Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Therapeutic psychedelic administration and contact with nature have been associated with the same psychological mechanisms: decreased rumination and negative affect, enhanced psychological connectedness and mindfulness-related capacities, and heightened states of awe and transcendent experiences, all processes linked to improvements in mental health amongst clinical and healthy populations. Nature-based settings can have inherently psychologically soothing properties which may complement all stages of psychedelic therapy (mainly preparation and integration) whilst potentiating increases in nature relatedness, with associated psychological benefits. Maximising enhancement of nature relatedness through therapeutic psychedelic administration may constitute an independent and complementary pathway towards improvements in mental health that can be elicited by psychedelics.

Keywords

drug effects health promotion health psychology well-being psychedelics

Introduction

Nature relatedness has been associated with a broad range of benefits to psychological health and well-being. It is a measurable, trait-like construct of one’s self-identification with nature, defined as a sense of ‘oneness with the natural world’ (Mayer and Frantz, 2004) or a ‘sustained awareness of the interrelatedness between one’s self and the rest of nature’ (Zylstra et al., 2014). It is a stable state of consciousness, that is experiential, emotional and highly personal, rather than rational or deliberation-based (Lumber et al., 2017; Nisbet et al., 2009; Nisbet and Zelenski, 2013; Richardson and Sheffield, 2017; Wright and Matthews, 2015; Zylstra et al., 2014). Nature relatedness is considered to be a basic psychological human need (Baxter and Pelletier, 2019), associated with mental well-being and also with increased contact with nature (Fretwell and Greig, 2019; Lin et al., 2014; Mayer and Frantz, 2004; Nisbet et al., 2009, 2011; Nisbet and Zelenski, 2013; Tam, 2013; Van Gordon et al., 2018; Wolsko and Lindberg, 2013; Wright and Matthews, 2015). Contact with nature is associated with an extraordinarily broad range of benefits to physical and mental health and well-being (for reviews see Frumkin et al., 2017; Twohig-Bennett and Jones, 2018). Nature relatedness (sometimes referred to as nature connectedness in the literature) is distinct from nature contact, yielding independent and additive benefits, although the two have a positively reinforcing relationship.

Research suggests that experiences with classical or serotonergic psychedelic compounds (acting as agonists at the serotonin 5-HT_2A receptor) (Carhart-Harris et al., 2014; Glennon et al., 1984; Nichols, 2016) can foster sustained increases in nature relatedness (Forstmann and Sagioglou, 2017; Kettner et al., 2019; Lyons and Carhart-Harris, 2018) and appreciation for and contact with nature (Doblin, 1991; Luke, 2017; Kangaslampi et al., 2020; Noorani et al., 2018; Studerus et al., 2011; Watts et al., 2017). Furthermore, access to nature-based settings during psychedelic sessions predicts positive changes in nature relatedness (Kettner et al., 2019). An increase in nature relatedness likely occurs through a number of different mechanisms, such as through increased mindfulness-related capacities, connectedness, openness to experience and eliciting strong emotional states (for a review see Aday et al., 2020). That psychedelics such as psilocybin are capable of eliciting sustained increases in nature relatedness even when administered in clinical settings lacking in nature (Lyons and Carhart-Harris, 2018) is a noteworthy finding.

Increased nature relatedness is just one of many psychological benefits that can be occasioned through therapeutic administration of psychedelics to both healthy and clinical populations. In clinical populations, psychedelic substances are currently being investigated for the treatment of major depressive disorder and existential anxiety secondary to a terminal cancer diagnosis (Agin-Liebes et al., 2020; Barrett et al., 2020; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016a, 2018a; Gasser et al., 2014; Griffiths et al., 2016; Grob et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2016), addiction (Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Bogenschutz and Johnson, 2016; Johnson et al., 2014, 2016) and PTSD (Krediet et al., 2020). For reviews of clinical studies with psychedelics see dos Santos et al. (2018). In studies looking at psychedelic administration amongst healthy populations, sustained increases across numerous measures of psychological well-being are observed (see reviews by Aday et al., 2020; Gandy, 2019).

The mechanisms by which psychedelics confer benefits to well-being share overlap with how nature relatedness and nature contact yield benefits. Psychedelics have been associated with eliciting sustained increases in mindfulness-related capacities (Madsen et al., 2020; Murphy-Beiner and Soar, 2020; Sampedro et al., 2017; Soler et al., 2018; Uthaug et al., 2019), facilitating enhanced connectedness, empathy and unitive states (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018b; Forstmann et al., 2020; Griffiths et al., 2018; Mason et al., 2019; Noorani et al., 2018; Pokorny et al., 2017; van Mulukom et al., 2020; Watts et al., 2017) and eliciting awe (Griffiths et al., 2006; Hendricks, 2018; Noorani et al., 2018; Richards et al., 1977; Watts et al., 2017). Psychedelics have also been found to increase openness to experience in an enduring way (Barrett et al., 2020; Erritzoe et al., 2018; Lebedev et al., 2016; MacLean et al., 2011; Madsen et al., 2020).

In this review, we lay out the argument for utilising nature-based settings and practices for some stages of psychedelic therapy (mainly preparation and integration). The current model for psychedelic therapy requires the psychedelic sessions themselves take place in a secure clinical setting for the safety and predictability this provides. However, it may be that incorporating some elements of nature contact and connection into the preparation and integration phases could support the therapy model, potentially by amplifying some of the key therapeutic mechanisms, whilst also increasing the likelihood that a patient will use nature as an ongoing resource. The potential of psychedelics to increase nature relatedness may warrant the development of a new model of psychedelic therapy specifically focused on increasing nature relatedness for the sake of the well-being this can bring to the individual, and the nature-protective potential this could bring to our communities. Such a model could be used with a healthy (non-clinical) population, with whom the possibility of conducting the psychedelic session itself in a secure and sheltered natural environment could be explored.

Mental health benefits of nature relatedness and contact

Nature contact and mental health

The inherent healing power of nature has been recognised for centuries (Olmsted, 1865; Kempf, 1905; Ward Thompson, 2011). Nature can be defined in this context as ‘areas containing elements of living systems that include plants and nonhuman animals across a range of scales and degrees of human management, from a small urban park through to relatively “pristine wilderness”’ (Bratman et al., 2012: 120).

When it comes to mental health, contact with nature is associated with reductions in mental distress (White et al., 2013), anxiety (Beyer et al., 2014; Bratman et al., 2015a; Maas et al., 2009; Nutsford et al., 2013; Song et al., 2013, 2015) and depression (Astell-Burt et al., 2014; Berman et al., 2012; Beyer et al., 2014; Cohen-Cline et al., 2015; Gascon et al., 2015; Maas et al., 2009; McEachan et al., 2016; Nutsford et al., 2013; Shanahan et al., 2016). Nature contact can yield improvements in mood and memory in patients suffering from major depressive disorder (Berman et al., 2012) and improve symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Anderson et al., 2018a, 2018b; Poulsen, 2017; Poulsen et al., 2016). It can also reduce rumination (Bratman et al., 2015a, 2015b), and stress levels (for reviews see Berto, 2014; Haluza et al., 2014), with this stress reduction being an important health benefit alone and a potential mechanism for further health benefits (Lovallo, 2015).

Contact with nature is a strong predictor of psychological well-being (Bowler et al., 2010; Capaldi et al., 2015; McMahan and Estes, 2015), elevating both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being (Capaldi et al., 2015) and facilitating psychological restoration (Berman et al., 2008; Hartig, 2008; Hartig et al., 1991, 2011; Korpela et al., 2014; van den Berg et al., 2014), the latter being defined as the renewal of psychological resources depleted by mental exertion or stress, such as attention and mood (Hartig et al., 2001). Time in nature has been found to increase vitality (Ryan et al., 2010), self-esteem (Barton and Pretty, 2010), and result in higher positive affect (associated with the extent a person feels happy, joyous, interested and active) and lower negative affect (associated with a predisposition towards negative feelings such as emotional distress and states such as sadness, guilt and fear) (Bratman et al., 2015a; MacKerron and Mourato, 2013; McMahan and Estes, 2015; Neill et al., 2019; Passmore and Holder, 2017; van den Bosch and Sang, 2017). Even 5–10 minutes spent in a natural setting is sufficient to improve psychological well-being and lower anxiety and stress levels (Meredith et al., 2020; Neill et al., 2019).

Nature relatedness and mental health

In addition to nature contact, there is a substantial body of research literature that highlights a strong association between nature relatedness and psychological health and eudaimonic well-being, that is, subjective experiences linked to living a life of virtue in pursuit of human excellence, associated with experiences of self-actualisation, vitality and personal expressiveness (for a review see Pritchard et al., 2020). One study reported a positive relationship between nature relatedness and eudaimonic well-being that was nearly four times larger than the increase in the latter associated with higher socio-economic status (Martin et al., 2020).

Specifically, nature relatedness has been associated with enhanced vitality (Capaldi et al., 2014; Cervinka et al., 2012; Ryan and Frederick, 1997), greater perceived life meaning (Cervinka et al., 2012; Nisbet et al., 2011), life satisfaction (Mayer and Frantz, 2004), feelings of worthwhileness (Fretwell and Greig, 2019; Martin et al., 2020), greater happiness and positive affect (Capaldi et al., 2014; Fretwell and Greig, 2019; Mayer et al., 2009; Nisbet et al., 2011; Pritchard et al., 2020; Zelenski and Nisbet, 2014) and reduced levels of anxiety (Capaldi et al., 2014; Martyn and Brymer, 2016; Zelenski and Nisbet, 2014). In addition, nature relatedness is associated with higher levels of self-reported personal growth (Pritchard et al., 2020), enhanced psychological functioning (Sobko et al., 2018) and resilience (Ingulli and Lindbloom, 2013). Nature relatedness is also associated with physical activity (Puhakka et al., 2018), which is linked to good mental health (Saxena et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 1985). While nature relatedness is associated with a broad range of psychological benefits, it may be associated with modern health worries perceived to result from living in artificial environments (Dömötör et al., 2017).

Nature relatedness is also a strong predictor of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviour (Diessner et al., 2018; Dutcher et al., 2007; Forstmann and Sagioglou, 2017; Geng et al., 2015; Gkargkavouzi et al., 2019; Mackay and Schmitt, 2019; Martin et al., 2020; Mayer and Frantz, 2004; Nisbet et al., 2009; Nisbet and Zelenski, 2013; Otto and Pensini, 2017; Restall and Conrad, 2015; Richardson et al., 2020; Tam, 2013; Whitburn et al., 2020; Zylstra et al., 2014), this being a salient finding, given a notable lack of effective interventions for reversing environmentally damaging human behaviour (Prescott and Logan, 2017). Pro-environmental behaviour has been associated with well-being (Corral-Verdugo et al., 2013; Kaida and Kaida, 2016; Netuveli and Watts, 2020; Prati et al., 2017) and strongly linked to prosociality (the intent to benefit others) – with the two likely being mutually reinforcing (Neaman et al., 2018). However, aspects of nature relatedness reflecting self-identification with nature and a conservation worldview may be associated with increased depression, anxiety or stress (Dean et al., 2018), likely due to increased awareness of human driven ecological damage and destruction.

Nature relatedness acts as an important mediator for some of the benefits obtained while spending time in nature. For example, nature relatedness was reported to mediate the link between contact with nature and subjective well-being and ecological behaviour (Martin et al., 2020; Pensini et al., 2016) in addition to mediating the relationship between engagement with natural beauty and pro-environmental behaviour (Diessner et al., 2018). Likewise, it was found to partially mediate a number of other positive effects experienced in natural settings such as increased attentional capacity, propensity to experience positive emotions and the ability to reflect on a life problem (McMahan et al., 2018; Mayer et al., 2009), while promoting a more positive body image (Swami et al., 2016, 2020). Furthermore, nature relatedness was found to be positively associated with the perceived restorativeness of natural settings (Berto et al., 2018), psychological benefits obtained from outdoor exercise (Lawton et al., 2017; Loureiro and Veloso, 2014) and predicts life satisfaction and self-esteem when individuals are attuned to nature’s beauty (Zhang et al., 2014). Following contact with nature, higher levels of nature relatedness have been found to positively predict life satisfaction (Chang et al., 2020), transcendent and awe-inspiring experiences (Davis and Gatersleben, 2013) and to elicit higher valuations of intrinsic (e.g. personal growth, intimacy and community) as opposed to extrinsic (e.g. money, image and social status) aspirations (Dopko, 2017; Weinstein et al., 2009).

Research indicates that childhood is a crucial life period for the development of a bond with nature (Berk, 2006; Chawla, 1999; Kals et al., 1999; Kellert, 2002; Ward Thompson et al., 2008). Greater contact with nature during childhood is associated with greater nature relatedness, contact with nature and pro-environmental behaviours in adulthood (Chawla, 1999; Chawla and Cushing, 2007; Chawla and Derr, 2012; Chawla and Flanders, 2007; Fretwell and Greig, 2019; Hinds and Sparks, 2008; Kals et al., 1999; Laird et al., 2014; Lohr and Pearson-Mims, 2005; Rosa et al., 2018; Tam, 2013; Wells and Lekies, 2006). However, as urbanisation increases globally (Dye, 2008; Eigenbrod et al., 2011; United Nations, 2018), increasing numbers of people are being brought up in nature-depleted environments (Eigenbrod et al., 2011; Soga and Gaston, 2016; Turner et al., 2004; van den Berg et al., 2007) which is likely to negatively impact people’s connection to nature (Fretwell and Greig, 2019). In addition, increasing usage of electronic entertainment technology and smartphones appears to be fuelling a growing disconnection from nature (Larson et al., 2018; Pergams and Zaradic, 2006; Richardson et al., 2018). This disconnection is further evidenced by a shift away from nature-based content in media and cultural products since the 1950’s (Kesebir and Kesebir, 2017; Prévot-Julliard et al., 2015).

There is a need for interventions able to foster sustained increases in nature relatedness (Frantz and Mayer, 2014; Nisbet and Zelenski, 2014; Richardson and Sheffield, 2017; Wright and Matthews, 2015), as passive contact with nature alone may only elicit transient increases (Nisbet and Zelenski, 2014) or be insufficient to increase it (Ernst and Theimer, 2011; Hamann and Ivtzan, 2016; Zylstra et al., 2014). Investigations into experimental manipulations of nature relatedness are lacking (Richardson and Sheffield, 2017). From what is known, with the exception of being an occasional consequence of passive and active nature contact, nature relatedness appears to be a deeply held and stable trait, and seems resistant to change like other environmental attitudes (Nisbet and Zelenski, 2014; Wright and Matthews, 2015) and personality traits (Terracciano et al., 2005, 2006).

Potential beneficial synergy of psychedelics and nature contact

Overlapping mechanisms between psychedelic administration and contact with nature

Neurobiological

Natural settings may elicit mind/brain states that share some similarities with psychedelic mind/brain states. Subjects walking in forests have been found to exhibit stronger functional connectivity between different brain regions than people walking in busy urban environments (Chen et al., 2015). Similarly, psychedelics appear to reduce modular activity, while enhancing global connectivity in the brain (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016c; Tagliazucchi et al., 2016), with effects extending at least a month after the psychedelic session (Barrett et al., 2020).

Both psychedelics (Barrett et al., 2020; Carhart-Harris et al., 2012; Speth et al., 2016; Watts et al., 2017) and contact with nature (Bratman et al., 2015a, 2015b) appear to reduce rumination and activity in areas of the brain implicated in depression, including the default mode network (DMN) (Hamilton et al., 2015). The DMN is involved with capacities involving self-projection, including remembering the past, envisioning the future and considering the thoughts and perspectives of others (Buckner and Caroll, 2007; Spreng and Grady, 2010) with parts of this brain region thought to mediate the sense of self (Letheby and Gerrans, 2017; Smigielski et al., 2019b). Rumination has been linked to the DMN (Zhou et al., 2020) and increased functional connectivity between the DMN and subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC), including increased regional cerebral blood flow in the latter (Hamilton et al., 2015). Rumination is associated with mood disorders such as depression and anxiety (for a review see Olatunji et al., 2013) and is an important predictor and maintaining factor of persistent PTSD (for a review see Szabo et al., 2017). Contact with nature appears to reduce activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC) which is a major node of the DMN (Bratman et al., 2015b). Similarly, intravenous psilocybin administration has been found to acutely decrease blood flow and metabolism in the sgPFC and also the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) which is another major node of the DMN (Carhart-Harris et al., 2012).

Psychological

Connectedness

Connectedness has been suggested as a key phenomenon relevant to both the acute action of psychedelics and their longer-term effects (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018b; Watts et al., 2017). The construct of connectedness is currently being defined as an empathic and embodied sense of closeness to self, others and world/universe. An upcoming measure of connectedness, the Watts Connectedness Scale (WCS) has three subscales (i) ‘connection to self’ which includes connection to senses, emotions, values and life meaning; (ii) ‘connection to others’ which includes feeling part of the surrounding environment and empathy for others (iii) ‘connection to world/universe’ which includes connection with nature, the ‘bigger picture’ and feeling that everything is interconnected. All of these are important components of the capacity for communion with the natural world. We propose that the ability of psychedelics to increase nature relatedness may be a component of a more general sense of connectedness so often associated with the psychedelic experience.

Ego-dissolution and the (arguably mutually dependent) unitive experience may be central to the experiences of increased interconnectedness that can occur. Ego-dissolution has been described as ‘a disruption of ego-boundaries, which results in a blurring of the distinction between self-representation and object-representation’ (Nour et al., 2016) and is strongly associated with nature relatedness, both retrospectively (Nour et al., 2017) and prospectively (Kettner et al., 2019) suggesting this relationship is causative, rather than merely correlative. This dissolution of boundaries is reliably occasioned by psychedelics, and may result in feelings of unity and oneness with nature (Grob, 2002; Grof, 1980) and the universe (Riba et al., 2001). Additionally, administration of psilocybin has been found to elicit dose-dependent increases in measures of ‘external unity’ (Griffiths et al., 2006, 2008, 2011), or feelings of interconnectedness with the external world.

Nature contact itself can lead to greater connectedness, acting in a similar way to psychedelics. Just as ego-dissolution under psychedelics is associated with the dissolution of self-referential boundaries (Johnson et al., 2008), connectedness to nature can yield a similar effect (Dutcher et al., 2007). Nature relatedness is also associated with empathy (Metz, 2014), and an increased acknowledgement of nature has also been implicated in enhancing connectedness to other people and life as a whole (Passmore and Holder, 2017).

The capacity of psychedelics and nature contact to increase a sense of connectedness is notable, as a sense of ‘disconnection’, alienation or isolation has been implicated with a broad range of mental illnesses including eating disorders (Huemer et al., 2011), bipolar personality disorder (Kverme et al., 2019), PTSD (McDermott et al., 2012) and depression (Karp, 2017; Sorajjakool et al., 2008; Watts et al., 2017). Interestingly, feelings of disconnection from nature and other humans are not uncommon insights described by psychedelic users (St John, 2018), and this disconnection is frequently viewed as a source of health and societal problems, with these substances perceived to partly facilitate healing by amending this disconnection (Fotiou, 2012; Gearin, 2015, 2017; Schmid, 2013; St John, 2018; Watts et al., 2017; Winkelman, 2013). Connectedness is considered a key predictor and mediator of well-being (Capaldi et al., 2015; Cervinka et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2008; Saeri et al., 2018; Zelenski and Nisbet, 2014), in addition to a factor linked to recovery of mental health, including recovery from depression and addiction (Drake and Whitley, 2014; Leamy et al., 2011).

Mystical experience

Feelings of interconnectedness are a core facet of the peak or mystical-type experiences that psilocybin can occasion (Barrett and Griffiths, 2018; MacLean et al., 2011). Other core features of this experience include deep feelings of unity, a sense of sacredness, deeply felt positive mood, a sense of transcending time and space, ineffability and paradoxicality and a noetic quality (Griffiths et al., 2006). In addition to being a key component of the long-term benefits reported in both clinical and healthy populations undergoing psychedelic sessions (Aday et al., 2020; Barrett and Griffiths, 2018; Johnson et al., 2019), this experience has been found to be strongly associated with enduring positive changes in people’s relationship to nature in a retrospective study of people’s first psychedelic experiences (Kangaslampi et al., 2020). Inversely, nature-based settings appear prone to eliciting transcendent or mystical-type experiences (Ashley, 2007; Bethelmy and Corraliza, 2019; Harrild and Luke, 2020; Laski, 1961; Marshall, 2005; Snell and Simmonds, 2012; Williams and Harvey, 2001) which may include experiential components such as deeply felt positive mood, unity, timelessness and states of mindful absorption. In addition, one study comparing mystical experiences that occur in natural and human-built settings found that both significantly predicted psychological well-being, but only mystical experiences occurring in natural settings predicted an increase in pro-environmental behaviour (Snell and Simmonds, 2015). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psychedelics are likely linked to the sustained increases in measures of spirituality reported by people that take them (Lerner and Lyvers, 2006; Móró et al., 2011; for a review see Aday et al., 2020). Spiritual feelings occur on deeper levels of experience than the intellect alone, involving emotions and meaning, and perceptions of connecting to something larger than oneself (Schroeder, 1992), similar to nature relatedness (Howell et al., 2011; Lumber et al., 2017).

Awe

The experience of awe has been linked to enhanced well-being (Anderson et al., 2018b; Dong and Ni, 2019; Rudd et al., 2012), life satisfaction (Rudd et al., 2012), prosociality (Bai et al., 2017; Piff et al., 2015; Sturm et al., 2020), and reduced negative affect (Lopes et al., 2020), and mental distress (Sturm et al., 2020), in addition to being associated with nature relatedness (Bethelmy and Corraliza, 2019) and pro-environmental behaviour (Wang and Liu, 2019; Zhao et al., 2018), all enduring effects associated with psychedelic use (Gandy, 2019). Psychedelics have been found to elicit feelings of awe (Griffiths et al., 2006; Hendricks, 2018; Noorani et al., 2018; Riba et al., 2001; Richards et al., 1977; Watts et al., 2017), and an enhancement of awe may persist beyond the acute experience (Noorani et al., 2018). This in turn has been linked to enhanced feelings of connectedness and empathy (Nelson-Coffey et al., 2019; van Mulukom et al., 2020). Nature can be considered a prototypical inducer of awe (Bethelmy and Corraliza, 2019; Keltner and Haidt, 2003), with experiences of awe more reliably triggered by exposure to natural rather than built environments (Ballew and Omoto, 2018). It has been proposed that administering psychedelics in natural settings known to elicit awe may enhance treatment efficacy of psychedelic therapy if safety is ensured (Hendricks, 2018). Experiences of awe in nature may be associated with perception of large natural objects such as mountains or vistas, events such as storms, or objects with infinite repetition, including waves and fractal patterns, such as trees, clouds, rain and birdsong – and a ‘smallness of self’ in this context (Forsythe and Sheehy, 2011; Keltner and Haidt, 2003; Richards, 2001; Shiota et al., 2007; Sturm et al., 2020). Perception of fractal patterns is also commonly associated with the visual imagery elicited by psychedelics (Klüver, 1966; Varley et al., 2020). Awe is deeply tied to feelings of spirituality (Hu et al., 2018; Kearns and Tyler, 2020; Preston and Shin, 2017; Van Cappellen and Saroglou, 2012), and spirituality and nature relatedness appear to be strongly linked (de Jager Meezenbroek et al., 2012; Dömötör et al., 2017; Saraglou et al., 2008; Trigwell et al., 2014). Spirituality can act as a mediator between nature relatedness and contact with nature and psychological well-being (Kamitsis and Francis, 2013; Knepple Carney and Patrick, 2016; Trigwell et al., 2014).

Reduction of negative affect

Psychedelics may elicit strong emotional states during the acute experience, and challenging emotions such as fear or grief are not uncommon (Belser et al., 2017; Griffiths et al., 2006, 2011; Haijen et al., 2018; Prepeliczay, 2002; Studerus et al., 2012). However, their longer term impact on affect has been consistently demonstrated to be positive. Reductions in negative affect are usually reported the day after a psychedelic session and tend to endure for weeks or months (Barrett et al., 2020; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016a, 2018a; Uthaug et al., 2018, 2019; Watts et al., 2017). Both nature relatedness and nature contact appear to have similar and potentially synergistic effects on reducing negative affect (Bratman et al., 2015a; Capaldi et al., 2014; Hamann and Ivtzan, 2016; Lopes et al., 2020; Mayer et al., 2009; McMahan and Estes, 2015; McMahan et al., 2018; Neill et al., 2019; Nisbet et al., 2011; Passmore and Holder, 2017; Pritchard et al., 2020; van den Bosch and Sang, 2017; Zelenski and Nisbet, 2014).

Major depression diagnoses are characterised by high levels of negative affect, with concurrent attenuated levels of positive affect (Boumparis et al., 2016; Clark and Watson, 1991; Watson et al., 1988; Watson and Naragon-Gainey, 2010), this being established in numerous studies (Brown et al., 1998; Kring et al., 2007; Lonigan et al., 2003). Negative affect has been found to act as general predictor of psychiatric disorder, and is strongly associated with mood and anxiety disorders (Hofmann et al., 2012), substance craving (Martel et al., 2014; Schlauch et al., 2013; Sinha and O’Malley, 1999; Volkow et al., 2016; Witkiewitz and Villarroel, 2009) and with rumination in depression (Iqbal and Dark, 2015; Thomsen, 2006). A reduction in negative affect has been found to reduce the strength and frequency of substance cravings following contact with natural environments (Martin et al., 2019).

Mindfulness

Mindfulness has been defined as ‘being attentive to and aware of what is taking place in the present’ (Brown and Ryan, 2003: 822). Psychedelics can foster enduring increases in measures of mindfulness-related capacities (Madsen et al., 2020; Murphy-Beiner and Soar, 2020; Sampedro et al., 2017; Soler et al., 2018; Uthaug et al., 2019), even when used outside the context of a mindfulness meditation practice. Cultivating mindfulness also enhances qualities of the acute psychedelic experience, in addition to the long-term psychological benefits obtained from psychedelic use (Griffiths et al., 2018; Smigielski et al., 2019a). Mindfulness has also been found to be related to both nature relatedness and psychological well-being (Howell et al., 2011) and is associated with pro-environmental behaviour (Barbaro and Pickett, 2016). There is a synergistic, positive association between mindfulness and nature relatedness (Andersen, 2017; Aspy and Proeve, 2017; Schutte and Malouff, 2018; Unsworth et al., 2016; Van Gordon et al., 2018), and the former has been found to enhance the latter in natural settings (Nisbet et al., 2019; Unsworth et al., 2016). Other studies confirm nature relatedness to be strongly associated with mindfulness (Howell et al., 2011; Wolsko and Lindberg, 2013).

Contact with natural settings can yield meditative, reflective mind states (Aspinall et al., 2015) and perception of fractals in nature may induce alpha activity in the brain, an indicator of a wakefully relaxed state and internalized attention (Hägerhäll et al., 2015). Nature contact can increase mindfulness (Hamann and Ivtzan, 2016; Richardson and Hallam, 2013; Van Gordon et al., 2018) and the benefits of mindfulness appear to be enhanced in nature-based settings (Araci, 2018; Choe et al., 2020; Gerard, 2018; Lymeus, 2019; Van Gordon et al., 2018). In turn, mindfulness can enhance the benefits yielded by nature-based settings (Van Gordon et al., 2018), acting as a mediator between nature contact and psychological well-being (Stewart and Haaga, 2018). Enhanced mindfulness capacities are associated with reductions in rumination (Jury and Jose, 2019; Williams, 2008), positive outcomes in the treatment of depression and addiction (Brewer et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2014; Williams, 2008; Witkiewitz and Bowen, 2010) and may contribute to the treatment of PTSD (Boyd et al., 2018; Hopwood and Schutte, 2017).

Personality

Psychedelics have been shown to increase personality trait openness to experience in an enduring way (Barrett et al., 2020; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016b; Erritzoe et al., 2018; Griffiths et al., 2018; Lebedev et al., 2016; MacLean et al., 2011; Madsen et al., 2020; Netzband et al., 2020). Openness is one of the primary personality correlates of connectedness to nature (Lee et al., 2015; Nisbet et al., 2009; Richardson and Sheffield, 2015) and pro-environmental behaviour (Markowitz et al., 2012; Puech et al., 2019; Wuertz, 2015), and predicts a propensity for awe-like experiences (Dong and Ni, 2019), including in response to nature (Silvia et al., 2015). It is associated with a number of traits including aesthetic appreciation (MacLean et al., 2011), one of the enduring effects linked to psilocybin usage (Noorani et al., 2018; Watts et al., 2017; Studerus et al., 2011). Appreciation of aesthetics in nature may partly explain the positive relationship between people and nature and act as a pathway to enhanced nature relatedness (Capaldi et al., 2017; Lumber et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2014). Ayahuasca users have been found to rate more highly in the personality trait of self-transcendence (Bouso et al., 2012; Jiménez-Garrido et al., 2020), which is linked to an expansion of personal boundaries to encompass that which is greater than the self, and is strongly related to openness (De Fruyt et al., 2000). Like openness, it is also a predictor of nature relatedness and pro-environmental attitudes (Dornhoff et al., 2019; Tam, 2013).

Psilocybin was found to increase trait absorption (characterised by a disposition to become absorbed in one’s internal mental imagery) for at least a month post experience in healthy volunteers (Barrett et al., 2020). Absorption predicts a proclivity towards experiencing awe and positive emotional states in response to natural but not built settings (Ballew and Omoto, 2018; van Elk et al., 2016), in addition to predicting response to psilocybin (Russ et al., 2019; Studerus et al., 2012). Psilocybin therapy for treatment resistant depression was found to significantly reduce trait neuroticism scores (Erritzoe et al., 2018), with psilocybin administration among healthy volunteers also found to lower neuroticism (Barrett et al., 2020). In addition, ayahuasca usage in a traditional context was found to significantly reduce neuroticism, with changes sustained at 6-month follow up (Netzband et al., 2020). This is notable, as individuals reporting lower levels of neuroticism appear to gain greater psychological benefits through contact with nature (Ambrey and Cartlidge, 2017).

How to maximise nature relatedness using psychedelics

Potential benefits of natural settings for therapeutic psychedelic experiences

Classical psychedelics such as psilocybin are currently designated as Schedule 1 drugs in the UK and USA, imposing onerous and highly restrictive regulations around their use in a research and therapeutic context (Aday et al., 2020; Nutt et al., 2013), with clinicians calling on such restrictions to be revised to more fairly reflect their relative harm and potential benefit and to facilitate greater access for research and potential medical development (Johnson et al., 2018; Nutt et al., 2020; Rucker, 2015). Presently, most human psilocybin studies occur in monitored hospital or research settings, despite psilocybin in its naturally occurring fungal-form having an ancient history of human usage (Nichols, 2020). Psilocybin has a very favourable toxicity profile and negligible addiction potential and a number of independent analyses reporting that it has a benign safety profile (Carhart-Harris and Goodwin, 2017; Hasler et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2018; Nutt et al., 2010; Rucker et al., 2019; van Amsterdam et al., 2011; Winstock et al., 2019).

The set (immediate and extended psychological context) and setting (extended sociocultural and immediate environmental context) framing psychedelic usage is known to be a key determinant of experiential outcomes (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018c; Eisner, 1997; Hartogsohn, 2016, 2017; Johnson et al., 2008; Leary et al., 1963; Masters and Houston, 1966). In clinical settings, psilocybin is often administered in a pre-prepared hospital room or living-room-like environment (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016a; Griffiths et al., 2006; Johnson et al., 2008; Krediet et al., 2020). People undergoing clinical psilocybin sessions typically wear eyeshades and headphones playing music, and they are instructed to focus their attention inwards (Johnson et al., 2008; Krediet et al., 2020) as an internal focus is required to limit distractions and facilitate the processing of autobiographical content that can arise (Grof, 1980; Schenberg, 2018). However, in an inwardly focused therapeutic session, where eyeshades are worn, there are many instances where the participant removes the eyeshades. For example, discussions with the therapists tend to take place with the eyeshades removed whereby the participant will be aware of the surrounding environment.

Part of the efficacy of psychedelics when utilised in a therapeutic context appears to be through their capacity to act as catalysts or amplifiers of psychotherapeutic practices and processes (Grof, 1980; Sloshower et al., 2020; Watts et al., 2017; Watts and Luoma, 2020). Nature seems to also act as an amplifier of therapeutic effect: one study found that cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)-based psychotherapy applied in a forest environment was helpful in achievement of remission of major depression among sufferers, with the forest setting enhancing the effect of the psychotherapeutic intervention when compared to a clinical hospital setting (Kim et al., 2009). A course of forest therapy was also found to hold great promise in ameliorating depression among people with alcohol dependency (Shin et al., 2012). If both psychedelics and nature can act as amplifiers for therapeutic effect, this is suggestive that incorporating nature-based settings into psychedelic treatment models could elicit a potential beneficial synergy.

There are many reasons to consider that therapeutic psilocybin sessions, despite the usual ‘inward focus’ could, for some participants, be better supported by being held in a natural setting than in a hospital room. Given that anxiety is a predictor of challenging or anxiety reactions to psychedelics (Haijen et al., 2018; Studerus et al., 2012), the importance of a psychologically soothing setting cannot be overstated. Nature-based settings have a tendency to be inherently more aesthetically pleasing than built environments (Carlson and Berleant, 2004; Richards, 2001; Shafer and Mietz, 1969; Ulrich, 1983) with natural stimuli having the capacity to induce psychologically restorative ‘soft fascination’ (Basu et al., 2018; Stenfors et al., 2019). Such settings have a soothing effect on the mind, allowing for mental space for reflection, with reductions in stress in line with attention restoration theory (the renewal of attention and depleted psychological resources, and reductions in mental fatigue, in a natural environment), in addition to stress reduction theory (Berman et al., 2008; Kaplan, 1995; Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Ulrich et al., 1991). Given the capacity of nature contact to reduce rumination and encourage present moment focus (Bratman et al., 2015a, 2015b), holding psychedelic sessions in natural environments could counteract mental preoccupation which has been associated with increased likelihood of challenging experiences with psychedelics (Russ et al., 2019). The soothing effect of a beautiful natural environment may partly explain why they are commonly selected as settings for psychedelic experiences (Kangaslampi et al., 2020; Luke, 2017; Mason et al., 2020; Masters and Houston, 1966; Prepeliczay, 2002; Uthaug et al., 2019) and taking psychedelics with the intent to connect with nature has been associated with greater well-being scores and likelihood of mystical-type experiences in comparison to a number of other potential motivations behind usage (Haijen et al., 2018). Natural settings are also the preferred setting for some indigenous psychedelic using groups, including the Wixáritari (Huichol) of Mexico, the planet’s oldest surviving psychedelic using culture (Lawlor, 2013).

Given that our species has spent almost its entire existence in natural environments, it is likely we have an innate preference for them (Kellert and Wilson, 1995). The perceptual effects associated with psychedelic administration include heightened sensory capacity and altered visual perception (Preller and Vollenweider, 2016; Watts et al., 2017), which can lead to a more absorbing and intensified experience of the environment in which they are taken. When psychedelics are taken in natural/nature-rich settings, the sensory aspects of nature may be perceived more richly and immersively than usual (Krippner and Luke, 2009). For example, a flower may be experienced as overwhelmingly beautiful in its intricacy and vibrancy (Huxley, 1954; Watts et al., 2017). In addition, feelings of interconnectedness with the natural world are likely to be more prominent in outdoor nature-based settings (Cooley et al., 2020; Dutcher et al., 2007; Unsworth et al., 2016; Van Gordon et al., 2018).

However, despite all the benefits of calm, beauty and a sense of interconnectedness with all life that a natural setting could potentially bring, there are major barriers to attempting to hold psychedelic sessions in nature. There may be issues with disturbances, privacy, inclement weather to name but a few (Cooley et al., 2020; Jordan and Marshall, 2010). Indoor settings offer a greater amount of control, comfort and safety than wild outdoor settings.

In situations where a clinical room is needed, bringing some natural elements into the clinical space can be beneficial, for example plants (including those that belong to the session participant), nature-based photography and art and a nature-based backdrop. Screens depicting woodland scenes were incorporated into the clinical protocol of the Phase II psilocybin for major depression treatment room at Imperial College London (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Photo of psilocybin for depression treatment room.

Even better than this would be the use of a hybrid indoor/outdoor secure, sheltered structure incorporating biophilic design elements (Joye, 2007) in a nature-based setting with large skylights and windows. This would allow the therapist to titrate the amount of nature immersion according to the client’s needs as the session progresses. Structures incorporating biophilic design elements, sheltered gardens, based in a rural, nature-based setting will be utilised by the Usona Institute in their future psychedelic therapy treatment centre.

Potential benefits of natural settings for preparation and integration of psychedelic experiences

Even when psychedelic sessions take place in a clinical environment, elements of nature contact and connection can be incorporated into some aspects of the preparation and integration sessions (before and after the psychedelic session). Preparation and integration sessions for individuals and groups of people undergoing psychedelic therapy could include some elements of nature immersion. The purpose of psychedelic preparation sessions is to establish trust between the person who will be having the psilocybin experience and the therapists who will be supporting them through the psychedelic session. Preparation sessions usually take place the day before, and include psychoeducation about the likely effects of psilocybin, discussion of the participant’s intentions for the upcoming session, and some time for establishing therapeutic rapport (Watts and Luoma, 2020). Horticulture exercises (Scott, 2015) may be a perfect complement to a preparation session; that is, ‘preparing the ground’ for the work to come. Individuals and groups could spend time weeding a patch of land, and tilling the soil, and adding compost as a ritual to mark the cleansing and preparation of the inner landscape (the psyche) ready to receive new insights, and experience psychological growth. Integration sessions, which happen the day after psilocybin sessions, are intended to support the participant in fully understanding any insights discovered during the session, and applying them to their life going forward. Horticultural exercises could be useful here too, that is, planting a seed in the freshly tilled soil, as a ritual to mark a new beginning, and a commitment to provide the psychological conditions for personal growth. Commitments to change may fall flat unless they are ‘fed and watered’ on a daily basis. Participants could take home a seed they have planted in a pot, to care for daily, as they nurture the lessons that are growing within themselves.

Other nature immersion exercises could enhance two other key aspects of preparation and integration sessions: mindfulness training and talking therapy. The practice of Shinrin-Yoku (forest bathing), a Japanese form of nature therapy and active mindfulness practice (Craig et al., 2016; Hansen et al., 2017) contains exercises to assist people to come out of their heads and into their environment, which could be useful at every stage in the psychedelic therapy journey. In the Phase II psilocybin for major depression clinical trial conducted by Imperial College London, mindfulness exercises were used to supplement the preparation and integration of psilocybin for depression treatment. Sitting in a calming sheltered garden (Annerstedt and Währborg, 2011; Cooley et al., 2020) could also enhance mindfulness practice, focusing on the smells of different flowers, the sounds of birdsong and running water, and the soothing appearance of trees or bodies of water. A garden can offer a rich canvas for reflective therapeutic process (Adevi et al., 2018; Adevi and Mårtensson 2013; Corazon et al., 2010, 2012; Kaiser, 1976; Sidenius et al., 2017). Awe walks are a simple intervention where people take a walk with the prior suggestion that they attend to details of the world around them and tap into their sense of wonder. A weekly 15 minute awe walk (over a time frame of 8 weeks) has been demonstrated to increase positive prosocial emotions and facilitate a reduction in mental distress in people’s day to day emotional state over time (Sturm et al., 2020). Awe walks in natural settings post psychedelic experience may be beneficial, helping consolidate any feelings of awe which may persist beyond the psychedelic session (Noorani et al., 2018). Such a practice may also help consolidate feelings of connectedness present post psychedelic session (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018b; Forstmann et al., 2020; Kettner et al., 2019; Noorani et al., 2018; Watts et al., 2017), as an increased acknowledgement of nature has been implicated in increasing connectedness in a broad sense (Passmore and Holder, 2017), and awe and connectedness appear to be strongly linked (Bethelmy and Corraliza, 2019; Nelson-Coffey et al., 2019; van Mulukom et al., 2020).

Parts of both preparation and integration sessions contain standard talking therapy elements: discussion of challenges in life, reflecting on traumatic experiences. Although some participants may feel more comfortable having these discussions with their therapist in a clinical room, others may feel more comfortable ‘walking and talking’ with their therapist in woodlands or gardens adjacent to the clinic (Revell and McLeod, 2016) which could provide a soothing setting for discussions which can be emotionally challenging. Participants often feel anticipatory anxiety during preparation session discussions, and integration sessions often touch on tender places and deep wounds that may have been re-visited in the session. Having such discussions whilst walking and talking in a natural setting could be helpful. Walking barefoot outside has been found to increase nature relatedness (Harvey et al., 2016) and this could also be a deeply grounding exercise for participants and therapists to engage in together. An appropriate safeguard for therapeutic work in nature, which is less contained than a clinical setting, might be that all outdoors activities include more than two people (i.e. a two therapists with a participant, or a group of participants with one or two facilitators). Maintaining standard therapeutic boundaries outdoors may require therapists to engage in some additional training, and some psychoeducation around this may need to be discussed with participants (Cooley et al., 2020).

Another benefit of linking preparation and integration to an outdoor nature-based setting is the possibility of establishing a connection to the outdoors as a ‘therapy room’ one can later return to by themselves to self-sooth (Revell et al., 2014). Establishing a nature habit as part of the integration process may serve to consolidate access to a very helpful resource in an ongoing manner. A nature habit may sustain feelings of connectedness beyond what the psilocybin alone may elicit, especially as the antidepressant effects of psychedelics are rarely permanent. The Synthesis Institute has recently launched a nature-based therapy programme for people undergoing psilocybin therapy for depression, a component of which is individually tailored nature plans, where participants select nature-based hobbies, activities, practices and service options, to encourage a deeper connection to, and more contact with nature for the associated psychological benefits this can foster. It is important to point out that although the restorative potential of nature may be well evidenced, actually going into nature may be very challenging for people suffering from severe depression. Therefore, encouraging contact with nature as a factor which could boost psychedelic integration practices may help people commit to visiting nature even when this feels hopeless or pointless, because such habits may confer such important benefits.

The practice of journaling with an emotional focus has been used to effectively supplement therapeutic psychedelic sessions (Griffiths et al., 2018). Nature journaling (recording three things one enjoys about nature each day for five days) has also been found to increase nature relatedness in a robust and sustained way (Richardson and Sheffield, 2017). This suggests that journaling about nature before and after the psychedelic experience could be incorporated into therapeutic models.

Spending time in nature may be one of the most effective practices for maintaining the benefits of psychedelic sessions. However even if people are not able to access beautiful nature on a regular basis, nature can still teach via metaphor. Two core metaphors offered by nature are of interconnectedness and seasonal change. Interconnectedness – recognition of being a small part of a greater whole, for example, demonstrable in many different ways, and seasonal change – with the recognition that humans, like all of nature, go through cycles of light and dark; death and rebirth can be therapeutically beneficial. Just as nature goes through spring, summer, autumn and winter, so do human beings, and it can be helpful to remember that dark times play their part in the cycle, and that ‘this too shall pass’. Our culture is not synchronised with the rhythms of nature: the valuing of productivity, ‘doing’ and happiness, and devaluing of retreat, sadness and loss, may be a contributing factor in the current mental health crisis. Nature can teach humans how to accept darkness as a fundamental part of life, and one that precedes growth. Recognition of this can be life changing for people who suffer from depression. Metaphors about nature have been incorporated into the ACE model for psilocybin for depression (Watts and Luoma, 2020), an upcoming therapy model for group settings, and an upcoming extended integration model.

Developing a new model for psychedelic therapy to treat nature disconnection

As well as incorporating nature contact into preparation and integration sessions where the specified intention is to use the psychedelic session for the improvement of mental health, a more specific model of nature-focused psychedelic work could be developed, with the specified intention of enhancement of nature relatedness. In the former context, an internal focus is required, whereas in the latter context a more outwardly focused session could be facilitated. This would add to the array of different therapeutic options in psychedelic work. As therapy models expand and more is learned about optimising the experience, there is a need for a variety of options. Just as with mindfulness meditation practices there are exercises for inner and outer focused mindfulness, this is also applicable to psychedelic usage. Whereas the inner focused clinical session might encourage connectedness to self, the outer focused session in nature could encourage interconnectedness with the environment. There could be a therapeutic model developed which starts with inner-focussed work in an indoor clinical setting before then graduating onto an outdoor nature-based setting once people are more experienced with psychedelic effects.

Conclusion

Aside from their intrinsically psychologically restorative and soothing qualities, nature-based settings could enhance some aspects of the preparation and integration phases of psychedelic therapy, and could under certain circumstances be used for psychedelic sessions themselves, without any neglect of vital safety concerns regarding safeguarding vulnerable people under the influence of psychedelics. Such settings have the potential to reduce anxiety and rumination, increase mindfulness, and elicit transcendent experiences and feelings of awe and connectedness. Furthermore, given the numerous demonstrated benefits to mental health associated with increasing nature relatedness, maximising its enhancement in combination with psychedelic therapy could constitute an independent and complimentary pathway by which psychedelics can lead to improvements in mental health, with nature contact undervalued and heavily underutilised as a health-promoting resource (Bratman et al., 2019; Maller et al., 2006; Summers and Vivian, 2018).

Future studies should seek to investigate the benefits of natural settings and how they may complement (or supplement) clinical or indoor settings in greater detail, employing fine-grained assessments of the settings in question, with thorough attention to potential risks. In addition, future studies should incorporate nature relatedness measures such as the NR-6 (Nisbet and Zelenski, 2013), or the longer but psychometrically superior Disposition to Connect with Nature scale (Brügger et al., 2011) which may help avoid ceiling issues associated with shorter item measures. Furthermore, the inclusion of introspective attitudinal and behavioural measures of environmental concern, in addition to measures assessing related lifestyle choices and materialistic and consumerist behaviours may enhance the validity of findings and avoid common methods bias (Otto et al., 2018).

The chemist and inventor of LSD and discoverer of psilocybin Albert Hofmann came to view the capacity of psychedelics to reconnect our increasingly nature-alienated species to the natural world as perhaps their most important fundamental property. He recalled that among his most satisfying experiences were hearing people say things like ‘I grew up in the city, but once I first took LSD, I returned to the forest’ (Hofmann et al., 2009: 4).

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Sam Gandy

References

Aday

Mitzkovitz

Bloescha

, et al. (2020) Long-term effects of psychedelic drugs: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 113: 179–189.

Adevi

Mårtensson

(2013) Stress rehabilitation through garden therapy: The garden as a place in the recovery from stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12(2): 230–237.

Adevi

Uvnäs-Moberg

Grahn

(2018) Therapeutic interventions in a rehabilitation garden may induce temporary extrovert and/or introvert behavioural changes in patients, suffering from stress-related disorders. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 30: 182–193.

Agin-Liebes

Malone

Yalch

, et al. (2020) Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for psychiatric and existential distress in patients with life-threatening cancer. Journal of Psychopharmacology 34(2): 155–166.

Ambrey

Cartlidge

(2017) Do the psychological benefits of greenspace depend on one’s personality? Personality and Individual Differences 116: 233–239.

Andersen

(2017) Minding the gap between awareness and behavior: Roles of mindfulness and connectedness to nature in fostering ecological behavior. Master’s Thesis, Harvard Extension School, Cambridge.

Anderson

Monroy

Keltner

(2018a) Emotion in the wilds of nature: The coherence and contagion of fear during threatening group-based outdoors experiences. Emotion 18(3): 355–368.

Anderson

Monroy

Keltner

(2018b) Awe in nature heals: Evidence from military veterans, at-risk youth, and college students. Emotion 18(8): 1195–1202.

Annerstedt

Währborg

(2011) Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 39(4): 371–388.

10.

Araci

(2018) Mindfulness and virtual environments – The impact of mediated nature on anxiety, affect, worry and levels of mindfulness. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton.

11.

Ashley

(2007) Toward an understanding and definition of wilderness spirituality. Australian Geographer 38(1): 53–69.

12.

Aspinall

Coyne

Roe

(2015) The urban brain: Analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG. British Journal of Sports Medicine 49: 272–276.

13.

Aspy

Proeve

(2017) Mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation: Effects on connectedness to humanity and to the natural world. Psychological Reports 120(1): 102–117.

14.

Astell-Burt

Mitchell

Hartig

(2014) The association between green space and mental health varies across the life course. A longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 68: 578–583.

15.

Bai

Maruskin

Chen

, et al. (2017) Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113(2): 185–209.

16.

Ballew

Omoto

(2018) Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology 10: 26–35.

17.

Barbaro

Pickett

(2016) Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences 93: 137–142.

18.

Barrett

Griffiths

(2018) Classic hallucinogens and mystical experiences: Phenomenology and neural correlates. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 36: 393–430.

19.

Barrett

Doss

Sepeda

, et al. (2020) Emotions and brain function are altered up to one month after a single high dose of psilocybin. Scientific Reports 10: 2214.

20.

Barton

Pretty

(2010) What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology 44: 3947–3955.

21.

Basu

Duvall

Kaplan

(2018) Attention restoration theory: Exploring the role of soft fascination and mental bandwidth. Environment and Behaviour 51(9-10): 1055–1081.

22.

Baxter

Pelletier

(2019) Is nature relatedness a basic human psychological need? A critical examination of the extant literature. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 60(1): 21–34.

23.

Belser

Agin-Liebes

Swift

, et al. (2017) Patient experiences of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 57: 354–388.

24.

Berk

(2006) Development through the Lifespan. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

25.

Berman

Jonides

Kaplan

(2008) The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19: 1207–1212.

26.

Berman

Kross

Krpan

, et al. (2012) Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 140: 300–305.

27.

Berto

(2014) The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences 4(4): 394–409.

28.

Berto

Barbiero

, et al. (2018) An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments. Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences 8(3): 34.

29.

Bethelmy

Corraliza

(2019) Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 509.

30.

Beyer

KMM

Kaltenbach

Szabo

, et al. (2014) Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11: 3453–3472.

31.

Bogenschutz

Johnson

(2016) Classic hallucinogens in the treatment of addictions. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 64: 250–258.

32.

Bogenschutz

Forcehimes

Pommy

, et al. (2015) Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study. Journal of Psychopharmacology 29: 289–299.

33.

Boumparis

Karyotaki

Kleiboer

, et al. (2016) The effect of psychotherapeutic interventions on positive and negative affect in depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 202: 153–162.

34.

Bouso

González

Fondevila

, et al. (2012) Personality, psychopathology, life attitudes and neuropsychological performance among ritual users of ayahuasca: A longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 7: e42421.

35.

Bowler

Buyung-Ali

Knight

, et al. (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10: 456.

36.

Boyd

Lanius

McKinnon

(2018) Mindfulness-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: A review of the treatment literature and neurobiological evidence. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 43(1): 7–25.

37.

Bratman

Anderson

Berman

, et al. (2019) Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances 5(7): eaax0903.

38.

Bratman

Daily

Levy

, et al. (2015a) The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning 138: 41–50.

39.

Bratman

Hamilton

Hahn

, et al. (2015b) Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(28): 8567–8572.

40.

Bratman

Hamilton

Daily

(2012) The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249: 118–136.

41.

Brewer

Smith

Bowen

, et al. (2010) Applying mindfulness-based treatments to co-occurring disorders: What can we learn from the brain? Addiction 105(10): 1698–1706.

42.

Brown

Ryan

(2003) The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84: 822–848.

43.

Brown

Chorpita

Barlow

(1998) Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 107: 179–192.

44.

Brügger

Kaiser

Roczen

(2011) One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist 16: 324–333.

45.

Buckner

Carroll

(2007) Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 49–57.

46.

Capaldi

Dopko

Zelenski

(2014) The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 976.

47.

Capaldi

Passmore

H-A

Ishii

, et al. (2017) Engaging with natural beauty may be related to well-being because it connects people to nature: Evidence from three cultures. Ecopsychology 9(4): 199–211.

48.

Capaldi

Passmore

H-A

Nisbet

, et al. (2015) Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a well-being intervention. International Journal of Well-being 5(4): 1–16.

49.

Carhart-Harris

Bolstridge

Day

CMJ

, et al. (2018a) Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: Six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology 235: 399–408.

50.

Carhart-Harris

Bolstridge

Rucker

, et al. (2016a) Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: An open label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 3: 619–627.

51.

Carhart-Harris

Erritzoe

Haijen

, et al. (2018b) Psychedelics and connectedness. Psychopharmacology 235(2): 547–550.

52.

Carhart-Harris

Erritzoe

Williams

, et al. (2012) Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 2138–2143.

53.

Carhart-Harris

Goodwin

(2017) The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: Past, Present, and Future. Neuropsychopharmacology 42(11): 2105–2113.

54.

Carhart-Harris

Kaelen

Bolstridge

, et al. (2016b) The paradoxical psychological effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Psychological Medicine 46(7): 1379–1390.

55.

Carhart-Harris

Leech

Hellyer

, et al. (2014) The entropic brain: A theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(20): 1–22.

56.

Carhart-Harris

Muthukumaraswamy

Roseman

, et al. (2016c) Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 4853–4858.

57.

Carhart-Harris

Roseman

Haijen

, et al. (2018c) Psychedelics and the essential importance of context. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32: 725–731.

58.

Carlson

Berleant

(2004) The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Plymouth: Broadview Press.

59.

Cervinka

Röderer

Hefler

(2012) Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology 17: 379–388.

60.

Chang

C-C

RRY

Le Nghiem

, et al. (2020) Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window. Landscape and Urban Planning 202: 103874.

61.

Chawla

(1999) Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education 31(1): 15–26.

62.

Chawla

Cushing

(2007) Education for strategic environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research 13: 437–452.

63.

Chawla

Derr

(2012) The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In: Clayton

(ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.527–555.

64.

Chawla

Flanders

(2007) Education for strategic environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research 13(4): 437–452.

65.

Chen

(2015) Natural environment promotes deeper brain functional connectivity than built environment. BMC Neuroscience 16(Suppl 1): P294.

66.

Choe

Jorgensen

Sheffield

(2020) Simulated natural environments bolster the effectiveness of a mindfulness programme: A comparison with a relaxation-based intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 67: 101382.

67.

Clark

Watson

(1991) Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 100: 316–336.

68.

Cohen-Cline

Turkheimer

Duncan

(2015) Access to green space, physical activity and mental health: A twin study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 69(6): 523–529.

69.

Cooley

Jones

Kurtz

, et al. (2020) ‘Into the wild’: A meta-synthesis of talking therapy in natural outdoor spaces. Clinical Psychology Review 77: 101841.

70.

Corazon

Stigsdotter

Jensen

AGC

, et al. (2010) Development of the nature-based therapy concept for patients with stress-related illness at the Danish healing forest garden Nacadia. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture 20: 33–51.

71.

Corazon

Stigsdotter

Moeller

, et al. (2012) Nature as therapist: Integrating permaculture with mindfulness-and acceptance-based therapy in the Danish Healing Forest Garden Nacadia. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling 14(4): 335–347.

72.

Corral-Verdugo

Montiel-Carbajal

Sotomayor-Petterson

, et al. (2013) Psychological wellbeing as correlate of sustainable behaviors. In: García

Corral-Verdugo

Moreno

(eds) Psychology Research Progress. Recent Hispanic Research on Sustainable Behavior and Interbehavioral Psychology. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp.27–40.

73.

Craig

Logan

Prescott

(2016) Natural environments, nature relatedness and the ecological theater: Connecting satellites and sequencing to Shinrin-yoku. Journal of Physiological Anthropology 35: 1.

74.

Davis

Gatersleben

(2013) Transcendent experiences in wild and manicured settings: The influence of the trait “connectedness to nature”. Ecopsychology 5(3): 92–102.

75.

De Fruyt

Van De Wiele

Van Heeringen

(2000) Cloninger’s psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 29(3): 441–452.

76.

de Jager Meezenbroek

Garssen

van den Berg

, et al. (2012) Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health 51: 336–354.

77.

Dean

Shanahan

Bush

, et al. (2018) Is nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15: 1371.

78.

Deng

Tang

(2014) The relationship between wandering mind, depression and mindfulness. Mindfulness 5: 124–128.

79.

Diessner

Genthôs

Praest

, et al. (2018) Identifying with nature mediates the influence of valuing nature’s beauty on proenvironmental behaviors. Ecopsychology 10(2): 97–105.

80.

Doblin

(1991) Pahnke’s “Good Friday experiment”: A long-term follow-up and methodological critique. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 23: 1–28.

81.

Dömötör

Szemerszky

Köteles

(2017) Nature relatedness is connected with modern health worries and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Journal of Health Psychology 24(12): 1756–1764.

82.

Dong

(2019) Openness to experience, extraversion, and subjective well-being among Chinese college students: The mediating role of dispositional awe. Psychological Reports 123(3): 903–928.

83.

Dopko

(2017) Effects of nature exposure and nature relatedness on goals: Implications for materialism. PhD Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

84.

Dornhoff

Sothmann

J-N

Menzel

, et al. (2019) Nature relatedness and environmental concern of young people in Ecuador and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 453.

85.

dos Santos

Bouso

Alcázar-Córcoles

, et al. (2018) Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of serotonergic psychedelics for the management of mood, anxiety, and substance-use disorders: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 11(9): 889–902.

86.

Drake

Whitley

(2014) Recovery and severe mental illness: Description and analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 59: 236–242.

87.

Dutcher

Finley

Luloff

, et al. (2007) Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior 39: 474–493.

88.

Dye

(2008) Health and urban living. Science 319(5864): 766–769.

89.

Eigenbrod

Bell

Davies

, et al. (2011) The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1722): 3201–3208.

90.

Eisner

(1997) Set, setting, and matrix. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29(2): 213–216.

91.

Ernst

Theimer

(2011) Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research 17(5): 577–598.

92.

Erritzoe

Roseman

Nour

, et al. (2018) Effects of psilocybin therapy on personality structure. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 138: 368–378.

93.

Forstmann

Sagioglou

(2017) Lifetime experience with (classic) psychedelics predicts pro-environmental behavior through an increase in nature relatedness. Journal of Psychopharmacology 31: 975–988.

94.

Forstmann

Yudkin

Prosser

, et al. (2020) Transformative experience and social connectedness mediate the mood-enhancing effects of psychedelic use in naturalistic settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117: 2338–2346.

95.

Forsythe

Sheehy

(2011) Is it not beautiful? Psychologist 24: 504–507.

96.

Fotiou

(2012) Working with “La Medicina”: Elements of healing in contemporary ayahuasca rituals. Anthropology of Consciousness 23(1): 6–27.

97.

Frantz

Mayer

(2014) The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 41: 85–89.

98.

Fretwell

Greig

(2019) Towards a better understanding of the relationship between individual’s self-reported connection to nature, personal well-being and environmental awareness. Sustainability 11(5): 1386.

99.

Frumkin

Bratman

Breslow

, et al. (2017) Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives 125: 075001.

100.

Gandy

(2019) Psychedelics and potential benefits in “healthy normals”: A review of the literature. Journal of Psychedelic Studies 3(3): 280–287.

101.

Gascon

Triguero-Mas

Martinez

, et al. (2015) Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(4): 4354–4379.

102.

Gasser

Holstein

Michel

, et al. (2014) Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 202: 513–520.

103.

Gearin

(2015) ‘Whatever you want to believe’: Kaleidoscopic individualism and ayahuasca healing in Australia. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 26: 442–455.

104.

Gearin

(2017) Good mother nature: Ayahuasca neoshamanism as cultural critique. In: Labate

Cavnar

Gearin

(eds) The World Ayahuasca Diaspora: Reinventions and Controversies. London: Routledge, pp.123–141.

105.

Geng

, et al. (2015) Connections with nature and environmental behaviors. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0127247.

106.

Gerard

(2018) A Thesis Proposal Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Psychology. Regina, Canada: University of Regina.

107.

Gkargkavouzi

Halkos

Matsiori

(2019) A multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern. Social Indicators Research 143: 859–879.

108.

Glennon

Titeler

McKenney

(1984) Evidence for 5-HT2 involvement in the mechanism of action of hallucinogenic agents. Life Sciences 35(25): 2505–2511.

109.

Griffiths

Johnson

Carducci

, et al. (2016) Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology 30(12): 1181–1197.

110.

Griffiths

Johnson

Richards

, et al. (2011) Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: Immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology 218(4): 649–665.

111.

Griffiths

Johnson

Richards

, et al. (2018) Psilocybin-occasioned mystical-type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32(1): 49–69.

112.

Griffiths

Richards

Johnson

, et al. (2008) Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology 22(6): 621–632.

113.

Griffiths

Richards

McCann

, et al. (2006) Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology 187(3): 268–283.

114.

Grob

(ed.) (2002) Hallucinogens: A Reader. New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.

115.

Grob

Danforth

Chopra

, et al. (2011) Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. JAMA Psychiatry 68: 71–78.

116.

Grof

(1980) LSD Psychotherapy. Pomona, CA: Hunter House.

117.

Haijen

ECHM

Kaelen

Roseman

, et al. (2018) Predicting responses to psychedelics: A prospective study. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 897.

118.

Hägerhäll

Laike

Küller

, et al. (2015) Human physiological benefits of viewing nature: EEG responses to exact and statistical fractal patterns. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 19: 1–12.

119.

Haluza

Schönbauer

Cervinka

(2014) Green perspectives for public health: A narrative review on the physiological effects of experiencing outdoor nature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11(5): 5445–5461.

120.

Hamann

Ivtzan

(2016) 30 minutes in nature a day can increase mood, well-being, meaning in life and mindfulness: Effects of a pilot programme. Social Inquiry into Well-Being 2(2): 34–46.

121.

Hamilton

Farmer

Fogelman

, et al. (2015) Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biological Psychiatry 78: 224–230.

122.

Hansen

Jones

Tocchini

(2017) Shinrin-yoku (forest bathing) and nature therapy: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(8): 851.

123.

Harrild

Luke

(2020) An evaluation of the role of mystical experiences in transpersonal ecopsychology. Transpersonal Psychology Review 22(1): 45–52.

124.

Hartig

(2008) Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality. Lancet 372: 1614–1615.

125.

Hartig

Kaiser

Bowler

(2001) Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior 33: 590–607.

126.

Hartig

Mang

Evans

(1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23: 3–26.

127.

Hartig

van den Berg

Hagerhall

, et al. (2011) Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In: Nilsson

Sangster

Gallis

, et al. (eds) Forests, Trees and Human Health. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp.127–168.

128.

Hartogsohn

(2016) Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: An extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychopharmacology 30: 1259–1267.

129.

Hartogsohn

(2017) Constructing drug effects: A history of set and setting. Drug Science, Policy and Law 3: 1–17.

130.

Harvey

Oskins

McCarter

, et al. (2016) Direct earth contact: Barefootedness and nature connection. Ecopsychology 8(2): 96–106.

131.

Hasler

Grimberg

Benz

, et al. (2004) Acute psychological and physiological effects of psilocybin in healthy humans: A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose–effect study. Psychopharmacology 172: 145–156.

132.

Hendricks

(2018) Awe: A putative mechanism underlying the effects of classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. International Review of Psychiatry 30: 331–342.

133.

Hinds

Sparks

(2008) Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 109–120.

134.

Hofmann

Broeckers

Liggenstorfer

(2009) When one lives in paradise one is in no hurry to leave. In: Feilding

(ed.) Hofmann’s Elixir: LSD and the New Eleusis: Talks and Essays by Albert Hofmann and Others. Oxford: Beckley Foundation/Strange Attractor Press, pp.1–14.

135.

Hofmann

Sawyer

Fang

, et al. (2012) Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety 29(5): 409–416.

136.

Hopwood

Schutte

(2017) A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on post traumatic stress. Clinical Psychology Review 57: 12–20.

137.

Howell

Dopko

Passmore

H-A

, et al. (2011) Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences 51: 166–171.

138.

Yang

Jing

, et al. (2018) Awe, spirituality and conspicuous consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies. Special Issue: Spirituality, Religion, and Consumption 42(6): 829–839.

139.

Huemer

Haidvogl

Mattejat

, et al. (2011) Perception of autonomy and connectedness prior to the onset of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 40: 61–68.

140.

Huxley

(1954) The Doors of Perception. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.

141.

Ingulli

Lindbloom

(2013) Connection to nature and psychological resilience. Ecopsychology 5(1): 52–55.

142.

Iqbal

Dark

(2015) Negative affectivity, depression, and anxiety: Does rumination mediate the links? Journal of Affective Disorders 181: 18–23.

143.

Jiménez-Garrido

Gómez-Sousa

Ona

, et al. (2020) Effects of ayahuasca on mental health and quality of life in naïve users: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study combination. Scientific Reports 10: 4075.

144.

Johnson

Garcia-Romeu

Griffiths

(2016) Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 43(1): 55–60.

145.

Johnson

Garcia-Romeu

Cosimano

, et al. (2014) Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology 28: 983–992.

146.

Johnson

Griffiths

Hendricks

, et al. (2018) The abuse potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act. Neuropharmacology 142: 143–166.

147.

Johnson

Hendricks

Barrett

, et al. (2019) Classic psychedelics: An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 197: 83–102.

148.

Johnson

Richards

Griffiths

(2008) Human hallucinogen research: Guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology 22(6): 603–620.

149.

Jordan

Marshall

(2010) Taking counselling and psychotherapy outside: Destruction or enrichment of the therapeutic frame? European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling 12(4): 345–359.

150.

Joye

(2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology 11(4): 305–328.

151.

Jury

Jose

(2019) Does rumination function as a longitudinal mediator between mindfulness and depression? Mindfulness 10: 1091–1104.

152.

Kaida

(2016) Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability 18(1): 111–127.

153.

Kaiser

(1976) Alternative to therapy: Garden program. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 5(2): 21–24.

154.

Kals

Schumacher

Montada

(1999) Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior 31(2): 178–202.

155.

Kamitsis

Francis

(2013) Spirituality mediates the relationship between engagement in nature and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36: 136–143.

156.

Kangaslampi

Hausen

Rauteenmaa

(2020) Mystical experiences in retrospective reports of first times using a psychedelic in Finland. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 52: 309–318.

157.

Kaplan

(1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

158.

Kaplan

(1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169–182.

159.

Karp

(2017) Speaking of Sadness: Depression, Disconnection, and the Meanings of Illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

160.

Kearns

Tyler

(2020) Examining the relationship between awe, spirituality, and religiosity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000365

161.

Kellert

(2002) Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, evaluative development in children. In: Kahn

PH Jr

Kellert

(eds) Children and Nature. Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.117–151.

162.

Kellert

Wilson

(1995) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

163.

Keltner

Haidt

(2003) Approaching awe: A moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 17: 297–314.

164.

Kempf

(1905) European medicine: A résumé of medical progress during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Medical Library and Historical Journal 3(4): 231–248.

165.

Kesebir

(2017) A growing disconnection from nature is evident in cultural products. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(2): 258–269.

166.

Kettner

Gandy

Haijen

ECHM

, et al. (2019) From egoism to ecoism: Psychedelics increase nature relatedness in a state-mediated and context-dependent manner. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(24): 5147.

167.

Kim

Lim

Chung

, et al. (2009) The effect of cognitive behavior therapy-based psychotherapy applied in a forest environment on physiological changes and remission of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Investigation 6(4): 245–254.

168.

Klüver

(1966) Mescal and Mechanisms of Hallucinations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, Phoenix Books.

169.

Knepple Carney

Patrick

(2016) Spirituality, connectedness to nature, and well-being among adults. The Gerontologist 56(Suppl 3): 593.

170.

Korpela

Borodulin

Neuvonen

, et al. (2014) Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor recreation and emotional well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology 37: 1–7.

171.

Krediet

Bostoen

Breeksema

, et al. (2020) Reviewing the potential of psychedelics for the treatment of PTSD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 23(6): 385–400.

172.

Kring

Persons

Thomas

(2007) Changes in affect during treatment for depression and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45: 1753–1764.

173.

Krippner

Luke

(2009) Psychedelics and species connectedness. Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies Bulletin 19: 12–15.

174.

Kverme

Natvik

Veseth

, et al. (2019) Moving toward connectedness – A qualitative study of recovery processes for people with borderline personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 430.

175.

Laird

McFarland-Piazza

Allen

(2014) Young children’s opportunities for unstructured environmental exploration of nature: Links to adults’ experiences in childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education 2(1): 59–75.

176.

Larson

Szcytko

Bowers

, et al. (2018) Outdoor time, screen time, and connection to nature: Troubling trends among rural youth? Environment and Behavior 51: 966–991.

177.

Laski

(1961) Ecstasy: A Study of Some Secular and Religious Experiences. London: The Cressett Press.

178.

Lawlor

(2013) Returning to Wirikuta: The Huichol and their sense of place. European Journal of Ecopsychology 4: 19–31.

179.

Lawton

Brymer

Clough

, et al. (2017) The relationship between the physical activity environment, nature relatedness, anxiety, and the psychological well-being benefits of regular exercisers. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1058.

180.

Leamy

Bird

Le Boutillier

, et al. (2011) Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry 199(6): 445–452.

181.

Leary

Litwin

Metzner

(1963) Reactions to psilocybin administered in a supportive environment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 137: 561–573.

182.

Lebedev

Kaelen

Lövdén

, et al. (2016) LSD-induced entropic brain activity predicts subsequent personality change. Human Brain Mapping 37(9): 3203–3213.

183.

Lee

Ashton

Choi

, et al. (2015) Connectedness to nature and to humanity: Their association and personality correlates. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1003.

184.

Lee

Dean

Jung

K-R

(2008) Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: Testing a mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences 45(5): 414–419.

185.

Lerner

Lyvers

(2006) Values and beliefs of psychedelic drug users: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 38(2): 143–147.

186.

Letheby

Gerrans

(2017) Self unbound: Ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness 3(1): nix016. DOI: 10.1093/nc/nix016.

187.

Lin

Fuller

Bush

, et al. (2014) Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS ONE 9: e87422.

188.

Lohr

Pearson-Mims

(2005) Children’s active and passive interactions with plants influence their attitudes as actions toward trees and gardening as adults. HortTechnology 15: 472–476.

189.

Lonigan

Phillips

Hooe

(2003) Relations of positive and negative affectivity to anxiety and depression in children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 71: 465–481.

190.

Lopes

Lima

Silva

(2020) Nature can get it out of your mind the rumination reducing effects of contact with nature and the mediating role of awe and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology 71: 101489.

191.

Loureiro

Veloso

(2014) Outdoor exercise, well-being and connectedness to nature. Psico 45(3): 299–304.

192.

Lovallo

(2015) Stress and Health: Biological and Psychological Interactions, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

193.

Luke

(2017) Otherworlds: Psychedelics and Exceptional Human Experience. London: Muswell Hill Press.

194.

Lumber

Richardson

Sheffield

(2017) Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE 12: e0177186.

195.

Lymeus

(2019) Mindfulness training supported by a restorative natural setting: Integrating individual and environmental approaches to the management of adaptive resources. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala.

196.

Lyons

Carhart-Harris

(2018) Increased nature relatedness and decreased authoritarian political views after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32: 811–819.

197.

Maas

Verheij

de Vries

, et al. (2009) Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63(12): 967–973.

198.

Mackay

Schmitt

(2019) Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 65: 101323.

199.

MacKerron

Mourato

(2013) Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change 23: 992–1000.

200.

MacLean

Johnson

Griffiths

(2011) Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. Journal of Psychopharmacology 25: 1453–1461.

201.

Madsen

Fisher

Stenbæk

, et al. (2020) A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding. European Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 71–80.

202.

Maller

Townsend

Pryor

, et al. (2006) Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International 21: 45–54.

203.

Markowitz

Goldberg

Ashton

, et al. (2012) Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality 80(1): 81–111.

204.

Marshall

(2005) Mystical Encounters with the Natural World: Experiences & Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

205.

Martel

Dolman

Edwards

, et al. (2014) The association between negative affect and prescription opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain: The mediating role of opioid craving. Journal of Pain 15(1): 90–100.

206.

Martin

Pahl

White

, et al. (2019) Natural environments and craving: The mediating role of negative affect. Health & Place 58: 102160.

207.

Martin

White

Hunt

, et al. (2020) Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, well-being and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology 68: 101389.

208.

Martyn

Brymer

(2016) The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology 21(7): 1436–1445.

209.

Mason

Dolder

Kuypers

(2020) Reported effects of psychedelic use on those with low well-being given various emotional states and social contexts. Drug Science, Policy and Law 6: 1–11.

210.

Mason

Mischler

Uthuag

, et al. (2019) Sub-acute effects of psilocybin on empathy, creative thinking, and subjective well-being. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 51(2): 123–134.

211.

Masters

Houston

(1966) The Varieties of Psychedelic Experience, vol. 9289. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

212.

Mayer

Frantz

(2004) The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503–515.

213.

Mayer

Frantz

Bruehlman-Senecal

, et al. (2009) Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior 41(5): 607–643.

214.

McDermott

Berry

Cobham

(2012) Social connectedness: A potential aetiological factor in the development of child post-traumatic stress disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 46: 109–117.

215.

McEachan

Prady

Smith

, et al. (2016) The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: Moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 70(3): 253–259.

216.

McMahan

Estes

(2015) The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology 10(6): 507–519.

217.

McMahan

Estes

Murfin

, et al. (2018) Nature connectedness moderates the effect of nature exposure on explicit and implicit measures of emotion. Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing 2(2): 128–148.

218.

Meredith

Rakow

Eldermire

ERB

, et al. (2020) Minimum time dose in nature to positively impact the mental health of college-aged students, and how to measure it: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2942.

219.

Metz

(2014) Back to nature: The impact of nature relatedness on empathy and narcissism in the millennial generation. Educational Specialist. Paper 65. http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/edspec201019/65/

220.

Móró

Simon

Bárd

, et al. (2011) Voice of the psychonauts: Coping, life purpose, and spirituality in psychedelic drug users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 43(3): 188–198.

221.

Murphy-Beiner

Soar

(2020) Ayahuasca’s ‘afterglow’: Improved mindfulness and cognitive flexibility in ayahuasca drinkers. Psychopharmacology 237: 1161–1169.

222.

Neaman

Otto

Vinokur

(2018) Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability 10: 583.

223.

Neill

Gerard

Arbuthnott

(2019) Nature contact and mood benefits: Contact duration and mood type. The Journal of Positive Psychology 14: 756–767.

224.

Nelson-Coffey

Ruberton

Chancellor

, et al. (2019) The proximal experience of awe. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0216780.

225.

Netuveli

Watts

(2020) Pro-environmental behaviours and attitudes are associated with health, wellbeing and life satisfaction in multiple occupancy households in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Population and Environment 41(3): 347–371.

226.

Netzband

Ruffell

Linton

, et al. (2020) Modulatory effects of ayahuasca on personality structure in a traditional framework. Psychopharmacology 237: 3161–3171.

227.

Nichols

(2016) Psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews 68: 264–355.

228.

Nichols

(2020) Psilocybin: From ancient magic to modern medicine. The Journal of Antibiotics 73: 679–686.

229.

Nisbet

Zelenski

(2013) The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 813.

230.

Nisbet

Zelenski

(2014) Nature relatedness and subjective well-being. In: Michalos

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp.4269–4276.

231.

Nisbet

Zelenski

Grandpierre

(2019) Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology 11(2): 81–91.

232.

Nisbet

Zelenski

Murphy

(2009) The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior 41(5): 715–740.

233.

Nisbet

Zelenski

Murphy

(2011) Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 12(2): 303–322.

234.

Noorani

Garcia-Romeu

Swift

, et al. (2018) Psychedelic therapy for smoking cessation: Qualitative analysis of participant accounts. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32(7): 756–769.

235.

Nour

Evans

Carhart-Harris

(2017) Psychedelics, personality and political perspectives. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 49: 182–191.

236.

Nour

Evans

Nutt

, et al. (2016) Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: Validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 269.

237.

Nutsford

Pearson

Kingham

(2013) An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health 127(11): 1005–1011.

238.

Nutt

Erritzoe

Carhart-Harris

(2020) Psychedelic psychiatry’s brave new world. Cell 181(1): 24–28.

239.

Nutt

King

Nichols

(2013) Effects of Schedule I drug laws on neuroscience research and treatment innovation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14: 577–585.

240.

Nutt

King

Phillips

(2010) Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet 376(9752): 1558–1565.

241.

Olatunji

Naragon-Gainey

Wolitzky-Taylor

(2013) Specificity of rumination in anxiety and depression: A multimodal meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2(3): 225–257.

242.

Olmsted

(1865) The value and care of parks. Reprinted in: Nash

(ed.) The American Environment: Readings in the History of Conservation. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, pp.18–24.

243.

Otto

Pensini

(2017) Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change 47: 88–94.

244.

Otto

Kröhne

Richter

(2018) The dominance of introspective measures and what this implies: The example of environmental attitude. PLoS ONE 13: e0192907.

245.

Passmore

H-A

Holder

(2017) Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12: 537–546.

246.

Pensini

Horn

Caltabiano

(2016) An exploration of the relationships between adults’ childhood and current nature exposure and their mental well-being. Children, Youth and Environments 26(1): 125–147.

247.

Pergams

Zaradic

(2006) Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management 80(4): 387–393.

248.

Piff

Dietze

Feinberg

, et al. (2015) Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108(6): 883–899.

249.

Pokorny

Preller

Kometer

, et al. (2017) Effect of psilocybin on empathy and moral decision-making. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 20(9): 747–757.

250.

Poulsen

(2017) Nature-based therapy as a treatment for veterans with PTSD: What do we know? Journal of Public Mental Health 16(1): 15–20.

251.

Poulsen

Stigsdotter

Djernis

, et al. (2016) ‘Everything just seems much more right in nature’: How veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder experience nature-based activities in a forest therapy garden. Health Psychology Open 3(1): 1–14.

252.

Prati

Albanesi

Pietrantoni

(2017) Social well-being and pro-environmental behavior. Human Ecology Review 23(1): 123–140.

253.

Preller

Vollenweider

(2016) Phenomenology, structure, and dynamic of psychedelic states. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 36: 221–256.

254.

Prepeliczay

(2002) Sociocultural and psychological aspects of contemporary LSD use in Germany. Journal of Drug Issues 32(2): 431–58.

255.

Prescott

Logan

(2017) Down to earth: Planetary health and biophilosophy in the symbiocene epoch. Challenges 8(2): 19.

256.

Preston

Shin

(2017) Spiritual experiences evoke awe through the small self in both religious and non-religious individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 212–221.

257.

Prévot-Julliard

A-C

Julliard

Clayton

(2015) Historical evidence for nature disconnection in a 70-year time series of Disney animated films. Public Understanding of Science 24(6): 672–680.

258.

Pritchard

Richardson

Sheffield

, et al. (2020) The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies 21: 1145–1167.

259.

Puech

Dougal

Deery

, et al. (2019) Openness is related to proenvironmental behavior both within and across families. Environment and Behavior 52: 996–1011.

260.

Puhakka

Pyky

Lankila

, et al. (2018) Physical activity, residential environment, and nature relatedness in young men—A population-based MOPO study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15: 2322.

261.

Restall

Conrad

(2015) A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 159: 264–278.

262.

Revell

McLeod

(2016) Experiences of therapists who integrate walk and talk into their professional practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 16(1): 35–43.

263.

Revell

Duncan

Cooper

(2014) Helpful aspects of outdoor therapy experiences: An online preliminary investigation. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 14(4): 281–287.

264.

Riba

Rodriguez-Fornells

Urbano

, et al. (2001) Subjective effects and tolerability of the South American psychoactive beverage ayahuasca in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 154: 85–95.

265.

Richards

(2001) A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 41(2): 59–95.

266.

Richards

Rhead

Dileo

, et al. (1977) The peak experience variable in DPT-assisted psychotherapy with cancer patients. Journal of Psychedelic Drugs 9: 1–10.

267.

Richardson

Hallam

(2013) Exploring the psychological rewards of a familiar semirural landscape: Connecting to local nature through a mindful approach. The Humanistic Psychologist 41(1): 35.

268.

Richardson

Sheffield

(2015) Reflective self-attention: A more stable predictor of connection to nature than mindful attention. Ecopsychology 7(3):166–175.

269.

Richardson

Sheffield

(2017) Three good things in nature: Noticing nearby nature brings sustained increases in connection with nature. PsyEcology 8(1): 1–32.

270.

Richardson

Hussain

Griffiths

(2018) Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 7(1): 109–116.

271.

Richardson

Passmore

Barbett

, et al. (2020) The green care code: How nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro-nature conservation behaviours. People and Nature 2(3): 821–839.

272.

Rosa

Profice

Collado

(2018) Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1055.

273.

Ross

Bossis

Guss

, et al. (2016) Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology 30(12): 1165–1180.

274.

Rucker

(2015) Psychedelic drugs should be legally reclassified so that researchers can investigate their therapeutic potential. The BMJ 350: h2902.

275.

Rucker

Young

Williams

, et al. (2019) Psilocybin administration to healthy participants: Safety and feasibility in a placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology 44(Suppl 1): 443–444.

276.

Rudd

Vohs

Aaker

(2012) Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science 23(10): 1130–1136.

277.

Russ

Carhart-Harris

Maruyama

, et al. (2019) States and traits related to the quality and consequences of psychedelic experiences. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 6(1): 1–21.

278.

Ryan

Frederick

(1997) On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality 65: 529–565.

279.

Ryan

Weinstein

Bernstein

, et al. (2010) Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(2): 159–168.

280.

Saeri

Cruwys

Barlow

, et al. (2018) Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 52(4): 365–374.

281.

Sampedro

de la Fuente Revenga

Valle

, et al. (2017) Assessing the psychedelic “after-glow” in ayahuasca users: Post-acute neurometabolic and functional connectivity changes are associated with enhanced mindfulness capacities. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 20(9): 698–711.

282.

Saraglou

Buxant

Tilquin

(2008) Positive emotions as leading to religion and spirituality. Journal of Positive Psychology 3: 165–173.

283.

Saxena

Van Ommeren

Tang

, et al. (2005) Mental health benefits of physical activity. Journal of Mental Health 14(5): 445–451.

284.

Schenberg

(2018) Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: A paradigm shift in psychiatric research and development. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 733.

285.

Schlauch

Gwynn-Shapiro

Stasiewicz

, et al. (2013) Affect and craving: Positive and negative affect are differentially associated with approach and avoidance inclinations. Addictive Behaviors 38(4): 1970–1979.

286.

Schmid

(2013) Healing with ayahuasca: Notes on therapeutic rituals and effects in European patients treating their diseases. In: Labate

Cavnar

(eds) The Therapeutic Use of Ayahuasca. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.77–94.

287.

Schroeder

(1992) The spiritual aspect of nature: A perspective from depth psychology. In: Proceedings of the 1991 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, 7–9 April, pp. 25–30. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA/FS).

288.

Schutte

Malouff

(2018) Mindfulness and connectedness to nature: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences 127: 10–14.

289.

Scott

(2015) Horticultural therapy. In: Pachana

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Singapore: Springer, pp.1–5.

290.

Shafer

Jr Mietz

(1969) Aesthetic and emotional experiences rate high with northeast wilderness hikers. Environment and Behavior 1(2): 187–197.

291.

Shanahan

Bush

Gaston

, et al. (2016) Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports 6: 28551.

292.

Shin

Yeoun

(2012) The influence of forest therapy camp on depression in alcoholics. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 17(1): 73–76.

293.

Shiota

Keltner

Mossman

(2007) The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion 21(5): 944–963.

294.

Sidenius

Stigsdotter

Poulsen

, et al. (2017) “I look at my own forest and fields in a different way”: The lived experience of nature-based therapy in a therapy garden when suffering from stress-related illness. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 12(1): 1324700.

295.

Silvia

Fayn

Nusbaum

, et al. (2015) Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9(4): 376–384.

296.

Sinha

O’Malley

(1999) Craving for alcohol: Findings from the clinic and the laboratory. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34(2): 223–230.

297.

Sloshower

Guss

Krause

, et al. (2020) Psilocybin-assisted therapy of major depressive disorder using acceptance and commitment therapy as a therapeutic frame. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 15: 12–19.

298.

Smigielski

Kometer

Scheidegger

, et al. (2019a) Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. Scientific Reports 9(1): 1–13.

299.

Smigielski

Scheiddegger

Kometer

, et al. (2019b) Psilocybin-assisted mindfulness training modulates self-consciousness and brain default mode network connectivity with lasting effects. NeuroImage 196: 207–215.

300.

Snell

Simmonds

(2012) “Being in that environment can be very therapeutic”: Spiritual experiences in nature. Ecopsychology 4(4): 326–335.

301.

Snell

Simmonds

(2015) Mystical experiences in nature: Comparing outcomes for psychological well-being and environmental behaviour. Archive for the Psychology of Religion 37(2): 169–184.

302.

Sobko

Jia

Brown

(2018) Measuring connectedness to nature in preschool children in an urban setting and its relation to psychological functioning. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0207057.

303.

Soga

Gaston

(2016) Extinction of experience: The loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(2): 94–101.

304.

Soler

Elices

Dominguez-Clavé

, et al. (2018) Four weekly ayahuasca sessions lead to increases in “acceptance” capacities: A comparison study with a standard 8-week mindfulness training program. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 224.

305.

Song

Ikei

Igarashi

, et al. (2015) Physiological and psychological effects of a walk in urban parks in fall. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(11): 14216–14228.

306.

Song

Joung

Ikei

, et al. (2013) Physiological and psychological effects of walking on young males in urban parks in winter. Journal of Physiological Anthropology 32(1): 18.

307.

Sorajjakool

Aja

Chilson

, et al. (2008) Disconnection, depression, and spirituality: A study of the role of spirituality and meaning in the lives of individuals with severe depression. Pastoral Psychology 56: 521–532.

308.

Speth

Kaelen

, et al. (2016) Decreased mental time travel to the past correlates with default-mode network disintegration under lysergic acid diethylamide. Journal of Psychopharmacology 30(4): 344–353.

309.

Spreng

Grady

(2010) Patterns of brain activity supporting autobiographical memory, prospection, and theory of mind, and their relationship to the default mode network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(6): 1112–1123.

310.

John

St (2018) The breakthrough experience: DMT hyperspace and its liminal aesthetics. Anthropology of Consciousness 29(1): 57–76.

311.

Stenfors

CUD

Van Hedger

Schertz

, et al. (2019) Positive effects of nature on cognitive performance across multiple experiments: Test order but not affect modulates the cognitive effects. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1413.

312.

Stewart

Haaga

DAF

(2018) State mindfulness as a mediator of the effects of exposure to nature on affect and psychological well-being. Ecopsychology 10(1): 53–60.

313.

Studerus

Gamma

Kometer

, et al. (2012) Prediction of psilocybin response in healthy volunteers. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30800.

314.

Studerus

Kometer

Hasler

, et al. (2011) Acute, subacute and long-term subjective effects of psilocybin in healthy humans: A pooled analysis of experimental studies. Journal of Psychopharmacology 25(11): 1434–1452.

315.

Sturm

Datta

Roy

ARK

, et al. (2020) Big smile, small self: Awe walks promote prosocial positive emotions in older adults. Emotion. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000876.

316.

Summers

Vivian

(2018) Ecotherapy - a forgotten ecosystem service: A review. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1389.

317.

Swami

Barron

Todd

, et al. (2020) Nature exposure and positive body image: (Re-)examining the mediating roles of connectedness to nature and trait mindfulness. Body Image 34: 201–208.

318.

Swami

Barron

Weis

, et al. (2016) Bodies in nature: Associations between exposure to nature, connectedness to nature, and body image in U.S. adults. Body Image 18: 153–161.

319.

Szabo

Warnecke

Newton

, et al. (2017) Rumination and posttraumatic stress symptoms in trauma-exposed adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anxiety, Stress & Coping 30(4): 396–414.

320.

Tagliazucchi

Roseman

Kaelen

, et al. (2016) Increased global functional connectivity correlates with LSD-induced ego dissolution. Current Biology 26(8): 1043–1050.

321.

Tam

(2013) Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 64–78.

322.

Taylor

Sallis

Needle

(1985) The relation of physical activity and exercise to mental health. Public Health Reports 100(2): 195–202.

323.

Terracciano

Costa

Jr McCrae

(2006) Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(8): 999–1009.

324.

Terracciano

McCrae

Brant

, et al. (2005) Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging 20(3): 493–506.

325.

Thomsen

(2006) The association between rumination and negative affect: A review. Cognition and Emotion 20(8): 1216–1235.

326.

Trigwell

Francis

AJP

Bagot

(2014) Nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: Spirituality as a potential mediator. Ecopsychology 6(4): 241–251.

327.

Turner

Nakamura

Dinetti

(2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience 54(6): 585–590.

328.

Twohig-Bennett

Jones

(2018) The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research 166: 628–637.

329.

Ulrich

(1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman

Wohlwill

(eds) Human Behavior and Environment, Vo1. 6: Behavior and Natural Environment. New York, NY: Plenum, pp.85–125.

330.

Ulrich

Simons

Losito

, et al. (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11(3): 201–230.

331.

United Nations (2018) Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

332.

Unsworth

Palicki

Lustig

(2016) The impact of mindful meditation in nature on self-nature interconnectedness. Mindfulness 7(5): 1052–1060.

333.

Uthaug

Lancelotta

van Oorsouw

, et al. (2019) A single inhalation of vapor from dried toad secretion containing 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) in a naturalistic setting is related to sustained enhancement of satisfaction with life, mindfulness-related capacities, and a decrement of psychopathological symptoms. Psychopharmacology 236(9): 2653–2666.

334.

Uthaug

van Oorsouw

Kuypers

KPC

, et al. (2018) Sub-acute and long-term effects of ayahuasca on affect and cognitive thinking style and their association with ego dissolution. Psychopharmacology 235(10): 2979–2989.

335.

van Amsterdam

Opperhuizena

van den Brink

(2011) Harm potential of magic mushroom use: A review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 59(3): 423–429.

336.

Van Cappellen

Saroglou

(2012) Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 4(3): 223–236.

337.

van den Berg

Hartig

Staats

(2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues 63(1): 79–96.

338.

van den Berg

Jorgensen

Wilson

(2014) Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning 127: 173–181.

339.

van den Bosch

Sang

(2017) Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research 158: 373–384.

340.

van Elk

Karinen

Specker

, et al. (2016) ‘Standing in awe’: The effects of awe on body perception and the relation with absorption. Collabra: Psychology 2(1): 4.

341.

Van Gordon

Shonin

Richardson

(2018) Mindfulness and nature. Mindfulness 9: 1655–1658.

342.

van Mulukom

Patterson

van Elk

(2020) Broadening your mind to include others: The relationship between serotonergic psychedelic experiences and maladaptive narcissism. Psychopharmacology 237(9): 2725–2737.

343.

Varley

Carhart-Harris

Roseman

, et al. (2020) Serotonergic psychedelics LSD and psilocybin increase the fractal dimension of cortical brain activity in spatial and temporal domains. NeuroImage 220(15): 117049.

344.

Volkow

Koob

McLellan

(2016) Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. The New England Journal of Medicine 374: 363–371.

345.

Wang

Lyu

(2019) Inspiring awe through tourism and its consequence. Annals of Tourism Research 77: 106–116.

346.

Ward Thompson

(2011) Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme. Landscape and Urban Planning 99: 187–195.

347.

Ward Thompson

Aspinall

Montarzino

(2008) The childhood factor: Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environment and Behavior 40(1): 111–143.

348.

Watson

Naragon-Gainey

(2010) On the specificity of positive emotional dysfunction in psychopathology: Evidence from the mood and anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/schizotypy. Clinical Psychology Review 30: 839–848.

349.

Watson

Clark

Carey

(1988) Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97(3): 346–353.

350.

Watts

Luoma

(2020) The use of the psychological flexibility model to support psychedelic assisted therapy. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 15: 92–102.

351.

Watts

Day

Krzanowski

, et al. (2017) Patients’ accounts of increased “connectedness” and “acceptance” after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 57: 520–564.

352.

Weinstein

Przybylski

Ryan

(2009) Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35: 1315–1329.

353.

Wells

Lekies

(2006) Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments 16(1): 1–24.

354.

Whitburn

Linklater

Abrahamse

(2020) Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology 34(1): 180–193.

355.

White

Alcock

Wheeler

, et al. (2013) Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science 24(6): 920–928.

356.

Williams

JMG

(2008) Mindfulness, depression and modes of mind. Cognitive Therapy and Research 32: 721.

357.

Williams

Harvey

(2001) Transcendent experience in forest environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 249–260.

358.

Winkelman

(2013) Therapeutic applications of ayahuasca and other sacred medicines. In: Labate

Cavnar

(eds) The Therapeutic Use of Ayahuasca. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.1–22.

359.

Winstock

Barrat

Maier

, et al. (2019) Global Drug Survey (GDS). 2019 Key findings report, 16^th May.

360.

Witkiewitz

Bowen

(2010) Depression, craving and substance use following a randomized trial of mindfulness-based relapse prevention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78(3): 362–374.

361.

Witkiewitz

Villarroel

(2009) Dynamic association between negative affect and alcohol lapses following alcohol treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 77(4): 633–644.

362.

Wolsko

Lindberg

(2013) Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology 5(2): 80–91.

363.

Wright

Matthews

(2015) Building a culture of conservation: Research findings and research priorities on connecting people to nature in parks. Parks 21(2): 11–24.

364.

Wuertz

(2015) Personality traits associated with environmental concern. PhD Thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.

365.

Zelenski

Nisbet

(2014) Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior 46(1): 3–23.

366.

Zhang

Howell

Iyer

(2014) Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38: 55–63.

367.

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. (2018) Relation between awe and environmentalism: The role of social dominance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2367.

368.

Zhou

H-X

Chen

Shen

Y-Q

, et al. (2020) Rumination and the default mode network: Meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. NeuroImage 206: 116287.

369.

Zylstra

Knight

Esler

, et al. (2014) Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews 2: 119–143.

The potential synergistic effects between psychedelic administration and nature contact for the improvement of mental health

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Mental health benefits of nature relatedness and contact

Nature contact and mental health

Nature relatedness and mental health

Potential beneficial synergy of psychedelics and nature contact

Overlapping mechanisms between psychedelic administration and contact with nature

Neurobiological

Psychological

Connectedness

Mystical experience

Awe

Reduction of negative affect

Mindfulness

Personality

How to maximise nature relatedness using psychedelics

Potential benefits of natural settings for therapeutic psychedelic experiences

Potential benefits of natural settings for preparation and integration of psychedelic experiences

Developing a new model for psychedelic therapy to treat nature disconnection

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References