The possibility of relatively anonymous communication involving no physical proximity means that Internet discussion forums offer opportunities for cross-gender communication that do not necessarily violate Saudi Arabian rules for behavior. This article studies participation in a public discussion forum for expatriate Saudi students. Building on a previous article that established the extent to which participants disclose their gender in the forum, it investigates the extent to which participants take advantage of the opportunity for mixed communication online, their attitudes towards it, and their reactions when it occurs. It analyzes in detail the cross-gender exchanges that occur in the corpus, together with remarks made by participants about this issue, in order to determine the circumstances under which mixed communication is seen as appropriate in this forum.
AlbalawiMS (2007) Critical Factors Related to the Implementation of Web-Based Instruction by Higher-Education Faculty at Three Universities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Dissertation, Doctor of Education, The University of West Florida.
2.
AlebaikanRTroudiS (2010) Online discussion in blended courses at Saudi universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences2(2): 507–514.
3.
Al-FadhliS (2008) Students’ perceptions of e-learning in Arab society: Kuwait University as a case study. E-Learning and Digital Media5(4): 418–428.
4.
Al-JarfR (2006) Teachers’ Online Discussion Forums in Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on teacher education, Canakkale, Turkey. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED497499. Available at: http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/aljarf/Publications/Forms/AllItems.aspx(accessed 28 November 2012).
5.
Al-LilyA (2011) Online and under veil: technology-facilitated communication and Saudi female experience within academia. Technology in Society33
(1–2): 119–127.
6.
AlmalkiAM (2011) Blended Learning in Higher Education in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Umm Al-Qura University. PhD Dissertation, School of Education, RMIT University. Available at: http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:14613(accessed 18 February 2013).
7.
AlmalkiGWilliamsN (2012) A strategy to improve the usage of ICT in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia primary school. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA)3(10): 42–49.
8.
Al-SaadatAAfifiE (1990) Teaching English via closed circuit television in a sex-segregated community. British Journal of Educational Technology21(3): 175–182.
9.
Al-SaggafY (2004) The effect of online community on offline community in Saudi Arabia. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC)16(2): 1–16.
10.
Al-SaggafY (2011) Saudi females on Facebook: an ethnographic study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society9(1): 1–19.
11.
Al-SaggafY (2012) Online Communities in Saudi Arabia: An Ethnographic Study. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
12.
Al-SaggafYBeggMM (2004) Online communities versus offline communities in the Arab/Muslim world. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society2(1): 41–54.
13.
Al-SaggafYWeckertJ (2004) The effects of participation in online communities on individuals in Saudi Arabia. Computers and Society ACM SIGCAS34(1).
14.
Al-SaggafYWilliamsonK (2004) Online communities in Saudi Arabia: evaluating the impact on culture through online semi-structured interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung5(3). Available athttp://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/564/1225(accessed 13 April 2014).
15.
BakiR (2004) Gender-segregated education in Saudi Arabia: its impact on social norms and the Saudi labor market. Education Policy Analysis Archives12(28). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n28/(accessed 28 November 2012).
HannaBEde NooyJ (2009) Learning Language and Culture via Public Internet Discussion Forums. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
JaffeJMLeeY-EHuangL-N. (1999) Gender identification, interdependence and pseudonyms in CMC: language patterns in an electronic conference. The Information Society15(4): 221–234.
19.
MadiniAAde NooyJ (2013) Disclosure of gender identity in Internet forums: a case study of Saudi Arabian forum communication. Gender, Technology and Development17(3): 233–257.
20.
MannCStewartF (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. London, UK: Sage.
21.
MillerJDurndellA (2004) Gender, language and computer-mediated communication. In: MorganKBrebbiaCASanchezJ. (eds) Human Perspectives in the Internet Society: Culture, Psychology and Gender. Southampton: WIT Press, pp. 235–244.
22.
MohamedAHAbuzaidRABenladenRM (2008) Opportunities and challenges of the knowledge management approach to e-learning: a case study in Al-Bayan Girls’ School, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries35(4): 1–11.
23.
NaajMANachoukiMAnkitA (2012) Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education11: 185–200.
24.
PagnucciM (1999) The masquerade: gender, identity, and writing for the web. Computers and Composition16(1): 141–151.
25.
PharaonNA (2004) Saudi women and the Muslim state in the twenty-first century. Sex Roles51
(5–6): 349–366.
26.
SaitSAl-TawilKSanaullahS. (2007) Impact of Internet usage in Saudi Arabia: a social perspective. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering2(2): 81–107.
SharifAAAl-KandariAA (2010) The use of online bulletin boards by females in the Gulf cooperation council countries. Telematics and Informatics27(1): 42–50.
29.
SimsimM (2011) Internet usage and user preferences in Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences23(2): 101–107.
30.
TeitelbaumJ (2002) Dueling for da’wa: state vs society on the Saudi Internet. Middle East Journal56(2): 223–239.
