This study explored narrative responses following abnormal Pap tests among Hispanic migrant farmworkers (N = 18; ages 22–50 years) via in-depth interviews in Florida. Qualitative analyses utilized health literacy domains (obtain/process/understand/communicate) as a conceptual framework. Participants described how they (1) obtained information about getting a Pap test, (2) processed positive and negative reactions following results, (3) understood results and recommended health-promoting behaviors, and (4) communicated and received social support. Women had disparate reactions and understanding following an abnormal Pap result. Health literacy was a meaningful conceptual framework to understand assets and gaps among women receiving an abnormal Pap test result. Future interventions should incorporate health literacy domains and facilitate patient–provider communications and social support to assist women in decision-making and health-promoting behaviors, ultimately decreasing cancer disparities.
BreitkopfCRPearsonHCBreitkopfDM (2005) Poor knowledge regarding the Pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health37(2): 78–84.
DaleyEMPerrinKMMcDermottRJ. (2010) The psychosocial burden of HPV: A mixed-method study of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among HPV+ women. Journal of Health Psychology15(2): 279–290.
5.
DaleyEMVamosCAWheldonCW. (2015) Negative emotions and stigma associated with a human papillomavirus test result: A comparison between human papillomavirus–positive men and women. Journal of Health Psychology20(8): 1073–1082.
6.
Del CarmenMGFindleyMMuzikanskyA. (2007) Demographic, risk factor, and knowledge differences between Latinas and non-Latinas referred to colposcopy. Gynecologic Oncology104(1): 70–76.
7.
DeWaltDABerkmanNDSheridanS. (2004) Literacy and health outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine19(12): 1228–1239.
8.
EgglestonKSCokerALDasIP. (2007) Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. Journal of Women’s Health16(3): 311–330.
9.
GarbersSChiassonMA (2004) Inadequate functional health literacy in Spanish as a barrier to cervical cancer screening among immigrant Latinas in New York City. Preventing Chronic Disease1(4): A07.
HouseJS (1981) Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
Institute of Medicine (2004) Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
13.
Institute of Medicine (2009) Measures of Health Literacy: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14.
JordanJEBuchbinderROsborneRH (2010) Conceptualising health literacy from the patient perspective. Patient Education and Counseling79(1): 36–42.
15.
LindauSTTomoriCLyonsT. (2002) The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology186(5): 938–943.
16.
McAlisterALPerryCLParcelGS (2008) How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social cognitive theory. In: GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th edn). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 169–188.
17.
MillsPKBeaumontJJNasseriK (2006) Proportionate mortality among current and former members of the United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO, in California 1973-2000. Journal of Agromedicine11(1): 39–48.
18.
MillsPKDodgeJYangR (2009) Cancer in migrant and seasonal hired farm workers. Journal of Agromedicine14(2): 185–191.
19.
MonsonegoJCortesJda SilvaDP. (2011) Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: Comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries. BMC Women’s Health11: 18.
NewtonDCMcCabeMP (2008) Sexually transmitted infections: Impact on individuals and their relationships. Journal of Health Psychology13(7): 864–869.
23.
Paasche-OrlowMKWilsonEAMcCormackL (2010) The evolving field of health literacy research. Journal of Health Communication15(Suppl. 2): 5–8.
24.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (6th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Percac-LimaSAldrichLSGambaGB. (2010) Barriers to follow-up of an abnormal Pap smear in Latina women referred for colposcopy. Journal of General Internal Medicine25(11): 1198–1204.
26.
PleasantAMcKinneyJRikardRV (2011) Health literacy measurement: A proposed research agenda. Journal of Health Communication16(Suppl. 3): 11–21.
27.
SandelowskiM (1995) Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health18(2): 179–183.
28.
ScarinciICBeechBMKovachKW. (2003) An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age. Journal of Immigrant Health5(3): 119–128.
29.
SimonMACofta-WoerpelLRandhawaV. (2010) Using the word “cancer” in communication about an abnormal Pap test: Finding common ground with patient-provider communication. Patient Education and Counseling81(1): 106–112.
30.
SørensenKVan den BrouckeSFullamJ. (2012) Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health12(1): 80.
31.
ThorburnSKeonKLKueJ (2013) Sources of breast and cervical cancer information for Hmong women and men. Women & Health53(5): 468–478.
32.
TuY-CWangH-H (2013) An exploration of human papillomavirus-related cervical cancer prevention experiences among college women: A descriptive qualitative approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing22(23–24): 3300–3309.
