Description of a novel telemedicine-enabled comprehensive system of care: drip and ship plus drip and keep within a system of stroke care delivery

Abstract

United States (US) and worldwide telestroke programs frequently focus only on emergency room hyper-acute stroke management. This article describes a comprehensive, telemedicine-enabled, stroke care delivery system that combines “drip and ship” and “drip and keep” models with a comprehensive stroke center primary hub at Ochsner Medical Center in New Orleans, advanced stroke-capable regional hubs, and geographically-aligned, “stroke-ready” spokes. The primary hub provides vascular neurology expertise via telemedicine and monitors care for patients remaining at regional hubs and spokes using a multidisciplinary team approach. By 2014, primary hub telestroke consults grew to ≈1000/year with 16 min average door to consult initiation and 20 min to completion, and 29% of ischemic stroke patients received recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA), increasing 275%. Most patients remained in hospitals close to home, but neurointensive care and interventional procedures were common reasons for primary hub transfer. Given the time sensitivity and expert consultation needed for complex acute stroke care delivery paradigms, telestroke programs are effective for fulfilling unmet care needs. Combining drip and ship and drip and keep management allows more patients to stay “local,” limiting primary hub transfer unless more advanced services are required. Post admission telestroke management at spokes increases personnel efficiency and can positively impact stroke outcomes.

Keywords

Stroke care delivery telestroke program

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schwamm

Holloway

Amarenco

. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 2616–2634.

Schwamm

Audebert

Amarenco

. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 2635–2660.

Schwab

Vatankhah

Kukla

. Long-term outcomes after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology 2007; 69: 898–903.

Audebert

Kukla

Von Claranau

. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke. The Telemedic Pilot project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 2005; 36: 287–291.

Wiborg

Widder

. Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia Study Group. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas. The Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) project. Stroke 2003; 34: 2951–2957.

Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, et al. Mortality in the United States, 2013. Data brief no. 178. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db178.pdf (2014, accessed 1 June 2015).

American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update, Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2010.

Boudreau

Guzauskas

Chen

. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator within 3 hours of acute ischemic stroke. Current evidence. Stroke 2014; 45: 3032–3039.

Emberson

Lees

Lyden

. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2014; 384: 1929–1935.

10.

Saver

. Time is brain-quantified. Stroke 2006; 37: 263–266.

11.

Kleindorfer

Moomaw

. US geographic distribution of rtPA utilization by hospital for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 3580–3584.

12.

Saler

Switzer

Hess

. Use of telemedicine and helicopter transport to improve stroke care in remote locations. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2011; 13: 215–224.

13.

Grise

Aeoye

Lindsell

. Emergency department adherence to American Heart Association Guidelines for blood pressure management in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 557–559.

14.

Prabhakaran

Ruff

Bernstein

. Acute stroke intervention. A systematic review. JAMA 2015; 313: 1451–1462.

15.

Silverman

Beland

Chhabra

. The “drip-and-ship” approach: starting IV t-PA for acute ischemic stroke at outside hospitals prior to transfer to a regional stroke center. Conn Med 2005; 69: 613–620.

16.

Saposnik

Fonarow

Pan

. Guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein management in high-risk patients with ischemic stroke. Findings from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke 2003 to 2012. Stroke 2014; 45: 3343–3351.

17.

Roumie

Ofner

Ross

. Prevalence of inadequate blood pressure control among veterans after acute ischemic stroke hospitalization. A retrospective cohort. Circ Cardiovascular Qual Outcomes 2011; 4: 399–407.

18.

Weimar

Mieck

Buchthal

. Neurologic worsening during the acute phase of ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 393–397.

19.

Kalra

Perez

Melbourn

. Stroke risk management. Changes in mainstream practice. Stroke 1998; 29: 53–57.

20.

Hong

Saver

Kang

. Years of optimum health lost due to complications after acute ischemic stroke: disability-adjusted life year’s analysis. Stroke 2010; 41: 1758–1765.

21.

Langhorne

Stott

Robertson

. Medical complication after acute stroke. A multicenter study. Stroke 2000; 31: 1223–1229.

22.

Arima

Heely

Delcourt

. Optimal achieved blood pressure in acute intracerebral hemorrhage INTERACT2. Neurology 2015; 84: 464–471.

23.

Qureshi

Palesch

. Antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale. Neurocrit Care 2011; 15: 559–576.

24.

Shafqat

Kevdar

Gauanci

. Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability of remote administration of the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 1999; 30: 2141–2145.

25.

Handschu

Littmann

Reulbach

. Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke. Interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system. Stroke 2003; 34: 2842–2846.

26.

Demaerschalk

Bobrow

Raman

. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona. The Initial Mayo Clinic Experience Trial. Stroke 2010; 41: 1251–1258.

27.

Demaerschalk

Raman

Ernstrom

. Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona Telestroke trials. Telemed eHealth 2012; 18: 230–237.

28.

Meyer

Raman

Hemmen

. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomized, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 787–795.

29.

Silva

Farrell

Shandra

. The status of telestroke in the United States. A survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs. Stroke 2012; 43: 2078–2085.

30.

Switzer

Demaerschalk

Xie

. Cost effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospital’s perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 18–26.

31.

Demaerschalk

Hwang

Leung

. Cost analysis review of stroke centers, telestroke, and rt-PA. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16: 537–544.

32.

De Bustos

Moulin

Audebert

. Barriers, legal issues, limitations and ongoing questions in telemedicine applied to stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27(Suppl 4): 36–39.

33.

Weintraub

. Thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator) in stroke. A medicolegal quagmire. Stroke 2006; 37: 1917–1922.

34.

LaMonte

Bahouth

. Telemedicine for acute stroke. Triumphs and pitfalls. Stroke 2003; 34: 725–728.

35.

Angileri

Cardali

Conti

. Telemedicine-assisted treatment of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 32: 1–7.

36.

The Joint Commission. Certification Comprehensive Stroke Center, http://www.jointcommission.org/certification/advanced_certification_comprehensive_stroke_centers.aspx (2016, accessed 1 March 2016).