Tikunoff, Ward & Lazar (1980) argue that parity or ‘equality of status’ (p.12) is one of the most important ingredients of successful collaboration. During the placement of students on teaching practice (TP), therefore, it can be argued that school and university personnel should be equal partners if the collaboration is to be effective. This paper reports one set of data from a study of Irish physical education teacher education (PETE) students and considers the impact of ineffective school–university partnerships on their professional learning during TP. The study employed a range of qualitative research methods centred on one umbrella case study and five individual case studies. Data were analysed using a systematic grounded theory process and findings indicated a perceived lack of parity between schools and the university. This resulted in PETE students developing in an unsupported and often isolated manner. The implications for career-long professional learning are considered.
Amade-EscotC (2000) The contribution of two research programmes on teaching content: “Pedagogical content knowledge” and the “didactics of physical education”. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education20(1): 78–101.
2.
AndersonGArsenaultN (2000) Fundamentals of Educational Research. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
3.
BarabSADuffyTM (2000) From practice fields to communities of practice. In: JonassenDHLandSM (eds) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BegleyCM (1996) Triangulation of communication skills in qualitative research instruments. Journal of Advanced Nursing24(4): 688–693.
5.
BehetsDVergauwenL (2006) Learning to teach in the field. In: KirkDMacdonaldDO'SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage.
6.
BrouwerNKorthagenF (2005) Can teacher education make a difference?American Educational Research Journal42(1): 153–224.
7.
CallahanJLMartinD (2007) The spectrum of school–university partnerships: A typology of organizational learning systems. Teaching and Teacher Education23(2): 136–145.
8.
CharmazK (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and subjectivist methods. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
9.
ClandininDJConnellyFM (1995) Teachers' Professional Knowledge Landscapes. New York: Teachers' College Press.
10.
CoadyL (2010) Becoming a teacher: Students’ experiences and perceptions of their initial teacher education. Doctor Of Philosophy, University Of Limerick, Ireland.
11.
Cochran-SmithM (2005) 2005 presidential address the new teacher education: For better for worse. Educational Researcher, Educational Researcher34(7): 3–17.
12.
Cochran-SmithMZeichnerKM (eds) (2005) Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13.
ColemanMMMitchellM (2000) Assessing observation focus and conference targets of cooperating teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education20(1): 40–54.
14.
CoolahanJ (2003) Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers: Country Background For Ireland. Dublin: Department of Education & Science and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD].
15.
CresswellJW (2002) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
16.
Darling-HammondL (2006a) Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education57(3): 300–314.
17.
Darling-HammondL (2006b). Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary programmes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Darling-HammondLBransfordJ (2005) Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers should Learn and be able to do., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
DAYC.1998. Re-thinking schooluniversity partnerships: A Swedish case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 807–819.
EdwardsAMuttonT (2007) Looking forward: Rethinking Professional learning through partnership arrangements in initial teacher education. Oxford Review of Education33(4): 503–519.
22.
European Commission (2010) Common European Principles for Teacher Competences and Qualifications. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
23.
FinlayL (2002) “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research12(4): 531–545.
24.
FurlongJBartonLMilesS. (2000) Teacher Education In Transition: Reforming Professionalism?Buckingham, Open University Press.
25.
GarmNKarlsenGE (2004) Teacher education reform in Europe: The case of Norway; Trends and tensions in a global perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education20(7): 731–744.
26.
GlaserBGStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
27.
GraberKC (1989) Teaching tomorrows teachers: Professional preparation as an agent of socialisation. In: TemplinTJSchemppPG (eds) Socialization into Physical Education: Learning to Teacher. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
28.
GrahamG (1988) Collaboration in PE: A lot like marriage. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education7(7): 165–174.
29.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 261–280.
30.
HagerPHodkinsonP (2009) Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal35(4): 619–638.
31.
HardyC (1999) Preservice teachers' perceptions of learning to teach in a predominantly school-based teacher education programme. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education18(2): 175–198.
32.
HarfordJ (2010) Teacher education policy in Ireland and the challenges of the twenty-first century. European Journal of Teacher Education33(4): 349–360.
33.
HarryBSturgesKKlingerJ (2005) Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher34(2): 3–13.
34.
Hynes-DuselJM (1999) Co-operating teachers perceptions about the student teaching experience. The Physical Educator56(4): 186–195.
35.
KielyE (2005) The mentoring phenomenon in educating pre-service science teachers through school-based collaborative partnership. Doctor Of Philosophy, University Of Limerick, Ireland.
36.
KinchinG (2009) From entry to completion: An examination of secondary physical education student teachers expectations of initial teacher education across one PGCE course, 1–4September, British Educational Research Association, University of Manchester.
37.
KirkJMillerML (1986) Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
38.
KorthagenFAJ (2010) Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education26(1): 98–106.
39.
LaveJWengerE (1991) Situated Learning and Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
LEWINK. M.2004. The Pre-Service Training of Teachers: Does it meet it's objectives and how can it be improved? Background paper for 2005 Education for All Global Monitoring Report: The Quality Imperative. Paris, France: UNESCO.
41.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. New York: Sage.
42.
MAWERM.1996. Mentoring in Physical Education: Issues and insights, London: Falmer Press.
43.
McCullickBA (2001) Practitioners perspectives on values, knowledge and skills needed by PETE participants. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education21(1): 35–56.
44.
McIntyreDJByrdDMFoxxSM (1996) Field and laboratory experiences. In: SikulaJButteryTJGuytonE (eds) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: A Project of the Association of Teacher Educators. New York: Macmillan.
45.
McWilliamsSCannonPMargaret FarrarM (2006) Comparison and evaluation of aspects of teacher education in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Teacher Education29(1): 67–79.
46.
MerriamSB (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
MyersM (2000) Qualitative research and the generalizability question: Standing firm with proteus. The qualitative report, 4. Available at: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/myers.html. (accessed 10 February 2008).
O'DonoghueTHarfordJ (2010) Troubling some generalisations on teacher education in the English-speaking world: The case of the Republic of Ireland. South African Journal Of Education30(1): 91–104.
51.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) Improving school leadership. Report.
52.
O'SullivanM (2003) Learning to teach physical education. In: SilvermanSJEnnisC (eds) Student Learning in Physical Education: Applying Research to Enhance Instruction. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
53.
PidgeonNHenwoodK (2004) Grounded theory. In: HardyMBrymanA (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis. London: Sage.
54.
RichardsonL (2000) Writing: A method of inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
RobinsonK (director) (2010) Bring on the Education Revolution. UK: TED.
56.
SandholtzJH (2002) Inservice training or professional development: Contrasting opportunities in a school/university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education18(7): 815–830.
57.
SkilbeckMConnellH (2003) Attracting, Developing and Retaining Teachers: Australian Country Background Report. Drysdale, Victoria: OECD.
58.
SpendloveDHowesAWakeG (2010) Partnerships in pedagogy: Refocusing of classroom lenses. European Journal of Teacher Education33(1): 65–77.
59.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury, CA: Sage.
60.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
61.
SutherlandL. M.ScanlonL. A.SperringA.2005. New Directions in preparing professionals: examining issues in engaging students in communities of practice through a school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 79–92.
62.
Teaching Council of Ireland (2011a) Initial Teacher Education: Criteria and Guidelines for Programme Providers. Maynooth, Co. Kildare: Teaching Council of Ireland.
63.
TeitelL.1999. Looking toward the future by understanding the past: The historical context of professional development schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 74, 6–20.
64.
Teaching Council of Ireland (2011b) Policy on the Continuum of Teacher Education. Maynooth: Teaching Council of Ireland.
65.
TikunoffWWardBLazarC (1980) Partners: Teachers, researchers, trainer/developers—An Interactive approach to teacher education in R& D. In: HallGHordSBrownG (eds) Exploring Issues in Teacher Education: Questions for Future Research. Austin: TX: The University of Texas R&D Center for Teacher Education.
66.
TrubowitzS (1986) Stages in the development of school-college collaboration. Educational Leadership43(5): 18–21.
67.
TsangaridouNSiedentopD (1995) Reflective teaching: A literature review. Quest47(2): 212–237.
68.
VeenmanS (1984) Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research54(2): 143–178.
YinRK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
71.
YouensBMcCarthyS (2007) Subject knowledge development by science student teachers: The role of university tutors and school-based subject mentors. Research in Science & Technological Education25(3): 293–306.
72.
ZeichnerKTabachnikBR (1981) Are the effects of university teacher education washed out by school experiences?Journal of Teacher Education32(1): 7–11.
