The objectives of this study were (a) to examine students' motivational experiences arising from their participation in games lessons based on autonomy-supportive strategies; and (b) to examine the interaction between boys' and girls' motivational experiences across different categories of games. A total of 759 students (380 F, 379 M) from 37 classes (grades four to seven) were taught a lesson from one of four game categories (i.e. target, net/wall, batting/fielding, invasion) using autonomy-supportive techniques. Following the lessons children completed various measures to assess their motivational experiences. Significant between-subject differences did emerge for both gender and games category. Girls reported higher levels of optimal challenge, perceived autonomy-support, and enjoyment whereas boys reported higher levels of perceived competence. For the games category, participants reported higher levels of self-determined motivation in net/wall games whereas invasion games received the lowest motivational ratings of the four games categories.
Assor, A. and Kaplan, H. (2001) `Mapping the Domain of Autonomy Support', in A. Efklides, J. Kuhl and R.M. Sorrentino (eds) Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research, pp. 101-20. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
2.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y. and Roth, G. (2005) `Directly Controlling Teacher Behaviors as Predictors of Poor Motivation and Engagement in Girls and Boys: The Role of Anger and Anxiety', Learning and Instruction15: 397-413.
3.
Blais, M.R. and Hess, U. (2002) `The Interaction between Global Task Motivation and the Motivational Function of Events on Self-Regulation: Is Sauce for the Goose, Sauce for the Gander?'Paper presented at Série Scientifique Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherché en Analyse des Organisations (April), Montreal, PQ.
4.
Boggiano, A.K., Main, D.S. and Katz, P.A. (1988) `Children's Preferences for Challenge: The Role of Perceived Competence and Control', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54: 134-41.
5.
Bunker, D. and Thorpe, R. (1982) `A Model for the Teaching of Games in Secondary Schools', British Journal of Physical Education18(1): 5-8.
6.
Butler, J. (1997) `How Would Socrates Teach Games? A Constructive Approach', Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance68(9): 42-7.
7.
Cragg, S. and Cameron, C. (2006) Physical Activity of Canadian Youth: An Analysis of 2002 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Data. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Institute .
8.
Craig, C.L., Cameron, C., Russell, S.J. and Beaulieu, A. (2001) Increasing Physical Activity: Supporting Children's Participation. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyles Research Institute.
9.
Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986) Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory . Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
10.
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
11.
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2002) Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
12.
Deci, E.L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L. and Porac, J. (1981) `When Trying to Win: Competition and Intrinsic Motivation', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin7(1): 79-83.
13.
Frederick-Recascino, C.M. (2002) `Self-Determination Theory and Participation Motivation Research in the Sport and Exercise Domain', in E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan (eds) Handbook of Self-Determination Research, pp. 277-94. Rochester, NY : University of Rochester Press.
14.
Gagné, M., Ryan, R.M. and Bargmann, K. (2003) `Autonomy Support and Need Satisfaction in the Motivation and Well-Being of Gymnasts', Journal of Applied Sport Psychology15: 372-90.
15.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Goudas, M., Biddle, S., Fox, K. and Underwood, M. (1995) `It Ain't What You Do, It's the Way That You Do It! Teaching Style Affects Children's Motivation in Track and Field Lessons' , The Sport Psychologist9: 254-64.
17.
Griffin, L.L. and Butler, J. (2005) Teaching Games for Understanding: Theory, Research, and Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18.
Griffin, L.L. and Patton, K. (2005) `Two Decades of Teaching Games for Understanding: Looking at the Past, Present, and Future', in L.L. Griffin and J. Butler (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 1-18. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19.
Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., Culverhouse, T. and Biddle, S.J.H. (2003) `The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behaviour: A Trans-Contextual Model', Journal of Educational Psychology95(4): 784-95.
20.
Hardman, K. and Marshall, J. (2000) `The State and Status of Physical Education in Schools in International Context', European Physical Education Review6(3): 203-29.
21.
Hardman, K. and Marshall, J. (2005) `Update on the State and Status of Physical Education World-Wide', Keynote address at the 2nd World Summit on Physical Education (2 Dec.), Magglingen, Switzerland. URL (consulted Nov. 2006): http://icsspe.org/portal/download/HardmanMarshall.pdf
22.
Hellison, D. (1973) Humanistic Physical Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Holt, N.L., Strean, W.B. and Benogoechea, E.G. (2002) `Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: New Avenues for Future Research and Practice', Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21: 162-76.
23.
Humbert, M.L. (1995) `On the Sidelines: The Experience of Young Women in Physical Education Classes', Avante1(2): 58-77.
24.
Humbert, M.L. (2006) `Listening for Change: Understanding the Experiences of Students in Physical Education', in E. Singleton and A. Varpalotai (eds) Stones in the Sneaker: Active Theory for Secondary School Physical and Health Educators, pp. 1-25. London, ON: Althouse.
25.
Keating, X.D., Kulinna, P.H. and Silverman, S. (1999) `Measuring Teaching Behaviors, Lesson Context, and Physical Activity in School Physical Education Programs: Comparing the SOFIT and the C-SOFIT Instruments', Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science3(4): 207-20.
26.
King, A., Boyce, W. and King, M. (1999) Trends in the Health of Canadian Youth. Ottawa: Health Canada.
27.
Kirk, D. (2005) `Future Prospects for Teaching Games for Understanding' , in L.L. Griffin and J.I. Butler (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding. Theory, Research and Practice, pp. 213-27. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
28.
Lenskyj, H.J. and van Daalen, C. (2006) `Look at That Cow Over There: Sexual Harassment and Shaming of Adolescent Girls in High School Physical Education', in E. Singleton and A. Varpalotai (eds) Stones in the Sneaker: Active Theory for Secondary School Physical and Health Educators, pp. 139-54. London, ON: Althouse.
29.
Light, R. (2002) `The Social Nature of Games: Australian Pre-Service Primary Teachers' First Experiences of Teaching Games for Understanding', European Physical Education Review8: 286-304.
30.
Light, R. (2003) `The Joy of Learning: Emotion and Learning in Games through TGfU', Journal of Physical Education in New Zealand36(1): 93-108.
31.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. and Tammen, V.V. (1989) `Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis' , Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport60(1): 48-58.
32.
McKenzie, T.L. (2002) `System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time Overview and Training Manual', unpublished manuscript, San Diego, CA, San Diego State University.
33.
Mahoney, C.A., Thombs, D.L. and Howe, C.Z. (1995) `The Art and Science of Scale Development in Health Education Research', Health and Education Research10(1): 1-10.
34.
Mandigo, J.L. (2001) `Creating a Developmentally Appropriate Self-Report Instrument of Children's Optimal Challenge during Physical Activity', unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
35.
Mandigo, J. and Holt, N.L. (2006) `Elementary Students' Accounts of Optimal Challenge in Physical Education', The Physical Educator4: 170-83.
36.
Mandigo, J.L. and Sheppard, J. (2003) `The Human Race: ACanadian Experience', Healthy Lifestyles Journal50(2): 20-6.
37.
Mandigo, J.L., Spence, J.C., Thompson, L.P., Melnychuk, N., Schwartz, M., Marshall, D. and Causgrove Dunn, J. (2004) `What's Going on in Physical Education Classes? An Alberta Example', Avante10(1): 1-15.
38.
Ministry of Education and Training (1998) The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8: Health and Physical Education. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education and Training.
39.
Mitchell, S.A., Oslin, J.L. and Griffin, L.L. (2006) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach, 2nd edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
40.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001) `A Self-Determination Approach to the Understanding of Motivation in Physical Education', British Journal of Educational Psychology71: 225-42.
41.
Ntoumanis, N. (2005) `A Prospective Study of Participation in Optional School Physical Education Based on Self-Determination Theory', Journal of Educational Psychology97: 444-53.
42.
Pope, R.P., Coleman, K.J., Gonzalez, E.C., Barron, F. and Heath, E.M. (2002) `Validity of a Revised System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT)', Pediatric Exercise Science14: 135-46.
43.
Prusak, K.A., Treasure, D.C., Darst, P.W. and Pangrazi, R.P. (2004) `The Effects of Choice on the Motivation of Adolescent Girls in Physical Education', Journal of Teaching in Physical Education23: 19-29.
44.
Reeve, J. (2002) `Self-Determination Theory Applied to Educational Settings', in E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan (eds) Handbook of Self-Determination Research, pp. 183-203. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
45.
Reeve, J., Bolt, E. and Cai, Y. (1999) `Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How they Teach and Motivate Students', Journal of Educational Psychology91: 537-48.
46.
Rowe, P.J., Schuldheisz, J.M. and van der Mars, H. (1997) `Validation of SOFIT for Measuring Physical Activity of First- to Eight-Grade Students', Pediatric Exercise Science9: 136-49.
47.
Standage, M., Duda, J.L. and Ntoumanis, N. (2003) `A Model of Contextual Motivation in Physical Education: Using Constructs from Self-Determination and Achievement Goal Theories to Predict Physical Activity Intentions', Journal of Educational Psychology95(1): 97-110.
48.
Statistics Canada (2001) Census: Community Highlights forSt. Catharines - Niagara. URL (consulted June 2007): http://www.12.statcan.ca/english/census01/home/index.cfm.
49.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
50.
Tremblay, M.S. and Willms, J.D. (2003) `Is the Canadian Childhood Obesity Epidemic Related to Physical Inactivity?', International Journal of Obesity27: 1100-5.
51.
Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P. and Bois, J. (2006) `Relation between Teachers' Early Expectations and Students' Later Perceived Competence in Physical Education Classes: Autonomy-Supportive Climate as a Moderator', Journal of Educational Psychology98: 75-86.
52.
Vallerand, R.J., Fortier, M.S. and Guay, F. (1997) `Self-Determination and Persistence in a Real-Life Setting: Toward a Motivational Model of High School Dropout', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(5): 1161-76.
53.
van Rossum, J.H.A., Musch, E. and Vermeer, A. (1999) `Perceived Motor Competence: Self-Referent Thinking in Physical Education', in Y. V. Auweele, F. Bakker, S. Biddle, M. Durand and R. Seiler (eds) Psychology for Physical Educators, pp. 187-210. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
