Anonymity is often regarded as a negative influence on the quality of online communication, but can anonymity serve to bridge communication gaps under specific conditions? This study explores this question by examining key affordances of Reddit using a quasi-ethnographic method. Here, anonymity is combined with active norm enforcement by self-appointed moderators of subReddits. This study develops the concept of actively moderated anonymity and assesses its ability to mend gaps in communication through an online ethnography of Medicine, a Reddit community of self-identified medical professionals to answer the following: How does anonymity work as an affordance in shaping online discussions, such as those in r/medicine, and what types of exchanges are occurring between medical professionals in the r/medicine community that may not occur elsewhere? r/medicine’s community provided a place for comfort and a place to freely exchange ideas including sensitive topics and opposing viewpoints. Findings conclude that medical professionals often sought to validate decisions they had made in the workplace and attempted to resolve concerns about particular institutional or systemic issues, suggesting actively moderated anonymity may afford an additional level of support that medical professionals may not find in the workplace or within an identifiable setting that could potentially be invaluable to the services provided to patients.
BergstromK (2011) ‘Don’t feed the troll’: Shutting down debate about community expectations on Reddit.com. First Monday16(8). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/3498/3029.
2.
BernhardtJMLariscyRAWParrottRL, et al. (2002) Perceived barriers to internet-based health communication on human genetics. Journal of Health Communication7(4): 325–340.
3.
BersMU (2009) New media for new organs: A virtual community for pediatric post-transplant patients. Convergence15(4): 462–469.
4.
BhattacharyaH (2008) New critical collaborative ethnography. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyP (eds) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 303–322.
5.
BornsteinBHEmlerAC (2001) Rationality in medical decision making: A review of the literature on doctors’ decision-making biases. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice7(2): 97–107.
6.
boydD (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed) Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. London: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
7.
BuozisM (2017) Doxing or deliberative democracy? Evidence and digital affordances in the Serial subReddit. Convergence2–17.
8.
Buntinx-KriegTCaravaglioJDomozychR, et al. (2017) Dermatology on Reddit: Elucidating trends in dermatologic communications on the World Wide Web. Dermatology Online Journal23(7): 1–6.
9.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT (1999) Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine49(5): 651–661.
10.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT (2000) How to improve communication between doctors and patients: Learning more about the decision making context is important. British Medical Journal320(7244): 1220.
11.
ChristophersonKM (2007) The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: ‘On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog’. Computers in Human Behavior23: 3038–3056.
12.
CirucciAM (2017) Normative interfaces: Affordances, gender, and race in Facebook. Social Media + Society3(2).
13.
De ChoudhuryMDeS (2014) Mental health discourse on Reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In: Proceedings for the association for the advancement of artificial intelligence conference. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2db7/15a479c8961d3020fe906f7bedfa0311b937.pdf (accessed 29 April 2019).
14.
DonathJS (1999) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: SmithMKollockP (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge, pp. 29–59.
15.
DriscollCGreggM (2010) My profile: The ethics of virtual ethnography. Emotion, Space, and Society3(1): 15–20.
EvansSKPearceKEVitakJ, et al. (2017) Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(1): 35–52.
18.
FrancisVKorschBMMorrisMJ (1969) Gaps in doctor-patient communication: Patients’ response to medical advice. New England Journal of Medicine280(10): 535–540.
19.
GarciaACStandleeAIBechkoffJ, et al. (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38(4): 52–84.
20.
GaverWW (1991) Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New Orleans, LA, 28 April–2 May 1991, pp. 79–84.
21.
GeertzC (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: LincolnYSDenzinNK (eds) Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots with a Handkerchief. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, pp. 143–168.
22.
GibsonJJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
GibsonJJ (1983) Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. GibsonReedEJonesR (eds). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
24.
HallS (1991 [1973]) Encoding, decoding. In: DuringS (eds) The Cultural Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 90–103.
25.
Hesse-BiberSN (2010) Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
HochschildAR (2012 [1983]) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
KorschBMGozziEKFrancisV (1968) Gaps in doctor-patient communication: I. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics42(5): 855–871.
29.
KraidyMMurphyPD (2004) Global Media Studies: Ethnographic Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
30.
KrishnaRKelleherKStahlbergE (2007) Patient confidentiality in the research use of clinical medical databases. American Journal of Public Health97(4): 654–658.
31.
Lapidot-LeflerNBarakA (2012) Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 434–443.
32.
MaciasWLewisLSSmithTL (2005) Health-related message boards/chat rooms on the web: Discussion content and implications for pharmaceutical sponsorships. Journal of Health Communication10(3): 209–223.
33.
MajchrzakAFarajSKaneGC, et al. (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(1): 38–55.
34.
MassanariA (2017) #Gamergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society19(3): 329–346.
MitchellSSLimM (2018) Too crowded for crowdsourced journalism: Reddit, portability, and citizen participation in the Syrian crisis. Canadian Journal of Communication43(3): 399–419.
37.
MooreJAbetzJS (2018) What do parents regret about having children? Communicating regrets online. Journal of Family Issues40(3): 390–412.
38.
MooreMJNakanoTEnomotoA, et al. (2012) Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Computers in Human Behavior28(3): 861–867.
39.
MurphyPD (2008) Writing media culture: Representation and experience in media ethnography. Communication, Culture & Critique1(3): 268–286.
40.
MurphyPD (2011) Locating media ethnography. In: NightingaleV (ed) The Handbook of Media Audiences. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 380–401.
41.
MurthyD (2008) Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology42(5): 837–855.
OngLMDe HaesJCHoosAM, et al. (1995) Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine40(7): 903–918.
46.
OvadiaS (2015) More than just cat pictures: Reddit as a curated news source. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian34(1): 37–40.
47.
ParkAConwayMChenAT (2018) Examining thematic similarity, difference, and membership in three online mental health communities from Reddit: A text mining and visualization approach. Computers in Human Behavior78: 98–112.
48.
PearceK (2015) Democratizing kompromat: The affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment. Journal of Information and Communication18(10): 1158–1174. Available at: PIP_reddit_usage_2013.pdf.
49.
QiuBZhaoKMitraP, et al. (2011, October) Get online support, feel better – sentiment analysis and dynamics in an online cancer survivor community. In: Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing (SocialCom), 2011 IEEE third international conference, Boston, MA, 9–11 October 2011.
50.
RedinbaughEMSullivanAMBlockSD, et al. (2003) Doctors emotional reactions to recent death of a patient: Cross sectional study of hospital doctors. British Medical Journal327(7408): 185.
51.
RichmanA (2007). The outsider lurking online: Adults researching youth cybercultures. In: BestAL (ed) Representing Youth: Methodological Issues in Critical Youth Studies. New York: New York University Press, pp. 182–202.
52.
RichterichA (2014) ‘Karma, precious karma!’ Karmawhoring on Reddit and the front page’s econometrisation. Journal of Peer Production4.
53.
Saville-TroikeM (2008) The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
SharmaRWiggintonBMeurkC, et al. (2017) Motivations and limitations associated with vaping among people with mental illness: A qualitative analysis of Reddit discussions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14(1): 1–15.
55.
ShawA (2017) Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture & Society39(4): 592–602.
56.
ShawASenderK (2016) Queer technologies: Affordances, affect, ambivalence. Critical Studies in Media Communication33(1): 1–5.
57.
SowlesSJKraussMJGebremedhnL, et al. (2017) ‘I feel like I’ve hit the bottom and have no idea what to do’: Supportive social networking on Reddit for individuals with a desire to quit cannabis use. Substance Abuse38(4): 477.
58.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
59.
SuranMKilgoDK (2017) Freedom from the press?Journalism Studies18(8): 1035–1051.
van der NagelEFrithJ (2015) Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday20(3). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/5615/4346.
62.
WardSJAWassermanH (2010) Towards an open ethics: Implications of new media platforms for global ethics discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics25(4): 275–292.
63.
WasikeBS (2011) Framing social news sites: An analysis of the top ranked stories on Reddit and Digg. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal27(1): 57–67.
64.
WolcottH (1995) Making a study ‘more ethnographic’. In: Van MaanenJ (ed) Representation in Ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 79–111.
65.
WoutersKMaesschalckJPeetersCF, et al. (2014) Methodological issues in the design of online surveys for measuring unethical work behavior: Recommendations on the basis of a split-ballot experiment. Journal of Business Ethics120(2): 275–289.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
