Pain-related cognitive biases have been demonstrated in chronic pain patients, yet despite theoretical predictions are rarely investigated in combination. Combined cognitive biases were explored in individuals with chronic headache (n = 17) and pain-free controls (n = 20). Participants completed spatial cueing (attentional bias), sentence generation (interpretation bias) and free recall tasks (memory bias), with ambiguous sensory-pain, disability and neutral words. Individuals with chronic headache, relative to controls, showed significantly greater interpretation and memory biases favouring ambiguous sensory-pain words and interpretation bias favouring ambiguous disability words. No attentional bias was found. Further research is needed exploring the temporal pattern of cognitive biases.
BaertSDe RaedtRSchachtR. (2010) Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry41: 265–274.
2.
Bar-HaimYLamyDLeeP. (2007) Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin133: 1–24.
3.
BeckATHaighEA (2014) Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology10: 1–24.
4.
BeckATEmeryGGreenbergRL (1985) Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BuschHMontgomeryWMelinB. (2006) Visuospatial and verbal memory in chronic pain patients: An explorative study. Pain Practice6: 179–185.
6.
CarletonRNRichterAAAsmundsonGJG (2011) Attention modification in persons with fibromyalgia: A double blind, randomized clinical trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy40: 279–290.
7.
ChapmanSMartinM (2011) Attention to pain words in irritable bowel syndrome: Increased orienting and speeded engagement. British Journal of Health Psychology16: 47–60.
8.
CleelandCSRyanKM (1994) Pain assessment: Global use of the brief pain inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore23: 129–138.
9.
CrombezGVan RyckeghemDEcclestonC. (2013) Attentional bias to pain-related information: A meta-analysis. Pain154: 497–510.
10.
CummingG (2012) Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.
11.
DehghaniMSharpeLNicholasMK (2003) Selective attention to pain-related information in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Pain105: 37–46.
12.
DonaldsonCLamDMathewsA (2007) Attention and rumination in major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy45: 2664–2678.
13.
DruryDA (1969) Homographs and pseudo-homographs. Word Ways: The Journal of Recreational Linguistics2: 146–154.
14.
EveraertJTierensMUziebloK. (2013) The indirect effect of attention bias on memory via interpretation bias: Evidence for the combined cognitive bias hypothesis in subclinical depression. Cognition & Emotion27: 1450–1459.
15.
FaulFErdfelderELangA-G. (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39: 175–191.
16.
FoxERussoRBowlesR. (2001) Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130: 681–700.
17.
HirschCRClarkDMMathewsA (2006) Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy37: 223–236.
18.
JonesEBSharpeL (2014) The effect of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) on avoidance of pain during an acute experimental pain task. Pain155: 1569–1576.
19.
KarimiZPilenkoAHeldSM. (2016) Recall bias in patients with chronic low back pain: Individual pain response patterns are more important than pain itself!International Journal of Behavioral Medicine23: 12–20.
20.
KosterEHDe RaedtRLeymanL. (2010) Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases. Behaviour Research and Therapy48: 219–225.
21.
LiossiCSchothDEBradleyBP. (2009) Time course of attentional bias for pain-related cues in chronic daily headache sufferers. European Journal of Pain13: 963–969.
22.
LiossiCSchothDEGodwinHJ. (2014) Using eye movements to investigate selective attention in chronic daily headache. Pain155: 503–510.
23.
McKellarJDClarkMEShrinerJ (2003) The cognitive specificity of associative responses in patients with chronic pain. British Journal of Clinical Psychology42: 27–39.
24.
MartinMChapmanSCE (2010) Cognitive processing in putative functional gastrointestinal disorder: Rumination yields orientation to social threat not pain. European Journal of Pain14: 207–213.
25.
MelzackR (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain1: 277–299.
26.
MoggKHolmesAGarnerM. (2008) Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy46: 656–667.
27.
NelsonDLMcEvoyCLSchreiberTA (2004) The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36: 402–407.
28.
NikendeiCWaldherrSSchiltenwolfM. (2009) Memory performance related to organic and psychosocial illness attributions in somatoform pain disorder patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research67: 199–206.
29.
PincusTMorleyS (2001) Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: A review and integration. Psychological Bulletin127: 599–617.
30.
PincusTFraserLPearceS (1998) Do chronic pain patients ‘Stroop’ on pain stimuli?British Journal of Clinical Psychology37: 49–58.
31.
PincusTPearceSPerrottA (1996) Pain patients’ bias in the interpretation of ambiguous homophones. British Journal of Medical Psychology69: 259–266.
32.
PincusTPearceSMcClellandA. (1994) Interpretation bias in responses to ambiguous cues in pain patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research38: 347–353.
33.
SchothDELiossiC (2013) Specificity and time-course of attentional bias in chronic headache: A visual-probe investigation. Clinical Journal of Pain29: 583–590.
34.
SchothDELiossiC (2016) Biased interpretation of ambiguous information in patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current studies. Health Psychology35(9): 944–956.
35.
SchothDEDelgado NunesVLiossiC (2012) Attentional bias towards pain-related information in chronic pain; a meta-analysis of visual-probe investigations. Clinical Psychology Review32: 13–25.
36.
SchothDEGeorgallisTLiossiC (2013) Attentional bias modification in people with chronic pain: A proof of concept study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy42: 233–243.
37.
SchothDEGodwinHJLiversedgeSP. (2015) Eye movements during visual search for emotional faces in individuals with chronic headache. European Journal of Pain19: 722–732.
38.
SchrootenMVancleefLVlaeyenJ (2015) Attention allocation to ambiguous health/somatic threat cues. European Journal of Pain19: 1002–1011.
39.
SerbicDPincusT (2014) Diagnostic uncertainty and recall bias in chronic low back pain. Pain155: 1540–1546.
40.
SharpeLDearBFSchrieberL (2009) Attentional biases in chronic pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis: Hypervigilance or difficulties disengaging?The Journal of Pain10: 329–335.
41.
SharpeLIanielloMDearBF. (2012) Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patients? Results of 2 randomised, controlled trials. Pain153: 722–731.
StewartWFLiptonRBDowsonAJ. (2001) Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology56: S20–S28.
44.
TaghaviMRMoradiARNeshat-DoostHT. (2000) Interpretation of ambiguous emotional information in clinically anxious children and adolescents. Cognition & Emotion14:809–822.
45.
ToddJSharpeLJohnsonA. (2015) Towards a new model of attentional biases in the development, maintenance, and management of pain. Pain156: 1589–1600.
46.
WilliamsAC (2002) Facial expression of pain: An evolutionary account. Behavioral and Brain Sciences25: 439–455.
47.
WilsonM (1988) MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers20: 6–10.
48.
ZigmondASSnaithRP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica67: 361–370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
