
35.
R Core Team (2019) A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
36.
Rosas-ChavezGRomero-VisurragaCARamirez-GuardiaE, et al. (2019) El grado de alfabetización en salud y adherencia al tratamiento en pacientes con hipertensión arterial en un hospital nacional de Lima, Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública36(2): 214–221.
37.
RStudio Team (2018) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, Inc.
38.
RusuRNGavrilRSAbabeiDC, et al. (2024) Validity and reliability of the Romanian version of the hill-bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale. Frontiers in Pharmacology15: 1256848.
39.
SadlerAEBelcastroFYarlequeCR (2022) Hypertension and dyslipidaemia in Argentina: Patient journey stages. International Journal of General Medicine15: 7799–7808.
40.
ShiDMaydeu-OlivaresARosseelY (2020) Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal27(1): 1–15.
41.
SongYHanHRSongHJ, et al. (2011) Psychometric evaluation of hill-bone medication adherence subscale. Asian Nursing Research5(3): 183–188.
42.
SungKCOhYSChaDH, et al. (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan/Amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan/amlodipine combination therapy for essential hypertension uncontrolled with telmisartan/amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, randomized, double-Blind TAHYTI Study. Clinical Therapeutics40(1): 50–63.e3.
43.
TanXPatelIChangJ (2014) Review of the four item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-4) and eight item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8). Innovations in Pharmacy5(3): 1–8.
44.
TegegnHGWarkSTursan D’EspaignetE, et al. (2022) Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for medication adherence in cardiovascular disease: A COSMIN systematic review. Clinical Drug Investigation42(11): 879–908.
45.
Trizano-HermosillaIAlvaradoJM (2016) Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology7: 168007.
46.
ViladrichCAngulo-BrunetADovalE (2017) Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicologia33(3): 755–782.
World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for medical research involving human subjects. Clinical Review and Education310(20): 2191–2194.
49.
YeRLiuKZhangZ, et al. (2018) Health-related quality of life of hypertension in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine19(8): 430–438.
50.
ZhouBCarrillo-LarcoRMDanaeiG, et al. (2021a) Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet398(10304): 957–980.
51.
ZhouBPerelPMensahGA, et al. (2021b) Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nature Reviews Cardiology18(11): 785–802.
