Intuitive cancer risk perceptions may inform strategies to motivate cancer prevention behaviors. This study evaluated factor structure and measurement invariance of two new measures of intuitive cancer risk, the Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales. Single- and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis models were fit to responses from three diverse samples. The confirmatory factor analysis models fit the data well, with all comparative fit indices (CFI) ≥ 0.94. Items flagged by chi-square difference tests as potentially non-invariant were largely invariant between samples according to practical fit indices (e.g. ΔCFI). These novel scales may be particularly relevant in diverse, underserved populations.
AikenLSFenaughtyAMWestSGet al. (1995) Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Womens Health1: 27–50.
2.
AtkinsonTMSalzTTouzaKKet al. (2015) Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine38(6): 837–850.
3.
BaserRE (2017) PROscorer: Scoring functions for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and other psychometric instruments (R Package Version 0.0.1). Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PROscorer
4.
BentlerPM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238.
5.
BoonyasiriwatWHungMHonSDet al. (2014) Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: A theory-based model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine47(3): 280–291.
6.
BorlandRDonaghueNHillD (1994) Illnesses that Australians most feared in 1986 and 1993. Australian Journal of Public Health18(4): 366–369.
7.
BrowneMCudeckR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 136–162.
8.
CameronLDLeventhalH (eds) (2003) The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour. London; New York: Routledge.
9.
ChenFF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(3): 464–504.
10.
CheungGWRensvoldRB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal9(2): 233–255.
11.
CohenPCohenJAikenLSet al. (1999) The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research34(3): 315–346.
12.
ConnerMNormanP (eds) (2005) Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models (2nd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.
13.
DarkePRFreedmanJL (1997) The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality31(4): 486–511.
14.
DillardAJFerrerRAUbelPAet al. (2012) Risk perception measures’ associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages. Health Psychology31(1): 106–113.
15.
FinucaneMLAlhakamiASlovicPet al. (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making13(1): 1–17.
16.
FrancoisFElyseeGShahSet al. (2009) Colon cancer knowledge and attitudes in an immigrant Haitian community. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health11(4): 319–325.
17.
GadermannAMGuhnMZumboBD (2012) Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation17(3): 1–13.
18.
HayJLBaserRWeinsteinNDet al. (2014a) Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations. Health, Risk & Society16(3): 227–242.
19.
HayJLBrennesselDKemenyMMet al. (2014b) Examining intuitive cancer risk perceptions in Haitian-Creole and Spanish-speaking populations. Journal of Transcultural Nursing16(3): 227–242.
20.
HayJLRamosMLiYet al. (2016a) Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time. Journal of Behavioral Medicine39(1): 65–74.
21.
HayJLShukECruzGet al. (2005) Thinking through cancer risk: Characterizing smokers’ process of risk determination. Qualitative Health Research15(8): 1074–1085.
22.
HayJLZaborECKumarJet al. (2016b) Cancer beliefs and patient activation in a diverse, multilingual primary care sample. Psycho-Oncology25(9): 1071–1078.
23.
HuertaEEMacarioE (1999) Communicating health risk to ethnic groups: Reaching Hispanics as a case study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute: Monographs (25): 23–26.
24.
JosephGBurkeNJTuasonNet al. (2009) Perceived susceptibility to illness and perceived benefits of preventive care: An exploration of behavioral theory constructs in a transcultural context. Health Education & Behavior36(Suppl. 5): 71S–90S.
25.
LeeSJ (2010) Uncertain futures: Individual risk and social context in decision-making in cancer screening. Health, Risk & Society12(2): 101–117.
26.
LipkusIMKuchibhatlaMMcBrideCMet al. (2000) Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention9(9): 973–975.
27.
LittleTDCardNASlegersDWet al. (2007) Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In: LittleTDBovairdJACardNA (eds) Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 121–147.
28.
LoewensteinGFWeberEUHseeCKet al. (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin127(2): 267–286.
29.
MacCallumRCRoznowskiMNecowitzLB (1992) Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin111(3): 490–504.
30.
MarshHWLüdtkeOMuthénBet al. (2010) A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment22(3): 471.
31.
MeadeAWJohnsonECBraddyPW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology93(3): 568–592.
32.
MuthénBAsparouhovT (2002) Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes4(5): 1–22.
PasickRJBurkeNJBarkerJCet al. (2009) Behavioral theory in a diverse society: Like a compass on Mars. Health Education & Behavior36(Suppl. 5): 11S–35S.
35.
PetersEMcCaulKDStefanekMet al. (2006) A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine31(1): 45–52.
36.
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
37.
SassDASchmittTAMarshHW (2014) Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal21(2): 167–180.
38.
SheeranPHarrisPREptonT (2014) Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin140(2): 511–543.
39.
ShepperdJAEmanuelASDoddVJet al. (2015) The reliability of psychological instruments in community samples: A cautionary note. Journal of Health Psychology21: 1–9.
40.
SlovicPPetersEFinucaneMLet al. (2002) The affect heuristic. In: GilovichTGriffinDKahnemanD (eds) Heuristics and Biases: Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.
41.
SlovicPPetersEFinucaneMLet al. (2005) Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology24(Suppl. 4): S35–S40.
42.
SubbotskyEQuinterosG (2002) Do cultural factors affect causal beliefs? Rational and magical thinking in Britain and Mexico. British Journal of Psychology93: 519–543.
43.
VrintenCMcGregorLMHeinrichet al. (2017) What do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer fears in the general population. Psycho-Oncology26(8): 1070–1079. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4287.
44.
WattsBGVernonSWMyersREet al. (2003) Intention to be screened over time for colorectal cancer in male automotive workers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention12(4): 339–349.
45.
WeinsteinNDKwitelAMcCaulKDet al. (2007) Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology26(2): 146–151.
