Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the clinical effectiveness, in acute ischaemic stroke patients, of bypassing non-specialist centres in preference for a specialist stroke centre to receive the time-critical intervention of thrombolysis.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis using: MEDLINE; MEDLINE In-Process; EMBASE; CINAHL; Cochrane Library including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL Controlled Trials Register, DARE, NHS EED and HTA databases. Studies were included if they compared acute ischaemic stroke patients directly triaged to a specialist centre versus those initially triaged to a non-specialist centre with some or all later transferred to a specialist centre. Studies were excluded if they compared patients ever treated in a specialist centre versus those never treated in such a centre, since the aim was to assess the optimum initial triage route rather than the optimum location for overall management. The assumption being, based on previous research, that management in a specialist centre leads to better patient outcomes.

Results

Fourteen studies investigating 2790 patients were identified. Studies comparing commencement of thrombolysis in non-specialist centres versus the specialist centres (n=1394) showed no significant difference in unadjusted mortality (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.61–1.30) or morbidity (favourable modified Rankin Score, n = 899) (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.85–1.59) among thrombolysed patients. In studies where thrombolysis could only be administered in a specialist centre, data for patients arriving within the therapeutic window (n = 140) revealed significantly higher mortality for those initially admitted to a non-specialist centre compared to directly admitted to a specialist centre (OR = 6.62; 95% CI = 2.60–16.82); morbidity data also favoured direct admission to a specialist centre, although not consistently.

Conclusions

For ischaemic stroke patients, the location of initial thrombolysis treatment does not affect outcomes. However, if thrombolysis is only available at a specialist centre, outcomes are considerably better for those patients admitted directly. However, these conclusions are based on poor quality data with small sample populations, significant heterogeneity and subject to confounding.

Keywords

stroke systematic review thrombolysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyle

. Mending hearts and brains: clinical case for change, London: Department of Health, 2006.

Darzi L. (ed). Change locally-led, patient-centred and clinically driven. In High quality care for all: NHS next stage review. London: Department of Health, 2008.

Hacke

Kaste

Bluhmki

. Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1317–1329.

Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2009.

Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. The Lancet 2004; 363: 768–774.

Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Alteplase for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. London, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007.

Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke, 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2012.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269, W64.

10.

Lees

Bluhmki

von

. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 1695–1703.

11.

Farrell

Godwin

Richards

. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 1044–1054.

12.

Brott

Adams

Olinger

. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870.

13.

Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer program). Version 5.0. 2008. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.

14.

Higgins JPT and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, www.cochrane-handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

15.

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Critical appraisal checklist for cohort studies, www.casp-uk.net, 2011.

16.

Downs

Black

. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377–384.

17.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottowa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses, www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp, 2011.

18.

Rodriguez G, Chaudhry S, Suri MF, et al. Outcomes of “drip-and-ship” paradigm among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Results of a state wide study. In: Neurology conference: 64th American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting New Orleans, LA United States Conference Start: 20120421 Conference End: 20120428 Conference Publication: (var pagings), 2012, 78 (1 Meeting Abstract): 22.

19.

Hsia AW, Benson RT, Pehlivanova M, et al. Evaluation of patients treated with IV tPA at regional stroke centers vs. community hospitals: is there opportunity for a wider stroke population to be treated? In: Stroke conference: 2011 International Stroke Conference Los Angeles, CA United States Conference Start: 20110209 Conference End: 20110211 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 2011. 42: 01.

20.

Pervez

Silva

Masrur

. Remote supervision of IV-tPA for acute ischemic stroke by telemedicine or telephone before transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe. Stroke 2010; 41: e18–e24.

21.

Allibert

Medeiros de Bustos

Montiel

. Telestroke in Thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27: 177–177.

22.

Silva

Lima

Camargo

. Starting IV t-PA infusions for acute ischemic stroke at community hospitals prior to transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe. Stroke 2009; 40: e162–e162. (Abstract P41).

23.

Wang

Rose

Honings

. Treating acute stroke patients with intravenous tPA. The OSF stroke network experience. Stroke 2000; 31: 77–81.

24.

Rymer MM, Thrutchley DE and Stroke Team at the Mid America Brain and Stroke Institute. Organizing regional networks to increase acute stroke intervention. Neurol Res 2005; 27: S9–S16.

25.

Rymer

Thrutchley

. Community hospitals initiate thrombolytic therapy safely with good outcomes. Stroke 2004; 35: 291–291. (Abstract P198).

26.

Perez de la Ossa

Millan

Arenillas

. Influence of direct admission to Comprehensive Stroke Centers on the outcome of acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurol 2009; 256: 1270–1276.

27.

Ribo

Molina

Pedragosa

. Geographic differences in acute stroke care in Catalunya: impact of a regional interhospital network. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26: 284–288.

28.

Merino

Silver

Wong

. Extending tissue plasminogen activator use to community and rural stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 141–146.

29.

Khor

Chen

. Potential risk and protective factors for in-hospital mortality in hyperacute ischemic stroke patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008; 24: 190–196.

30.

Perez de la Ossa

Sanchez-Ojanguren

Palomeras

. Influence of the stroke code activation source on the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurology 2008; 70: 1238–1243.

31.

Muller

Pfefferkorn

Vatankhah

. Admission facility is associated with outcome of basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2007; 38: 1380–1383.

32.

Martin-Schild

Morales

Khaja

. Is the drip-and-ship approach to delivering thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke safe? J Emerg Med 2011; 41: 135–141.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

0.13 MB

0.06 MB

0.02 MB

Acute ischaemic stroke patients – direct admission to a specialist centre or initial treatment in a local hospital? A systematic review