The purpose of this study was to unpack the challenges and constraints encountered by preservice and novice teachers when implementing student-centred models, and to describe the methodological characteristics of research conducted on this topic between 2004 and 2020. The procedure had a three-step approach: (a) searching for publications in electronic databases; (b) selecting studies based on inclusion criteria; and (c) refining this selection to identify research-based papers. 29 articles were selected, most of which were from Europe and North America. The most researched model was Sport Education, and studies considering novice teachers were scarce. The predominant methodology across studies involved multiple qualitative data sources and inductive analysis. Our major finding was the identification of three themes reflecting distinct challenges to the implementation of student-centred models: (a) teacher-related challenges (i.e. pervasive beliefs, occupational socialization, managerial- and instruction-related); (b) student-related challenges (i.e. student resistance to engaged participation in student-centred models); and (c) external challenges (i.e. context- and environment-related). Physical education teacher education should invest in training preservice teachers to: (a) manage the dynamics of students’ cooperative interactions and peer-assisted learning; (b) design developmentally appropriate small-sided games and problem-solving contexts, and (c) scaffold the gradual transfer of responsibility to students for their engagement in persistent learning team activities. Longer studies and the inclusion of student perspectives will be particularly valuable for future investigations.
Barba-MartínRBores-GarcíaDHortigüela-AlcaláD, et al. (2020) The application of the teaching games for understanding in physical education. Systematic review of the last six years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(9): 3330–3346.
2.
BarrettKTurnerA (2000) Sandy’s Challenge: New Game, New Paradigm “a Correspondence”. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education19: 162–281.
3.
BessaCHastiePAraújoR, et al. (2019) What do we know about the development of personal and social skills within the sport education model: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine18(4): 812–829.
4.
BodsworthHGoodyearV (2017) Barriers and facilitators to using digital technologies in the Cooperative Learning model in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy22(6): 563–579.
5.
Bores-GarcíaDHortigüela-AlcaláDFernandez-RioF, et al. (2020) Research on cooperative learning in physical education. Systematic review of the last five years. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport92(1): 146–155.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4): 589–597.
7.
BunkerDThorpeR (1982) A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education18(1): 5–8.
8.
CaseyAGoodyearV (2015) Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest67(1): 56–72.
9.
CaseyAMacPhailA (2018) Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy23(3): 294–310.
ChenYSinelnikovOHastieP (2013) Professional development in physical education: Introducing the Sport Education Model to teachers in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport & Physical Education4(1): 1–17.
12.
Chiva-BartollÓSalvador-GarcíaCRuiz-MonteroPJ (2018) Teaching games for understanding and cooperative learning: Can their hybridization increase motivational climate among physical education students?Croatian Journal of Education20(2): 561–584.
13.
ChuTZhangT (2018) Motivational processes in Sport Education programs among high school students: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review24(3): 372–394.
14.
Curtner-SmithMSofoS (2004) Preservice teachers’ conceptions of teaching within sport education and multi-activity units. Sport, Education and Society9(3): 347–377.
15.
Curtner-SmithMHastiePKinchinG (2008) Influence of occupational socialization on beginning teachers’ interpretation and delivery of sport education. Sport, Education and Society13(1): 97–117.
16.
DeenihanJMacPhailA (2017) The influence of organizational socialization in preservice teachers’ delivery of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education36(4): 477–484.
17.
DysonBCaseyA (2016) Cooperative Learning in Physical Education and Physical Activity: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.
18.
DysonBGriffinLHastieP (2004) Sport education, tactical games, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations. Quest56(2): 226–240.
19.
EllisNAlonzoDNguyenHTM (2020) Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education92: 1–13.
20.
FariasCHastiePMesquitaI (2018) Scaffolding student–coaches’ instructional leadership toward student-centred peer interactions: A yearlong action-research intervention in sport education. European Physical Education Review24(3): 269–291.
21.
FariasCWallheadTMesquitaI (2020) “The project changed my life”: Sport education’s transformative potential on student physical literacy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport91(2): 263–278.
22.
Fernandez-RioJ (2017) Quality physical education through models-based practice. In: MilanovićDSporišGŠalajS, et al. (Eds) 8th international scientific conference on kinesiology, Zagreb, pp.186–190.
23.
FletcherTChróinínDO’SullivanM, et al. (2020) Pre-service teachers articulating their learning about meaningful physical education. European Physical Education Review26(4): 885–902.
24.
Gil-AriasAClaverFPráxedesA, et al. (2020) Autonomy support, motivational climate, enjoyment and perceived competence in physical education: Impact of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit. European Physical Education Review26(1): 36–53.
25.
Gil-AriasAHarveySCárcelesA, et al. (2017) Impact of a hybrid TGfU-Sport Education unit on student motivation in physical education. PLoS ONE12(6): e0179876.
26.
GlotovaOHastieP (2014) Learning to teach sport education in Russia: Factors affecting model understanding and intentions to teach. Sport, Education and Society19(8): 1072–1088.
27.
González-VílloraSEvangelioCSierra-DíazJ, et al. (2019) Hybridizing pedagogical models: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review25(4): 1056–1074.
28.
GoodyearV (2017) Sustained professional development on cooperative learning: Impact on six teachers’ practices and students’ learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport88(1): 83–94.
29.
GoodyearVDudleyD (2015) “I’m a facilitator of learning!” Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest67(3): 274–289.
30.
GoodyearVCaseyAKirkD (2014) Hiding behind the camera: Social learning within the cooperative learning model to engage girls in physical education. Sport, Education and Society19(6): 712–734.
31.
HarveySJarrettK (2014) A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy19(3): 278–300.
32.
HarveySLightR (2015) Questioning for learning in game-based approaches to teaching and coaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education6(2): 175–190.
33.
HattieJ (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. London: Routledge.
34.
HastiePCaseyA (2014) Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education33(3): 422–431.
35.
HastiePMesquitaI (2016) Sport-based physical education. In: EnnisC (ed) Routledge Handbook of Physical Education Pedagogies. London: Routledge, pp. 367–379.
36.
HongQPluyePFàbreguesS, et al. (2018) Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 User guide. Available at: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks (accessed 1 February 2019).
37.
HordvikMMacPhailARonglanLT (2019a) Learning to teach sport education: Investigating a pre-service teacher’s knowledge development. Sport, Education and Society24(1): 51–65.
38.
HordvikMMacPhailARonglanLT (2019b) Negotiating the complexity of teaching: A rhizomatic consideration of pre-service teachers’ school placement experiences. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy24(5): 447–462.
39.
JarrettKLightR (2017) In-service teachers’ experiences of using game based approaches to teach games: Implications for physical education teacher educators. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health4(2): 73–81.
40.
KimJPenneyDChoM, et al. (2006) ‘Not business as usual’: Sport education pedagogy in practice. European Physical Education Review12(3): 361–379.
41.
KirkD (2013) Educational value and models-based practice in physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory45(9): 973–986.
42.
LiCCruzA (2008) Pre-service PE teachers’ occupational socialization experiences on teaching games for understanding. New Horizons in Education56(3): 20–30.
MacPhailATannehillDKarpG (2013) Preparing physical education preservice teachers to design instructionally aligned lessons through constructivist pedagogical practices. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies33: 100–112.
45.
McCaughtryNSofoSRovegnoI, et al. (2004) Learning to teach sport education: Misunderstandings, pedagogical difficulties, and resistance. European Physical Education Review10(2): 135–155.
46.
McMahonEMacPhailA (2007) Learning to teach sport education: The experiences of a pre-service teacher. European Physical Education Review13(2): 229–246.
47.
MesquitaIGraçaA (2009) Modelos instrucionais no ensino do desporto. Pedagogia do desporto. Lisboa: Faculdade de Motricidade Humana.
48.
MetzlerM (2017) Instructional Models for Physical Education. New York: Routledge.
49.
MillerA (2015) Games centered approaches in teaching children & adolescents: Systematic review of associated student outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education34(1): 36–58.
50.
MitchellSOslinJGriffinL (2013) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
51.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2015) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Systematic Reviews, 4. (accessed 30 October 2019).
52.
NasriN (2019) Self-directed learning through the eyes of teacher educators. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences40(1): 164–171.
53.
O’LearyN (2014) Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding: The experiences of a recently qualified teacher. European Physical Education Review20(3): 367–384.
54.
O’LearyNLongmoreCMedcalfR (2014) The influence of occupational socialisation upon a teacher’s interpretation and delivery of Teaching Games for Understanding to pupils experiencing social and emotional behavioural difficulties. Support for Learning29(1): 57–75.
55.
O’SullivanM (2003) Learning to teach in PE. In: SilvermanSEnnisC (eds) Student Learning in PE. Champaign: Human Kinetics, pp. 275–290.
56.
OslinJMitchellS (2006) Game-centred approaches to teaching physical education. In: KirkDMacDonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage Publications, pp.627–651.
57.
ÖzlemAFerdaG (2019) Teacher who (cannot) change: Experimental processes of physical education teachers by means of pedagogical innovations at the time of their professional development. Egitim ve Bilim44(197): 401–420.
58.
PattonM (2015) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
59.
PriorLCurtner-SmithM (2020) Effects of occupational socialization on United States secondary physical education teachers’ beliefs regarding curriculum design. European Physical Education Review26(1): 179–197.
60.
RoblesMCollado-MateoDFernández-EspínolaC, et al. (2020) Effects of teaching games on decision making and skill execution: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(2): 505–518.
61.
RomarJ-EFriskA (2017) The influence of occupational socialization on novice teachers’ practical knowledge, confidence and teaching in physical education. Qualitative Research in Education6(1): 86–116.
62.
RowleyCFookJGlazzardJ (2018) Adopting a student-led pedagogic approach within higher education: the reflections of an early career academic. Reflective Practice19(1): 35–45.
63.
SchwambergerBCurtner-SmithM (2016) Influence of a training programme on a preservice teacher’s ability to promote moral and sporting behaviour in sport education. European Physical Education Review23(4): 428–443.
64.
SchwambergerBCurtner-SmithM (2018a) Moral development and sporting behavior in sport education: A case study of a preservice teacher with a coaching orientation. European Physical Education Review25(2): 581–596.
65.
SchwambergerBCurtner-SmithM (2018b) Moral development in sport education: A case study of a teaching-oriented preservice teacher. Physical Educator75(3): 546–566.
66.
SiedentopDHastiePMarsHVD (2020) Complete Guide to Sport Education. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
67.
SinclairCThorntonL (2016) Exploring preservice teachers’ conceptions after ‘living a hybrid curriculum’. European Physical Education Review24(2): 133–151.
68.
SinelnikovO (2009) Sport education for teachers: Professional development when introducing a novel curriculum model. European Physical Education Review15(1): 91–114.
69.
StranMCurtner-SmithM (2009a) Influence of occupational socialization on two preservice teachers’ interpretation and delivery of the sport education model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education28(1): 38–53.
70.
StranMCurtner-SmithM (2009b) Influence of two preservice teachers’ value orientations on their interpretation and delivery of sport education. Sport, Education and Society14(3): 339–352.
71.
StranMCurtner-SmithM (2010) Impact of different types of knowledge on two preservice teachers’ ability to learn and deliver the Sport Education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy15(3): 243–256.
72.
StranMSinelnikovOWoodruffE (2012) Pre-service teachers’ experiences implementing a hybrid curriculum: Sport Education and Teaching Games for Understanding. European Physical Education Review18(3): 287–308.
73.
Wahl-AlexanderZCurtner-SmithM (2015) Influence of negotiations between preservice teachers and pupils on instruction within multi-activity and sport education units. Sport, Education and Society20(7): 838–854.
74.
Wahl-AlexanderZCurtner-SmithMSinelnikovaO (2017) Influence of a training program on preservice teachers’ ability to negotiate with students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education37(2): 144–153.
75.
WangCHaA (2013a) The theory of planned behaviour: Predicting pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour towards a constructivist approach. Sport, Education & Society18(2): 222–242.
76.
WangCHaA (2013b) Three groups of teachers’ views, learning experiences, and understandings of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy18(3): 336–350.
77.
WardPAyvazoS (2016) Pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptions and findings in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education35(3): 194–207.
78.
WardPLeeM-A (2005) Peer-assisted learning in physical education: A review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education24(3): 205–225.
79.
WebbLScoularT (2011) Reflection on reflection on reflection: Collaboration in action research. Educational Action Research19(4): 469–487.
80.
WrightSMcNeillMFryJ (2009) The tactical approach to teaching games from teaching, learning and mentoring perspectives. Sport, Education and Society14(2): 223–244.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
