Novelty has recently been suggested as a potential basic psychological need within self-determination theory. Taking into account the lack of research on this new construct, the purpose of this study was to show the role of novelty satisfaction in physical education, analyzing its relations with some outcomes that are relevant for academic achievement. Secondary school students completed measures of basic psychological need satisfaction (autonomy, competence, and relatedness), novelty satisfaction, the three types of intrinsic motivation (to know, to accomplish, and to experience stimulation), and different outcomes (vitality, dispositional flow, and satisfaction) for physical education. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a high correlation between autonomy and novelty satisfaction. The problem of discriminant validity was solved by removing an item from the original version of the Novelty Need Satisfaction Scale due to its overlap with the autonomy construct. This modification contributed to improving the psychometric properties of this scale. Structural equation modeling showed that satisfaction of the need for competence was the strongest predictor of intrinsic motivation to accomplish and to experience stimulation, whereas novelty satisfaction was the strongest predictor of intrinsic motivation to know. Positive direct and indirect effects from novelty satisfaction were found on vitality, dispositional flow, and satisfaction with physical education classes. These results suggest the importance of teachers developing strategies to provide novelty support, with the aim of achieving multiple positive outcomes in physical education.
AlexanderPAGrossnickleEM (2016) Positioning interest and curiosity within a model of academic development. In: WentzelKRMieleDB (eds) Handbook of Motivation at School, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, pp.188–208.
2.
BagozziRPKimmelSK (1995) A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal directed behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology34(4): 437–461.
3.
BagozziRPYiY (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1): 74–94.
4.
BanackHRSabistonCMBloomGA (2011) Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of Paralympic athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport82(4): 722–730.
5.
BosticTJRubioDMHoodM (2000) A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research52(3): 313–324.
6.
CarbonneauNVallerandRJLafrenièreMAK (2012) Toward a tripartite model of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality80(5): 1147–1178.
7.
CastilloITomásIBalaguerI (2017) The Spanish-version of the Subjective Vitality Scale: Psychometric properties and evidence of validity. The Spanish Journal of Psychology20: E26.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
CunninghamGB (2007) Development of the Physical Activity Class Satisfaction Questionnaire (PACSQ). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science11(3): 161–176.
10.
DeciEL (1992) The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In: RenningerKAHidiSKrappA (eds) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 43–71.
11.
DeciELRyanRM (1991) A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In: DienstbierR (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 237–288.
12.
DeciELRyanRM (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227–268.
13.
Fernandez-RioJMenendez-SanturioJI (2017) Teachers and students’ perceptions of a hybrid Sport Education and Teaching for Personal and Social Responsibility learning unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education36(2): 185–196.
14.
FerrizRSiciliaASáenz-ÁlvarezP (2013) Predicting satisfaction in physical education classes: A study based on self-determination theory. The Open Education Journal6(1): 1–7.
15.
González-CutreDSiciliaAMorenoJA. (2009) Dispositional flow in physical education: Relationships with motivational climate, social goals, and perceived competence. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education28(4): 422–440.
16.
González-CutreDSiciliaASierraAC. (2016) Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences102(November): 159–169.
17.
GrossnickleEM (2016) Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review28(1): 23–60.
18.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
20.
JacksonSAEklundR (2002) Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology24(2): 133–150.
21.
KashdanTBSilviaPJ (2009) Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In: LopezSJ (ed.) Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–375.
22.
KawabataMMalletCJ (2016) What is flow? Reconsideration of the state of optimal functioning beyond flow theory. In: SchinkeRHSmithBMcGannonK (eds) Routledge International Handbook in Sport Psychology. New York: Routledge, pp. 369–377.
23.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
24.
LubansDRLonsdaleCCohenK. (2017) Framework for the design and delivery of organized physical activity sessions for children and adolescents: Rationale and description of the ‘SAAFE’ teaching principles. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14: 24.
25.
MarshHWHauKTWenZ (2004) In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling11(3): 320–341.
26.
MorenoJAGonzález-CutreDChillónM. (2008) Adaptación a la educación física de la Escala de las Necesidades Psicológicas Básicas en el ejercicio [Adaptation of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale to physical education]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología25(2): 295–303.
27.
MouratidisALensW (2015) Adolescents’ psychological functioning at school and in sports: The role of future time perspective and domain-specific and situation-specific self-determined motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology34(8): 643–673.
28.
MouratidisAMichouAVassiouA (2017) Adolescents’ autonomous functioning and implicit theories of ability as predictors of their school achievement and week-to-week study regulation and well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology48: 56–66.
29.
MouratidisAAVansteenkisteMSideridisG. (2011) Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils’ autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology103(2): 353–366.
30.
NathansLLOswaldFLNimonK (2012) Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation17(9): 1–19.
31.
NtoumanisN (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on motivation in sport and physical education: Current trends and possible future research directions. In: RobertsGCTreasureDC (eds) Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 91–28.
32.
NúñezJLLeónJ (2015) Autonomy support in the classroom: A review from self-determination theory. European Psychologist20(4): 275–283.
33.
NúñezJLMartín-AlboJNavarroJG. (2006) Preliminary validation of a Spanish version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills102(3): 919–930.
34.
OstroffWL (2016) Cultivating Curiosity in K-12 Classrooms: How to Promote and Sustain Deep Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
35.
PelletierLGFortierMSVallerandRJ. (1995) Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology17(1): 35–53.
36.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
37.
RadelRPelletierLSarrazinP (2013) Restoration processes after need thwarting: When autonomy depends on competence. Motivation and Emotion37(2): 234–244.
38.
ReeveJM (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: ChristensonSLReschlyAWylieC (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer, pp. 149–172.
39.
ReeveJM (2016) Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In: LiuWCWangJCKRyanRM (eds) Building Autonomous Learners. New York: Springer, pp. 129–152.
40.
ReissS (2004) Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology8(3): 179–193.
41.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
42.
RyanRMDeciEL (2017) Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
43.
RyanRMFrederickC (1997) On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality65(3): 529–565.
44.
RyanRMHutaVDeciEL (2008) Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies9(1): 139–170.
45.
ShernoffDJBeheshtehAAndersonB. (2014) Flow in schools revisited. Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In: FurlongMJGilmanRHuebnerES (eds) Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 211–226.
46.
SiciliaAFerrizRTriguerosR. (2014) Adaptación y validación española del Physical Activity Class Satisfaction Questionnaire (PACSQ) [Spanish adaptation and validation of the Physical Activity Class Satisfaction Questionnaire (PACSQ)]. Universitas Psychologica13(4): 1321–1332.
47.
SilviaPJ (2006) Exploring the Psychology of Interest. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
StormoenSUrkeHBTjomslandHE. (2016) High school physical education: What contributes to the experience of flow?European Physical Education Review22(3): 355–371.
49.
SylvesterBDLubansDREatherN. (2016a) Effects of variety support on exercise-related well-being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being8(2): 213–231.
50.
SylvesterBDStandageMArkTK. (2014a) Is variety a spice of (an active) life? Perceived variety, exercise behavior, and the mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology36(5): 516–527.
SylvesterBDStandageMMcEwanD. (2016b) Variety support and exercise adherence behavior: experimental and mediating effects. Journal of Behavioral Medicine39(2): 214–224.
53.
TaylorIMLonsdaleC (2010) Cultural differences in the relationships among autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality, and effort in British and Chinese physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology32(5): 655–673.
54.
Van den BergheLVansteenkisteMCardonG. (2014) Research on self-determination in physical education: key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy19(1): 97–121.
55.
VlachopoulosSPMichailidouS (2006) Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science10(3): 179–201.
56.
VlachopoulosSPKatartziESKontouMG (2011) The Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education Scale. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education30(3): 263–280.
57.
YeattsPEBartonMHensonRK. (2017) The use of structure coefficients to address multicollinearity in sport and exercise science. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science21(2): 83–91.
