WeChat users’ debunking strategies in response to COVID-19 conspiracy theories: A mixed-methods study

Abstract

The current study adopted a mixed-methods approach to examine both qualitative and quantitative data of Chinese WeChat users’ strategies in response to COVID-19 conspiracy theories disseminated in WeChat. Thematic analysis based on 30 interviewees suggested interesting patterns about how such conspiracy theories were disseminated based on relationship types within WeChat groups and how different types of debunking strategies were used to counter conspiracy theories based on the relational outcomes and contexts. Quantitative data based on 588 participants suggested COVID-19 information exposures from different sources, conspiracy beliefs, exposures of conspiracy beliefs and face concerns influence WeChat users’ responses to address COVID-19-related information in WeChat platform.

Keywords

Conspiracy theory COVID-19 debunking strategies face information exposure mixed-methods study relationship WeChat

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biddlestone

Green

Douglas

(2020) Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology 59(3): 663–673. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12397.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Caulfield

(2020) Does debunking work? Correcting COVID-19 misinformation on social media. In Flood

MacDonnell

Philpott

, et al. (eds) Vulnerable: The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 183–200.

Chadwick

Vaccari

(2019) News sharing on UK social media: misinformation, disinformation, and correction. Loughborough: Online Civic Culture Centre, Loughborough University.

China Internet Network Information Center (2020) The 46th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. Available at: http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202009/P020200929546215182514.pdf (accessed 19 April 2021).

DeGennaro

(2019) The Ultimate Beginner’s Guide to WeChat Official Accounts for Business. Available at: https://www.dragonsocial.net/blog/beginner-guide-wechat-for-business/ (accessed 6 September 2021).

Douglas

(2021) COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24(2): 270–275. DOI: 10.1177/1368430220982068.

Douglas

Sutton

(2011) Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(3): 544–552. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x.

Douglas

Sutton

Cichocka

(2017) The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26(6): 538–542. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417718261.

10.

Douglas

Uscinski

Sutton

, et al. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40(S1): 3–35. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12568.

11.

Guess

Nagler

Tucker

(2019) Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1): eaau4586. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.

12.

Hakim

(2021) SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19, and the debunking of conspiracy theories. Reviews in Medical Virology 31(6): e2222. DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2222.

13.

DYF

(1976) On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 867–884. DOI: 10.1086/226145.

14.

DYF

Peng

Lai

, et al. (2001) Indigenization and beyond: methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions. Journal of Personality 69(6): 925–953. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.696170.

15.

Humprecht

Esser

van Aelst

(2020) Resilience to online disinformation: a framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25(3): 493–516. DOI: 10.1177/1940161219900126.

16.

Hwang

(1987) Face and favor: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology 92(4): 944–974. DOI: 10.1086/228588.

17.

Hwang

(2012) Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations (Electronic Version). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1.

18.

Imhoff

Lamberty

(2020) A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science 11(8):1110–1118. DOI: 10.1177/1948550620934692.

19.

Jia

Luo

(2021) I wear a mask for my country: conspiracy theories, nationalism, and intention to adopt Covid-19 prevention behaviors at the later stage of pandemic control in China. Journal of Health Communication. Epub ahead of print 06 August 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1958982.

20.

Ohs

Park

, et al. (2021) Interpersonal communication influence on health-protective behaviors amid the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Health Communication. Epub ahead of print 08 August 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1956038.

21.

Liu

(2021) The scientific understanding and governance of conspiracy theories in the context of epidemic. Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology (Social Science) 36(2): 16–22. DOI: 10.16573/j.cnki.1672-934x.2021.02.003.

22.

Liu

Zhang

Huang

(2020) Media exposure to COVID-19 information, risk perception, social and geographical proximity, and self-rated anxiety in China. BMC Public Health 20(1): 1649. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09761-8.

23.

Oetzel

Ting-Toomey

Masumoto

, et al. (2001) Face and facework in conflict: a cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs 68(3): 235–258. DOI: 10.1080/03637750128061.

24.

Papakyriakopoulos

Medina Serrano

Hegelich

(2020). The Spread of COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories on Social Media and the Effect of Content Moderation. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-034.

25.

Peng

(2017) Affective networks: how WeChat enhances Tencent’s digital business governance. Chinese Journal of Communication 10(3): 264–278. DOI: 10.1080/17544750.2017.1306573.

26.

Romer

Jamieson

(2020) Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine 263: 113356. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356.

27.

Rutjens

van der Linden

van der Lee

(2021) Science skepticism in times of COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24(2): 276–283. DOI: 10.1177/1368430220981415.

28.

Shank

(2006) Qualitative Research: A Personal Skills Approach (2nd ed). NJ: Pearson Education.

29.

Lee

DKL

Xiao

, et al. (2021) Who endorses conspiracy theories? A moderated mediation model of Chinese and international social media use, media skepticism, need for cognition, and COVID-19 conspiracy theory endorsement in China. Computers in Human Behavior 120: 106760. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106760.

30.

Ting-Toomey

Gao

Trubisky

, et al (1991) Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: a study in five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management 2(4):275–296. DOI: 10.1108/eb022702.

31.

Uscinski

Klofstad

Atkinson

(2016) What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly 69(1): 57–71. DOI: 10.1177/1065912915621621.

32.

Van Bavel

Baicker

Boggio

, et al. (2020) Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour 4(5): 460–471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.

33.

van Prooijen

Douglas

(2017) Conspiracy theories as a part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies 10(3): 323–333. DOI: 10.1177/1750698017701615.

34.

Wardle

Derakhshan

(2017) Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Report No. DGI(2017)09. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

35.

Zane

Yeh

(2002) The use of culturally-based variables in assessment: studies on loss of face. In Kurasaki

Okazaki

Sue

(eds) Asian American Mental Health: Assessment Theories and Methods. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 123–140. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0735-2_9.

36.

Zeng

Chan

(2021) A cross-national diagnosis of infodemics: comparing the topical and temporal features of misinformation around COVID-19 in China, India, the US, Germany and France. Online Information Review 45: 709–728. DOI: 10.1108/oir-09-2020-0417.

37.

Zeng

Schäfer

(2021) Conceptualizing “dark platforms”. Covid-19-related conspiracy theories on 8kun and Gab. Digital Journalism 9(9): 1321–1343. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2021.1938165.

38.

Zhai

(2011) Perspectives on Chinese “Face”: Psychological Motives and Social Representations (In Chinese). Beijing: Peking University.

39.

Zhang

Pian

, et al. (2021) Characterizing the COVID-19 infodemic on Chinese social media: exploratory study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7(2): e26090. DOI: 10.2196/26090.