Temporarily disconnecting from social media has become more widespread in recent years with users choosing to limit or stop engaging with social media platforms for a period of time. There are no published syntheses that integrate the collective research on this phenomenon, nor how this behaviour is experienced. This review provides insight into the research on this phenomenon and proposes a conceptual framework for understanding social media user’s temporal discontinuance experience. We conducted a scoping review of 27 articles published during 2010–2020, focusing on the most salient factors of temporal discontinuance. Our review revealed a number of issues related to users’ motivations for temporal discontinuance, including the need to address self-reported problematic and excessive social media use, the want to restore control and/or agency, as well as the desire to minimise distractions and address privacy concerns. We identified the various benefits and challenges temporal disconnectors experience and describe two specific practices related to their return to social media use: 1) manipulating technological and/or platform affordances and/or 2) self-regulating behaviours. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
AllcottHBraghieriLEichmeyerS, et al. (2020) The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review110(3): 629–676.
2.
ArkseyHO'MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 19–32.
3.
BaumerEAdamsPKhovanskayaVD, 2013. Limiting, leaving, and (re) lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. In Proceedings of the …. ACM, pp. 3257–3266.
4.
BaumerEPSGuhaSQuanE, et al. (2015) Missing photos, suffering withdrawal, or finding freedom? How experiences of social media non-use influence the likelihood of reversion. Social Media + Society1(2): 205630511561485.
5.
BaumerEPSSunRSchaedlerP (2018) Departing and returning: sense of agency as an organizing concept for understanding social media non/use transitions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2(CSCW): 23–19.
6.
BaymNKWagmanKBPersaudCJ (2020) Mindfully scrolling: rethinking facebook after time deactivated. Social Media + Society6(2): 205630512091910.
7.
BossioDHoltonAE (2019) Burning out and turning off: Journalists’ disconnection strategies on social media. Journalism2(2): 146488491987207.
8.
BrownAJ (2020) “Should I stay or should I leave?”: Exploring (dis)continued Facebook use after the cambridge analytica scandal. Social Media + Society6(1): 205630512091388.
9.
BrubakerJRAnannyMCrawfordK (2016) Departing Glances: A Sociotechnical Account of “leaving”Grindr. New Media & Society.
10.
ChengJBurkeMDavisEG (2019) Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use. In the 2019 CHI Conference, New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, pp. 1–13.
11.
ChoIH (2015) Facebook discontinuance: discontinuance as a temporal settlement of the constant interplay between disturbance and coping. Quality & Quantity49(4): 1531–1548.
12.
DermljugaR-R (2018) The process and affordances of platform-specific social media disconnection. Studies of Transition States and Societies10(2): 82–96.
13.
DindarMAkbulutY (2014) Why do pre-service teachers quit Facebook? An investigation on ‘quitters forever’ and ‘quitters for a while. Computers in Human Behavior39: 170–176.
14.
DwivediYKWadeMRSchnebergerSL (eds), (2012) Information Systems Theory. Springer New York, Vol. 28. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2.
15.
FranksJChenhallRKeoghL (2018) The Facebook sabbatical as a cycle: describing the gendered experience of young adults as they navigate disconnection and reconnection. Social Media + Society4(3): 205630511880199.
16.
GangneuxJ (2019) Logged in or locked in? Young adults’ negotiations of social media platforms and their features. Journal of Youth Studies22(8): 1053–1067.
17.
GomezRFootKYoungM, et al. (2015) Pulling the plug visually: Images of resistance to ICTs and connectivity. First Monday20(11).
18.
GrandhiSAPlotnickLHiltzSR (2019) Do I stay or do I go?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3(GROUP): 1–27.
19.
HesselberthP (2018) Connect, Disconnect, Reconnect: Historicizing the Current Gestures towards Disconnectivity from the Plug-In Drug to Digital Detox, pp. 1–12.
20.
HongWThongJYL (2013) Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. MIS Quarterly37(1): 275–298. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.12.
21.
JorgeA. (2019) Social media, interrupted: users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Social Media + Society5(4): 205630511988169.
22.
KoohangAPaliszkiewiczJGoluchowskiJ (2018) Social media privacy concerns: Trusting beliefs and risk beliefs. Industrial Management & Data Systems118(6): 1209–1228. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-12-2017-0558.
23.
LepikKMurumaa-MengelM (2018) Students on a social media “detox”: disrupting the everyday practices of social media use In: Information Literacy in Everyday Life. 6th European Conference, ECIL 2018, Oulu, Finland, September 24–27, 2018, Revised Selected Papers. Cham: Springer, pp. 60–69.
24.
LuptonD (2020) Thinking with Care about Personal Data Profiling: A More-Than-Human Approach.ijoc.org
25.
LuqmanACaoXAliA, et al. (2017) Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Computers in Human Behavior70: 544–555.
26.
LuqmanAMasoodAWengQ, et al. (2020) Linking excessive SNS use, technological friction, strain, and discontinuance: the moderating role of guilt. Taylor & Francis37(2): 94–112.
27.
MaierCLaumerSWeinerC, et al. (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services, Information Systems Journal, 25(3): 275–308.
28.
MaierCLaumerSEckhardtA, et al. (2017) When Social Networking Turns to Social Overload: Explaining the Stress, Emotional Exhaustion and Quitting Behavior from Social Network Sites Users, pp. 1–13.
29.
MannellK (2018) A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication7(1): 76–93.
30.
NevesBBde MatosNMRenteR, et al. (2015) The “Non-aligned”: young people’s narratives of rejection of social networking sites. Young23(2): 116–135.
31.
NgYMM (2020) Re-examining the innovation post-adoption process: the case of Twitter discontinuance. Computers in Human Behavior103: 48–56.
32.
Portwood-StacerL (2012) Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: the performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society15(7): 1041–1057.
33.
RavindranTYeow KuanACHoe LianDG (2014) Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65(11): 2306–2320.
34.
SaloMPirkkalainenHChuaC, et al. (2017) Explaining Information technology users' ways of mitigating technostress.
35.
SchoenebeckS (2014a) Developing healthy habits with social media: theorizing the cycle of overuse and taking breaks. Proceeds of SIGCHI.
36.
SchoenebeckSY (2014b) Giving up Twitter for Lent: How and Why We Take Breaks from Social Media. New York, New York, USA: ACM.
37.
ShenXWangJ-L (2019) Loneliness and excessive smartphone use among Chinese college students: moderated mediation effect of perceived stressed and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior95: 31–36.
38.
SkoviraWWARJ (2017) Authenticity and Social Media, pp. 1–10.
39.
SolimanWRinta-KahilaT (2020) Toward a refined conceptualization of IS discontinuance: Reflection on the past and a way forward. Information & Management57(2): 103167–103172.
40.
StanovsekS (2019) Cultivating Digital Mindfulness in an Era of Constant Connection: A Phenomenological Exploration of College Students' Digital Detox.
SuttonT (2017) Disconnect to reconnect: the food/technology metaphor in digital detoxing. First Monday22(6).
43.
SyvertsenTEnliG (2019) Digital detox: media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence64(17): 135485651984732.
44.
ThomasVAzmitiaMWhittakerS (2016) Unplugged: exploring the costs and benefits of constant connection. Computers in Human Behavior63: 540–548.
45.
TromholtM (2016) The Facebook experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19(11): 661–666.
46.
TurelO (2016) Untangling the complex role of guilt in rational decisions to discontinue the use of a hedonic Information System. European Journal of Information Systems25(5): 432–447.
47.
TurelOR CavagnaroD (2018) Effect of abstinence from social media on time perception: differences between low- and at-risk for social media “addiction” groups. Psychiatric Quarterly90(2–3): 183.
48.
VallyZD'SouzaCG (2019) Abstinence from social media use, subjective well‐being, stress, and loneliness. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care55(4): 752–759.
49.
ZhangSZhaoLLuY, et al. (2016) Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information & Management53(7): 904–914.
50.
ZhouF.PengXZhouL, et al. (2016) Why Do Users Become Inactive on Online Social Networks? A Friendship Perspective. PACIS.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
