Physical education reform efforts support constructivist learning theory (CLT) to re-conceptualize K-12 physical education. Advocates of models-based instruction (MBI) indicate that sport education and a tactical games approach are grounded in CLT. A key implication for physical education teacher education (PETE) programmes is to develop preservice teachers (PSTs) capable of implementing MBI. Often, PSTs enter PETE programmes with the pre-conception that learning can only occur through passive transfer of information. As a result, PETE programmes must help PSTs re-conceptualize physical education. The two purposes of this study were to: (a) explore the use of a ‘living the curriculum’ experience to influence PSTs’ conceptions of learning and teaching in physical education; and (b) examine the usefulness of visual methods to further understand students’ experiences in a PETE course. Participants were undergraduate PSTs (N = 12; five women, seven men) who experienced living a hybrid curriculum. PSTs took five to seven photographs to create a photo-collage that best depicted their experiences in the class. Semi-structured focus group interviews centered on discussion of the PSTs’ photo collages. Data analysis revealed two major themes and sub-themes: (1) Learning in physical education – (a) knowledge is socially constructed and (b) learning is active; and (2) The role of the professor – (a) professor as facilitator and (b) clinging to old conceptions. PSTs experienced cognitive conflict and conceptual addition, suggesting old ideas were not completely extinguished but revised. Overall, the PSTs’ conceptions indicated an openness to and basic understanding of alternate forms of physical education.
BorkoHMayfieldV (1995) The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education11(5): 501–518.
5.
BransfordJDerrySBerlinerD. (2005) Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In: Darling-HammondLBransfordJ (eds) Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley, pp.40–87.
6.
CollierC (1998) Sport education and preservice education. The Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance69(5): 44–45.
7.
CollierJCollierM (1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
8.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
9.
DavisJ (2010) Conceptual change. In: OreyM (ed) Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology. Available at: http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/ (accessed 1 June 2016).
10.
DeenihanJTMacPhailAYoungAM (2011) ‘Living the curriculum’: Integrating sport education into a physical education teacher education programme. European Physical Education Review17(1): 51–68.
11.
DoolittleSADoddsPPlacekJ (1993) Persistence of beliefs about teaching during formal training of preservice teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education12(4): 355–365.
12.
DysonBGriffinLLHastieP (2004) Sport education, tactical games, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations. Quest56(2): 226–240.
13.
EnnisCD (2014) What goes around comes around…or does it? Disrupting the cycle of traditional, sport-based physical education. Kinesiology Review3(1): 63–70.
14.
EnrightEO’SullivanM (2012) Listening to young people’s voices in physical education and youth sport research. In: ArmourKMacdonaldD (eds) Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport. London: Routledge, pp.120–131.
15.
FenshamPJGunstoneRFWhiteRT (1994) The Content of Science: A Constructive Approach to its Teaching and Learning. London: Falmer.
16.
FletcherTCaseyA (2014) The challenges of models-based practice in physical education teacher education: A collaborative self-study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education33(3): 403–421.
17.
GurvitchRLundJLMetzlerMW (2008a) Chapter 1. Researching the adoption of models-based instruction: Context and chapter summaries. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education27(4): 449–456.
18.
GurvitchRTeejerdsma BlankenshipBMetzlerMW. (2008b) Chapter 3. Student teachers’ implementation of models-based instruction: Facilitators and inhibitors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education27(4): 466–486.
19.
HammernessKDarling-HammondLBransfordJ. (2005) How teachers learn and develop. In: Darling-HammondLBransfordJ (eds) Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, pp.1–39.
20.
HastiePACaseyA (2014) Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education33(3): 422–431.
21.
HastiePACurtner-SmithMD (2006) Influence of a hybrid Sport Education—teaching games for understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy11(1): 1–27.
22.
HewsonPW (1992) Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. National Center for Educational Research, Documentation, and Assessment, Ministry for Education, Madrid, Spain.
23.
JonesRSantosSMesquitaI. (2012) Visual methods in coaching research. In: ArmourKMacdonaldD (eds) Research Methods in Physical Education and Youth Sport. London: Routledge, pp.263–275.
24.
KeatsPA (2009) Multiple text analysis in narrative research: Visual, written, and spoken stories of experience. Qualitative Research9(2): 181–195.
25.
KinchinGDPennyDClarkeG (2005) Sport education in teacher education. In: PennyDClarkeGQuillM. (eds) Sport Education in Physical Education: Research-Based Practice. London: Routledge, pp.217–228.
26.
KirkD (2013) Educational value and models-based practice in physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory45(9): 973–986.
27.
KirkDMacdonaldD (1998) Situated learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education17(3): 376–387.
28.
McCloskeyM (2014) Naïve theories of motion. In: GentnerDStevensA (eds) Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.299–326.
29.
MantaninMCollierC (2003) Longitudinal analysis of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching physical education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education22(2): 153–168.
30.
Mayer-SmithJAMitchellIJ (1997) Teaching about constructivism: Using approaches informed by constructivism. In: RichardsonV (ed) Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a World of New Understandings. London: Falmer Press, pp.129–153.
31.
MerriamSB (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
MitchellSOslinJGriffinLL (2013) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach for Ages 7 to 18. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
34.
OslinJCollierCMitchellS (2001) Living the curriculum. The Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance72(5): 47–51.
35.
ParkerMPattonKSinclairC (2015) “I took this picture because…”: Accessing teachers’ depictions of change. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy21(3): 328–346.
36.
PenneyD (2013) Points of tension and possibility: Boundaries in and of physical education. Sport, Education and Society18(1): 6–20.
37.
PhoenixC (2010) Seeing the world of physical culture: The potential of visual methods for qualitative research in sport and exercise. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise2(2): 93–108.
38.
PiagetJ (1977) Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. New York: Viking Press.
PosnerGJStrikeKAHewsonPW. (1982) Accommodation of scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education66(2): 211–227.
41.
RichardsonV (1997) Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In: RichardsonV (ed) Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a World of New Understandings. London: Falmer Press, pp.3–14.
42.
RovegnoIDollyJP (2006) Constructivist perspectives on learning. In: KirkDMacDonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: SAGE Publications, pp.242–261.
43.
SiedentopDHastiePvan der MarsH (2011) Complete Guide to Sport Education. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
44.
StanczakGC (2007) Visual Research Methods Image, Society, and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
45.
StrikeKPosnerG (1985) A conceptual change of learning and understanding. In: WestLHTPinesAL (eds) Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp.211–231.
46.
StrikeKAPosnerG (1992) A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In: DuschlRHamiltonR (eds) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology and Educational Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp.147–176.
47.
ThompsonP (2008) Children and young people: Voices in visual research. In: ThompsonP (ed) Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People. London and New York: Routledge, pp.1–22.
48.
WangCBurrisM (1997) Photovoice: Concept, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior24(3): 369–387.
49.
WinitzkyNKauchakD (1997) Constructivism in teacher education: Applying cognitive theory to teacher learning. In: RichardsonV (ed) Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a World of New Understandings. London: Falmer Press, pp.59–83.
