Remote-control technologies have expanded into homes, potentially transforming domestic dynamics by altering how pets are monitored, interacted with, and cared for within domestic environments. This study delves into the user experiences and societal implications of Enabot, a mobile surveillance robot designed for pets in China. We employ telepresence to gauge operators’ perception of being present in a mediated and physical environment, focusing on human-animal interactions and relationships. Drawing from semi-structured interviews with 22 Chinese users, this research puts forth a typology of ‘embodied projection’ to articulate rich telepresence encounters. Moreover, we establish connections between various forms of telepresence and mediated interactions within the triadic relationship of operator-pets-others (e.g., families, friends, colleagues), surpassing the design intent for operator-pet interactions. Notably, this study finds that when operators regard Enabot as an extension of themselves, they actively seek attention from their pets, which might signal a shift of power in the human-pet dynamic and a novel relationship. Ultimately, we conclude that the utilization of this robot fundamentally serves as an act of self-care for operators.
AlmeidaLMenezesPDiasJ (2022) Telepresence social robotics towards co-presence: a review. Applied Sciences12(11): 5557.
2.
BaloghRObdržálekDChristoforouE (eds) (2023) Robotics in Education: Proceedings of the RiE 2023 Conference. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature.
3.
BerridgeCWetleFT (2020) Why older adults and their children disagree about in-home surveillance technology, sensors, and tracking. The Gerontologist60(5): 926–934. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz068.
4.
BioccaF (1997) The cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(2): JCMC324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x.
5.
BioccaFHarmsCBurgoonJK (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments12(5): 456–480. DOI: 10.1162/105474603322761270.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
ChoeH (2020) Talking the cat: footing lamination in a Korean livestream of cats mukbang. Journal of Pragmatics160: 60–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.009.
8.
ChoiJJKwakSS (2017) Who is this? Identity and presence in robot-mediated communication. Cognitive Systems Research43: 174–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.07.006.
9.
ChristensenTH (2009) Connected presence'in distributed family life. New Media & Society11(3): 433–451.
10.
CloutierAPeetzJ (2016) Relationships’ best friend: links between pet ownership, empathy, and romantic relationship outcomes. Anthrozoös29(3): 395–408. DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2016.1181361.
11.
DoHMPhamMShengW, et al. (2018) RiSH: a robot-integrated smart home for older adults care. Robotics and Autonomous Systems101: 74–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2017.12.008.
12.
DraperJVKaberDBUsherJM (1998) Telepresence. Human Factors40(3): 354–375.
13.
Forbes Insights (2024) Enabot Jason: how do Chinese domestic robots enter the global market?(in Chinese). Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/C_l0J_kjGiVDL7DnGIbRTA (accessed 29 July 2024).).
14.
GennerSSüssD (2017) Socialization as media effect. In: RösslerPHoffnerCAZoonenL (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Hoboken, NY: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0138.
15.
HaansAIJsselsteijnWA (2012) Embodiment and telepresence: toward a comprehensive theoretical framework. Interacting with Computers24(4): 211–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.010.
16.
HeeterC (1992) Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments1(2): 262–271.
17.
HillerHHFranzTM (2004) New ties, old ties and lost ties: the use of the internet in diaspora. New Media & Society6(6): 731–752. DOI: 10.1177/146144804044327.
18.
KasugaHSakamotoDMunekataN, et al. (2017) A social robot in a human-animal relationship at home: a field study. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human agent interaction, Bielefeld, Germany, 17–20 October 2017, 61–69. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3125739.3125759.
19.
KilteniKGrotenRSlaterM (2012) The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments21(4): 373–387.
20.
LeeK (2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory14(1): 27–50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x.
21.
LeiMClementeIMLiuH, et al. (2022) The acceptance of telepresence robots in higher education. International Journal of Social Robotics14(4): 1025–1042.
22.
LiberatiN (2017) Teledildonics and new ways of “being in touch”: a phenomenological analysis of the use of haptic devices for intimate relations. Science and Engineering Ethics23(3): 801–823.
23.
LombardMDittonT (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(2): JCMC321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
24.
LyonD (1994) Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
MäkinenLA (2016) Surveillance on/off: examining home surveillance systems from the user’s perspective. Surveillance and Society14(1): 59–77. DOI: 10.24908/ss.v14i1.5488.
27.
MartínezABelmonteLMGarcíaAS, et al. (2021) Facial emotion recognition from an unmanned flying social robot for home care of dependent people. Electronics10: 868. DOI: 10.3390/electronics10070868.
28.
McLuhanM (1994) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
29.
MertensC (1991) Human-cat interactions in the home setting. Anthrozoös4(4): 214–231. DOI: 10.2752/089279391787057062.
MoyleWJonesCCookeM, et al. (2014) Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatrics14(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-7.
32.
MuhlbachLBockerMPrussogA (1995) Telepresence in videocommunications: a study on stereoscopy and individual eye contact. Human Factors37(2): 290–305. DOI: 10.1518/001872095779064582.
33.
OhCSBailensonJNWelchGF (2018) A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI5: 00114. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00114.
34.
OnishiYTanakaKNakanishiH (2016) Embodiment of video-mediated communication enhances social telepresence. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on human agent interaction, biopolis, Singapore, 4–7 October 2016, 171–178. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2974804.2974826.
35.
PetróEAbdaiJGergelyA, et al. (2016) Dogs (Canis familiaris) adjust their social behaviour to the differential role of inanimate interactive agents. Animal Cognition19(2): 367–374. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0939-0.
36.
PowerER (2012) Domestication and the dog: embodying home. Area44(3): 371–378. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01098.x.
37.
RaeIVenoliaGTangJC, et al. (2015) A framework for understanding and designing telepresence. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, Vancouver, BC, 14–18 March 2015, 1552–1566. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2675141.
38.
SheridanTB (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments1(1): 120–126. DOI: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120.
StahlCAnastasiouDLatourT (2018) Social telepresence robots: the role of gesture for collaboration over a distance. In: Proceedings of the 11th pervasive technologies related to assistive environments conference, Corfu, Greece, 26–29 June 2018, 409–414. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3197768.3203180.
TanRCheokAPeirisR, et al. (2007) Computer game for small pets and humans. In: MaLRauterbergMNakatsuR (eds) Entertainment Computing — ICEC 2007. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 28–38.
43.
TanNHKinneeBLangsethD, et al. (2022a) Critical-playful speculations with cameras in the home. In: Paper presented at the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New Orleans, LA, 29 April 2022–5 May 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, 485. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3502109.
44.
TanNHWongRYDesjardinsA, et al. (2022b) Monitoring pets, deterring intruders, and casually spying on neighbors: everyday use of smart home cameras. In: Paper presented at the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New Orleans, LA, 29 April 2022–5 May 2022, 617. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517617.
45.
The Chinese Academy of Industry Economy Research (2022) 2022 forecast and analysis of China’s pet Industry market data: market size nearing 270 billion yuan. Available at: https://www.sohu.com/a/545177555_350221 (Accessed 2 November 2023).
46.
TsaiTCHsuYLMaAI, et al. (2007) Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the older adults in a home environment. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association13(4): 407–424. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0068.
47.
Xh.newrank.cn (2023) Ranking of heated topic. Available at: https://xh.newrank.cn/ (Accessed 2 November 2023).
48.
YangLNeustaedterC (2018) Our house: living long distance with a telepresence robot. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2(CSCW): 1–18. DOI: 10.1145/3274459.
