Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ankle—brachial index (ABI) is the standard test used in clinical practice to detect peripheral artery disease (PAD) and is a powerful predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This study sought to measure the baseline knowledge of the ABI test among a sample of internal medicine residents and to examine the impact of an educational intervention on performance of the test. A total of 29 residents were asked to perform three tasks, with the performance of each task being assessed using a point-based scoring system: measure an ABI on a normal volunteer (15 points), calculate the ABI based on data from a hypothetical patient (3 points), and interpret a range of ABI values (6 points). A standardized educational intervention was then provided and post-education performance was assessed for each task using the same scoring system. At baseline, 4% of residents correctly measured the ABI, 10% correctly calculated the ABI, and 45% correctly interpreted the ABI. Baseline performance was unaffected by year of residency training. Following the educational intervention, 50% of residents correctly measured the ABI, 75% correctly calculated the ABI, and 88% correctly interpreted the ABI. The mean score for the tasks of ABI measurement, calculation and interpretation between baseline and post-education were 4.6 ± 3 and 13.9 ± 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 1 ± 0.9 and 2.3 ± 1.2 (p = 0.002), and 4.9 ± 1.6 and 5.9 ± 0.3 (p = 0.008), respectively. In conclusion, baseline knowledge of the ABI test was poor among a sample of internal medicine residents. These results suggest that instruction regarding the ABI test is deficient in medical school and residency programs and requires action by those responsible for the education of medical students and residents.

Keywords

ankle—brachial index education performance peripheral artery disease

References

Creager MA , White CJ , Hiatt WR , et al. Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: executive summary. Circulation 2008; 118: 2811-2825.

Hirsch AT , Criqui MH , Treat-Jacobson D. , et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 2001; 286: 1317-1324.

Newman AB , Siscovick DS , Manolio TA , et al. Ankle-arm index as a marker of atherosclerosis in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Cardiovascular Heart Study (CHS) Collaborative Research Group . Circulation 1993; 88: 837-845.

Criqui MH , Fronek A. , Barrett-Connor E. , Klauber MR , Gabriel S. , Goodman D. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a defined population . Circulation 1985; 71: 510-515.

Ouriel K. Peripheral arterial disease. Lancet 2001; 358: 1257-1264.

Fowkes FG , Murray GD , Butcher I. , et al. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 300: 197-208.

Heald CL , Fowkes FG , Murray GD , Price JF Risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with the ankle-brachial index: systematic review. Atherosclerosis 2006; 189:61-69.

Doobay AV , Anand SS Sensitivity and specificity of the ankle-brachial index to predict future cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 1463-1469.

Begelman SM , Jaff MR Noninvasive diagnostic strategies for peripheral arterial disease. Cleve Clin J Med 2006; 73(suppl 4): S22-29.

10.

Hirsch AT , Haskal ZJ , Hertzer NR , et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation 2006; 113: e463-654.

11.

Sacks D. , Bakal CW , Beatty PT , et al. Position statement on the use of the ankle brachial index in the evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease. A consensus statement developed by the Standards Division of the Society of Interventional Radiology . J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14(9 Pt 2): S389.

12.

Caruana MF , Bradbury AW , Adam DJ The validity, reliability, reproducibility and extended utility of ankle to brachial pressure index in current vascular surgical practice. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 443-451.

13.

Fleck CA Measuring ankle brachial pressure index. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007; 20: 645-646, 648-649.

14.

Belch JJ , Topol EJ , Agnelli G. , et al. Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 884-892.

15.

Mohler ER 3rd , Treat-Jacobson D. , Reilly MP , et al. Utility and barriers to performance of the ankle-brachial index in primary care practice . Vasc Med 2004; 9: 253-260.

Ankle—brachial index performance among internal medicine residents

Abstract

Keywords

References