Despite infant weaning being one of the most challenging aspects of parenting, there is uncertainty about the right time to start. This research aimed to understand the impact of newspaper reporting of weaning on parents, in particular, focussing on the coverage of a scientific report published in the British Medical Journal in 2011. Using a media analysis of weaning articles from UK national newspapers and the ‘Mumsnet’, Internet discussion forum, the analysis was able to explore how forum members had reacted to the reporting and embellished the communication of the weaning issue by adding their own personal advice and experience. The case study shows the role of discussion forums in science communication and how they can provide a new arena for studying audience effects.
ArtzKWormerH (2011) What recipients ask for: An analysis of ‘user question generated’ science coverage. Journalism12(7): 871–888.
4.
BoucheGMigeotV (2008) Parental use of the Internet to seek health information and primary care utilisation for their child: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health8: 300.
DavidsonAEWallackLA (2004) Content Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the Print News Media. Journal of Health Communication9(2): 111–117.
7.
DaviesDPO’HareB (2004) Weaning: A worry as old as time. Current Paediatrics14(2): 83–96.
8.
DeneckeKNejdlW (2009) How valuable is medical social media data? Content analysis of the medical web. Information Sciences179(12): 1870–1880.
9.
DeweyKG (2001) Nutrition, growth, and complementary feeding of the breastfed infant. Pediatric Clinics of North America48(1): 87–104.
10.
DiazJAGriffithRANgJJ. (2002) Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. Journal of General Internal Medicine17(3): 180–185.
11.
DunwoodySPetersHP (1993) The mass media and risk perception. In: RuckB (ed.) Risk is a Construct. Munich: Knesebeck, pp. 293–320.
12.
EntwistleVHancock-BeaulieuM (1992) Health and medical coverage in the UK national press. Public Understanding of Science1(4): 367–382.
13.
EysenbachGKöhlerC (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal324: 573–577.
14.
FahyDNisbetM (2011) The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices. Journalism12(7): 778–793.
15.
FewtrellMWilsonDCBoothI. (2011) When to wean? How good is the evidence for six months’ exclusive breastfeeding?British Medical Journal342: 209–212.
16.
FriedmanSMVillamilKSurianoRA. (1996) Alar and apples: Newspapers, risk and media responsibility. Public Understanding of Science5(1): 1–20.
17.
GamblesR (2010) Going public? Articulations of the personal and political on Mumsnet.com. In: MahonyNNewmanJBarnettC (eds) Rethinking the Public. Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol, pp. 29–42.
18.
GauthierE (2011) Foodborne microbial risks in the press: The framing of listeriosis in Canadian newspapers. Public Understanding of Science20(2): 270–286.
19.
HiltonSHuntKLanganM. (2010) Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005–2008). Social Science & Medicine70(6): 942–950.
20.
HollimanR (2004) Media coverage of cloning: A study of media content, production and reception. Public Understanding of Science13(2): 107–130.
21.
JohanssonMRubertssonCRådestadI. (2010) The Internet: One important source for pregnancy and childbirth information among prospective fathers. Journal of Men’s Health7(3): 249–258.
22.
KhooKBoltPBablFE. (2008) Health information seeking by parents in the Internet age. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health44(7–8): 419–423.
23.
KjærgaardRS (2010) Making a small country count: Nanotechnology in Danish newspapers from 1996 to 2006. Public Understanding of Science19(1): 80–97.
24.
KrimskyS (2007) Risk communication in the internet age: The rise of disorganized scepticism. Environmental Hazards7: 157–164.
25.
LacySRiffeD (1996) Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories: Sins of omission and commission in mass communication quantitative research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly73: 969–973.
26.
LasloEBaram-TsabariALewensteinBV (2011) A growth medium for the message: Online science journalism affordances for exploring public discourse on science and ethics. Journalism12(7): 847–870.
27.
LemireMParéGSicotteC. (2008) Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health. International Journal of Medical Informatics77(11): 723–734.
MaloneMHarrisRHookerR. (2004) Health and the Internet – changing boundaries in primary care. Family Practice21(2): 189–191.
30.
MarksLKalaitzandonakesNWilkinsL. (2007) Mass media framing of biotechnology news. Public Understanding of Science16(2): 183–203.
31.
MikkelsenARinné-LjungqvistLBorresMP. (2007) Do parents follow breastfeeding and weaning recommendations given by paediatric nurses. A study with emphasis on introduction of cow’s milk protein in allergy risk families. Journal of Pediatric Health Care21(4): 238–244.
NorthstoneKEmmettPNethersoleF. (2001) The effect of age of introduction to lumpy solids on foods eaten and reported feeding difficulties at 6 and 15 months. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics14(1): 43–54.
37.
O’ConnorHMadgeC (2004) ‘My mum’s thirty years out of date’. Community, Work and Family7(3): 351–369.
38.
PedersenSSmithsonJ (2010) Membership and activity in an online parenting community. In: TaiwoR (ed.) Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 88–103.
39.
PedersenSSmithsonJ (2013) Mothers with attitude – How the Mumsnet parenting forum offers space for new forms of femininity to emerge online. Women’s Studies International Forum38(1): 97–106.
40.
PellechiaMG (1997) Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science6(1): 49–68.
PlantinLDanebackK (2009) Parenthood, information and support on the internet: A literature review of research on parents and professionals. BMC Family Practice10: 34.
RierDA (2007) The impact of moral suasion on Internet. HIV/AIDS support groups: Evidence from a discussion of seropositivity disclosure ethics. Health Sociology Review16(3–4): 237–247.
45.
RobinsonSDeShanoC (2011) ‘Anyone can know’: Citizen journalism and the interpretative community of the mainstream press. Journalism12(8): 963–982.
46.
RoweGFrewerLSjobergL. (2000) Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Understanding of Science9(1): 59–78.
47.
SarkadiABrembergS (2005) Socially unbiased parenting support on the Internet: A cross-sectional study of users of a large Swedish parenting website. Child: Care, Health and Development31(1): 43–52.
48.
SchudsonM (2003) The Sociology of News. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
49.
SchwitzerG (2004) A statement of principles for health care journalists. Am J Bioeth4: W9–W13.
50.
SchwitzerG (2008) How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories. PLoS Medicine5(5): e95.
51.
SeckoDM (2009) The unfinished science story: Reflections on journalist-audience interactions in the online environment. Journal of Media Practice10(2–3): 259–266.
52.
SeckoDMTlalkaSDunlopM. (2011) The unfinished science story: Journalist-audience interactions from the Globe and Mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism12(7): 814–831.
53.
ShanahanM-C (2010) Changing the meaning of peer-to-peer? Exploring online comment spaces as sites of negotiated expertise. Journal of Science Communication9(1): 1–13.
54.
ShanahanM-C (2011) Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging. Journalism12(7): 903–919.
55.
SkeaZCEntwistleVAWattI. (2008) ‘Avoiding harm to others’ considerations in relation to parental measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination discussions – An analysis of an online chat forum. Social Science & Medicine67(9): 1382–1390.
56.
WhaleySRTuckerM (2004) The influence of perceived food risk and source trust on media system dependency. Journal of Applied Communications88(1): 9–27.
57.
WilkinsLPattersonP (1987) Risk analysis and the construction of news. Journal of Communication37(3): 80–91.
58.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2002a) Nutrient Adequacy of Exclusive Breastfeeding for the Term Infant During the First Six Months of Life. Geneva: World Health Organization.
59.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2002b) The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding: Report of an Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization (28–30March2001).
60.
WrightCMParkinsonKNDrewettRF (2004) Why are babies weaned early: Data from a prospective population based cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood89(9): 813–816.
