Grounded in the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model, this study investigated how individual characteristics and socio-psychological factors influenced Americans’ information seeking about the Monkeypox (Mpox) outbreak. The RISP model proposes that one’s cognitive need for information (i.e. information insufficiency) and desire to fulfill social expectations about their own information level (i.e. informational subjective norms) are key factors that motivate information seeking. Further, risk judgment and affective response contribute to these two primary motivational factors. Based on a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N = 1000), results indicated that social dominance orientation contributed to information seeking indirectly through risk judgment, information insufficiency, and relevant channel beliefs. These findings suggest that it is important to consider individual attribute such as social dominance orientation when communicating to the public about a public health crisis that affected marginal social groups disproportionately.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation50(2): 179–211.
2.
AltemeyerB (1988) Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BessetteDZwickleSWilsonR (2019) In the weeds: distinguishing organic farmers who want information about ecological weed management from those who need it. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems34(5): 460–471.
4.
Bin NaeemSKamel BoulosMN (2021) COVID-19 misinformation online and health literacy: A brief overview. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(15): 8091.
5.
BraunJNiederdeppeJ (2012) Disruption and identity maintenance in risk information seeking and processing. Communication Theory22(2): 138–162.
6.
BrehmJW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance. London: Academic Press.
7.
BrehmSSBrehmJW (2013) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. London: Academic Press.
CrossMHeerenACornicelliLJ, et al. (2018) Bovine tuberculosis management in northwest Minnesota and implications of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model for wildlife disease management. Frontiers in Veterinary Science5: 190.
11.
DongXYangJZ (2023) PFAS contamination: Pathway from communication to behavioral outcomes. Journal of Health Communication28(4): 205–217.
12.
DuckittJ (2001) A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology33(2-3): 41–113.
13.
DuckittJ (2006) Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(5): 684–696.
14.
DunningD (2011) Chapter five - the Dunning-Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. In: OlsonJMZannaMP (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp.247–296.
15.
DunwoodySGriffinRJ (2013) The role of channel beliefs in risk information seeking. In: ArvaiJRiversL (eds) Effective Risk Communication. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.246–259.
16.
DunwoodySGriffinRJ (2015) Risk information seeking and processing model. In: ChoHReimerTMcComasKA (eds) The Sage Handbook of Risk Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.102–116.
17.
DuriezBVansteenkisteMSoenensB, et al. (2007) The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality75(4): 757–782.
18.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
19.
FordJLDouglasMBarrettAK (2022) The role of pandemic fatigue in seeking and avoiding information on COVID-19 among young adults. Health Communication38(11): 2336–2349.
20.
GriffinRJDunwoodySNeuwirthK (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research80(2): S230–245.
21.
GriffinRJDunwoodySYangJZ (2013) Linking risk messages to information seeking and processing. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 323–362.
22.
GriffinRJNeuwirthKDunwoodyS, et al. (2004) Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology6(1): 23–61.
23.
GriffinRJNeuwirthKGieseJ, et al. (2002) Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Communication Research29(6): 705–732.
24.
GriffinRJTer HuurneEBoernerF, et al. (2008) After the flood: Anger, attribution, and the seeking of information. Science Communication29(3): 285–315.
25.
GuadagnoliEVelicerWF (1988) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin103(2): 265–275.
26.
HmielowskiJDWangMYDonawayRR (2018) Expanding the political philosophy dimension of the RISP model: Examining the conditional indirect effects of cultural cognition. Risk Analysis38(9): 1891–1903.
27.
HoAKSidaniusJKteilyN, et al. (2015) The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology109(6): 1003–1028.
28.
HoAKSidaniusJPrattoF, et al. (2012) Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(5): 583–606.
29.
HubnerAYHovickSR (2020) Understanding risk information seeking and processing during an infectious disease outbreak: The case of Zika virus. Risk Analysis40(6): 1212–1225.
30.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
31.
HustonSA (2013) Patients’ intentions to seek medication information from pharmacists. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association53(5): 466–474.
32.
JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAW, et al. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin129(3): 339–375.
33.
JuWSannusiSNMohamadE (2023) Stigmatizing monkeypox and COVID-19: A comparative framing study of the Washington Post’s online news. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20(4): 3347.
34.
KahlorLAYangJZLiangM-C (2018) Risky politics: Applying the planned risk information seeking model to the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Mass Communication & Society21(6): 697–719.
35.
KimHKAhnJAtkinsonL, et al. (2020) Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicountry comparative study. Science Communication42(5): 586–615.
36.
KimHKKimY (2019) Risk information seeking and processing about particulate air pollution in South Korea: The roles of cultural worldview. Risk Analysis39(5): 1071–1087.
37.
KlineR (ed.) (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
KosickiGMMcLeodJM (1990) Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In: Kraus S (ed) Mass Communication and Political Information Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.69–83.
39.
KozlovM (2022) How does monkeypox spread? What scientists know. Nature608(7924): 655–656.
40.
KuglerMJostJTNoorbaloochiS (2014) Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions?Social Justice Research27(4): 413–431.
41.
KupferschmidtK (2022) Why monkeypox is mostly hitting men who have sex with men. Science376(6600): 1364–1365.
42.
LaiC-HTangT (2021) Disaster communication behaviors in the U.S. and China: Which channels do you use and with whom?Journal of Applied Communication Research49(2): 207–227.
43.
LazarusRS (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
LeeHYJinSWHenning-SmithC, et al. (2021) Role of health literacy in health-related information-seeking behavior online: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(1): e14088.
45.
LeeT-T (2010) Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist54(1): 8–21.
46.
LeiserowitzA (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change77(1): 45–72.
47.
LiaoCZhouXZhaoD (2018) An augmented risk information seeking model: Perceived food safety risk related to food recalls. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15(9): 1800.
48.
LiSSLoS-YWuT-Y, et al. (2022) Information seeking and processing during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Taiwan: Examining the effects of emotions and informational subjective norms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(15): 1–13.
49.
LiuMChenYShiD, et al. (2021) The public’s risk information seeking and avoidance in China during early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology12: 649180.
50.
LiuZYangJZFeeleyTH (2022) Reduced risk information seeking model (RISK): A meta-analysis. Science Communication44(6): 787–813.
51.
LoAY (2013) The role of social norms in climate adaptation: Mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Global Environmental Change23(5): 1249–1257.
52.
LuH (2015) Burgers or tofu? Eating between two worlds: Risk information seeking and processing during dietary acculturation. Health Communication30(8): 758–771.
53.
LuHSongHMcComasK (2021) Seeking information about enhanced geothermal systems: The role of fairness, uncertainty, systematic processing, and information engagement intentions. Renewable Energy169: 855–864.
54.
MacCallumRCWidamanKFPreacherKJ, et al. (2001) Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research36(4): 611–637.
NabiR (2002) Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs69(3): 204–216.
57.
NgQXYauCELimYL, et al. (2022) Public sentiment on the global outbreak of monkeypox: An unsupervised machine learning analysis of 352,182 twitter posts. Public Health213: 1–4.
58.
Perez-ArcheHMillerDJ (2021) What predicts attitudes toward transgender and nonbinary people? An exploration of gender, authoritarianism, social dominance, and gender ideology. Sex Roles85(3): 172–189.
59.
PerryRSibleyCGDuckittJ (2013) Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality47(1): 116–127.
60.
PoteatVPMereishEH (2012) Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology33(2): 211–224.
61.
PowellMDunwoodySGriffinR, et al. (2007) Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk. Public Understanding of Science16(3): 323–343.
62.
PrattoFLiuJHLevinS, et al. (2000) Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology31(3): 369–409.
63.
PrattoFSidaniusJStallworthLM, et al. (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(4): 741–763.
64.
PrattoFStallworthLMConway-LanzS (1998) Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28(20): 1853–1875.
65.
PuckettJAZachary DuBoisLMcNeillJN, et al. (2020) The association between social dominance orientation, critical consciousness, and gender minority stigma. Journal of Homosexuality67(8): 1081–1096.
66.
ReynoldsRMWeaverSRNymanAL, et al. (2022) Trust in COVID-19 information sources and perceived risk among smokers: A nationally representative survey. Plos One17(1): e0262097.
67.
ReynoldsTZhuLAquinoK, et al. (2021) Dual pathways to bias: Evaluators’ ideology and ressentiment independently predict racial discrimination in hiring contexts. E-Journal of Applied Psychology106(4): 624–641.
68.
RimalRNRealK (2003) Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory13(2): 184–203.
69.
RoseKMTomanEOlsenCS (2017) Public use of information about smoke emissions: Application of the risk information seeking and processing (RISP) model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research47(11): 1527–1537.
70.
RosenstockIM (1974) The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs2(4): 354–386.
71.
RubinZPeplauLA (1975) Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues31(3): 65–89.
72.
SahRMohantyARedaA, et al. (2022) Stigma during monkeypox outbreak. Frontiers in Public Health10: 1023519.
73.
SidaniusJCotterillSSheehy-SkeffingtonJ, et al. (2017) Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In: SibleyCGBarlowFK (ed) The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.149–187.
74.
SidaniusJKteilyNSheehy-SkeffingtonJ, et al. (2013) You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality81(3): 313–323.
75.
SidaniusJPrattoF (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Suarez-LledoVAlvarez-GalvezJ (2021) Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(1): e17187.
77.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (eds) (2019) Using Multivariate Statistics, 7th edn.New York, NY: Pearson.
78.
Ter HuurneEFJGriffinRJGuttelingJM (2009) Risk information seeking among U.S. and Dutch residents: An application of the model of risk information seeking and processing. Science Communication31(2): 215–237.
79.
TichenorPJDonohueGAOlienCN (1970) Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 159–170.
80.
TropeYLibermanN (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review117(2): 440–463.
81.
ValloneRPRossLLepperMR (1985) The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49(3): 577–585.
82.
WongJCSYangJZLiuZ, et al. (2021) Fast and frugal: Information processing related to the coronavirus pandemic. Risk Analysis41(5): 771–786.
83.
YangJZHuangJ (2019) Seeking for your own sake: Chinese citizens’ motivations for information seeking about air pollution. Environmental Communication13(5): 603–616.
84.
YangJZKahlorLA (2013) What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication35(2): 189–212.
85.
YangJZKahlorLALiH (2014) A United States-China comparison of risk information–seeking intentions. Communication Research41(7): 935–960.
86.
ZhengHJiangSRosenthalS (2022) Linking online vaccine information seeking to vaccination intention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Communication44(3): 446–346.
87.
ZhouXRobertoAJLuAH (2023) Understanding online health risk information seeking and avoiding during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Communication38(3): 532–542.
88.
ZhuWWeiJZhaoD (2016) Anti-nuclear behavioral intentions: The role of perceived knowledge, information processing, and risk perception. Energy Policy88: 168–177.
